Attachment 11 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

(WHEN COMPLETED) SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

RFP: FA8575-21-R-0001

ATTACHMENT 11

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

RSAF F-15 Classified Repair and Return Support Services

(15 July 2021) *Sections 1 and 2 to be filled out by Offeror

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor:________________________________________________________________________

B. Contractor Cage Code:_________________________________

C. Contract number: ______________________________________

D. Contract type: ______________________________

E. Role in the Program/Work Performed As:

_____ Prime _____ Subcontractor _____ Vendor/Supplier

F. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

G. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________

H. Period of Performance:

1. Original MAX Contract $ Value (assuming all options exercised): ___________________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised): ____________________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable): ___________________

I. Initial contract cost: $____________________________

J. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________

K. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

L. Description of service provided:

M. Rationale for relevancy assertion:

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or Agency name:__________________________________________________________

B. Address: _________________________________________________________________________

C. Customer or Agency description (if applicable): __________________________________________

D. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

* Sections 3,4, and 5 to be filled by Government/Customer evaluator

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Name/Role of Evaluator Relative to Contract (e.g. Buyer, Program Manager, etc.)

B. Evaluator's title:_____________________________________________________

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number/email:

D. Length of time (number of years/months) evaluator worked on subject contract:

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by circling the letter representing one of the following quality assessment indicators. Additional comments, if applicable, can be added at the end of this section.

PERFORMANCE QUALITY ASSESSMENT LEVELS

EXCEPTIONAL (E)

During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) many. Very few, if any, minor problems encountered.

Contractor took immediate and effective corrective action.

VERY GOOD (VG)

During the contract period, contractor is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) some. Some minor problems encountered. Contractor took timely corrective action.

SATISFACTORY (S)

During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements. For any problems encountered, contractor took effective corrective action.

MARGINAL (M)

During the contract period, contractor performance is not meeting (or did not meet) some contract requirements. For problems encountered, corrective action appeared only marginally effective, not effective, or not fully implemented. Customer involvement was required.

UNSATISFACTORY (U)

During the contract period, contractor performance is failing (or fail) to meet most contract requirements. Serious problems encountered; corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent. Extensive Customer oversight and involvement was required.

NOT APPLICABLE (NA)

Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect. Do not know.

NOTE: In Section 4, should your response be other than “satisfactory (S),” please provide supporting documentation in “Additional Remarks” in Section 5 or on an additional sheet to this document (which is in word format). If supporting documentation is not provided for ratings that are other than “satisfactory,” the ratings will be considered to be unsubstantiated and will be interpreted as satisfactory.

Technical Performance E VG S M U N/A

1. How was the quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts?

2. How adequate/effective was the System Engineering Process?

3. How well did the contractor develop, and execute test and evaluation efforts

4. How well did the contractor understand/comply with customer objectives and technical requirements?

5. Extent to which Company’s products and/or services met the technical/performance requirements of the specification

Program Management E VG S M U N/A

1. Quality of Completed Product (less than 1% defect-free repairs turned in to customer)

2. How did the contractor manage quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts?

3. How effective was the contractor’s material management (including Government Furnished Property and/or Contract Acquired Property)?

4. How well did the contractor perform to meet contract identified average Turnaround Time (TAT) for completed assets per option and overall contract? In the remarks, specify if the contractor met, exceeded, or failed to meet contractual average contract TAT.

5. How well did contractor develop, maintain, and update a Management Information System (MIS) to track, process, modify, and archive historical repair data for all items repaired?

Cost E VG S M U N/A

1. Contractor’s Effectiveness in maintaining a budget and developing mitigation plans to prevent unnecessary expenditures.

2. Contractor’s overall ability to effectively estimate costs.

3. Contractor’s estimating methodology and assumptions and whether the estimated costs they delivered could be verified by a creditable/independent third party.

1. Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes_____ Default_____ Convenience_____ Pending Terminations_____ No_____

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules)

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

2. Have there been any disputes/claims relative to the contract? If yes, explain.

3. Describe the contractor’s or company’s strong and/or weak points identified as a result of technical performance and any technical performance risk identified during the life of the contract.

4. If given a choice, would you award to this contractor again? If not, please explain.

5. Describe contractor’s ability to establish and maintain certified sources of repair.

Additional Remarks.

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION