ATTACHMENT 2 - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE RFQ 36C24822Q1676.docx

DOCX document 19 KB Posted

Attached to
R410--FY22: Accreditation Readiness Survey VISN 8
Solicitation number
36C24822Q1676
Issued by

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI ·

This document provides details for a federal solicitation seeking accreditation readiness consulting services. The Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 8 is soliciting proposals to provide accreditation readiness consulting services to support all eight of its facilities. Services will include conducting mock surveys utilizing The Joint Commission or Long-Term Care Institute standards to identify issues regarding safety, quality of care, treatment and services. Each facility will receive one 4-day consultative visit not exceeding 12 consultant days total. Consultant teams of 4 members with experience in nursing, physician, and life safety/environment of care will conduct multi-day surveys. Consultants must have a minimum of three years surveying experience including in infection control. The base period of performance is one year with four one-year option periods. Questions are due by August 26th and proposals by September 6th. The contracting officer is identified as point of contact.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
36C24822Q1676_1.docx DOCX document
PWS ATTACHMENT 1 - JAHVH Site Map 12-08-2009.pdf PDF
RFQ 36C24822Q1676 - Accreditation 8-19-22.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT 3 - Limitations on Subcontracting 36C24822Q1676.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

ATTACHMENT 1

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE COVER SHEET

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION RFQ #36C24822Q1676

ACCREDITATION READINESS CONSULTING SERVICE

The entire questionnaire should be forwarded to your previous clients for completion and clients shall directly return the cover sheet and questionnaire to Kim Tucker at e-mail address: Kim.Tucker1@va.gov It is your responsibility to ensure correct and verifiable point of contact information. Information that is incorrect or unverifiable may lead to a lower past performance rating.

(Offeror Fill-In Below)

1. Offeror Name (Name of Organization/Firm being Evaluated):

2. Name of Organization/Firm Providing Reference:

3. Address of Organization/Firm Providing Reference:

4. Contract Number:

5. Project Description:

6. Contract/Task Order Amount:

7. Performance Period:

8. Evaluator’s Point of Contact Information:

Name and Title:____________________________________________________________

Phone Number:____________________________________________________________

Fax Number:_______________________________________________________________

E-Mail Address:_____________________________________________________________

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION RFQ #36C24822Q1676

ACCREDITATION READINESS CONSULTING SERVICE

ADJECTIVAL RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

E (EXCELLENT)
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds expectations. The contractual performance of the element assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. (High Confidence).
G (GOOD)
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. (Significant Confidence).
S (SATISFACTORY)
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the elements contains some minor problems for which corrective action taken by the contractor is satisfactory. (Confidence).
M (MARGINAL)
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. (Little Confidence).
P (POOR)
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is no likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element contains serious problems for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. (No confidence).
NR (NO RATING)
No relevant past performance record is identifiable upon which to base a meaningful performance risk prediction. A search was unable to identify any relevant past performance information for the contractor or their key personnel. (This is neither a negative or positive assessment).

SOLICITATION RFQ #36C24822Q1676

ACCREDITATION READINESS CONSULTING SERVICE

EVALUATOR: PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVAL RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

Was this a competitive contract?
YES NO
Role of the contractor
Prime Contractor or Subcontractor
Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance
E G S M P NR
Compliance with contractual terms and conditions
E G S M P NR
Quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts.
E G S M P NR
Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirement.
E G S M P NR
Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, and control the project.)
E G S M P NR
Effectiveness of on-site management and control of multidiscipline construction categories, including management of subcontractors.
E G S M P NR
Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports).
E G S M P NR
Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance.
E G S M P NR
Ability to successfully respond to emergency situations.
E G S M P NR
Effectiveness of material management.
E G S M P NR
Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client.
E G S M P NR
Contractor Safety Record.
E G S M P NR
Contractor responsiveness to safety issues.
E G S M P NR
Contractor’s timeliness, completeness, and accuracy in submitting invoices.
E G S M P NR
Ability to hire and retain a qualified workforce to this effort.
E G S M P NR

If this was a Government contract has the contract been terminated for default or Convenience? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued or any default action in the comment section below.

E G S M P NR

Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problem?

E G S M P NR

COMMENTS:

Evaluator’s Point of Contact Information:

Signature and Title:_________________________________________________________

Phone Number:____________________________________________________________

E-Mail Address:_____________________________________________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .