Attachment 15 - Question-Answer Matrix.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 22 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA489021R0007_Draft-RFP_Synopsis
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 7 - Offeror Company Information Form.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 13 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 11 - Team Structure Format.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 9 - Self-Scoring Matrix.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 1 - Draft PWS Appendices 09 Jun 21.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - Draft CDRLs.pdf | ||
| Attachment 10 - Cross-Reference Matrix.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 6 - Section M Evaluation.pdf | ||
| Attachment 8 - Work Sample Cover Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 1 - Draft PWS 09 Jun 21.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 - Section L Instructions to Offerors.pdf | ||
| Attachment 12 - Past Performance Info Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 3 - Draft DD254.pdf | ||
| DRAFT_Solicitation-FA489021R0007.pdf | ||
| Attachment 14 - Subcontractor Teaming Partner Consent Letter.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Gov-2-Industry QA
| Government | Industry Only | ||||||
| Q# | Doc | Pg # | Par. # | Comment/Question | Response | Disposition | Comments |
| 1 | Instructions to Offerors | 4 | 2.2 | Are the number of work samples and associated page limits IAW Section L para 2.2 appropriate for this source selection? Please provide a comprehensive rationale within response. | |||
| 2 | Evaluation Factors for Award | 2 | 1.4 | Is the proposed minimum guarantee appropriate to facilitate the Post Award Conference? Please provide a comprehensive rationale within response. | |||
| 3 | Instructions to Offerors | 7 | 2.4.1.2 | For this acquisition, IAW Section L para 2.4.1.2 (Work Sample Qualifications) the Government considers subcontractors who perform at least 25% of the work in an applicable SOC-E program area will be consider a major subcontractor. Does industry have any feedback or concerns with this percentage? Please provide a comprehensive rationale within response. | |||
| 4 | Instructions to Offerors | Appendix D | N/A | Does industry have any comments or feedback regarding Appendix D (Self-scoring matrix)? | |||
| 5 | Evaluation Factors for Award | 5-6 | 4.2 | Does industry have any comments or feedback regarding the tie-breaking process outlined within Section M. | |||
| 6 | Evaluation Factors for Award | 3 | 3.1 | Does industry have any comments or feedback regarding the small business and 8(a) pools for Evaluation Purposes Only. |
&"Arial,Bold"SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
&"Arial,Bold"SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 Page &P of &N
Industry-2-Gov QA
| FA489021R0007 Attachment 15 - Questions and Answer Matrix | |||||
| Offerors | Government Only | ||||
| Q# | Document | Pg # | Par. # | Comment/Question | Response |
&"Arial,Bold"SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
&"Arial,Bold"SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 Page &P of &N
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .