Attachment 03 -Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- S-76D Flight Simulator Visual System - Amended
- Solicitation number
- 692M15-25-R-00002
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire that is part of the solicitation for the S-76D Flight Simulator Visual System contract opportunity with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).
The key details are: The FAA has a requirement for a visual system for the S-76D cockpit simulator maintained by the Cockpit Simulation Facility in Atlantic City, NJ. The contract will be awarded as a firm fixed-price contract. The NAICS code is 333310 with a business size standard of 1,000 employees. Contractors must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) prior to submitting an offer. The evaluation will use Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable (LPTA) factors. A site visit is scheduled for October 30, 2024 and contractors must pre-register to attend. Proposals are due by the time specified and any received after may not be considered.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions 692M15-25-R-00002.docx | DOCX document | |
| SIR S-76 FINAL.pdf | ||
| Attachment 01- SOW S76 Visual System FINAL.pdf | ||
| Attachment 02 - Corporate Experience Form.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attahcment 04- Terms and Condidtions.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 03 – Past Performance Questionnaire
RFP 692M15-25-R-00002
S-76D Cockpit Simulator Page 1 / 2
Attachment 03 – Past Performance Questionnaire
RFP 692M15-25-R-00002
S-76D Cockpit Simulator Page 2 / 2
Page 2 / 2
Reference Information: Provide the following information for the organization that performed the referenced work:
Part A. Contract Summary
Contractor Name
Contract Number
Street
Contract Type
City
Competitive
State
Zip Code
| Follow-on |
| Yes |
| No |
Telephone # email
| Performed work as (select 1) |
| Prime |
Subcontractor Period of Performance
| Contract Cost Data |
| Estimated Cost |
| Fee |
| Total Value |
| Initial Contract Cost |
| $ |
| Current Contract Cost |
| $ |
Subcontractors:
Product Description and/or Services Provided
Part B. Performance Evaluation of Contract
| Evaluation Elements |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
Quality of Service
Schedule
Cost Control
Management (including business, subcontract, program, personnel management)
Overall Evaluation
Remarks on exceptional performance. Provide data supporting this observation. [Continue on separate sheet(s) if needed.]
Remarks on unsatisfactory performance. Provide data supporting the observation. [Continue on separate sheet(s) if needed.]
Part C. Identification of Evaluator
Name
Organization
Phone #
Title
Date
| NOTE: If verbal telephonic response received, complete the following |
| Information obtained by |
Evaluator Signature:
Evaluation Ratings Guidance
| Rating |
| Contract Requirements |
| Problems |
| Corrective Actions |
| Exceptional |
| Exceeds many |
| Couple minor |
| Highly effective |
| Very Good |
| Exceeds some |
| Few minor |
| Effective |
| Satisfactory |
| Meets all |
| Several minor |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Does not meet some – Govt impact |
| Serious, recovery still possible |
| Marginally effective, not fully implemented |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Does not meet most – Govt impact |
| Serious, recovery not likely |
| Ineffective |
NOTE: THIS INFORMATION WILL BE KEPT CONFIDENTIAL
PPQ must not exceed three (3) pages (including any supporting data provided on a separate sheet, if needed)
Version 21.0 1 of 2
Version 21.0 2 of 2 image1.emf
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .