Attachment 03_Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 60 KB Posted
- Attached to
- PKB - Aircraft Corrosion Control Services - Travis AFB, CA Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA442725R0004
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template for a solicitation seeking Aircraft Corrosion Control Services at Travis Air Force Base, California. The questionnaire must be completed by references and submitted to Contract Specialist William Rife at william.rife.1@us.af.mil by February 17, 2025 at 12:00 PM Pacific Time.
The PPQ contains sections for reference information, respondent details, and contract information, followed by a 23-point performance evaluation using a 5-point rating scale (Substantial Confidence to Unknown Confidence). Key evaluation areas include technical/management capabilities, quality control, responsiveness, workforce management, reporting, and overall performance. The questionnaire also asks about CPARS ratings, any cure notices issued, and willingness to award future contracts to the contractor. This document is part of solicitation FA442725R0004 for the 60th Maintenance Group at Travis AFB.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Travis AFB is in the process of soliciting offers from companies capable of providing:
Aircraft Corrosion Control Services In order for 60th Contracting Squadron to conduct its evaluation, we request that you complete the questionnaire below and email a PDF file to: william.rife.1@us.af.mil, the Contract Specialist, at 60th CONS, Travis AFB. The due date to submit a completed questionnaires is: 17 February 2025 at 12:00 PM Pacific Time. Your completed questionnaire will become part of the official source selection records. To be considered, the Past Performance Questionnaire shall be returned to the Contract Specialist in its entirety and by the due date and time specified above.
To confirm receipt of your completed/submitted questionnaires, please contact:
Contract Specialist: William Rife by email at , Tel: 707-424-7753.
A. OFFEROR’s REFERENCE INFORMATION:
Contract Name and/or Number (Include task order number(s) if applicable:
Company (Include task order number(s) if applicable:
Address:
POC of Contact (POC):
Title of POC:
Telephone Number:
Email:
| Contractor performed as: | |
| Prime Contractor | Sub-Contractor |
Attachment 3 – Past Performance Questionnaire
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION: Please complete
Contracting Activity/Customer:
Address:
Telephone Number:
Email Address:
Point of Contract (POC) Title of POC:
C. CONTRACT INFORMATION: Please Complete.
Contract Name and/or Number
Contract Number:
Type of Contract:
Contract Value:
Total Contract Dollar Value:
Contract Description:
| Contractor performed as: |
| Prime Contractor: |
Sub-Contractor:
If subcontractor: What percentage was performed by the evaluated Contractor
Attachment 3 – Past Performance Questionnaire
A. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate number on the scale (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) that most accurately describes the Contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 4 or 5.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| Substantial Confidence (Exceptional) |
| Satisfactory Confidence (Satisfactory) |
| Limited Confidence (Marginal) |
| No Confidence |
(Unsatisfactory) Unknown Confidence (Neutral)
| Based on the offer’s performance record, the government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Based on the offer’s performance record, the government has an expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Based on the offer’s performance record, the government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Based on the offer’s performance record, the government has no expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| No performance record is identifiable or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. |
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| THE CONTRACTOR |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 1 |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 2 |
| Demonstrated the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
| 3 |
| Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements. |
| 4 |
| The Contractor corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their contract requirements. |
| 5 |
| Home office participated in solving significant local problems. |
| 6 |
| Followed approved quality control plan. |
| 7 |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| 8 |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| 9 |
| Provided material submittal in accordance with the contract requirements |
| 10 |
| Met established turnaround times for required periodic contract reports, etc. |
| 11 |
| Was responsive to contract changes |
| 12 |
| Demonstrated ability to retain a qualified workforce. |
| 13 |
| Provided accurate and timely invoices |
| 14 |
| Provided accurate and timely progress reports. |
| 15 |
| Demonstrated good organizational structure and accountability |
| 16 |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies |
| 17 |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems |
| 18 |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems |
| 19 |
| Met established project schedules |
| 20 |
| Provided timely resolutions of warranty defects |
| 21 |
| Was responsive to contract changes |
| 22 |
| Provided adequate employee supervision |
| 23 |
| How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance? |
THE CONTRACTOR
Is the Contractor rated in CPARS?
| Yes |
| No |
| 2 |
| Was the Contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
| 3 |
| Would you award another contract to this Contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
Additional Remarks
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .