Attachment 02 - Performance Assessment Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 249 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Fort Campbell Construction Services Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W91248-23-R-0001
About this file
This document contains a past performance assessment questionnaire and details of a federal construction services multiple award task order contract opportunity. The U.S. Army Mission and Installation Contracting Command at Fort Campbell is seeking past performance evaluations of offerors as part of a competitive source selection for a multiple award indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity construction services contract. Offerors are required to provide information on relevant past federal, state or local government contracts. Point of contact respondents will evaluate offerors based on compliance, project management, timeliness, cost control, customer satisfaction and other criteria. Evaluations are due within 15 days of receipt or before the proposal due date, whichever occurs first. The construction services MATOC opportunity is for maintenance, repair and new construction projects at Fort Campbell, Kentucky over a broad range of trades such as carpentry, electrical and HVAC. Awarded contractors will compete for task orders which will be issued by the contracting officer. The contractor must provide all necessary management, labor, materials, tools and equipment to complete construction services tasks.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachement 03 W91248-23-R-0001 - Questions and Answers_10 May 2023.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachement 03 W91248-23-R-0001 - Questions and Answers_05 May 2023.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| W91248-23-R-0001 Amendment0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment 01 - FTCKY HAZMAT Inventory Form.pdf | ||
| Technical Exhibit B - Submittal Register Form.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| W91248-23-R-0001.pdf | ||
| Technical Exhibit A - CDRLs A001 - A011 03Apr2023.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
U.S. ARMY MISSION AND INSTALLATION CONTRACTING
COMMAND 922ND CONTRACTING BATTALION
6923 38TH & DESERT STORM
FORT CAMPBELL, KY 42223-5355
Attachment 02
13 April 2023
SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal
(RFP) W91248-23-R-0001
Dear Sir/Ma’am, The US Army Mission and Installation Contracting Command – Fort Campbell
(MICC-Fort Campbell) is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on same or similar federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification System [NAICS] 236220. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.
Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation.
Please complete the enclosure and return to MICC-Fort Campbell, 6923 38th Street and Desert Storm Avenue, Fort Campbell, KY 42223, no later than 15 days after receipt of request or before the due date for receipt of proposals, whichever occurs first. Submit your completed quest to Evan.M.Rea.civ@army.mil and eric.c.boston.civ@army.mil.
Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to the undersigned at eric.c.boston.civ@army.mil.
Sincerely, ERIC C. BOSTON
Contracting Officer mailto:eric.c.boston.civ@army.mil mailto:eric.c.boston.civ@army.mil
Performance Assessment Questionnaire
Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does (and/or) notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.
Rating Definitions:
Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.
Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.
Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.
No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
Total Contract Value:
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.
Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence
Rationale:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
Comments:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
Point of Contact (Name):
Telephone Number:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire to the individuals identified in the cover letter.
Thank you for your assistance.
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
| Rating Definitions: |
| PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror) |
| PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) |
| PART III. RETURN INFORMATION |
| 2023-04-13T15:51:21-0500 | |
| BOSTON.ERIC.CHRISTOPHER.1178183032 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .