Attachment 06 - ADA-T Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 158 KB Posted

Attached to
U. S. Army's Air Defense Artillery Targets (ADA-T)
Solicitation number
W900KK21R0029
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire related to a solicitation for an Air Defense Artillery Targets (ADA-T) contract. The U.S. Army Contracting Command Orlando is soliciting proposals for a single-award IDIQ contract to provide ADA-T capabilities for a five-year base period. The incumbent contractor is requested to complete the past performance questionnaire to assist with proposal evaluation. Proposals are due on the date stated in the attached solicitation W900KK-21-R-0029, and any questions regarding the solicitation must be submitted no later than 11 calendar days from the posting date. Interested prime contractors should notify the specified contracting specialist of their intent to submit a proposal by the question due date.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
ADA-T Late Question and Answer.pdf PDF
Attachment 04 Pricing Sheet Workbook - Ammendment 6-23-21.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
ADA-T Questions and Answers.pdf PDF
Exhibit A CDRL Training Conduct Support Documents.pdf PDF
Exhibit A CDRL Quality System Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment 02 DD 254.pdf PDF
Exhibit A CDRL Mission Flight Operations Summary Report.pdf PDF
Exhibit A CDRL Commercial Drawings-Models and Associated Lists.pdf PDF
Attachment 07 Cross_Reference_Matrix_V1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit A CDRL Hazardous Materials Management Program (HMMP) Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment 11 Property Management Plan Review.pdf PDF
Exhibit A CDRL Engineering Services Memorandum (ESM).pdf PDF
Exhibit A CDRL Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) Manual.pdf PDF
Attachment 04 Pricing Sheet Workbook.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit A DD1423 for Small Business Utilization Report.pdf PDF
Attachment 10 Draft Order for Task Order One.docx DOCX document
Exhibit A CDRL Status of Government Furnished equipment (GFE) Report.pdf PDF
Exhibit A CDRL Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) Manual Supplemental Data.pdf PDF
Exhibit A CDRL Performance and Cost Report.pdf PDF
Exhibit A CDRL Explosive Hazard Classification Data Report (EHCDR).pdf PDF
Exhibit A CDRL Acceptance Test Plan.pdf PDF
Exhibit A CDRL Commercial Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Manual and Associated Supplemental Data.pdf PDF
Exhibit A CDRL Test-Inspection Report.pdf PDF
Exhibit A CDRL Report Record of Meeting.pdf PDF
Exhibit A CDRL Engineering Change Proposal (ECP).pdf PDF
Exhibit A CDRL Technical Report-Study-Services.pdf PDF
W900KK-21-R-0029 ADA-T.pdf PDF
Exhibit A CDRL Hazardous Materials Management Program (HMMP) Report.pdf PDF
Attachment 05 GFP List from PIEE.pdf PDF
Exhibit A CDRL Test Plan.pdf PDF
Exhibit A CDRL GFP-CAP Property Managment System (PMS) Written Procedures.pdf PDF
Exhibit A CDRL Frequency Allocation Data.pdf PDF
Attachment 03 Target Drawing.pdf PDF
Exhibit A CDRL Engineering and Technical Services Accomplishment Report.pdf PDF
Attachment 01 Consolidated SOW for MQM-170 MQM-171 and MQM-186 Hardware and Services 28 May 2021.pdf PDF
Exhibit A CDRL Safety Assessment Report (SAR).pdf PDF
Exhibit A CDRL Accident-Incident Report.pdf PDF
Exhibit A CDRL Technical and Management Work Plan.pdf PDF
Exhibit A CDRL Reproductions.pdf PDF
Attachment 03 MQM-170 Performance Specification.pdf PDF
Attachment 08 DCAA Preaward_Survey_of_Prospective_Contractor_Accounting_System_Checklist.pdf PDF
Exhibit A CDRL System Safety Program Plan (SSPP).pdf PDF
Attachment 08 SF1408 Preaward_Survey_of_Prospective_Contractor_Accounting_System.pdf PDF
Attachment 09 Industry Solicitation Question Form.doc DOC document
Show all 44

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 06

Past Performance Risk Assessment Past Performance Questionnaire

ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND - ORLANDO

W900KK-21-R-0029

SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Risk Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP) W900KK-21-R-0029 Dear Sir/Ma’am, The US Army Contracting Command – Orlando (ACC-O) is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on recent and relevant federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 336411 Aircraft manufacturing. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.

Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation.

Please complete the enclosure and return to Army Contracting Command – Orlando, 12211 Science Drive, Partnership II, 5th Floor, Orlando, FL 32826 no later than 15 days after receipt of request. Submit your completed questionnaire to Mr. Wayne Fagan at wayne.j.fagan.civ@mail.mil Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to the undersigned at (407) 208-5868 and/or jason.jerome3.civ@mail.mil.

Sincerely, Jason Jerome Contracting Officer

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)

Performance Assessment Questionnaire Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does [and/or notify the Contracting Officer]. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.

Rating Definitions:

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror) Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above): Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date: Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased: Total Contract Value:

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Performance Confidence Assessments

Rating
Definition
Substantial Confidence
Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence
Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Neutral Confidence
No recent/relevant performance record is available or the Offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of the past performance.
Limited Confidence
Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
No Confidence
Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

B. Aerial target / unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) design, testing and prototyping.

A. Aerial target / unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) production.

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number: Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.

· Substantial Confidence

· Satisfactory Confidence

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence Rationale:

· Substantial Confidence

· Satisfactory Confidence

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence Rationale:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

C. Aerial target / unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) operations and maintenance in support of Department of Defense training, research, development, and/or test operations on U.S. Government and/or Allied Government ranges.

· Substantial Confidence

· Satisfactory Confidence

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence

Rationale:

D. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

Comments:

E. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

Point of Contact (Name): Telephone Number:

Organization: Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

PART III.

RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)

F. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .