Attachment 2 Past Performance Questionnaire (1).docx
DOCX document 2 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 1305M226Q0061
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template for Solicitation 1305M226Q0061, an Invitation for SF 330s A&E Support for NOAA Marine Operations issued by the Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The questionnaire is designed to evaluate contractor performance on reference contracts and must be completed and submitted to Elizabeth.Eichelberger@noaa.gov no later than 3:00 PM Eastern on July 21, 2026.
The questionnaire assesses contractor performance across four evaluation categories: Quality of Service, Schedule, Cost Control, and Management. Each category uses a five-level rating scale consisting of Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, and Unsatisfactory, with detailed definitions provided for each rating level. Evaluators are required to identify the company being evaluated, reference contract number, work title/description, and provide their name, email, phone number, and agency or company affiliation. Comments are mandatory for any rating other than Satisfactory. The template captures contractor performance metrics related to meeting contractual requirements, specifications, workmanship standards, timeliness of deliverables and milestones, forecasting and cost management effectiveness, and overall management integration including problem identification, corrective actions, proposal submittals, and customer satisfaction.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1305M226Q0061- Invitation to submit SF330s CLEAN.docx | DOCX document | |
| 2026 SOW Clean .pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR
Solicitation 1305M226Q0061
Name of Company Being Evaluated: _______________________________________
| REFERENCE CONTRACT #: | _____________________________________________ | |
| (the contract the evaluation is based on) |
Brief Title/Description of the Work: ______________________________________________
Evaluator’s Name:___________________________
Evaluator’s email: ____________________ Evaluator’s Phone Number: _______________
Evaluator’s Agency or Company Name: __________________________________________
Send Completed Questionnaire to Elizabeth.Eichelberger@noaa.gov no later than 3:00 PM Eastern, July 21, 2026.
1. QUALITY OF SERVICE
Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).
(Check the appropriate rating box. Please provide comments for ratings other than Satisfactory.)
| RATING |
| ADJECTIVAL RATING |
| DEFINITION |
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Attachment 4 Comments:
Page PAGE 4 of 5 Source Selection Information
Page PAGE 5 of 5 Source Selection Information
2. SCHEDULE
Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
| RATING |
| ADJECTIVAL RATING |
| DEFINITION |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
3. COST CONTROL
Assess the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling cost. (Check the appropriate rating box.)
| RATING |
| ADJECTIVAL RATING |
| DEFINITION |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
4. MANAGEMENT
Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
| RATING |
| ADJECTIVAL RATING |
| DEFINITION |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:
Rater’s Name: Rater’s Signature: Date:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .