Attachment 2 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 19 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- HT940625QE012
- Issued by
-
Defense Health Agency
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a Defense Health Agency (DHA) solicitation (HT940625QE012) for Autotransfusion Services at Naval Medical Center Portsmouth. The questionnaire is designed to collect detailed performance feedback from previous contractors, evaluating their service quality across multiple rating areas including overall fill rate, on-time fill percentage, turnover rate, and replenishment rate.
The solicitation seeks non-personal services with a specific focus on healthcare staffing and service delivery. References are requested to complete and return the questionnaire by 5 pm Eastern Time on September 1, 2025, via email to specified DHA contacts. The evaluation uses a rating scale from Exceptional (E) to Unsatisfactory (U), with references asked to assess the contractor's performance, confirm willingness to re-award a contract, and disclose any past contract terminations. The questionnaire is part of a comprehensive past performance assessment for a potential future contract involving pre-filled syringes and bags for the Pharmacy Department at Naval Medical Center Portsmouth.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Solicitation - HT940625QE012 0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2- Past Performance Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| Exhibit B.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 1 Project Summary Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| Exhibit D.docx | DOCX document | |
| Exhibit E.docx | DOCX document | |
| Exhibit C.docx | DOCX document | |
| Exhibit A.docx | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation - HT940625QE012.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 2 – Past Performance Questionnaire Past Performance Questionnaire
The Defense Health Agency (DHA) Healthcare Contracting Division Southeast (HCD-Southeast) is conducting an acquisition for the services noted below. The offeror has identified you as a reference to validate past performance.
Solicitation HT940625QE012 is for non-personal services; Autotransfusion Services at the Naval Medical Center Portsmouth located in Portsmouth, VA.
Please complete the following questionnaire to assist our evaluation of the offeror’s past performance and return via email no later than 5 pm Eastern Time on Monday, 1 September 2025 via email to lisa.c.wilk.civ@health.mil and carol.e.uebelacker.civ@health.mil. Please reference “Solicitation HT940625QE012” in the subject of the email.
RESPONDENT INFORMATION (to be completed by the Offeror):
Contracting Activity/Customer:
Point of Contact (POC):
Title of POC:
Telephone:
Email:
CONTRACT INFORMATION (to be completed by the Offeror):
Contract Number:
Task Order Number (if applicable):
Performance Period: (Base plus any options):
Description of Services (included position description(s)):
REQUIREMENT DESCRIPTION
Number of FTEs/description of required schedule:
Facility Type Services performed for (i.e., Hospital/Clinic):
All information from here down shall be completed by the Reference POC. The Reference POC shall also verify the information completed by the Offeror and make any necessary corrections before signing this form.
Please refer to the following assessment definitions to assess the Offeror’s performance in each of the areas listed in this questionnaire:
(E) Exceptional - The Offeror’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Offeror were highly effective.
(V) Very Good - The Offeror’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Offeror were effective.
(S) Satisfactory - The Offeror’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Offeror appear or were resolved satisfactorily.
(M) Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the Offeror has not yet identified corrective actions or the Offeror’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
(U) Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the Offeror’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
(N) Not Applicable – Unable to assess the area.
Overall Fill Rate (CPARS “Quality of Service” Rating Area)
| Assess how the Offeror: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Provided qualified contract personnel IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.
Ensured that qualified contract personnel remained filled IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.
Recruited, placed and retained qualified contract personnel with minimal disruption for hard-to-fill (specialty) positions or at remote locations.
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
On-Time Fill Percentage (CPARS “Schedule” Rating Area)
| Assess how the Offeror: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Provided qualified contract personnel on time IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.
Provided complete, current and accurate qualifying package for each contract personnel IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
Turnover Rate (CPARS “Management” Rating area)
| Assess how the Offeror: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Retained qualified contract personnel without frequent turnover and minimal operations disruption IAW the terms of the contract.
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
Replenishment Rate (CPARS “Management” Rating area)
| Assess how the Offeror: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Planned for and provided replacement candidates during the life of the contract to, include pre-planned/unplanned absences and extended leave of absence to avoid disruption of services and/or work schedule IAW the terms of the contract.
If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
| PERFORMANCE SUMMARY |
| Yes |
| No |
Would you award this firm another contract:
If you answered “No” provide an explanation:
Was the contract terminated for default or cause:
If you answered “Yes” provide an explanation:
Additional Comments:
Signature: _________________________________________ Date: __________________
Print Name: ________________________________________
Title: ______________________________________________
Telephone: _________________________________________
Thank you for your participation in providing a detailed and accurate history of past performance for this offeror.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .