Attach. 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).pdf

PDF 671 KB Posted

Attached to
Direct Procurement Method (DPM) Sch I, II, III Services
Solicitation number
FA462026QA219
Issued by

About this file

This is a Present/Past Performance Questionnaire for FY26 DPM Schedule I, II & III services at Fairchild Air Force Base, Washington under solicitation number FA462026QA219. The questionnaire is designed to solicit feedback from current or past customers regarding contractor performance on related contracts. Responses must be submitted by 30 June 2026 at 1:00 PM Pacific Time to the contracting officers Paul Blais (paul.blais@us.af.mil or 509-247-4864) and A1C Angelo Bolanos (angelo.bolanos@us.af.mil or 509-247-2237), either electronically or by mail to 92 CONS/PKA, 110 W. Ent St, Building 2451, Suite 200, Fairchild AFB WA 99011.

The questionnaire requires respondent and contractor information including contract details, award amounts, and scope of work performed. Evaluation criteria are assessed on a five-point rating scale (Unsatisfactory, Marginal, Satisfactory, Very Good, Exceptional) covering eight performance areas: personnel adequacy relative to the Performance Work Statement, employee knowledge and experience, performance of assigned duties, timely correction of deficiencies and customer complaints, responsiveness to contract changes, overall performance, maintenance of professional business relationships, and effectiveness in resolving contract issues. The form also requests yes/no responses regarding issuance of Contract Discrepancy Reports, cure or show cause notices, and future contract award recommendations, with space for detailed comments on each evaluation criterion.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attach 4 Air Force Specific Terms and Conditions.pdf PDF
Attach 2 - Price Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attach 1 - Performance Work Statement.pdf PDF
26QA219 COMBO.pdf PDF
Attach 3 - WD 2015-5537 (Rev 28).pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

FY26 DPM Schedule I, II & III

FAIRCHILD AFB, WA

SOLICITATION NO: FA462026QA219

1. Your assistance is respectfully requested in providing information on the below present/past performance questionnaire. The importance of your opinion cannot be overstated since this survey will measure the present/past performance of each prospective offeror for providing DPM Schedule I, II & III at Fairchild AFB, WA.

2. INSTRUCTIONS FORM COMPLETION: Please fill this questionnaire in by hand or electronically and email the results to the Contracting Officer(s), Paul Blais, at paul.blais@us.af.mil and A1C Angelo Bolanos at angelo.bolanos@us.af.mil. Email submissions are preferred but you can also return by mail to the following address:

92 CONS/PKA

Attn: AlC Angelo Bolanos and Mr. Paul Blais 110 W. Ent St Bldg. 2451, Suite 200 Fairchild AFB WA 99011

3. Please direct questions to Paul Blais at paul.blais@us.af.mil or (509) 247-4864 and A1C Angelo Bolanos at angelo.bolanos@us.af.mil or (509) 247-2237. Your participation is greatly appreciated.

4. PLEASE RETURN NO LATER THAN: 30 June 2026, at 1:00 PM (Pacific Time)

Section A: Contractor Information.

Contractor’s name and address:

a. Point of Contact:

b. Phone #:

c. Contract Number:

d. Project Title:

e. Period of Performance:

SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION

a. Respondent’s name and address:

Organization: _ Address:

City: _ State: _ Zip: _

b. Respondent’s Name and Title:

c. Signature:

d. Commercial Phone #: DSN Phone #:

Fax #: E-Mail:

e. Contract Type (i.e.: Firm Fixed Price):

f. Award Amount: $ Final Amount: $

g. What was the job title(s) for this project?

FA462026QA219 – FY26 DPM

Attach. 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

Pg 1 of 3 mailto:paul.blais@us.af.mil mailto:angelo.bolanos@us.af.mil mailto:angelo.bolanos@us.af.mil

What were the scope and major functions performed under this contract?

For any ratings less than satisfactory rating, please provide explanation in Remarks section below.

1 2 3 4 5 Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very

Good Exceptional

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit.

The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

CONTRACTOR PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

1. How effective was the contractor at having adequate personnel to meet the requirement of the Performance Work Statement?

5. 4. ____3. ____2. ____1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

2. Were the contract employees knowledgeable and experienced in their position?

5. 4. ____3. ____2. ____1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

3 How well did contract personnel perform assigned duties?

5. 4. ____3. ____2. ____1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

4. How well did the contractor correct deficiencies and valid customer complaints in a timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures?

5. 4. ____3. ____2. ____1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

FA462026QA219 – FY26 DPM

Attach. 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

Pg 2 of 3

5.Was the contractor responsive to contract changes?

5. 4. 3. 2. 1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

6. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?

5. 4. ____3. ____2. ____1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

7. How effective was the contractor in maintaining professional business relationships with customers and in resolving contract issues?

5. 4. 3. 2. 1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

8. Were Contract Discrepancy Reports (CDR) issued, Yes/No ____ Were they addressed appropriately? Yes/No ______ If so, how?

9. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?

Yes/No ___

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

10. Would you award another contract to this contractor? Yes/No ____ Please explain in "comments/remarks”.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

FA462026QA219 – FY26 DPM

Attach. 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

Pg 3 of 3

SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .