Attachment 2- Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 18 KB Posted

Attached to
Calibration, Maintenance, and Repair of Test Measurement and Diagnostic Equipment (TMDE)
Solicitation number
12096001
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire related to Solicitation HT940624Q0045 for Test Measurement Diagnostic Equipment Calibration Services at the Naval Medical Center Camp Lejeune in North Carolina. The questionnaire is to be completed by a reference to validate the past performance of the offeror. It includes sections for the respondent to provide information about the contract, assess the offeror's performance in areas such as fill rate, on-time fill percentage, turnover rate, and replenishment rate, and provide an overall performance summary. The related federal contract opportunity is for a firm fixed-price contract to provide annual maintenance and calibration of Test Measurement Diagnostic Equipment, with a 5-year base period and a 6-month extension option. The solicitation is set aside for small businesses under NAICS code 811210 with a $34,000,000 size standard.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Questions and Answers.docx DOCX document
HT940624Q0045.docx DOCX document
Attachment 1- Project Summary Sheet.docx DOCX document
Attachment 3- Pricing Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 2 – Past Performance Questionnaire Past Performance Questionnaire

The Defense Health Agency (DHA) Southeastern Healthcare Operations Division is conducting an acquisition for the services noted below. The offeror has identified you as a reference to validate past performance.

Solicitation HT940624Q0045 is for non-personal services; Test Measurement Diagnostic Equipment Calibration Services at the Naval Medical Center Camp Lejeune located in Camp Lejeune, NC.

Please complete the following questionnaire to assist our evaluation of the offeror’s past performance and return via email no later than 10:00 am Eastern Standard Time on Tuesday, 12 May 2024 via email to lendorph.e.ramos.civ@health.mil. Please reference “Solicitation HT940624Q0045” in the subject of the email.

RESPONDENT INFORMATION (to be completed by the Offeror):

Contracting Activity/Customer:

Point of Contact (POC):

Title of POC:

Telephone:

Email:

CONTRACT INFORMATION (to be completed by the Offeror):

Contract Number:

Task Order Number (if applicable):

Performance Period: (Base plus any options):

Description of Services (included position description(s)):

REQUIREMENT DESCRIPTION

Number of FTEs/description of required schedule:

Facility Type Services performed for (i.e., Hospital/Clinic):

All information from here down shall be completed by the Reference POC. The Reference POC shall also verify the information completed by the Offeror and make any necessary corrections before signing this form.

Please refer to the following assessment definitions to assess the Offeror’s performance in each of the areas listed in this questionnaire:

(E) Exceptional - The Offeror’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Offeror were highly effective.

(V) Very Good - The Offeror’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Offeror were effective.

(S) Satisfactory - The Offeror’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Offeror appear or were resolved satisfactorily.

(M) Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the Offeror has not yet identified corrective actions or the Offeror’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

(U) Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the Offeror’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

(N) Not Applicable – Unable to assess the area.

Overall Fill Rate (CPARS “Quality of Service” Rating Area)

Assess how the Offeror:
E
V
S
M
U
NA

Provided qualified contract personnel IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.

Ensured that qualified contract personnel remained filled IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.

Recruited, placed and retained qualified contract personnel with minimal disruption for hard-to-fill (specialty) positions or at remote locations.

If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

On-Time Fill Percentage (CPARS “Schedule” Rating Area)

Assess how the Offeror:
E
V
S
M
U
NA

Provided qualified contract personnel on time IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.

Provided complete, current and accurate qualifying package for each contract personnel IAW the terms and conditions of the contract.

If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

Turnover Rate (CPARS “Management” Rating area)

Assess how the Offeror:
E
V
S
M
U
NA

Retained qualified contract personnel without frequent turnover and minimal operations disruption IAW the terms of the contract.

If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

Replenishment Rate (CPARS “Management” Rating area)

Assess how the Offeror:
E
V
S
M
U
NA

Planned for and provided replacement candidates during the life of the contract to, include pre-planned/unplanned absences and extended leave of absence to avoid disruption of services and/or work schedule IAW the terms of the contract.

If other than “Satisfactory,” explain how the performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:

PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
Yes
No

Would you award this firm another contract:

If you answered “No” provide an explanation:

Was the contract terminated for default or cause:

If you answered “Yes” provide an explanation:

Additional Comments:

Signature: _________________________________________ Date: __________________

Print Name: ________________________________________

Title: ______________________________________________

Telephone: _________________________________________

Thank you for your participation in providing a detailed and accurate history of past performance for this offeror.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .