Attachment_0005__Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 198 KB Posted

Attached to
Visitor Center Rehabilitation for Russell Cave Nat
Solicitation number
140P5122R0008
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a contractor bidding on the Gilbert H. Grosvenor Visitor Center Rehabilitation project at Russell Cave National Monument in Bridgeport, Alabama. The National Park Service Southeast Region is soliciting bids under solicitation number 140P5122R0008 to rehabilitate the visitor center. The past performance questionnaire requests a reference to evaluate the contractor's performance on criteria such as meeting requirements, schedule, price, timeliness, and quality of work for a previous contract. The reference is asked to rate the contractor as exceptional, very good, satisfactory, marginal, or unsatisfactory in these areas. Explanatory comments are also requested.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFQ #140P5122R0008 - Attachment 0005

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Solicitation#140P5122R0008 Please complete this Questionnaire and Submit with your Proposal

We are currently in the process of preparing our proposal for the National Park Service, Interior Region 2 South Atlantic Gulf, Solicitation Number: 140P5122R0008 for the Gilbert H. Grosvenor Visitor Center Rehabilitation at the Russell Cave National Monument, Fort Payne, Alabama. As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency under the previous/current contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.

Please complete this Questionnaire and submit with your proposal

Questionnaire is due to prior to the closing of RFP #140P5122R0008.

Alternate POC name:

Alternate POC phone number:

Alternate POC e-mail address:

Thank you.

* NAME OF OFFEROR:

Phone: ________________________ Fax: _____________________

E-Mail: _______________________

I. Current or Historical Contract Information

CONTRACT REFERENCED:

1. Contract or Identifying Number:

2. Contract Value:

3. Period of Performance:

4. Brief description of items provided:

5. Name of Person Completing Questionnaire:

Agency/Company:

Title: Phone:

E-mail:

mailto:Please%20complete%20this%20Questionnaire%20and%20e-mail%20to%20edward_dingle@nps.gov mailto:Please%20complete%20this%20Questionnaire%20and%20e-mail%20to%20Contracting%20Officer,%20e-mail:%20edward_dingle@nps.gov

II. EVALUATION. Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.

Evaluation Definitions –

The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.

VERY GOOD

Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

MARGINAL

Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment.

Past Performance Evaluation

Question 1. Performance

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Performance

Comments, if any.

Questions 2 and 3. Timeliness

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide products in a timely manner?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Timeliness Ability to Resolve Timeliness Problems

Comments, if any.

Question 4. Quality of Work

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet requirements of tasks and the overall quality of the work?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A Quality of Shipments

Comments, if any.

Question 5. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance

What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

General Comments:

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
I. Current or Historical Contract Information CONTRACT REFERENCED:
II. EVALUATION. Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.
Past Performance Evaluation Question 1. Performance
Questions 2 and 3. Timeliness
Question 4. Quality of Work
Question 5. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance
General Comments:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .