Attachment 001-Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 73 KB Posted

Attached to
Fine Art Conservation IDIQ
Solicitation number
W912CH-24-R-L001
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire related to a federal contract opportunity for Fine Arts Conservation Services (Solicitation Number W912CH-24-R-L001).

The key details are:

  • The U.S. Army Contracting Command - Detroit Arsenal (ACC-DTA) intends to competitively award a new Firm Fixed Price (FFP), Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contract for professional fine art conservation services, under a Total Small Business Set-Aside. The contract is to support the U.S. Army Center of Military History (CMH) and Army Museum Enterprise (AME) System.
  • The contract will consist of three 12-month ordering periods. The guaranteed minimum will be obligated in the first Task Order of Ordering Year One.
  • The Past Performance Questionnaire requests the respondent's assessment of the contractor's ability to provide conservation treatment, material analysis, and reporting for historical works of art, as well as the contractor's project schedule management and business relations. Responses are due by 17 May 2024.
  • All questions related to this Request For Proposal (RFP) must be submitted in writing no later than 27 April 2024, with Q&As to be posted to SAM.gov by 07 May 2024.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Solicitation Questions and Answers.docx DOCX document
CDRL A001-A004.pdf PDF
Attachment 002-Pricing Workbook.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CDRLs A005-A008.pdf PDF
W912CH-24-R-L001 - Solicitation.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 003: Past Performance Questionnaire

W912CH-24-R-L001 Fine Arts Conservation Services

Please provide your candid response to the following questions. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore it is important that your information be as factual and accurate as possible. If you do not have the appropriate knowledge with the company in question, please forward this questionnaire to the person who does. Upon completion of this questionnaire, please forward by electronic email to Ms. Asoma Al Najjar, asoma.a.alnajjar.civ@army.mil by 17 May 2024. Thank you for your assistance.

PART I - IDENTIFICATION (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. RELEVANT CONTRACT

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract/Task Order Number:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Contract Period of Performance End Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion:

Place of Performance:

Brief Description of the Relevant Contract Scope:

B. OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

FAX Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II - EVALUATION (To be completed by Respondent’s Point of Contact)

RATING SCALE & DEFINITIONS

Table 1 identifies the rating scale and descriptions. Please apply the rating that most closely matches your assessment for each area of consideration listed below. Please include a written narrative for each rating applied, utilizing the adjectival rating definition in Table 1 on the following page.

Table 1

A. Quality:

1. Assess the contractor’s ability to: Provide conservation treatment of historical works of art.

|_| Exceptional |_| Very Good |_| Satisfactory |_| Marginal |_| Unsatisfactory |_| Too soon to tell |_| Not Applicable

Comments:

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault (e.g. mostly attributable to contractor, evenly attributable to contractor and customer/end user, only somewhat attributable to contractor) and your assessment of the extent to which customer/end user was at fault (e.g. changes to the specification requirements, unrealistic or ambiguous specification requirements, etc.) or other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor.

2. Assess the contractor’s ability to: Provide material analysis for historical works of art and the impact to the treatment proposal based on the data acquired from the analysis.

|_| Exceptional |_| Very Good |_| Satisfactory |_| Marginal |_| Unsatisfactory |_| Too soon to tell |_| Not Applicable

Comments:

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault (e.g. mostly attributable to contractor, evenly attributable to contractor and customer/end user, only somewhat attributable to contractor) and your assessment of the extent to which customer/end user was at fault (e.g. changes to the specification requirements, unrealistic or ambiguous specification requirements, etc.) or other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor.

3. Assess the contractor’s ability to: Conduct conservation treatment to chemically and physically stabilize the artifact and to produce a conservation report, with accompanying photographs, identifying actions and materials used in the conservation.

|_| Exceptional |_| Very Good |_| Satisfactory |_| Marginal |_| Unsatisfactory |_| Too soon to tell |_| Not Applicable

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault (e.g. mostly attributable to contractor, evenly attributable to contractor and customer/end user, only somewhat attributable to contractor) and your assessment of the extent to which customer/end user was at fault (e.g. changes to the specification requirements, unrealistic or ambiguous specification requirements, etc.) or other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor.

B. Project Schedule:

Assess the Contractor ability to manage multiple projects and meet contractual schedules: To what extent did the contractor adhere to the delivery schedules, on an overall basis?

|_| Exceptional |_| Very Good |_| Satisfactory |_| Marginal |_| Unsatisfactory |_| Too soon to tell |_| Not Applicable

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault (e.g. mostly attributable to contractor, evenly attributable to contractor and customer/end user, only somewhat attributable to contractor) and your assessment of the extent to which customer/end user was at fault (e.g. changes to the specification requirements, unrealistic or ambiguous specification requirements, etc.) or other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor.

C. Management / Business Relations:

Assess the contractor’s ability to effectively manage the Program (to include subcontractors). To what extent was the contractor effective in managing the Program, on an overall basis?

|_| Exceptional |_| Very Good |_| Satisfactory |_| Marginal |_| Unsatisfactory |_| Too soon to tell |_| Not Applicable

Comments:

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault (e.g. mostly attributable to contractor, evenly attributable to contractor and customer/end user, only somewhat attributable to contractor) and your assessment of the extent to which customer/end user was at fault (e.g. changes to the specification requirements, unrealistic or ambiguous specification requirements, etc.) or other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor.

D. General Comments:

Any additional information, which your organization deems relevant or important, is welcome by our evaluation team. Please provide any other relevant or important performance information.

PART III - RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION

Please provide a point of contact who compiled or completed this questionnaire and who, if needed, may be contacted by our evaluation team regarding the information provided in this questionnaire.

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

image1.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .