Attach 5 HAZMAT Surveys 14 Buildings 5Aug24.pdf

August 5, 2024

Hazardous Materials Surveys

14 Buildings

Demolition of Programmatic Agreement Phase I Buildings Beltsville Agricultural Research Center (BARC)

Beltsville, MD

Building Document and No of Pages Location of Pages in this Document

Hazardous Materials Assessment Report 343 Pages

Pages 2-344

Hazardous Materials Assessment Report 333 Pages

Pages 345-677

Hazardous Materials Assessment 3 Pages

Pages 678-680

Pages 681-683

Pages 684-686

Pages 687-689

6 Pages

Pages 690-695

085A

Pages 696-698

166A

2 Pages

Pages 699-700

541C

Pages 701-702

541D

Pages 703-705

Pages 706-707

Pages 708-709

Pages 710-712

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

ASSESSMENT REPORT

BELTSVILLE AGRICULTURAL

RESEARCH CENTER (BARC)

BUILDING-009

CONTRACT AG-32SD-C-15-0011 /

AG-32SC-D-16-0226

Prepared for:

U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service 5601 Sunnyside Avenue Beltsville, Maryland 20705

April 2017

12420 Milestone Center Drive, Suite 150 Germantown, Maryland 20876

This page is intentionally left blank

Hazardous Materials Survey Report

BELTSVILLE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CENTER (BARC), BUILDING-009

Contract AG-32SD-C-15-0011 / AG-32SC-D-16-0226 i

Table of Contents

Executive Summary ................................................................................................. ES-1

1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1-1

1.1 Objective ..................................................................................................................... 1-1

1.2 Scope of Services........................................................................................................ 1-1

1.3 Limiting Conditions ...................................................................................................... 1-2

1.4 Limitations of the Assessment .................................................................................... 1-2

2.0 Site Description ................................................................................................. 2-1

3.0 Methodology .................................................................................................... 3-1

3.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials Survey Methodology ............................................ 3-1

3.1.1 Sampling ............................................................................................................... 3-1

3.1.2 Laboratory Analysis ............................................................................................. 3-2

3.2 Lead-Containing Materials Survey Methodology .................................................. 3-2

3.3 Other Hazardous Materials ........................................................................................ 3-2

3.4 Subsurface Conditions ............................................................................................... 3-3

4.0 Results ................................................................................................................ 4-1

4.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials ................................................................................. 4-1

4.2 Lead-Containing Materials ........................................................................................ 4-2

4.3 Other Hazardous Materials ........................................................................................ 4-2

4.4 Subsurface Conditions ............................................................................................... 4-3

5.0 Conclusions ...................................................................................................... 5-1

5.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials ................................................................................. 5-1

5.2 Lead-Containing Materials ........................................................................................ 5-2

5.3 Other Hazardous Materials ........................................................................................ 5-3

5.4 Subsurface Conditions ............................................................................................... 5-3

6.0 References ........................................................................................................ 6-1

Contract AG-32SD-C-15-0011 / AG-32SC-D-16-0226 ii

Tables Table 1 Suspect Asbestos-Containing Materials Inventory and Sample Results

Table 2 Asbestos-Containing Materials and Assumed Asbestos-Containing Materials

Table 3 Suspect Lead-Containing Materials Inventory and Testing Results

Table 4 Other Hazardous Materials

Figures Figure 1 Site Location Map

Figure 2 Site Plan

Figure 3 Suspect Asbestos-Containing Material Sample Locations – First Floor

Figure 4 Suspect Asbestos-Containing Material Sample Locations – Exterior, Basement, and Attic

Figure 5 Suspect Lead-Containing Material Sample Locations – First Floor

Figure 6 Asbestos-Containing Material Location Plan – First Floor

Figure 7 Asbestos-Containing Material Location Plan – Exterior, Basement, and Attic

Appendices Appendix A Bulk Suspect Asbestos-Containing Materials Analytical Results and

Sample Chains of Custody

Appendix B Suspect Lead-Containing Materials Analytical Results and Sample Chains of Custody

Appendix C Asbestos and Lead Inspector Credentials

Appendix D Laboratory Accreditations

Appendix E Environmental Database Review

Contract AG-32SD-C-15-0011 / AG-32SC-D-16-0226

ES-1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

AECOM was retained by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (USDA ARS) to perform a hazardous materials survey of the Beltsville Agricultural Research Center (BARC) Building-009 located in Beltsville, Maryland. This survey was performed as part of USDA Contract Number AG-32SD-C-15-0011 / AG-32SC-D-16-0226, NEPA Predesign and Hazmat Services.

Building-009, also known as the “Range 3 Headhouse,” was constructed in 1943 as a one-story, 19,577-square foot building with brick exterior walls, an attic, and a dirt floor basement. The subject building was reportedly used as an experimental greenhouse and associated laboratory, an office space, and a potting space from the date of construction until it was vacated in 2009.

The purpose of this survey was to identify the presence of asbestos-containing material (ACM), lead-containing material (LCM), and other hazardous materials within areas that would be impacted by the planned demolition of Building-009. Additionally, a literature/data review and field survey were performed concerning the historic use and potential presence of underground storage tanks (USTs), aboveground storage tanks (ASTs), and hazardous materials and substances at or in the vicinity (i.e., within a 50-foot buffer) of Building-009 to evaluate the potential for subsurface environmental conditions.

The hazardous materials survey of Building-009 was conducted on November 28, 2016 by AECOM staff who are accredited Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) asbestos inspectors. One of the AECOM staff members is also a State of Maryland and U.S. EPA-accredited lead inspector.

ACM is defined by the U.S. EPA as any material containing greater than 1% asbestos.

ACM identified (>1%) within Building-009 include:

• Red Mounting Block for Westinghouse Safety Switch

• Black Cementitious Wall Panel Hanger

• Black Electrical Mounting Block for Square D Safety Switch

• White Cloth Vibration Damper

• Black Seam Sealant for Metal Roof Flashing

The following materials contained trace amounts (< 1%) of asbestos and are not considered ACM under U.S. EPA or State of Maryland regulations1:

• Joint Compound

• Drywall System

1 The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) considers any amount of asbestos fibers released during disturbance of a building material a potential worker exposure hazard.

