Attachment 2 - Evaluation Factors (EF).pdf

EVALUATION FACTORS

1. The Government will use FAR 15.3 Source Selection to evaluate offers submitted in response to the solicitation. The factors that shall be used to evaluate proposals are Technical and Price, as expounded below. All evaluation factors are equal in importance; however, a proposal is un-awardable at any price if, after final evaluation, the Technical factor receives a rating of “Unacceptable.” The evaluation does not permit tradeoffs between price and non-price factors.

Award will be made to the responsible offeror who submits a proposal that (1) conforms to the requirements of the solicitation; (2) that receives a rating of “Acceptable” on the Technical evaluation factor; and (3) that submits the proposal with the lowest Total Evaluated Price (TEP), provided that the TEP is not unbalanced and is fair and reasonable. The Government reserves the right to award no contract at all depending upon (1) the quality of proposals received and (2) the fair and reasonableness of the pricing of proposals received.

FACTOR 1 - Technical: Pursuant to evaluation of all subfactors and elements hereunder, the Technical factor will receive an overall rating of either “Acceptable,” or “Unacceptable” using the rating and descriptions in the table below:

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirement of the solicitation.

Subfactor 1: Quality Control Plan (PWS 2.1)

Description: This sub-factor will evaluate the offeror’s approach for ensuring performance will be in accordance with (IAW) the standards in the PWS throughout the life of the contract.

Measure of Merit: This element is met when the offeror provides a detailed QCP that is likely to ensure that performance will be IAW the standards in the PWS throughout the life of the contract to include:

1. Identification of personnel responsible for quality control

2. A description of the offeror’s inspection system with types and frequencies of inspection to be conducted and personnel responsible for conducting inspections

3. A system for preventing the occurrence or recurrence of deficiencies

4. A description of how inspections will be documented with sample inspections records for each type of inspection to be conducted.

FA8601-24-R-0036

Attachment 2

Subfactor 2: Preventive Maintenance Inspection (PWS 1.1, 1.1.1)

Description: This subfactor will evaluate the offeror’s ability to develop and submit to the Government an annual written PMI plan for each swing and sliding gate system.

Measure of Merit: This subfactor is met when the offeror provides a detailed PMI plan that ensures that inspections and maintenance will be performed IAW the standards in the PWS throughout the life of the contract to include:

1. A description of required inspections, timelines for inspections, and maintenance to be performed to ensure reliable and continuous safe operation of all systems

2. Sample computer-generated reports of inspections and reports

Subfactor 3: Personnel: (PWS 3.14)

Description: This subfactor will evaluate the offeror’s ability to ensure personnel are available to perform regular maintenance and to notify its personnel when such services are required.

Measure of Merit: This subfactor is met when the offeror provides an effective Notification Plan, including points-of-contact, which is likely to ensure that personnel are consistently available to perform scheduled maintenance but also emergency service repairs which need to be cover 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

1. Detail the proposed method/methods for avoiding environmental damage IAW PWS 1.10 Environmental Protection.

2. The proposal shall include copies of all standard certifications

IAW PWS 1.3

Subfactor 4: Prior Experience

Description: This element will evaluate the offeror’s ability to provide sufficient prior experience.

1. Performing maintenance and repair of swinging/sliding gate systems or similar mechanical systems.

2. Maintaining and following a schedule for routine maintenance swinging/sliding gate systems or similar mechanical systems.

3. Experience responding to emergency service calls for repair of swinging/sliding gate systems or similar mechanical systems.

For each relevant gate maintenance contract/job described, provide the following administrative data:

1. Company/Division Name

2. Program Title

3. Contracting Agency

4. Contract Number

5. Type of Contract (Fixed Price)

6. Dates Performed

7. Contract Value (including any option years)

Measure of Merit: An acceptable rating is met when the offeror’s proposal provides sufficient proof of two (2) relevant contracts performed within five years of the issue date of the solicitation. Provide your relevant experience as it relates in sufficient detail: