ATTACHMENT 1 - Battle Creek Main Gate B3 Submittal Book.pdf

WK Kellogg Airport

Michigan Air National Guard

Battle Creek, Michigan

Construct Main Base Entrance

Project no. MBMV099170

Type B-3

Submittal Book

February 17, 2021

Project No. 3141900-113782.01

This page intentionally left blank.

Battle Creek, Michigan

Construct Main Base Entrance Project no. MBMV099170

Basis of Design

Part I – Design Intent

Authorizing Signatures:

Air Commander: _______________________________________ Date: ________________

Base Civil Engineer: __________________________________ Date: ________________

Using Organization Rep: ______________________________ Date: ________________

Environmental Manager: ______________________________ Date: ________________

Fire Chief: _____________________________________________ Date: ________________

Security Chief: ________________________________________ Date: ________________

Safety Officer: ________________________________________ Date: ________________

Communication Chief: ________________________________ Date: ________________

October 8, 2019

Maj Nathan Finfrock

Deputy Base Civil Engineer, 110 CES

3585 Mustang Avenue

Battle Creek, MI 49015-5512

Subject: Type A2 Submittal, Construct Main Base Entrance

Battle Creek ANGB, W.K. Kellogg Airport, Michigan

Project Number: MBMV099170

Dear Maj Finfrock:

Mead & Hunt, Inc. is pleased to present the Type A2 Concept Development Submittal for the Construct

Main Base Entrance project at Battle Creek Air National Guard, Battle Creek, Michigan.

If there is anything else you require, please contact us.

Sincerely, MEAD & HUNT, Inc.

Jeremy Bluhm, PE

Project Manager

Cc: MSgt Steven Stocking, Contracting Officer

Project Number: MBMV099170 Construct Main Base Entrance Contract Number: W912JB-14-D-2001 Basis of Design Part I – Design Intent

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page i 8 October 2019 Type A2 Submittal

Contents Page

1.1 TAB A – PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Project Number and Title

Project Scope

Maximum Construction Cost (MCC)

ANG Definitives/Facility Design Guides

Floor Plan

Number of Occupants

Hours of Operation

1.2 TAB B – PROJECT SITE REQUIREMENTS

Project Number and Title

Location of Project

Site Plan

Utilities

Architectural Treatment

Special Siting Criteria

Environmental Requirements

1.3 TAB C – ANG DESIGN OBJECTIVES AND PROCEDURES

1.4 TAB D – ANG DESIGN POLICY

1.5 TAB E – PROJECT APPROVAL PACKAGE

1.6 TAB F – PROJECT APPENDICES

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page ii 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 1 8 October 2019

1.1 TAB A – PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Project Number and Title

Project number: MBMV099170

Project name: Construct Main Base Entrance

Project Scope

The 110th Attack Wing at Battle Creek Air National Guard Base requires an adequately sized, properly sited, appropriately configured installation entrance to support day-to-day mission objectives. The entrance must meet the Unified Facilities Criteria and anti-terrorism and force protection measures for a primary entry control facility. Leased land adjacent to the existing main Base must be properly lit and secured to allow for this expansion. The entry complex requires a properly sized gate within the controlled area that can withstand an attack, including attacks from a ballistic impact by a vehicle, small arms fire, or an explosion. Access roads must be capable of controlling peak traffic flows while safely rejecting unauthorized vehicles and pedestrians. The site must have vehicle entrapment areas, control gates, fencing, and other security measures. A properly sited final denial barrier and overwatch position is required on the newly designed entry road. Finally, a commercial vehicle inspection area is required to maximize personnel safety and minimize damage caused by a potential explosion or attack. The commercial vehicle access must be able to control the entry and inspection of commercial vehicles while safely rejecting unauthorized visitors and provide adequate queuing space.

The current Base entrance is split between a primary gate and a geographically separated contractor gate.

Both gates have limited vehicle queuing space, inadequate vehicle barrier siting, and require rejected vehicles to enter the Base to turn around for exiting. A new main gate is proposed to be located off vacated

Skyline Drive area along the west side of the Base. The new gate will incorporate requirements from the current Unified Facilities Criteria for Entry Control Facilities, and will include new access drives, gate house with canopies, commercial vehicle inspection facility, security fencing, vehicle barriers, and parking for visitors.

The intent of this project is to design a new main Base entry control facility on the west side of the Base.

The project should comply with facility design– and construction-related provisions of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 05), section 109; Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA 07); and Executive

Order 13423, all as applicable by the project scope.

The project will clear and grub the site along vacated Skyline Drive and install AT/FP compliant perimeter fence, vehicle and personnel gates as needed. Sections of fence will be security fence/barriers as needed to provide a secure safety zone around the entry control facility.

A new gatehouse with overhead protection at inbound vehicle lanes will be located within the access control zone. The gatehouse will conform to existing architectural standards, including brick exterior and standing seam metal roof. The new gatehouse will have a restroom and appropriate ballistic/impact protection.

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 2 8 October 2019 Type A2 Submittal

The project will provide new roadway for the approach zone and response zone including curbing, signage and drainage, active vehicle barriers (AVBs) at the end of the response zone, and security forces parking space before the barrier location for sufficient security overwatch. Area lighting and other site utilities including electrical, water, sewer, and communication service will be provided.

A new roadway from the intersection of Skyline Drive and Hill Brady Road will be required. A Military

Construction Cooperative Agreement will be needed for the roadway and intersection modifications and improvements immediately adjoining the public intersection. Work is to be coordinated with the City of Battle

Creek.

The main gate receives vehicles of various sizes, ranging from personal automobiles to full size semi-trailers with trailer lengths of 53 feet and overall length of 73.5 feet (AASHTO WB-67) daily. During construction projects on Base, the main gate area additionally serves as an entry point for trucks hauling materials to project sites. A traffic study was completed in advance of this project (Battle Creek Air National

Guard Base, Entry Control Facilities Study, April 2017). This project will utilize the traffic data collected with that study for the development of alternatives.

The overall design will be in accordance with UFC 4-022-01, 27 July 2017, Security Engineering: Entry

Control Facilities / Access Control Points. According to UFC 4-022-01, the protective design elements to mitigate the effects of an explosive device as identified in UFC 4-010-01 DoD Minimum Antiterrorism

Standards for Buildings are not mandatory for guardhouse facilities. Other standards from UFC 4-010-01 will be incorporated into the design and layout as practical within the constraints of the project scope and budget.

The project does not meet the minimum requirements of buildings greater than 1,000 square feet of floor space as established by USGBC for consideration for LEED certification and, thus, cannot pursue LEED certification. The project designs, however, in order to minimize energy use and recurring utility bills, will strive to achieve optimum resource efficiency, constructability, sustainability, and energy conservation within the limits provided by the scope and budget. The project will be designed in accordance with ANGETL

15-01-01, Sustainable Design, Development, and Resource Conservation, and design elements will be tracked via the ANG Sustainable Design and Energy Conservation Score Sheet. The project is classified as “Vertical” construction ANG Category of Work, with a sustainable design goal of ANG Meritable.

Maximum Construction Cost (MCC)

ANG Definitives/Facility Design Guides

This project is required to meet the criteria/scope specified in Air National Guard Handbook 32-1084, “Facility Requirements.” There is minimal threat for this facility and the level of protection is low, so minimum construction standards have been applied.

REMOVED FOR PUBLIC

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 3 8 October 2019

The following codes and guidelines are utilized in the development of this project scope:

DoD Design Requirements

Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC)

• UFC 1-200-01: DoD Building Code (General Building Requirements); Change 2, 1 November 2018

• UFC 1-200-02: High Performance and Sustainable Building Requirements; Change 3, 7 July 2018

• UFC 3-101-01: Architecture; Change 4, 03 June 2019

• UFC 3-110-03: Roofing; Change 3, 03 June 2019

• UFC 3-120-01: Design: Sign Standards; Change 3, 12 December 2017

• UFC 3-201-01: Civil Engineering; Change 2, 19 June 2019

• UFC 3-201-02: Landscape Architecture; Change 1, 1 November 2009

• UFC 3-210-10: Low Impact Development; Change 1, 1 February 2016

• UFC 3-220-01: Geotechnical Engineering; 1 November 2012

• UFC 3-230-01: Water Storage and Distribution; Change 1, 01 October 2018

• UFC 3-240-01: Wastewater Collection; Change with Change 2, 01 January 2019

• UFC 3-250-01: Pavement Design for Roads and Parking Areas; 14 November 2016

• UFC 3-250-03: Standard Practice Manual for Flexible Pavements; 30 May 2018

• UFC 3-250-04: Standard Practice for Concrete Pavements; Change 2, 29 July 2009

• UFC 3-250-07: Standard Practice for Pavement Recycling; 16 January 2004

• PCASE, “Pavement-Transportation Computer Assisted Structural Engineering” design software

• UFC 3-301-01: Structural Engineering; Change 4, 1 November 2018

• UFC 3-410-01: Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning Systems; Change 4, 1 November 2017

• UFC 3-420-01: Plumbing Systems; Change 10, 26 October 2015

• UFC 3-501-01: Electrical Engineering; 6 October 2015

• UFC 3-520-01: Interior Electrical Systems; with Change 1, 20 March 2019

• UFC 3-530-01: Interior and Exterior Lighting Systems and Controls; Change 3, 1 June 2016

• UFC 3-550-01: Exterior Electrical Power Distribution; Change 1, 23 March 2017

• UFC 3-560-01: Operation and Maintenance: Electrical Safety; Change 2, 13 March 2019

• UFC 3-580-01: Telecommunications Interior Infrastructure Planning and Design; Change 1, 1 June 2016

• UFC 3-600-01: Fire Protection Engineering for Facilities; Change 3, 10 May 2019

• UFC 4-010-01: DoD Minimum Antiterrorism Standards for Buildings; 12 December 2018

• UFC 4-020-01: DoD Security Engineering Facilities Planning Manual; 9 November 2008

• UFC 4-020-02FA: Security Engineering: Concept Design (FOUO); March 1, 2005

• UFC 4-020-03FA: Security Engineering: Facilities Design (FOUO); March 1, 2005

• UFC 4-021-01: Design and O&M: Mass Notification Systems; Change 1, 1 January 2010

• UFC 4-022-01: Security Engineering: Entry Control Facilities/Access Control Points; 27 July 2017

• SDDCTEA Pamphlet 55-15, Traffic and Safety Engineering for Better Entry Control Facilities; 2014

• UFC 4-022-02: Selection and Application of Vehicle Barriers; Change 1, 9 August 2010

• UFC 4-022-03: Security Fences and Gates; 1 October 2013

Public Law

• Public Law 1095-58: Energy Policy Act (EPAct) of 2005; 8 August 2005

Accessibility for DoD Facilities

• ABA Accessibility Standard for Department of Defense Facilities; 31 October 2008

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 4 8 October 2019

Air National Guard Requirements

Air National Guard Handbooks (ANGH)

• ANGH 32-1084: Facility Space Standards; 27 January 2015

• ANGH 32-1084: 730-839 Traffic Check House

Air National Guard Technical Letters (ANG-ETL)

• ANG ETL 10-3: Air National Guard Design Objectives and Procedures; 16 April 2010

• ANG-ETL 15-01: Air National Guard Design Policy; 1 May 2015

• ANG ETL 15-01-01: Sustainable Design, Development, and Resource Conservation; 1 May 2015

• ANG ETL 15-01-02: SCIF & AT/FP Guidance; 1 May 2015

• ANG ETL 15-01-03: Fire Protection Design Guidance; 1 May 2015

• ANG ETL 15-01-04: Mechanical Engineering; 1 May 2015

• ANG ETL 15-01-05: Electrical and Communications Engineering; 1 May 2015

• ANG ETL 15-01-06: Roof Design Guidance; 1 May 2015

• ANG ETL 15-01-07: Airfield Vehicle Pavements; 1 May 2015

• ANG ETL 15-01-08: ANG Generators; 1 May 2015

Public Codes

International Code Council (ICC)

• International Building Code (IBC); 2015

• International Plumbing Code (IPC); 2015

• International Mechanical Code (IMC); 2015

• International Electrical Code (IEC); 2015

American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE)

• ASHRAE Standard 55: Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy; 2013

• ASHRAE Standard 62.1: Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality; 2010

• ASHRAE Standard 90.1: Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings (IP); 2013

National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)

• NFPA 13: Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems; 2013

• NFPA 25: Standard for the Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance of Water-Based Fire Protection Systems;

• NFPA 70: National Electrical Code; 2014

• NFPA 72: National Fire Alarm Code and Signaling Code; 2013

• NFPA 75: Standard for the Fire Protection of Information Technology Equipment; 2013

• NFPA 90A: Standard for the Installation of Air-Conditioning Ventilating Systems; 2015

• NFPA 101: Life Safety Code; 2015

• NFPA 170: Standard for Fire Safety and Emergency Symbols; 2015

• NFPA 241: Standard for Safeguarding Construction, Alteration and Demolition Operations; 2013

• NFPA 780: Standard for the Installation of Lightning Protection Systems; 2014

Floor Plan

See attached architectural drawing in A-2 submittal set. This is a new facility; there are no existing floor plans.

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 5 8 October 2019

Number of Occupants

Cat-Code Name Daily UTA

730-839 Traffic Check House (Gate House) 4 8

145-921 Overhead Protection

Hours of Operation

Main Gate: This facility operates 7 days a week, 24 hours a day.

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 6 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 7 8 October 2019

INDIVIDUAL SPACE CRITERIA DATA SHEET

Space:

Guard Station – Room

Size (s.f.): 175 Occupancy: 1-2 Function: Guard House Size (s.m.):

ARCHITECTURAL

Finishes: Flooring, Paint Floor: LVT Walls: Gypsum Board (painted), CMU (painted)

Ceiling: New ACT Clear Ceiling Height:

Windows: Bullet resistant glazing system.

Doors: Exterior: Bullet Resistant steel doors and frames. Interior: Flush Wood w/ Hollow Metal

Frames Adjacencies Badging Area, Toilet Room

Features:

Furnishing:

STRUCTURAL

Floor: Concrete slab on grade Walls:

Ceiling:

Features:

HVAC

Heating: X Air Conditioning: X Ventilation: � Temperature:

Special Requirements:

PLUMBING

Fixtures:

Shop Air: � Equipment Air: � Floor Drains: �

Natural Gas: � Other:

FIRE PROTECTION

System Type: N/A Hazard Classification:

Detection: Smoke and Heat Detection

ELECTRICAL

Telephone: X LAN: X PA: X Lighting: LED light fixtures. Lighting controls to be in compliance with UFC and current energy codes.

Special Requirements: Voice and Data locations will need to be provided.

Security: Access control system, duress alarm system, CCTV system, intrusion detection system Power: Access vehicle control barrier system

Grounding:

EQUIPMENT

Cranes & Hoists:

Other:

GFGI:

OTHER COMMENTS (Add Continuation Sheets)

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 8 8 October 2019

Badging Area – Room

Size (s.f.): 38 Occupancy: 1-2 Function: Guard House Size (s.m.):

ARCHITECTURAL

Finishes: Flooring, Paint Floor: LVT Walls: Bullet Resistant Gypsum Board (painted), CMU (painted)

Ceiling: Gypsum Board Clear Ceiling Height:

Windows: Bullet resistant transaction window Doors: HM steel doors and frames.

Adjacencies Guard Work Area Features:

Furnishing:

STRUCTURAL

Floor: Concrete slab on grade Walls:

Ceiling:

Features:

HVAC

Heating: X Air Conditioning: X Ventilation: � Temperature:

Special Requirements:

PLUMBING

Fixtures:

Hazard Classification:

Detection: Smoke and Heat Detection

ELECTRICAL

Lighting: LED light fixtures. Lighting controls to be in compliance with UFC and current energy codes.

Security:

Power:

Cranes & Hoists:

Other:

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 9 8 October 2019

Guard Station – Toilet

Size (s.f.): 30 Occupancy: Function: Guard House Restroom Size (s.m.):

ARCHITECTURAL

Finishes: Flooring, Paint Floor: Porcelain Tile Walls: Gypsum Board (painted), CMU (painted)

Ceiling: New ACT Clear Ceiling Height:

Windows:

Doors: Flush Wood w/ Hollow Metal Frames

Adjacencies Front Entry / Office Features:

Furnishing:

STRUCTURAL

Floor: Concrete slab on grade Walls:

Ceiling:

Features:

HVAC

Heating: X Air Conditioning: X Ventilation: X Temperature:

Special Requirements:

PLUMBING

Fixtures: Water closet, lavatory

Hazard Classification:

Detection: Smoke and Heat Detection

ELECTRICAL

Lighting: LED light fixtures. Lighting controls to be in compliance with UFC and current energy codes.

Special Requirements:

Cranes & Hoists:

Other:

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 10 8 October 2019

Guard Station –Fire Alarm Room

Size (s.f.): 5 Occupancy: Function: Guard House Fire Alarm Size (s.m.):

ARCHITECTURAL

Finishes: Paint Floor: Sealed concrete Walls: Gypsum Board (painted), CMU (painted)

Ceiling:

Clear Ceiling Height:

Windows:

Doors: Steel door w/ Hollow Metal Frames

Adjacencies Storage Yard Features:

Furnishing:

STRUCTURAL

Floor: Concrete slab on grade Walls:

Ceiling:

Features:

HVAC

Heating: X Air Conditioning: X Ventilation: � Temperature:

Special Requirements:

PLUMBING

Fixtures:

Hazard Classification:

Detection: Smoke and Heat Detection

ELECTRICAL

Lighting: LED light fixtures. Lighting controls to be in compliance with UFC and current energy codes.

Cranes & Hoists:

Other:

GFGI: Uninterruptable power supply

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 11 8 October 2019

1.2 TAB B – PROJECT SITE REQUIREMENTS

Project Number and Title

Project number: MBMV099170

Project name: Construct Main Base Entrance

Location of Project

The Battle Creek Air National Guard Base is located at a joint-use airport, W.K. Kellogg Airport (BTL). The

Base is located on the north and west sides of the Airport south of West Dickman Road. The Canadian

National Railway divides the Base. The new entry control facility project site will be located on the west side of the Base off vacated Skyline Drive on lands to be leased from the City of Battle Creek.

Site Plan

The site plan layout utilizes the criteria as stated in UFC 4-022-01 “Security Engineering: Entry Control

Facilities/Access Control Points,” SDDCTEA Pamphlet 55-15, and ANGH 32-1084 ANG “Standard Facility

Requirements” for security, safety, and traffic flow.

The north, west, and east sides of the Guard Base are enclosed by a perimeter fence. The airport runways, which are shared with BTL, are located immediately adjacent to the south and southeast sides of the Base.

Currently there are two access gates located on West Dickman Road. The existing main gate is situated on two north-south–oriented one-way paired streets that approximately bisect the Guard Base (Sabre Street and Phantom Avenue) and intersects with Thunderbolt Avenue. There is an auxiliary access gate approximately 780-feet east of the existing main gate that also intersects with Thunderbolt Avenue. The site generally drains toward the west and northwest, where the flow is eventually intercepted by a creek that flows northeast into the North Branch Kalamazoo River.

The new main gate will be located on the west side of the Base, west of the railroad tracks bisecting the

Base. Access to the east side of the Base, across the railroad tracks, will be via the existing overpass on

Sentry Avenue. The existing gate entrances on West Dickman Road will be maintained as auxiliary access points.

The main gate access to the local roadway network is planned to occur near the intersection of Skyline

Drive and Hill Brady Road – both under the jurisdiction of the City of Battle Creek. The access point is west of BTL and southwest of the Guard Base. Prior to 2015, Skyline Drive continued northeasterly from Hill

Brady Road for 5,000 feet to its then intersection with Dickman Road. In 2015, Skyline Drive was vacated by Michigan DOT between Hill Brady Road and Dickman Road. At that time, jurisdiction was transferred to the City of Battle Creek.

The current intersection configuration includes Skyline Drive terminating at Hill Brady Road in a “T” intersection. The predominant traffic movement involves Skyline Drive traffic turning left onto Hill Brady

Road and the corresponding and opposing movement of Hill Brady Road traffic turning right onto Skyline

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 12 8 October 2019

Drive. The intersection received minor improvements in 2015 and is currently signalized. Hill Brady Road also continues easterly for approximately 200 feet to its intersection with Logistics Drive, another local street.

The ECF project site is located along vacated Skyline Drive between Hill Brady Road and its intersection with Sentry Drive. A gate at Sentry Drive is currently unused. There is a munitions storage area located south of Sentry Drive. The project site is a vacated roadbed with partially wooded and open grassy areas adjacent to the roadway.

The site landscaping design will employ a combination of hardscape and softscape areas to provide a sense of entry and place, as well as reduce noise, incorporate stormwater management, improve energy efficiency, and screen light and glare. Care must be taken to discourage nesting and foraging of birds around the airport and to create a low-maintenance and attractive face to the surrounding community.

The project will necessitate improvements to the intersection of Skyline Drive and Hill Brady Road/Logistics

Drive as well as improvements to the vacated portion of Skyline Drive between the intersection and the new entrance location. The work shall be coordinated with the City of Battle Creek to meet requirements of

Private Improvement Agreements.

Utilities

A description of the existing utilities and utility needs within the site are as follows:

Water: There is an existing watermain running along the west side of vacated Skyline Drive. From that watermain there is a water service line crossing vacated Skyline Drive into the Base property approximately

290 feet southwest of the intersection with Sentry Avenue. This water service line then heads south and branches out to serve the buildings in the munitions storage area. There are several hydrants within the munitions storage area. Water service for the new gatehouse facility will be able to connect into the existing watermain along vacated Skyline Drive.

Sanitary sewer: There is a gravity sanitary sewer lateral connection crossing vacated Skyline Drive approximately 980 feet southwest of the intersection with Sentry Avenue and sanitary sewer along the west side of vacated Skyline Drive. Sanitary connections for the new gatehouse will be able connect to the sanitary sewer along Skyline Drive.

Storm drain: There are no existing storm sewer facilities in this area of the Base. There are two existing culverts crossing Sentry Avenue that discharge toward the northeast. One of the culverts is located at the ditch line of vacated Skyline Drive and the other is approximately 300 feet southeast of the vacated Skyline

Drive. An existing wetland area is located approximately 570 feet northeast of the intersection of vacated

Skyline Drive with Sentry Avenue on Base property. This low area may serve as the destination for the storm water runoff from the new main gate area. Storm water can be conveyed to this low area via graded swales, ditches and storm sewer piping. Storm water management practices will be required to manage stormwater for the site improvements. The Guard Base maintains a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 13 8 October 2019

(dated July 2018) in conformance with the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ)

Michigan Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program.

Gas: There are existing gas facilities located east of vacated Skyline Drive and a service lateral serving the munitions storage area approximately 375 feet to the south of Sentry Drive. Investigation of the location of existing gas facilities that may service the project site is ongoing.

Electrical: There is an existing buried electric facility running down the northeast side of Sentry Avenue.

Electric service to the new main gate facility can be provided from this facility.

Lighting: There are existing light poles along the south side of Sentry Ave. Refer to Part II, Item 2.1.6 for the planned lighting work.

Communication lines: There are no existing communication lines near the project site according to the existing data. Investigation of the existence and/or location of existing communication facilities that may service the project site is ongoing. Refer to Part II, Item 2.1.7 for the planned site communications work.

Hazardous Area: There are no known hazardous material sites in the vicinity of the new main gate.

Architectural Treatment

The new primary ECF guardhouse and canopies will match the style and look of other existing facilities on the Guard Base.

Special Siting Criteria

The ECF is divided into four zones, each encompassing specific functions and operations. Beginning at the

Base’s property boundary, the zones include the approach zone, access control zone, response zone, and safety zone. Each zone is more fully described in the following sections.

Approach Zone

The approach zone lies from the existing Base’s property boundary to the ECF ID checkpoint. The approach zone consists of an area that vehicles must transverse before reaching the checkpoint. This area should include design elements to support the following functions and operations:

1) Reduce the speed of incoming vehicles to, or below, the design speed of the ECF.

2) Perform sorting of traffic by vehicle type prior to each vehicle reaching the checkpoint.

3) Provide adequate queuing distance for vehicles waiting for entry.

4) Provide the first opportunity to identify potential threat vehicles, including those attempting entry through the outbound lane of traffic.

5) Provide an area for traffic calming techniques to mitigate high-speed threats.

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 14 8 October 2019

The existing approach zone layout at the existing facility located west of the train trestle does not conform to the current requirements stated within UFC 4-022-01 “Security Engineering: Entry Control

Facilities/Access Control Points.” The current configuration does not provide the following:

1) A designated commercial/large vehicle inspection lane. Currently, accommodating large trucks severely limits the space available at the main gate or contractor gate.

2) A rejection point prior to the ID checkpoint in which vehicles can exit without reaching the inspection point.

3) The minimum required 50-foot-long raised primary channelization gatehouse island for either the primary or secondary inspection areas.

4) Curbing of sufficient height is not present to keep vehicles from leaving the roadways to bypass the security checkpoints. The current calming devices are non-existent.

5) Adequate lighting of the area.

6) Standard required pavement markings and signage in accordance with SDDCTEA Pamphlet 55-

15.

Facility containment is necessary to prevent inbound vehicles from unauthorized access and leaving the containment area to bypass security and must extend from the Base’s perimeter to the final barrier to be effective. The current layout provided shows passive barriers consisting of 7-foot-high chain-link fencing with integral double cable barriers.

Access Control Zone

The access control zone is the main body of the ECF and includes the guard facilities and traffic management equipment used by the security forces manning the facility. The design of the access control zone should be flexible enough to ensure the infrastructure can support future inspection demands, access control equipment, and technologies. Design of the access control zone should consider the requirements to process all varieties of vehicles entering the Base. These vehicles should consist of POVs of authorized personnel; Government and visitor vehicles; military convoys; and delivery and construction vehicles consisting of vans, trucks, buses, and semi-trailers.

Typical operations in the access control zone consist of the verification of vehicle decals and personnel identification, general surveillance of the vehicles and their contents, and random inspections of the vehicles and contents.

Response Zone

The response zone is the area extending from the end of the access control area to the final denial barrier.

This zone defines the end of the ECF. The design of the response zone requires that security forces have enough time to react to a threat, operate the final denial barriers, and close the ECF if necessary.

Safety Zone

The safety zone is an area that extends from the passive and active barriers in all directions to protect installation personnel, buildings, and assets from a possible explosion at the vehicle barriers. The limits of this area are defined by UFC 4-022-02.

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 15 8 October 2019

Site Conditions

Pavements and perimeter fencing shall be constructed to meet the AT/FP classifications. For the existing and proposed buildings within the project area, a description of each building and the associated AT/FP setback is described as follows:

• The munitions admin building is a concrete, masonry, and steel structure with brick exterior. Although presently it has a low occupancy, the Guard Base may modify its function to primary. Therefore, consideration will be given to locating the controlled perimeter 186 feet from the building.

• The gatehouse constructed as part of this project will not be regularly occupied by more than 10 personnel and is considered uninhabited. Therefore, no setback is required.

The munitions storage area has quantity distance (QD) arcs of 500 feet and 1250 feet. The concept design falls outside the 500-foot arc but is within the 1250-foot arc.

Environmental Requirements

The project is to incorporate Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) and sustainable development concepts to achieve optimum resource efficiency, constructability, sustainability, and energy conservations, while minimizing adverse impacts to the built and natural environments through all phases of its life cycle. The project will not be registered with the US Green Building Council. The project will comply with the ANG Sustainable Design and Energy Conservation 2009 Edition and provide score sheet v2010(1).

The project shall comply with facility design and construction related provisions of the Energy Policy Act of

2005 and Executive Order EO 13423, as applicable by project scope, with the exception of the Energy

Policy Act of 2005, Section 109 energy consumption reduction requirements, which is not required to be met. Subject project shall also comply with the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 including, but not limited to Section 438 (EISA 438), as applicable by project scope. EISA 438 specifically calls for federal developments that exceed 5,000 square feet to maintain or restore pre-development hydrology.

Erosion Control Plan

An erosion control plan will be prepared to cover the disturbed area of the project site and include best management practices to address construction runoff at the site. The plans shall comply with Calhoun

County and Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) standards. A permit is required when greater than 1 acre of land is disturbed. The MDEQ and County permit applications will be filled out and submitted with final plans.

Stormwater Management Plan

A stormwater management plan will be prepared to address stormwater peak flows and volume, stormwater quality, and channel protection to address the requirements of MEGLE.

The following design standards will be utilized:

• FAA AC 150/5320-5B.

• FAA AC 150/5200-33B.

• UFC 03-210-10 Low Impact Development (> 5,000 SF of impervious surface is added).

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 16 8 October 2019

• Technical Reference Manual for the City of Battle Creek’s Stormwater Management Program

• MDEQ

Michigan EGLE

MEGLE erosion control standards will be utilized when creating the erosion control plan.

Calhoun County

The plan will be prepared in accordance with County Ordinance No. 02-1.

City of Battle Creek

The stormwater design will take into consideration the City’s ordinance.

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 17 8 October2019

1.3 TAB C – ANG DESIGN OBJECTIVES AND PROCEDURES

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 18 8 October2019

This page intentionally left blank

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 19 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 20 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 21 8 October 2019

1.4 TAB D – ANG DESIGN POLICY

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 22 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 23 8 October 2019

1.5 TAB E – PROJECT APPROVAL PACKAGE

Contents: DD Form 1391

MCP Certificate of Compliance

MCP Checklist

AF Form 813, Request for Environmental Impact Analysis

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 24 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 25 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 26 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 27 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 28 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 29 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 30 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 31 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 32 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 33 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 34 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 35 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 36 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 37 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 38 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 39 8 October 2019 Type A2 Submittal

1.6 TAB F – PROJECT APPENDICES

Contents: Real Estate Appendix

Environmental Restoration Program (ERP) Appendix

Asbestos Appendix: The project plan is to construct all new facilities. No existing facilities will be demolished under this project. The Asbestos Appendix is not applicable.

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 40 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 41 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 42 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 43 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 44 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 45 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 46 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 47 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 48 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 49 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 50 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 51 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 52 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 53 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 54 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 55 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 56 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 57 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 58 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 59 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 60 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 61 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 62 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 63 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 64 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 65 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 66 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 67 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 68 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 69 8 October 2019

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 70 8 October 2019

Battle Creek, Michigan

Construct Main Base Entrance

Project no. MBMV099170

Type B-3

Basis of Design

Part II – Design Narrative

February 17, 2021

Contract Number: W912JB-14-D-2001 Basis of Design Part II – Narratives

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page i 17 February 2021 Type B3 Final

CONTENTS Page

Attachment 12 – Type B-3 Final Design Submittal Checklist ....................................................................... iii

2.1 NARRATIVES

2.1.1 STRUCTURAL DESIGN NARRATIVE

2.1.2 CIVIL DESIGN NARRATIVE

2.1.3 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN NARRATIVE

2.1.4 MECHANICAL DESIGN NARRATIVE

2.1.5 PLUMBING DESIGN NARRATIVE

2.1.6 FIRE PROTECTION DESIGN NARRATIVE

2.1.7 ELECTRICAL DESIGN NARRATIVE

2.1.8 TELECOMMUNICATIONS DESIGN NARRATIVE

2.1.9 SUSTAINABLE DESIGN NARRATIVE

2.1.10 ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERS ACT (ABA)

2.2 SUSTAINABLE DESIGN AND ENERGY CONSERV. SCORESHEET

APPENDICES

Appendix A – Review Comments from Types A2, B1, and B2 with Responses

Appendix B – Minutes from Project DWG Kickoff Meeting and Design Charrette, A1 CPM, A2 CDM, and B1 CDDM

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page ii 17 February 2021

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page iii 17 February 2021

ANG Design Objectives and Procedures (Tab C) 16 APR 10

Attachment 12

TYPE B-3 – FINAL DESIGN SUBMITTAL

CHECKLIST

BASE: BATTLE CREEK ANG BASE STATE: MI DATE: 17 February 2021

PROJECT NUMBER: MBMV099170

TITLE: CONSTRUCT MAIN BASE ENTRANCE

X CORRECTED FINAL DRAWINGS FOR ALL DISCIPLINES

X FINAL SPECIFICATIONS INCLUDING DIVISION I –GENERAL PROVISIONS,

INCLUDING SUMMARY OF WORK, BID STRUCTURING, AND

CONSTRUCTION PHASING PLAN (If required for this project.)

X CORRECTED FINAL DETAILED CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE

INCLUDING ABI’s or BID OPTIONS

X FINAL UPDATED ANG SUSTAINABLE DESIGN AND ENERGY

CONSERVATION SCORE SHEET

X UPDATED BASIS OF DESIGN, PARTS I AND II

X PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS WITH A-E DISPOSITION

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page iv 17 February 2021

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 1 17 February 2021

2.1 NARRATIVES

2.1.1 STRUCTURAL DESIGN NARRATIVE

The structure of the guard house will be cold formed trusses. The trusses will bear on steel framing and masonry walls. The framing and walls will bear on piers and foundation walls. The foundation walls and piers will bear on spread concrete footings.

The canopy structure will consist of metal deck on cold formed steel trusses. The cold formed steel trusses will bear on structural steel beams. The beams will be integrated with steel columns into two-way moment frames. The columns will bear on piers. The piers will be cantilevered vertically from spread concrete footings.

The secondary check house is to be pre-engineered and will sit on a slab-on-grade system. There will also be equipment pads and stoops provided under external equipment and entryways, respectively.

Building Code

• UFC 1-200-01: DoD Building Code; Change 2, 1 November 2018

Air National Guard Engineering Technical Letters

• ANGETL 15-01: Air National Guard Design Policy (Tab D); 01 May 2015

Unified Facilities Criteria

• UFC 1-200-01: DoD Building Code; Change 2,1 November 2018

• UFC 3-301-01: Structural Engineering; 1 November 2018

• UFC 4-010-01: DoD Minimum Antiterrorism Standards for Buildings; 12 December 2018

2.1.2 CIVIL DESIGN NARRATIVE

Facility Layout

The following graphic represents the functional relationships for the new main gate:

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 2 17 February 2021

Approach Zone

Design Considerations

Within the approach zone, the design will serve to reduce speeds and prepare vehicles for the ID check point and provide sufficient queueing lengths to minimize impacts onto the public right-of-way. The design includes a total of three check lanes: one lane for commercial vehicles (truck lane), a second lane for non-CAC (Common Access Card) combined with CAC holders, and a third lane for CAC holders only. Signage will be provided to direct and inform traffic of the correct entry lane.

The design is to be based on FPCON Bravo+ conditions.

Traffic Analysis

Traffic enters the entry control facility (ECF) from the south via the intersection of Hill Brady

Road/Logistics Drive and Skyline Drive, an existing “T” intersection with Skyline Drive terminating at Hill Brady Road/Logistics Drive. Queuing lengths were estimated based on the traffic study (April

2017) for the worst-case scenario which would occur during UTA drill weekends with a calculated demand forecast volume of 660 vehicles per hour.

The traffic queue is allowed to spread between the Hill Brady Road access point and the ID check point. The peak hour maximum vehicle queue is 24 vehicles assuming handheld processing and single screening configuration. Handheld screening is the preferred method during normal operation. However, it is assumed that manual screening may be used during UTA drill weekends to improve processing rates.

Results and Recommendations

To provide the required queueing length during the UTA drill weekends, multiple lanes are included within the approach adjacent to the access control zone which aligns the entering vehicles with the

ID check lanes. Two to three lanes of approach traffic are accommodated between the entry point and the guard house. The left lane and center lane provide access for base personnel to the primary

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 3 17 February 2021 checking lanes; the right lane provides access for contractors to the commercial vehicle inspection bay.

To provide increased capacity needed on UTA drill weekends, the truck inspection lane and POV inspection accessory area can be utilized as additional processing lanes for a total of four ID check locations on three lanes, as no commercial vehicles are expected during this time. It is anticipated that up to three lanes will have single checkers with the potential to move to two lanes in tandem for a total of five Security Forces Staff required during peak processing time.

Traffic calming measures are utilized within the approach zone to reduce speeds of vehicles approaching the access control zone. A circular traffic loop at the entrance of the site and sharp horizontal curves in the approach zone reduce speeds and provide the necessary time for all four threat detection scenarios.

Access Control Zone

Channelization islands provide separation between the commercial vehicle inspection area and the POV inspection areas and provide safe, elevated locations for security force personnel to stand during ID checks.

Two rejection lanes with turning capacity for trucks are preferred, one before and one after the ID check point. A single truck turnaround location past the ID check is provided within this site. The design vehicle for the commercial truck access is a WB-67. Parking is provided for visitors and security forces personnel.

A pull-off area for vehicle inspection is included past the ID check.

The access control zone includes three canopied inspection lanes: the CAC holder only lane, the combined

CAC and non-CAC holder lane, and the commercial vehicle lane. The commercial vehicle lane is a separate lane with a separate canopy from the POV lanes. A non-canopied accessory inspection area for POVs is provided adjacent to the truck lane and canopy. This area is intended to be a location for vehicles requiring a more thorough inspection to be directed to, out of the way of the incoming POV lanes and commercial vehicle lane. It also serves as an option to provide an additional inspection capacity during UTA drill weekends to improve processing rates.

The two canopied inspection stations include one guard house and three guard booths. A dedicated parking area for up to two chase vehicles is provided. Channelization islands provide separation between the truck inspection area and the POV inspection area and provide locations for security forces to safely stand during

ID checks. The rejection lane for trucks is provided after the ID check point and prior to the final denial barrier.

The truck inspection area canopy is 21’-8” wide and 71-0” feet long. The canopy will be a minimum of 17.5 feet high. Manually operated barrier gates will be included to control traffic within the search area.

Response Zone

The response zone design provides adequate physical length to provide a sufficient response time to safely deploy the active vehicle barrier (AVB) system based on calculated response times and potential attack scenarios. An overwatch area is included at the end of the response zone.

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 4 17 February 2021

The length of the response zone is dependent upon the length of time needed for personnel to react to a threat and for the activation of the AVB. This includes safety measures indicating AVB deployment, which is typically calculated at nine seconds minimum. The length of the response zone is also influenced by point of detection, velocity, and acceleration of the threat vehicle. When designing an ECF, four threat scenarios are considered to determine if adequate response time is provided. Below is a summary of the various threats and associated response times to activate the AVB. Each scenario assumes a vehicle accelerates at 11.3 ft/s2. All threat scenarios not only verify a threat in the inbound direction but also if a vehicle utilizes the outbound lane to enter the facility. A minimum nine second deployment of the AVB was analyzed for threat scenarios 1, 2, and 3. For threat scenario 4, a minimum deployment of seven seconds was utilized.

In order to provide the minimum response zone time, the route length along the existing straight, flat roadway needs to be a minimum of 445 feet prior to the AVB. If the vehicle enters the access control zone at a higher rate of speed than 31 mph as determined within the UFC, the response zone length needs to be greater. Early detection of a threat within the approach zone reduces the response length required and is factored in the design. Adequate sight lines are provided to aid in early detection. Additionally, restriction of attainable vehicle speed within the approach and response zones shortens the length of the response zone. This is accomplished with grading, geometrics, and other traffic calming features.

Routes Threat Scenario 1

Threat Scenario 2

Threat Scenario 3

Threat Scenario 4

Inbound 1 22.9 Seconds 23.3 Seconds 11.8 Seconds 8.0 Seconds

Inbound 2 25.6 Seconds 26.0 Seconds 12.0 Seconds 9.3 Seconds

Inbound Truck Bay

20.0 Seconds 20.3 Seconds 9.4 Seconds 9.0 Seconds

Outbound 16.6 Seconds 16.8 Seconds 11.6 Seconds 10.9 Seconds

Minimum Response

Time

9 Seconds 9 Seconds 9 Seconds 7 Seconds

Safety Zone

Within the safety zone, a controlled perimeter is established through passive and active vehicle barriers that provide the required setbacks for existing buildings and personnel as identified in the special siting criteria below. The passive vehicle barriers will consist of barrier (cable) fencing and knee walls at the AVB.

Sitework

Site Improvements

The project includes new asphalt and concrete pavements with associated base and subgrade preparation.

Consideration has been given during design for reuse of demolished pavement materials (concrete, asphalt, and base rock). Concrete sidewalks for pedestrian access will be in compliance with ADA/ABA.

Concrete curbing is provided to control vehicle maneuvering and speed. Site features such as pavement, Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 5 17 February 2021 curb and gutter, and sidewalk have been designed in accordance with relevant the standards of the

Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT).

The preferred site location is located on the vacated roadbed of Skyline Drive north of Hill Brady Road. The site is predominantly linear in arrangement and follows the old roadbed (see Appendix A).

Pavements

Specific site information regarding existing site pavements and soil characteristics have been determined.

New asphalt pavement was designed in accordance with UFC criteria and MDOT Pavement Design

Standards using PCASE. The pavement section consists of 4.5-inches Hot Mix Asphalt over 9.5-inches aggregate base rock. Within the concrete paved portions of the site, 8-inches of doweled concrete pavement over 6-inches of aggregate base rock will be utilized.

The existing concrete pavement of Skyline Drive will be removed from Hill Brady Road to Sentry Drive to accommodate construction of the ECF. In other areas not requiring removal for the ECF, the existing pavement will be removed or left in place depending on cost and budget.

Grading and Drainage

The pavement is sloped to direct drainage off the roadway surface toward curb and gutter located along the roadway perimeters and separator islands. Due to the site constraints, a majority of the runoff in the approach, access, and response zones will be collected and transported via a storm sewer system. The storm sewer system has six discharge points for the collected runoff. Working from south to north, the first three discharge points adjacent to and east of the commercial vehicle inspection entry lane. The three discharges release into the site storm water facility which is defined as two basins as described below. The facility is defined as two basins to avoid impacts to a shallow existing 8-inch high pressure gas main that traverses the site. Over 70% of the curb and reconstructed site area is directed toward the basins.

The remaining three discharges accommodate the final 200 feet of curbed roadway. The roadway further north drains to roadside ditches in a rural section. The storm water runoff is directed via grass lined ditch to wetlands in the area.

The storm water facility consists of two bioretention basins that have been sized to fully retain and infiltrate runoff from the 2-year, 24-hour storm event. Initial runoff from paved surfaces contain high concentrations of pollutants that are removed by the engineered soil media and prairie grasses prior to infiltrating to groundwater. Vegetation consists of low maintenance native species that survive under fluctuating water conditions and are tolerant to salt that may be placed on adjacent roadways. Sandy native soils allow the facility to completely drain within 48 hours of the storm event, minimizing wildlife attractant. Runoff from large storm events is detained by an outlet structure to reduce peak flow rates and protect downstream channels. The outlet structure also contains an emergency overflow to direct flood waters away from the site. Outflow from each of the bioretention basins flows through a reinforced concrete pipe and is discharged to an existing grass lined ditch before flowing the wetlands in the area.

Mead & Hunt, Inc. Page 6 17 February 2021

Skyline Drive was constructed in the early 1960’s and it traverses a sizable drainageway. The stream branch drains a portion of the nearby airfield and conveys drainage westerly through a 6’-9” x 10’

-3” steel plate pipe arch drainage structure under Skyline Drive. The pipe arch is original construction and is nearing the end of its useful life and should be replaced. Leaving the culvert in place could impact the future use of the ECF.