Contract AG-32SD-C-15-0011 / AG-32SC-D-16-0226

ES-2

The following materials were assumed to contain asbestos and are considered ACM for removal design purposes (i.e., to be protective of occupational health)2:

• Pipe Gaskets

• Roof Layers

All of the paint chip samples collected were determined to be LCM in that they contained lead in amounts less than 0.5% by weight. One lead-based paint (LBP) was identified within Building-009 as follows:

• White Coating on Metal Vertical Beam (I-Beam)

LBP is defined by the State of Maryland as a paint or coating containing greater than 0.5% lead by weight when analyzed by flame atomic absorption spectrometry. LBP, when disturbed, may require greater efforts to control occupational exposure than paints containing lower lead concentrations.

The building exterior consisted of a brick façade with no exterior paint observed.

Therefore, the potential for lead concentrations in soils surrounding the building associated with deteriorated paints is unlikely.

Other potentially regulated materials that may require removal prior to demolition or special handling and segregation during demolition that were located within Building- 009 and inventoried as possible hazardous materials included, but was not limited to:

mold-impacted materials, thermostats, fluorescent light tubes, ballasts, and air conditioning equipment. Furthermore, if any floor drains are encountered within the subject building, they should be inspected and possibly sampled to determine if they contain materials that may require special handling prior to demolition. Given that all laboratories used thermometers and it was reportedly common practice up until approximately 2000 to flush mercury down the sink drains when the thermometers broke, all sink traps and hoods should be sampled for mercury prior to demolition.

The environmental regulatory database and document review did not identify any current or former USTs or open/closed leaking underground storage tank (LUST) cases within 50 feet of Building-009. One 194-gallon diesel AST that fuels an emergency generator was observed at the subject building. No evidence of spills or releases was observed within the vicinity of the generator. Given the historical use of the subject building as a greenhouse, the use of pesticides, herbicides, and/or metals may have occurred during research operations; therefore, there is a potential for subsurface contamination associated with historic use of these substances at the building.

However, neither historical documentation nor environmental regulatory databases indicated the use (or release) of these substances at the subject building.

2 Pipe gaskets and roof layers were not sampled during the survey because it was deemed unsafe to do so and/or to avoid causing damage to the structural integrity of the facility. These materials should either be treated as ACM or sampled when they become accessible and prior to disturbance.

Contract AG-32SD-C-15-0011 / AG-32SC-D-16-0226

1-1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Objective

AECOM was retained by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (USDA ARS) to perform a hazardous materials survey of the Beltsville Agricultural Research Center (BARC) Building-009 located in Beltsville, Maryland. This survey was performed as part of USDA Contract Number AG-32SD-C-15-0011 / AG-32SC-D-16-0226, NEPA Predesign and Hazmat Services.

Building-009, also known as the “Range 3 Headhouse,” was constructed in 1943 as a one-story, 19,577-square foot building with brick exterior walls, an attic, and a dirt floor basement. The subject building was reportedly used as an experimental greenhouse and associated laboratory, an office space, and a potting space from the date of construction until it was vacated in 2009.

The objective of this hazardous materials survey is to plan for the demolition of Building- 009 by identifying the locations and quantities of asbestos-containing material (ACM), lead-containing material (LCM), and other hazardous materials found in Building-009 that will require special handling and disposal. In addition, the historic use and potential presence of underground storage tanks (USTs), aboveground storage tanks (ASTs), and hazardous materials and substances was assessed to evaluate the potential for subsurface environmental conditions with the footprint and the immediate vicinity (i.e., within a 50-foot radius) of Building-009.

1.2 Scope of Services

AECOM evaluated existing site conditions relevant to hazardous materials that are, or may be, present in Building-009. Additionally, AECOM inspected Building-009 and the immediate surrounding area for evidence of the presence of current and/or former ASTs and USTs.

The identification of hazardous materials present in the subject building and their proper removal prior to construction (renovation/demolition), or proper management during construction, are required by both Federal and State of Maryland environmental protection and occupational safety and health regulations. Also, the identification of hazardous materials was conducted to avoid schedule delays and claims of unknown or changed conditions during construction. Specifically, AECOM’s services consisted of the following:

• Review of relevant hazardous material documents and other information provided by the USDA ARS at BARC.

• Review of Federal and State of Maryland environmental database records provided by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR), as well as Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) online sources.

• Evaluation of existing conditions in the subject building related to hazardous materials, as well as the presence of current and/or former USTs or ASTs.

Contract AG-32SD-C-15-0011 / AG-32SC-D-16-0226

1-2

• Completion of a hazardous materials survey of the subject building in sufficient scope and detail to allow for the proper identification (and future removal) of materials prior to demolition, or special handling of identified materials during demolition.

• Identification and quantification of ACM and LCM.

• Visual assessment of the presence and quantity of other suspected building hazardous materials.

• Preparation of a report of findings on a room-by-room basis detailing identified hazardous materials and their location, condition, and quantity.

1.3 Limiting Conditions

It is important to note that the bulk samples analyzed in this investigation are considered isolated data points that may not be representative of all conditions across the entire building; therefore, the conclusions of this survey may not be completely indicative of all non-homogeneous building materials. The conclusions described within this report are based on the scope of services completed by AECOM as described herein in accordance with industry standards and practices. No warranty or guarantee is expressed or implied.

Cement, wood, brick, metal(s), foam, rubber, gaskets, glass, fiberglass, and other non-suspect ACM were excluded from sampling and analysis. The survey was confined to the subject building defined in the scope of services.

1.4 Limitations of the Assessment

The conclusions of this hazardous materials survey report are AECOM’s professional opinions, based solely upon site observations and interpretations of analytical data, as described in this report. This report includes tables and figures summarizing survey services, sampling activities, and results. It should be noted that AECOM’s scope of services does not include preparing and submitting required notifications, permit applications, or reports to appropriate State of Maryland or Federal agencies.

The opinions presented herein apply to the site conditions existing at the time of AECOM’s investigation and interpretation of current regulations pertaining to asbestos, lead, and other hazardous materials. Therefore, AECOM’s opinions and recommendations may not apply to future conditions that may exist at the subject building that we have not had the opportunity to evaluate. All applicable State of Maryland and Federal regulations should always be verified prior to any work that will disturb materials containing ACM, assumed ACM, LCM, and other hazardous materials.

Contract AG-32SD-C-15-0011 / AG-32SC-D-16-0226

2-1

2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION

Building-009 is located at the intersection of 3rd Drive and Range 3 Drive at BARC in Beltsville, Maryland (subject building). A site location map and site plan are included as Figures 1 and 2. According to the Beltsville Agricultural Research Center 1996 Master Plan Update, Master Plan Report, dated September 1996, Building-009, also known as the “Range 3 Headhouse,” was constructed in 1943 as a one-story, 19,577-square foot building with brick exterior walls, an attic, and a dirt floor basement. According to information obtained from Real Property representative Lisa Bynum, the subject building was used as an experimental greenhouse and associated laboratory, an office space, and a potting space from the date of construction until it was vacated in 2009. Six greenhouses that were formerly connected to the building have been removed.

Greenhouses 1, 2, and 3 were demolished in 2001, and Greenhouses 4, 5, and 6 were demolished in 1998. Vines have overgrown portions of the building and the structure was observed to be in poor/fair condition.

Contract AG-32SD-C-15-0011 / AG-32SC-D-16-0226

2-2

Contract AG-32SD-C-15-0011 / AG-32SC-D-16-0226

3-1

3.0 METHODOLOGY

The hazardous materials survey of the subject building was conducted on November 28, 2016 by the following AECOM staff members, who are accredited State of Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.

EPA) Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) asbestos inspectors:

• Mr. Ryan Jakubco

• Mr. Steven Hohman

Mr. Ryan Jakubco is also a State of Maryland and U.S. EPA-accredited lead inspector.

3.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials Survey Methodology

Buildings scheduled to undergo demolition or renovation are required to be inspected for ACM prior to the beginning of these activities, according to the U.S. EPA National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) Regulations (40 CFR Part 61 Subpart M). In accordance with the Asbestos School Hazard Abatement Reauthorization Act (ASHARA), AECOM’s AHERA-accredited asbestos inspectors performed the NESHAP asbestos survey by implementing survey protocols outlined in AHERA (40 CFR 763 Subpart E).

The ACM survey was conducted to identify the locations and quantities of friable and non-friable ACM. A walk-through of Building-009 was first conducted to develop an inventory of materials that could be grouped into the same category (i.e., homogeneous area) based on their color and texture. Samples were then collected from each homogeneous area in accordance with the sampling protocol in AHERA (40 CFR 763 Subpart E). It should be noted that materials containing trace amounts (< 1%) of asbestos are not considered ACM under AHERA, NESHAP, or State of Maryland regulations. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) does not define an ACM, but considers any amount of asbestos fibers released during disturbance of a building material to be a potential worker exposure hazard.

A brief description of the requirements of this methodology is included below. Certain materials were assumed to contain asbestos and are considered ACM for removal design purposes to be protective of occupational health. These materials were not sampled during the survey because it was deemed unsafe to do so and/or to avoid causing damage to the structural integrity of the facility. These materials should either be treated as ACM or sampled when they become accessible and prior to disturbance.

3.1.1 Sampling

AECOM sampled suspect ACM by implementing AHERA protocols. The inspectors collected bulk samples by utilizing appropriate sampling techniques to reduce airborne fiber generation and cross-contamination. Sampled areas were sealed with duct tape, caulking, or other material to reduce the potential for subsequent fiber release. Each bulk sample was placed in a disposable, re-sealable plastic bag and labeled with a unique sample identifier. Suspect ACM sample locations were recorded on drawings

Contract AG-32SD-C-15-0011 / AG-32SC-D-16-0226

3-2 and labeled with the corresponding sample number. ACM sample location diagrams are included as Figures 3 and 4 within this report.

Sample identification information was recorded on a Chain of Custody (COC) form.

Bulk samples and completed COCs were shipped to the laboratory for analysis.

3.1.2 Laboratory Analysis

All asbestos bulk samples and completed COCs were delivered to AmeriSci Richmond located in Midlothian, Virginia for asbestos analysis. This laboratory participates in the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP), a quality assurance/quality control program administered by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) for laboratories performing asbestos bulk sample analysis.

Samples were analyzed by polarized light microscopy (PLM) via U.S. EPA Method 600/R- 93/116 per 40 CFR 763 (National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) Lab Code 101904-0). Samples reported by the laboratory to contain greater than 1% asbestos are reported as ACM.

3.2 Lead-Containing Materials Survey Methodology

The LCM survey was conducted to identify the locations of damaged lead-containing coatings within Building-009 that might be impacted by the planned renovation/demolition activities. The State of Maryland defines lead-based paint (LBP) as a paint or coating containing greater than 0.7 milligrams per square centimeter (mg/cm2) lead when measured by x-ray fluorescence (XRF), which is more stringent than the U.S. EPA definition (i.e., greater than or equal to 1.0 mg/cm2 lead when measured by XRF). Both the State of Maryland and U.S. EPA also define LBP as a paint or coating containing greater than 0.5% lead by weight when tested by flame atomic absorption spectrometry [AAS]. However, since OSHA regulations consider any amount of lead to be a potential worker exposure hazard, for the purposes of this survey, LCM is defined as a paint or surface coating with detectable lead concentrations by XRF or flame AAS.

Testing for LCM was conducted by collecting paint chip samples. An LCM sample location diagram is included as Figure 5.

Sample identification information was recorded on COCs. Bulk samples and completed COCs were shipped to AmeriSci Richmond and forwarded to Environmental Hazard Services, LLC in Richmond, Virginia for analysis by flame AAS.

3.3 Other Hazardous Materials

AECOM visually surveyed Building-009 for the presence of other potentially regulated materials that would require removal prior to demolition, or special handling and segregation during demolition, referred to as “other hazardous materials.” These materials include light ballasts, liquid-filled capacitors and transformers, ozone-depleting substances (ODS), fluorescent light tubes, mold, emergency light equipment, fire-suppression systems, equipment potentially containing low-level radioactive materials (e.g., smoke detectors, exit signs), and stored chemicals. Materials of concern potentially include: mercury-containing equipment (e.g., thermostats, thermometers, Contract AG-32SD-C-15-0011 / AG-32SC-D-16-0226

3-3 gauges), polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) ballasts and electrical equipment, low-level radioactive building materials, USTs, ASTs, batteries, large volumes of avian excreta, and

ODS.

3.4 Subsurface Conditions

The historic use and potential presence of USTs, ASTs, hazardous materials and substances of concern were evaluated to determine the potential for subsurface environmental conditions within the footprint and immediate surrounding area (i.e., within a 50-foot radius) of Building-009. AECOM reviewed the Federal, State, and local database list search provided by EDR, included as Appendix E; the BARC Online Superfund Database;

MDE Open and Closed Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) cases databases; and BARC-provided documents. AECOM also interviewed BARC Real Property representative Lisa Bynum, who provided information regarding the historic use of the subject building.

Finally, the subject building was surveyed for evidence (i.e., fill ports or vent lines) of the presence of current and/or former USTs and ASTs during AECOM’s field survey.

Contract AG-32SD-C-15-0011 / AG-32SC-D-16-0226

3-4

Contract AG-32SD-C-15-0011 / AG-32SC-D-16-0226

4-1

4.0 RESULTS

4.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

During the asbestos sampling event, AECOM collected 63 bulk samples from 25 suspect homogeneous areas in Building-009. Samples were analyzed by PLM. Based on laboratory analysis, the following suspect materials identified within the subject building are classified as ACM (>1% asbestos):

Material Description Location Condition Estimated Quantity3

Red Mounting Block for Westinghouse Safety Switch

Headhouse #1, #2, & #3 Corridor Good 4.5 SF

Black Cementitious Wall Panel Hanger Headhouse #2 Laboratory 1 Good 4 SF

Black Electrical Mounting Block for Square D Safety Switch

Headhouse #4 & #6 Corridors Fair 2 SF

White Cloth Vibration Damper Attic Good 1 EA

Black Seam Sealant for Metal Roof Flashing Roof Good 500 LF

The following materials contained trace amounts (< 1%) of asbestos and are not considered ACM under the U.S. EPA and State of Maryland regulations; however, OSHA regulations must be followed during disturbance of these materials:

Material Description Location Condition Estimated Quantity

Joint Compound Various Laboratories Good 3,847 SF

Drywall System Various Laboratories Good 3,847 SF

The following materials were assumed to contain asbestos and are considered ACM for removal design purposes to be protective of occupational health:

Material Description Location Condition Estimated Quantity

Pipe Gaskets Basement Good 53 EA

Roof Layers Roof Good 16,000 SF

3 Estimated quantities of materials are indicated in various units, as applicable. These include: square feet (SF), linear feet (LF), and per structural item, indicated as “EA.”

Contract AG-32SD-C-15-0011 / AG-32SC-D-16-0226

4-2

Table 1 provides an inventory of suspect ACM. This table includes sample identifications, sample locations, material descriptions, and analytical results. Table 2 provides a summary of ACM and assumed ACM. Suspect ACM Sample Location plans are included as Figures 3 and 4, and ACM Location plans are included as Figures 6 and 7.

The laboratory analytical reports and COCs are provided in Appendix A; the State of Maryland and U.S. EPA AHERA-accredited inspector credentials of AECOM’s inspectors who conducted the survey are provided in Appendix C; and laboratory accreditations are provided in Appendix D.

4.2 Lead-Containing Materials

During the LCM survey of Building-009, AECOM collected 13 bulk samples. The testing combinations represented by individual testing locations are assumed to be representative of similar paint color, substrate, and component in other portions of Building-009. All samples were determined to be LCM in that they contained detectable concentrations of lead; however, only one of the bulk sample testing combinations was determined to be LBP4 as follows:

• White Coating on Metal Vertical Beam (I-Beam)

The lead concentrations of all testing combinations and locations are presented in Table 3.

The laboratory analytical reports and COCs are provided in Appendix B. Copies of the State of Maryland and U.S. EPA lead inspector accreditations for AECOM personnel are provided in Appendix C. Laboratory accreditations are provided in Appendix D.

4.3 Other Hazardous Materials

Other components located within Building-009 and inventoried as possible hazardous materials included the following:

• Fluorescent light tubes and pressure gauges that may contain mercury.

• Light ballasts and sodium vapor lights that may contain PCBs, as well as di-2-ethylhexylphthalate-containing components.

• Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) equipment that may contain

ODS.

• Mold-impacted building materials that include pipe insulation and wall board.

• Various equipment that may contain petroleum liquids.

• Insecticide containing 10% vapona (regulated substance).

A list of this equipment, estimated quantities, and locations are provided in Table 4.

4 Both the State of Maryland and U.S. EPA define LBP as a paint or coating containing greater than 0.5% lead by weight when tested by flame AAS.

Contract AG-32SD-C-15-0011 / AG-32SC-D-16-0226

4-3

4.4 Subsurface Conditions

As a result of environmental concerns identified during prior on-site investigations, BARC was added to the Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) in 1994, with potential environmental Areas of Concern (AOCs) identified throughout the research center. The subject building and surrounding area (within 50 feet of the building) are not located within an AOC.

The environmental regulatory database and document review did not identify any current or former USTs or open/closed LUST cases within 50 feet of Building-009.

According to BARC’s Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan, dated August 24, 2015, one 194-gallon diesel AST that fuels an emergency generator is present at the subject building. The emergency generator and associated AST were observed during AECOM’s field survey. No evidence of spills or releases was observed within the vicinity of the generator.

No historical documents reviewed indicated the past use of hazardous chemicals within the subject building or the surrounding 50-foot radius aside from the above-mentioned AST. Given the historical use of the subject building as a greenhouse, the use of pesticides, herbicides, and/or metals may have occurred during research operations;

therefore, there is a potential for subsurface contamination associated with historic use of these substances at the building. However, neither historical documentation nor environmental regulatory databases indicated the use or release of these substances at the subject building.

Contract AG-32SD-C-15-0011 / AG-32SC-D-16-0226

4-4

Contract AG-32SD-C-15-0011 / AG-32SC-D-16-0226

5-1

5.0 CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results of the hazardous materials survey conducted by AECOM at BARC Building-009, the following conclusions and recommendations are provided herein.

5.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

ACM was identified in Building-009 as described in Section 4.1 and identified in Tables 1 and 2. Any ACM/assumed ACM that will be disturbed by the planned demolition must be removed prior to disturbance by a trained, qualified, and appropriately licensed asbestos abatement contractor.

It should be noted that certain types of ACMs may remain in place during demolition under NESHAP regulations. These materials, known as Category I non-friable ACMs, have a low probability to release asbestos fibers into the air when standard demolition practices are employed. Category I ACM includes asbestos-containing gaskets, packings, resilient floor coverings, resilient floor covering mastic, and asphalt roofing products containing more than one-percent asbestos. Asphalt roofing products that may contain asbestos include built-up roofing; asphalt-containing single ply membrane systems; asphalt shingles and binders; asphalt-containing underlayment felts; asphalt-containing roof coatings and mastics; and asphalt-containing base flashings.

If a Category I non-friable ACM remains attached to its substrate (e.g., concrete slabs with asbestos-containing mastic), the resulting demolition debris cannot be recycled.

Furthermore, a contractor may not employ burning as a means to demolish a building containing Category I non-friable ACM. In the State of Maryland, Category I non-friable ACMs may be disposed in a construction and demolition (C&D) landfill provided that the landfill accepts such material.

Alternatively, assumed ACM can be tested prior to any planned construction activities.

If an assumed ACM is found not to be an ACM through testing, removal prior to disturbance would not be required. If suspect materials are encountered for which asbestos sampling data are not available, each suspect material shall be sampled prior to disturbance.

Regulations that require the proper testing, handling, removal, transport, and disposal of ACM include:

• U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), Subtitle B – Other Regulations Relating to Transportation (49 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 171, 172, 173, 177, 178, and 180)

• U.S. EPA, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) – Asbestos (40 CFR 61 Subpart M)

• U.S. EPA, Asbestos School Hazard Abatement Reauthorization Act (ASHARA) (40 CFR 763 Appendix C to Subpart E)

• OSHA, Occupational Safety and Health Standards for General Industry, Air Contaminants (29 CFR 1910.1000)

Contract AG-32SD-C-15-0011 / AG-32SC-D-16-0226

5-2

• OSHA, Occupational Safety and Health Standards for General Industry, Asbestos (29 CFR 1910.1001, including Appendices A through I)

• OSHA, Occupational Safety and Health Standards for General Industry, Hazard Communication (29 CFR 1910.1200)

• OSHA, Occupational Safety and Health Standards for Construction, Asbestos (29 CFR 1926.1101, including Appendices A through K)

• Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR) Title 26 Subtitle 11 Section 21 "Control of Asbestos"

5.2 Lead-Containing Materials

All bulk sample testing combinations were determined to be LCM in that they contained detectable concentrations of lead. One LBP was identified within Building- 009 as described in Section 4.2 and identified in Table 3.

It is the responsibility of the construction contractor (the “Contractor”) to ensure that all workers involved with on-site activities are properly trained to work with LCM and adequate controls are provided to protect workers from lead exposure.

The Contractor must minimize possible lead in dust exposure from paint, tile, and other finished surfaces during demolition activities. Removal of building components may be preferable to paint or coating removal. If the component removal method is chosen, the Contractor will be required to remove lead-containing paint or surface coatings from 6-inches on either side of each cut-line using PeelAwayTM or an equivalent product. The Contractor will be afforded the option to perform a negative exposure assessment for lead, thus eliminating the need for paint removal prior to cutting. Any LCM that is specified by another discipline to be stripped (for refinishing) will be designed as an LCM abatement project. Regulations that require the proper handling, removal, transport, and disposal of LCM include:

• U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), Subtitle B – Other Regulations Relating to Transportation (49 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 171, 172, 173, 177, 178, and 180)

• U.S. EPA, Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention (40 CFR 745)

• OSHA, Occupational Safety and Health Standards for General Industry, Air Contaminants (29 CFR 1910.1000)

• OSHA, Occupational Safety and Health Standards for General Industry, Lead (29

CFR 1910.1025)

• OSHA, Occupational Safety and Health Standards for General Industry, Hazard Communication (29 CFR 1910.1200)

• OSHA, Occupational Safety and Health Standards for Construction, Lead (29 CFR 1926.62)

• Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR) Title 26 Subtitle 16 Section 05 "Procedures for Performing Lead Abatement Services"

Contract AG-32SD-C-15-0011 / AG-32SC-D-16-0226

5-3

• Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR) Title 26 Subtitle 02 Section 07 "Procedures for Abating Lead Containing Substances from Buildings"

• Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR) Title 26 Part 3 Subtitle 13 Section 10 "Standards for the Management of Specific Hazardous Wastes and Specific Types of Hazardous Waste Management Facilities"

The building exterior consisted of a brick façade with no exterior paint observed.

Therefore, the potential for lead concentrations in soils surrounding the building associated with deteriorated paints is unlikely.

5.3 Other Hazardous Materials

If the project activities will impact the hazardous materials described in Section 4.3 and identified in Table 4, implementation of existing facility programs or policies regarding hazard notification, labeling, warning signs, training, engineering controls, and personal protective equipment (PPE) should be used to reduce or eliminate potential exposure to hazardous materials.

Regulations may require specific procedures be followed with regard to handling, removal, transport, and disposal/recycling/reclamation of these items.

Furthermore, if any floor drains are encountered within the subject building, they should be inspected and possibly sampled to determine if they contain materials that may require special handling prior to demolition. Given that all laboratories used thermometers and it was reportedly common practice up until approximately 2000 to flush mercury down the sink drains when the thermometers broke, all sink traps and hoods should be sampled for mercury prior to demolition.

5.4 Subsurface Conditions

One 194-gallon diesel AST that fuels an emergency generator is located at the subject building; no evidence of spills or releases was observed in the vicinity of the tank. Prior to the planned demolition of Building-009, the existing AST should be properly decommissioned in accordance with the applicable Federal and State regulatory requirements.

Given the historical use of the subject building as a greenhouse, the use of pesticides, herbicides, and/or metals may have occurred during research operations; therefore, there is a potential for subsurface contamination associated with historic use of these substances at the building. However, neither historical documentation nor environmental regulatory databases indicated the use or release of these substances at the subject building.

Contract AG-32SD-C-15-0011 / AG-32SC-D-16-0226

5-4

Contract AG-32SD-C-15-0011 / AG-32SC-D-16-0226

6-1

6.0 REFERENCES

Bernard Johnson Young Inc., Beltsville Agricultural Research Center 1996 Master Plan

Update, Master Plan Report, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, September 1996.

Environmental Data Resources, Inc., 2017. The EDR Radius Map with Geocheck®, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center USDA, BARC, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, Maryland 20705, Inquiry Number: 4819658.2s, January 5, 2017.

Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) – Oil Control Program, Open/Closed Petroleum Subsurface Investigation/Remediation Cases in Maryland Database, accessed by AECOM on November 18, 2016.

Tidewater, Inc, Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Beltsville Agricultural Research Center (BARC),10300 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, Maryland, August 24, 2015.

United States Department of Agriculture – Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center (BARC) Potential Environmental Areas of Concern Map, last updated March 2016.

Contract AG-32SD-C-15-0011 / AG-32SC-D-16-0226

6-2

Contract AG-32SD-C-15-0011 / AG-32SC-D-16-0226

TABLES

Ta b le

U n it ed

S ta te s

D ep ar tm en t o f

A gr ic u lt u re , A gr ic u lt u ra l R es ea rc h S er vi ce

B el ts vi lle A gr ic u lt u ra l R es ea rc h C en te r

B u ild in g-

Su sp ec t

A sb es to s- C o n ta in in g

M at er ia ls In ve n to ry a n d S am p le R es u lt s

F L

O O

R R

O O

M M

A T

E R

IA

L

D E

S C

R

IP

T

IO

N H

A

A

S B

E S

T O

S A

C M

Y

/N

E S

T

IM

A T

E D

Q U

A N

T

IT

Y U

N

IT

F R

IA

B

L E

Y

/N

C O

N D

IT

IO

N

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

C O

R R

ID

O

R B

L A

C K

C O

A T

IN

G

F O

R F

IB

E

R B

O A

R D

O N

C E

IL

IN

G

-0

N

A D

N

S F

N G

O O

D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R W

H

IT

E C

A U

L K

F O

R D

O O

R F

R A

M E

-0

N A

D N

L F

N G

O O

D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

G L

A Z

IN

G

-0

N A

D N

L F

N P

O O

R

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

F R

A M

E C

A U

L K

-0

N A

D N

L F

N P

O O

R

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

G L

A Z

IN

G

F O

R B

A C

K W

O O

D E

N D

O O

R S

-0

N A

D N

L F

N G

O O

D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R R

E D

M O

U N

T

IN

G B

L O

C K

F O

R W

E S

T

IN

G H

O U

S E

S A

F E

T Y

S W

IT

C

H

-0

H

R Y

S O

T

IL

E Y

.5

S F

N G

O O

D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

L A

B O

R A

T O

R Y

D

R Y

W A

L L

-0

N A

D N

S

F N

G O

O D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

J O

IN

T

C O

M P

O U

N D

-0

C H

R Y

S O

T

IL

T R

A C

E N

S

F N

G O

O D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

D

R Y

W A

L L

S Y

S T

E M

-0

C H

R Y

S O

T

A C

E N

S

F N

G O

O D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

G L

A Z

IN

G

-0

N A

D N

L

F N

P O

O R

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

F R

A M

E C

A U

L K

-0

N A

D N

L F

N P

O O

R

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

B

R O

W N

G L

U E

F O

R C

H A

IR

R

A

IL

M O

L D

IN

G

-0

N A

D N

L F

N G

O O

D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

G L

A Z

IN

G

-0

N A

D N

L F

N G

O O

D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

D

R Y

W A

L L

-0

N A

D N

S

F N

G O

O D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

J O

IN

T

C O

M P

O U

N D

-0

C H

R Y

S O

T

A C

E N

S

F N

G O

O D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

D

R Y

W A

L L

S Y

S T

E M

-0

C H

R Y

S O

T

A C

E N

S

F N

G O

O D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

G L

A Z

IN

G

-0

N A

D N

L F

N G

O O

D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

F R

A M

E C

A U

L K

-0

N A

D N

L F

N G

O O

D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

W

H

IT

E S

K

IM

C O

A T

P L

A S

T E

R

-0

N

A D

N

S F

N G

O O

D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

B

R O

W N

B A

S E

C O

A T

P L

A S

T E

R

-0

N

A D

N

S F

N G

O O

D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R B

L A

C K

C O

A T

IN

G

F O

R F

IB

E

R B

O A

R D

O N

C E

IL

IN

G

-0

N

A D

N

S F

N G

O O

D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R W

H

IT

E C

A U

L K

F O

R D

O O

R F

R A

M E

-0

N A

D N

L F

N F

A

IR

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

G L

A Z

IN

G

-0

N A

D N

L

F N

P O

O R

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

F R

A M

E C

A U

L K

-0

N A

D N

L F

N P

O O

R

P ag e o f le

U n it ed

S ta te s

D ep ar tm en t o f

A gr ic u lt u re , A gr ic u lt u ra l R es ea rc h S er vi ce

B el ts vi lle A gr ic u lt u ra l R es ea rc h C en te r

B u ild in g-

Su sp ec t

A sb es to s- C o n ta in in g

M at er ia ls In ve n to ry a n d S am p le R es u lt s

F L

O O

R R

O O

M M

A T

E R

IA

L

D E

S C

R

IP

T

IO

N H

A

A

S B

E S

T O

S A

C M

Y

/N

E S

T

IM

A T

A N

T

IT

Y U

N

IT

F R

IA

B

L E

Y

/N

C O

N D

IT

IO

N

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

G L

A Z

IN

G

F O

R B

A C

K W

O O

D E

N D

O O

R S

-0

N A

D N

L F

N P

O O

R

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R R

E D

M O

U N

T

IN

G B

L O

C K

F O

R W

E S

T

IN

G H

O U

S E

S A

F E

T Y

S W

IT

C

H

-0

R Y

S O

T

IL

E Y

.5

S F

N G

O O

D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R

/4

O U

T E

R D

IA

M

E T

E R

B L

A C

K C

L O

T H

W R

A P

P E

D W

IR

E

S

-0

N

A D

N U

N K

L F

N G

O O

D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R

/4

O U

T E

R D

IA

M

E T

E R

C L O

T H

W R

A P

P E

D C

A B

L E

S

-0

N

A D

N U

N K

L F

N G

O O

D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R B

L A

C K

B O

A R

D F

O R

E X

P A

N S

IO

N

J O

IN

T

S

-0

N

A D

N

L F

N G

O O

D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

D

R Y

W A

L L

-0

N A

D N

S

F N

G O

O D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

J O

IN

T

C O

M P

O U

N D

-0

C H

R Y

S O

T

A C

E N

S

F N

G O

O D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

D

R Y

W A

L L

S Y

S T

E M

-0

C H

R Y

S O

T

A C

E N

S

F N

G O

O D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

B

L A

C K

B O

A R

D F

O R

E X

P A

N S

IO

N

J O

IN

T

S

-0

N

A D

N

L

F N

G O

O D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

G L

A Z

IN

G

-0

N A

D N

L

F N

P O

O R

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

F R

A M

E C

A U

L K

-0

N A

D N

L F

N P

O O

R

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

B

L A

C K

C E

M E

N T

IT

IO

U S

W A

L L

P A

N E

L H

A N

G E

R

-0

R Y

S O

T

IL

E Y

S

F N

G O

O D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

B

R O

W N

G L

U E

F O

R C

H A

IR

R

A

IL

M O

L D

IN

G

-0

N A

D N

L F

N G

O O

D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

B

L A

C K

C O

A T

IN

G

F O

R F

IB

E

R B

O A

R D

O N

C E

IL

IN

G

-0

N

A D

N

S F

N G

O O

D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

W

H

IT

E C

A U

L K

F O

R D

O O

R F

R A

M E

-0

N A

D N

L F

N G

O O

D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

G L

A Z

IN

G

-0

N A

D N

L F

N P

O O

R

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

F R

A M

E C

A U

L K

-0

N A

D N

L F

N P

O O

R

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

D

R Y

W A

L L

-0

N A

D N

S

F N

G O

O D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

J O

IN

T

C O

M P

O U

N D

-0

C H

R Y

S O

T

A C

E N

S

F N

G O

O D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

D

R Y

W A

L L

S Y

S T

E M

-0

C H

R Y

S O

T

A C

E N

S

F N

G O

O D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

B

L A

C K

C O

A T

IN

G

F O

R F

IB

E

R B

O A

R D

O N

C E

IL

IN

G

-0

N

A D

N

S F

N G

O O

D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R B

L A

C K

C O

A T

IN

G

F O

R F

IB

E

R B

O A

R D

O N

C E

IL

IN

G

-0

N

A D

N

S F

N G

O O

D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R B

L A

C K

B O

A R

D F

O R

E X

P A

N S

IO

N

J O

IN

T

S

-0

N

A D

N

L F

N G

O O

D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R W

H

IT

E C

A U

L K

F O

R D

O O

R F

R A

M E

-0

N A

D N

L F

N G

O O

D

P ag e o le

U n it ed

S ta te s

D ep ar tm en t o f

A gr ic u lt u re , A gr ic u lt u ra l R es ea rc h S er vi ce

B el ts vi lle A gr ic u lt u ra l R es ea rc h C en te r

B u ild in g-

Su sp ec t

A sb es to s- C o n ta in in g

M at er ia ls In ve n to ry a n d S am p le R es u lt s

F L

O O

R R

O O

M M

A T

E R

IA

L

D E

S C

R

IP

T

IO

N H

A

A

S B

E S

T O

S A

C M

Y

/N

E S

T

IM

A T

A N

T

IT

Y U

N

IT

F R

IA

B

L E

Y

/N

C O

N D

IT

IO

N

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

G L

A Z

IN

G

F O

R B

A C

K W

O O

D E

N D

O O

R S

-0

N A

D N

L F

N P

O O

R

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

G L

A Z

IN

G

-0

N A

D N

L

F N

P O

O R

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

F R

A M

E C

A U

L K

-0

N A

D N

L F

N P

O O

R

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R R

E D

M O

U N

T

IN

G B

L O

C K

F O

R W

E S

T

IN

G H

O U

S E

S A

F E

T Y

S W

IT

C

H

-0

R Y

S O

T

IL

E Y

.5

S F

N G

O O

D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

S T

R O

O M

W H

IT

E

S K

IM

C

O A

T P

L A

S T

E R

-0

N A

D N

S

F N

F A

IR

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

S T

R O

O M

B R

O W

N B

A S

E C

O A

T P

L A

S T

E R

-0

N A

D N

S

F N

F A

IR

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

S T

R O

O M

W H

IT

E

W

IN

D O

W G

L A

Z

IN

G

-0

N

A D

N

L

F N

G O

O D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

S T

R O

O M

W H

IT

E

W

IN

D O

W F

R A

M E

C A

U L K

-0

N A

D N

L F

N G

O O

D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

B

L A

C K

C O

A T

IN

G

F O

R F

IB

E

R B

O A

R D

O N

C E

IL

IN

G

-0

N

A D

N

S

F N

G O

O D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

G L

A Z

IN

G

-0

N A

D N

L

F N

P O

O R

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

F R

A M

E C

A U

L K

-0

N A

D N

L F

N P

O O

R

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

B

L A

C K

B O

A R

D F

O R

E X

P A

N S

IO

N

J O

IN

T

S

-0

N

A D

N

L

F N

G O

O D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

D

R Y

W A

L L

-0

N A

D N

S

F N

G O

O D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

J O

IN

T

C O

M P

O U

N D

-0

C H

R Y

S O

T

A C

E N

S

F N

G O

O D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

D

R Y

W A

L L

S Y

S T

E M

-0

C H

R Y

S O

T

A C

E N

S

F N

G O

O D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

B

L A

C K

C O

A T

IN

G

F O

R F

IB

E

R B

O A

R D

O N

C E

IL

IN

G

-0

N

A D

N

S F

N G

O O

D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

D

R Y

W A

L L

-0

N A

D N

S

F N

G O

O D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

J O

IN

T

C O

M P

O U

N D

-0

C H

R Y

S O

T

A C

E N

S

F N

G O

O D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

D

R Y

W A

L L

S Y

S T

E M

-0

C H

R Y

S O

T

A C

E N

S

F N

G O

O D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

G L

A Z

IN

G

-0

N A

D N

S F

N P

O O

R

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

F R

A M

E C

A U

L K

-0

N A

D N

S F

N P

O O

R

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R B

L A

C K

C O

A T

IN

G

F O

R F

IB

E

R B

O A

R D

O N

C E

IL

IN

G

-0

N

A D

N

S F

N G

O O

D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R B

L A

C K

B O

A R

D F

O R

E X

P A

N S

IO

N

J O

IN

T

S

-0

N

A D

N

L F

N G

O O

D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

G L

A Z

IN

G

-0

N A

D N

L

F N

P O

O R

P ag e o le

U n it ed

S ta te s

D ep ar tm en t o f

A gr ic u lt u re , A gr ic u lt u ra l R es ea rc h S er vi ce

B el ts vi lle A gr ic u lt u ra l R es ea rc h C en te r

B u ild in g-

Su sp ec t

A sb es to s- C o n ta in in g

M at er ia ls In ve n to ry a n d S am p le R es u lt s

F L

O O

R R

O O

M M

A T

E R

IA

L

D E

S C

R

IP

T

IO

N H

A

A

S B

E S

T O

S A

C M

Y

/N

E S

T

IM

A T

A N

T

IT

Y U

N

IT

F R

IA

B

L E

Y

/N

C O

N D

IT

IO

N

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

F R

A M

E C

A U

L K

-0

N A

D N

L F

N P

O O

R

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

G L

A Z

IN

G

F O

R B

A C

K W

O O

D E

N D

O O

R S

-0

N A

D N

L F

N P

O O

R

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R

B L

A C

K E

L E

C T

R

IC

A L

M O

U N

T

IN

G B

L O

C K

F O

R S

Q U

A R

E D

S A

F E

Y

S W

IT

C

H

-0

R Y

S O

T

IL

E Y

S

F N

F A

IR

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R

/4

O U

T E

R D

IA

M

E T

E R

B L

A C

K C

L O

T H

W R

A P

P E

D W

IR

E

S

-0

N

A D

N U

N K

L F

N F

A

IR

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R

/4

O U

T E

R D

IA

M

E T

E R

C L O

T H

W R

A P

P E

D C

A B

L E

S

-0

N

A D

N U

N K

L F

N F

A

IR

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

B

L A

C K

C O

A T

IN

G

F O

R F

IB

E

R B

O A

R D

O N

C E

IL

IN

G

-0

N

A D

N

S F

N G

O O

D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

D

R Y

W A

L L

-0

N A

D N

S

F N

G O

O D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

J O

IN

T

C O

M P

O U

N D

-0

C H

R Y

S O

T

A C

E N

S

F N

G O

O D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

D

R Y

W A

L L

S Y

S T

E M

-0

C H

R Y

S O

T

A C

E N

S

F N

G O

O D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

X

W

H

IT

E W

IT

H

P

IN

H O

L E

A N

D T

E X

T U

R E

D C

E

IL

IN

G

T

IL

E

-0

N

A D

N

S F

N G

O O

D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

G L

A Z

IN

G

-0

N A

D N

L

F N

P O

O R

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

F R

A M

E C

A U

L K

-0

N A

D N

L F

N P

O O

R

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

B

L A

C K

B O

A R

D F

O R

E X

P A

N S

IO

N

J O

IN

T

S

-0

N

A D

N

L

F N

G O

O D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

S T

R O

O M

W

H

IT

E S

K

IM

C O

A T

P L

A S

T E

R

-0

N

A D

N

S F

N P

O O

R

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

S T

R O

O M

B

R O

W N

B A

S E

C O

A T

P L

A S

T E

R

-0

N

A D

N

S F

N P

O O

R

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

S T

R O

O M

W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

G L

A Z

IN

G

-0

N A

D N

L F

N P

O O

R

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

S T

R O

O M

W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

F R

A M

E C

A U

L K

-0

N A

D N

L F

N P

O O

R

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

S T

R O

O M

W

H

IT

E S

K

IM

C O

A T

P L

A S

T E

R

-0

N

A D

N

S F

N F

A

IR

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

S T

R O

O M

B

R O

W N

B A

S E

C O

A T

P L

A S

T E

R

-0

N

A D

N

S F

N F

A

IR

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

S T

R O

O M

W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

G L

A Z

IN

G

-0

N A

D N

L F

N P

O O

R

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

S T

R O

O M

W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

F R

A M

E C

A U

L K

-0

N A

D N

L F

N P

O O

R

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R B

L A

C K

C O

A T

IN

G

F O

R F

IB

E

R B

O A

R D

O N

C E

IL

IN

G

-0

N

A D

N

S F

N G

O O

D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

G L

A Z

IN

G

-0

N A

D N

L

F N

P O

O R

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

F R

A M

E C

A U

L K

-0

N A

D N

L F

N P

O O

R

P ag e o le

U n it ed

S ta te s

D ep ar tm en t o f

A gr ic u lt u re , A gr ic u lt u ra l R es ea rc h S er vi ce

B el ts vi lle A gr ic u lt u ra l R es ea rc h C en te r

B u ild in g-

Su sp ec t

A sb es to s- C o n ta in in g

M at er ia ls In ve n to ry a n d S am p le R es u lt s

F L

O O

R R

O O

M M

A T

E R

IA

L

D E

S C

R

IP

T

IO

N H

A

A

S B

E S

T O

S A

C M

Y

/N

E S

T

IM

A T

A N

T

IT

Y U

N

IT

F R

IA

B

L E

Y

/N

C O

N D

IT

IO

N

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R W

H

IT

E C

A U

L K

F O

R D

O O

R F

R A

M E

-0

N A

D N

L F

N F

A

IR

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R B

L A

C K

B O

A R

D F

O R

E X

P A

N S

IO

N

J O

IN

T

S

-0

N

A D

N

L F

N G

O O

D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

G L

A Z

IN

G

F O

R B

A C

K W

O O

D E

N D

O O

R S

-0

N A

D N

L F

N P

O O

R

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R

/4

O U

T E

R D

IA

M

E T

E R

B L

A C

K C

L O

T H

W R

A P

P E

D W

IR

E

S

-0

N

A D

N U

N K

L F

N F

A

IR

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

R R

ID

O

R

/4

O U

T E

R D

IA

M

E T

E R

C L O

T H

W R

A P

P E

D C

A B

L E

S

-0

N

A D

N U

N K

L F

N F

A

IR

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

B

L A

C K

C O

A T

IN

G

F O

R F

IB

E

R B

O A

R D

O N

C E

IL

IN

G

-0

N

A D

N

S F

N G

O O

D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

D

R Y

W A

L L

-0

N A

D N

S

F N

G O

O D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

J O

IN

T

C O

M P

O U

N D

-0

C H

R Y

S O

T

A C

E N

S

F N

G O

O D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

D

R Y

W A

L L

S Y

S T

E M

-0

C H

R Y

S O

T

A C

E N

S

F N

G O

O D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

B

L A

C K

B O

A R

D F

O R

E X

P A

N S

IO

N

J O

IN

T

S

-0

N

A D

N

L

F N

G O

O D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

G L

A Z

IN

G

-0

N A

D N

L

F N

P O

O R

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

F R

A M

E C

A U

L K

-0

N A

D N

L F

N P

O O

R

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

B

R O

W N

G L

U E

F O

R C

H A

IR

R

A

IL

M O

L D

IN

G

-0

N A

D N

L F

N F

A

IR

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

B

L A

C K

C O

A T

IN

G

F O

R F

IB

E

R B

O A

R D

O N

C E

IL

IN

G

-0

N

A D

N

S F

N G

O O

D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

D

R Y

W A

L L

-0

N A

D N

S

F N

G O

O D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

J O

IN

T

C O

M P

O U

N D

-0

C H

R Y

S O

T

A C

E N

S

F N

G O

O D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

D

R Y

W A

L L

S Y

S T

E M

-0

C H

R Y

S O

T

A C

E N

S

F N

G O

O D

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

G L

A Z

IN

G

-0

N A

D N

L F

N P

O O

R

H

E A

D H

O U

S E

D

IV

IS

IO

N

B O

R A

T O

R Y

W

H

IT

E W

IN

D

O W

F R

A M

E C

A U

L K

-0

N A

D N

L F

N P

O O

R

H