Attachment 03 Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).docx
DOCX document 28 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Interpreting DFAS-Rome, New York
- Solicitation number
- HQ042326QE012
- Issued by
-
Defense Finance and Accounting Service
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for an interpreting services contract with the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) in Rome, New York. The solicitation (HQ042326QE012) seeks in-person and virtual interpreting services, with DFAS intending to award a Firm Fixed Price Purchase Order to a single vendor. The PPQ is designed to capture detailed performance evaluations from previous customers, using a rating scale from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory across categories such as overall technical performance, quality of work, schedule performance, and cost performance.
The questionnaire requires the respondent to complete sections detailing past contract information and provide performance ratings by 12:00 PM EST on December 18, 2025. Key evaluation questions include the contractor's ability to proactively identify and mitigate risks, respond to critical situations, and whether the customer would recommend using the contractor again. Completed questionnaires should be emailed to christina.l.rosen.civ@mail.mil and veronica.c.hay.civ@mail.mil, and will be used as part of the source selection process for this interpreting services contract.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
INSTRUCTIONS:
QUOTER: Please complete Section A and send the Past Performance Questionnaire to the COR or other customer POC with knowledge of performance.
RESPONDENT: Thank you in advance for completing this questionnaire for the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS). We understand that your time is very valuable and we appreciate your input. Your rating is essential in successfully evaluating past performance. In reference to the information provided in Section A, please complete Sections B and C of this questionnaire and submit directly to DFAS by 12:00PM EST on 18 December 2025. Email completed questionnaires to christina.l.rosen.civ@mail.mil and veronica.c.hay.civ@mail.mil.
SECTION A: QUOTER INFORMATION
| Company Name: |
| CAGE: |
| Point of Contact: |
| Title: |
| Email Address: |
| Phone Number: |
| Contract Number: |
| Dollar Amount: |
Contract Period of Performance:
Performed as the prime contractor or sub-contractor:
Brief Description of Work Performed:
SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION
Company Name:
| Point of Contact: |
| Title: |
| Email Address: |
| Phone Number: |
SECTION C: PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Use the below performance ratings and definitions to reflect your evaluation.
| Rating |
| Definition |
Exceptional (E) Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good (VG) Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Past Performance Questionnaire Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) Interpreting Services – DFAS Rome, NY
RFQ: HQ042326QE012
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION FAR 2.101 & 3.104
Satisfactory (S) Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal (M) Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Unsatisfactory (U) Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
| Not Applicable (NA) |
| No information or did not apply. |
Using the chart above, please place an X in the column with the performance rating that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance. Please respond with a narrative explanation for any ratings of unsatisfactory or marginal.
| Performance Objective |
| Rating |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Overall Technical Performance
Quality of Work
Schedule Performance
Cost Performance
For the questions below, please place an X in the column that represents your response. Please respond with a narrative explanation for any no responses.
| Question |
| Yes |
| No |
Did the contractor proactively identify risk areas, mitigate risks, and respond to emergency and critical situations?
Would you use this contractor again?
Narrative Explanation / Additional Remarks:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .