Attachment 10 - BSA Summary Table_Rev2.pdf

PDF 95 KB Posted

Attached to
USCGC ELM (WLB- 204) Dockside Repair Availability
Solicitation number
70Z08522QP4504600
Issued by

About this file

This document summarizes the load limits for structures at the Tongue Point Pier facility in Astoria, Oregon. It provides the code-based minimum loads, original design loads where available, worst case operating loads from facility personnel and equipment, and any posted loads for three zones of the pier. For each zone, it compares the structural demand from these loading sources to the structural capacity as calculated by the document author. It recommends limiting vehicle loads in the pier approach area and prohibiting heavy vehicles in the parking area. It also provides recommended load postings for each zone based on the structural analysis.

The related federal contract opportunity is solicitation number 70Z08522QP4504600 for dockside repair availability services for the USCGC ELM (WLB- 204). The solicitation is from the Department of Homeland Security United States Coast Guard for combined synopsis and solicitation of the opportunity. No other details are provided about products, services, response dates, or other salient information.

View the file

Other files

Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

2021 Waterfront Facility Inspection and Assessment iii

USCG Tongue Point Facility Astoria, Oregon

The following table summarizes the load limits for the LBS at the facility

BSA Summary Table:

Structure Name: Tongue Point Pier (RPUID 17646)

Code-Based Minimum Loads: 100 psf for pedestrian exit ways

Design Loads:

Zones 1 & 2: Unknown Zone 3: 500 psf uniform, 29,000 lb concentrated, 15-ton capacity forklift, HS20

Worst Case Operating Loads:

Zone 1: Pedestrians and personal occupancy vehicles, typically less than H5 Zone 2: Forklift with 40,000 lb front axle (loaded), fuel truck with 20,000 lb axle Zone 3: Storage of buoys and sinkers, forklift with 40,000 lb front axle (loaded), fuel truck with 20,000 lb axle

Posted Loads:

Zone 1: “Limited vehicle access; authorized personnel only” Zone 2: “Pier loading restriction; no forklift or truck traffic” Zone 3: [No Posting]

Required Action / Operational Recommendation:

Limit vehicle loads in approach area as shown below. Continue to prohibit heavy vehicles in parking area.

Load Posting Recommendation:

Post each zone as applicable:

“MAX LOADS FOR APPROACH AREA:

240 PSF UNIFORM; 15,900 LB CONCENTRATED;

19,800 LB VEHICLE AXLE”

“MAX LOADS FOR PARKING AREA:

120 PSF UNIFORM; 7,500 LB CONCENTRATED;

10,400 LB VEHICLE AXLE”

“MAX LOADS FOR HEAVY PICK AREA:

500 PSF UNIFORM; 29,000 LB CONCENTRATED;

58,000 LB / 6,000 LB FORKLIFT AXLES (F/R); AASHTO HS20 TRUCK”

VERTICAL ANALYSIS STRUCTURAL DEMAND1 STRUCTURAL CAPACITY2

ZONE 1: Approach Area

Uniform Storage Load 100 psf 240 psf

Concentrated Load 20,000 lb wheel 13,600 lb

Vehicle Axle Load 40,000 lb 19,800 lb

ZONE 2: Parking Area

Uniform Storage Load 100 psf 120 psf

Concentrated Load 4,000 lb wheel 7,500 lb

Vehicle Axle Load 8,000 lb 10,400 lb

ZONE 3: Heavy Lift Area

Uniform Storage Load 500 psf 500 psf

Concentrated Load 29,000 lb 29,000 lb

Forklift Axle Load (Front / [GVW]) 58,000 lb / [64,000 lb GVW] 58,000 lb / [64,000 lb GVW]

Truck Load Pattern AASHTO HS20 AASHTO HS20

1. Structural demand is taken as the greatest of:

a. Code-based minimum loads, if applicable.

b. Original design loads, if available.

c. Worst case operating loads from the facility’s personnel and equipment.

d. Posted loads, if available.

2. Structural capacity is calculated and factored to present an appropriate comparison with structural demand.

The structure has adequate capacity for the given demand.

The structure has inadequate capacity for the given demand, and load restrictions are required.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .