Attachment 07 Cross_Reference_Matrix_V1.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 24 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W900KK21R0029
About this file
This document contains a cross reference matrix and related federal contract opportunity solicitation. The solicitation seeks proposals for an indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contract to provide Air Defense Artillery Target capabilities for a five year base period. The U.S. Army Contracting Command Orlando is soliciting on behalf of the U.S. Army Program Executive Officer for Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Threat System Management Office to procure production and operational support for MQM-170, MQM-171 and MQM-186 aerial targets. Proposals are due within 11 calendar days of posting, with questions due 11 days prior. The contract will provide a monthly production rate of 40 MQM-170, 2 MQM-171 and 2 MQM-186 targets utilizing domestic production and supply chain management. Evaluation criteria include the offeror's production plans, facilities, quality control measures, schedule, parts lists and target diagrams.
View the file
Other files
Show all 44
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FACTOR 3 - Technical
| UNCLASSIFIED/FOUO | |||||||
| CONTRACTOR's PROPORAL | Contractor factor Notes/Other References | ||||||
| Reference | RFP Section L-Instructions to Offerors | RFP Section M - Evaluation Criteria | Volume III TECHNICAL | Section and Page No. | Paragraph | ||
| VOLUME I FACTOR 1 TECHNICAL | Solicitation Attachment 10 Order #1 - SOW section 3 | L.4.1 The Offeror shall provide a detailed production plan that illustrates the entire production process of all three targets. The Production plan shall at a minimum contain: | M.4.1 The Government will evaluate the Offerors capabilities to perform SOW 3, 3.3.8, 3.3.9, 3.3.10 , 3.3.22, 3.3.24, and 3.3.26 for efficiencies, quality control measures, through put, and schedule risk. Significant emphasis is placed on the location of facilities, supply chain management procedures with quality assurance for parts or part assemblies, and domestic production for quick response to short notice requests. Facilities / production outside the U.S.A will be identified as a significant increase to performance and schedule risk. | ||||
| L.4.1.1. Proposed facilities for each target variant with a general diagram(s), location(s), and capabilities that will be used to support the TSMO in Huntsville Alabama. Provide appropriate quality control measures used to ensure the facilities produce targets that meet the identified performance specification. Stating a facilities QA certification does not provide adequate information for the Government to determine feasibility of submitted production procedures. | M.4.1.1 The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s proposed production facilities based on the ability that the plant and equipment submitted in the vendor's proposal can meet and or support the maximum annual production requirements of the contract found in accordance with SOW section 3 and that the location of the facility shall not cause delays in the deliverance of the products. The Offerors quality control measures and production risk mitigation procedures used at the proposed facilities shall be used to determine the feasibility of production through put and production schedules. | ||||||
| L.4.1.2. Production schedule for each target that identifies a minimum and optimum production time. The schedule shall provide data to support the monthly production capability of (40) MQM‐170 Aerial Target System, (02) MQM 171 Aerial Target Systems and (02) MQM 186 Aerial Target Systems. Production schedule must be initiated 30 days after contract award. Provide identified schedule risk items that have been mitigated and any item that can not be mitigated. | |||||||
| M.4.1.2 The Government will evaluate the Offerors production plans capability to efficiently execute the monthly production rate of (40) MQM‐170 IAW SOW 3.3.8, (2) MQM‐171 IAW SOW 3.3.9, and (2) MQM‐186 IAW 3.3.10 utilizing the proposed facilities and schedule. Emphasis is placed on the Offerors understanding of target production procedures, redundancies to ensure consistent production schedules are maintained and overall risk management. | |||||||
| L.4.1.3. Part list for each target with a production sources identified; parts purchased or manufactured outside of the U.S.A have to be identified. Major part assemblies not organically produced can be identified at the assembly level. All parts need to be compliant to Section 889 of Fiscal Year 2019 National Defense Authorization, Trade Agreements Act (TAA), and current regulations. | M.4.1.3 The Government will evaluate the Offerors production plan supply chain management to determine feasibility, quality control procedures, and efficiency for the production of part assemblies as well as full production targets. Significant emphasis will be placed on domestic production and rapid delivery capabilities of modified parts to meet unique testing needs. | ||||||
| L.4.1.4 The Offeror shall provide (3) Target Production diagrams for operational target vehicles. The diagrams shall identify how the functional target meets / exceeds the performance specifications contained in Attachment 03 Performance Specifications. Items that exceed the Performance requirement have to disclosed as increased performance has to be included in target test plan data for end users. | M.4.1.4 The Government will evaluate the (3) Target Production diagrams to determine the feasibility of meeting or exceeding the performance specification. Any diagram that does not meet the specification will not be considered. Targets that have the ability to be modified, upon the Government request, to exceed the performance specification shall be evaluated more favorably. |
ATTACHMENT 7 CROSS REFERENCE MATRIX
UNCLASSIFIED/FOUO
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .