Attachment_004_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Solicitation No. 140P5424R0013

Please Complete this Questionnaire and Email to Christian_Sanabria@nps.gov

We are currently preparing our proposal for the National Park Service, Contracting Operations East, Solicitation Number: 140P5424R0013 for Replacing Fellers’ Boathouse Dock located within Canaveral National Seashore. As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency or company under the previous or ongoing contract listed below.

Your input on our performance is therefore requested.

This Questionnaire is due to Christian Sanabria no later than 04:00 PM EST on May 20, 2024. The Questionnaire must be submitted directly to the Contracting Officer from a corporate or government email account.

If you will unavailable on May 20, 2024, for verification (if necessary) of this past performance evaluation, please indicate another point of contact (POC) for the Contracting Officer to contact.

Thank you.

Alternate POC:

Alternate POC Phone Number:

Alternate POC Email Address:

NAME OF OFFEROR:

PHONE:

EMAIL:

CURRENT OR HISTORICAL CONTRACT INFORMATION

CONTRACT REFERENCED

Contract or Identifying Number:

Contract Value:

Period of Performance:

Brief Description:

Name of Person Completing Questionnaire:

Agency / Company:

Title:

Phone:

Email:

EVALUATION

Please rate the contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.

Evaluation Definitions: The following definitions should be used in assessing Contractor performance.

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

5BEXCEPTIONAL

Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.

0BVERY GOOD

Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.

1BSATISFACTORY

Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

2BMARGINAL

Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.

3BUNSATISFACTORY

Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

4BNOT APPLICABLE

(N/A)

Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation.

Unable to provide assessment.

QUESTION 1: PERFORMANCE

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?

Exceptional Very

Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory 6BN/A

Performance

Comments, if any.

QUESTIONS 2 AND 3: TIMELINESS

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide products timely?

Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory 7BN/A

Timeliness

Ability to Resolve Timeliness Problems

QUESTION 4: QUALITY OF WORK

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet requirements of tasks and the overall quality of the work?

Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Quality of Shipments

QUESTION 5: OVERALL RATING OF CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

General Comments: