Attachment 2 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 44 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Northern WA Road & Bridge Construction IDIQ
- Solicitation number
- 1240BH26R0004
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template for the Northern Washington Road/Bridge Construction IDIQ contract solicitation (1240BH26R0004). The questionnaire is designed to collect performance references from previous clients on contractors bidding for the USDA Forest Service's Indefinite Delivery-Indefinite Quantity contract covering road, bridge, and civil construction projects across three National Forests in Washington State (Mt. Baker Snoqualmie, Okanogan Wenatchee, and Colville). The form requires contractors to identify a reference who can evaluate their performance, with the reference completing detailed ratings across five evaluation categories: Quality (workmanship, quality control plan adherence, and technical submittals), Schedule and Time Management (milestone achievement, responsiveness, timely deliverables, and issue resolution), Cost/Price (fair pricing and invoice accuracy), Management (project manager oversight, subcontractor coordination, stakeholder relationships, problem resolution, and labor standards compliance), and an Overall Recommendation for similar future contracts.
The questionnaire uses a standardized five-level rating scale ranging from Exceptional Performance to Unsatisfactory Performance, with each level containing specific performance descriptors. The reference must provide supporting comments for all ratings and return the completed questionnaire to the Contracting Officer, Janet Paul at the USDA Forest Service Procurement Operations Critical Requirements Team, by 4:00 p.m. PST on July 27, 2026. This template is an appendix to the larger IDIQ solicitation for small business contractors (NAICS 237310, $45 million size standard) with an anticipated 15–20 multiple award contracts and a shared ceiling of $50 million over a five-year ordering period.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 3 - Sample Task Order A - 1240BH26R0004.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Task Order Proposal Request Template.doc | DOC document | |
| 1240BH26R0004 - Solicitation Packet.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
R3 National Forests Roads Multiple IDIQ Contracts
SOLICITATION 1240BH26R0004
Northern Washington Road/Bridge Construction IDIQ
APPENDIX E
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
INSTRUCTIONS:
Offeror to complete Sections A and B and transmit questionnaire to reference.
Reference to complete Sections C and D and transmit back to Contracting Officer listed in Section E.
1. Contractor Information
Company Name
Street Address
City
State
Zip Code
SAM UEI Number
| Point of Contact |
| Name, Email, Phone |
1. Contract Information
Project Title
Contract Number
| Contract Type |
| Firm Fixed Price / Time & Materials / Cost Reimbursable / Other |
| Awarded Contract Price |
| $ |
| Current / Final Price |
| $ |
Contract Award Date
Contract Completion Date
| Period of Performance |
| xx/xx/xx to xx/xx/xx |
| Project Location |
| Street address, City, State, National Forest, National Park, etc. |
| Brief description of the contract & work effort: |
| Scope of work description |
1. Reference:
Name
Position / Title
Organization
Phone Number
Email Address
Signature
Date
1. Evaluation
| Rating |
| Definition |
| N/A |
| Not Applicable |
| Exceptional |
| Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Very Good |
| Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| Evaluation Area |
| Rating |
Quality
| Quality of workmanship (including subcontractor)? |
| Not Applicable |
| Quality of and adherence to quality control plan? |
| Choose an item. |
| Quality of informational and technical submittals? |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Quality Rating |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments: Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. |
Schedule (& Time Management)
| Met project schedule milestones? |
| Choose an item. |
| Responded to owner requests in a timely manner? |
| Choose an item. |
| Informational and technical deliverables submitted timely? |
| Choose an item. |
| Promptly addressed scheduling issues? |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Schedule (& Time Management) Rating |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments: Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. |
Cost / Price
| Provided fair and reasonable pricing for contract awards and modifications? |
| Choose an item. |
| Submitted accurate and complete invoices? |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Cost /Price Rating |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments: Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. |
Management
| General oversight by project manager? |
| Choose an item. |
| Coordination with and control of subcontractor? |
| Choose an item. |
| Maintained good working relationship with all mission partners |
| Choose an item. |
| Demonstrated flexibility, innovativeness and cooperation in resolving potential problems? |
| Choose an item. |
| Met regulatory and contractual labor standards? |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Management Rating |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments: Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. |
Overall Recommendation:
| Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to perform in accordance with the contract’s most significant requirements, I would recommend them for similar contracts: |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Comments: |
1. Return:
| Return by |
| 4:00 pm PST on 07/27/2026 |
| Name |
| Janet Paul |
| Title |
| Contracting Officer |
| Organization |
| USDA Forest Service, Procurement Operations, Critical Requirements Team |
| janet.paul@usda.gov |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .