Attach 4 - PPQ Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 72 KB Posted

Attached to
Bulk Laundry Service Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA442722Q0055
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Mobility Command

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a federal contract solicitation for laundry services. The past performance questionnaire requests a performance evaluation of a contractor being considered for a David Grant Medical Center laundry services contract at Travis Air Force Base in California. It asks respondents to rate the contractor's past performance on a scale and provide explanations for marginal or unsatisfactory ratings. The federal contract solicitation seeks proposals for bulk laundry services, including pick-up and delivery, for the 60th Medical Group at David Grant Medical Center at Travis Air Force Base. Interested offerors are invited to attend an optional site visit on July 6th, 2022. Proposals are due by the specified deadline in order to be considered for this contract to provide laundry services at Travis Air Force Base.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Bulk Laundry Service, newest first.
File Type Posted
Amendment 1 - FA442722Q0055 (Questions Response).pdf PDF
Attach 1 - PWS DGMC LAUDRY SERVICES 2023.pdf PDF
Attach 2 - Pricing Worksheet - DGMC Laundry Services.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attach 3 - Wage Determination.pdf PDF
RFQ - FA442722Q0055 Bulk Laundry Service.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Past Performance Questionnaire 21 June 2022

TO:

SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for a David Grant Medical Center Laundry Services contract at Travis AFB, CA.

Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, I can be contacted at .

Please submit completed questionnaire to the Government Contract Specialist identified on the attached questionnaire.

Contractor Signature

Enclosed:

1 - Past Performance Questionnaire

Solicitation: FA442722Q005560 CONS/PKB Flight
DGMC Laundry ServicesTravis AFB, CA

I. GENERAL INFORMATION: To be Completed by the Contractor

A. Offeror Information:

Name (Company/Division): CAGE Code: DUNS Number: If Other than the Prime Offeror, Identify Prime Offeror:

B. Program Title:

C. Contract Specifics:

Contracting Agency or Customer:Contract Number:Contract Type:Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Contract,FFP Task Order or Purchase Order,
Cost Reimbursable or Other Contractual Arrangement
Period of Performance (include options):Contract Dollar Value:

Has the contract been entered into the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS)?

Yes orNo
Contract Environment:Performance on an Air Force or Air Force Reserve Base,
Performance on a DoD Installation within the United StatesPerformance at a Federal, State, County or City facility within the United States,Other Performance Location.

D. Description of Contract as Prime or _ Subcontractor Indicate the type of services provided and highlight portions considered most relevant to the Base Linen Exchange acquisition.

E. Number of items cleaned:,
Pickup per week, Delivery per week

F. Number of building pickup/delivery locations :

NOTE: Buildings may only be counted once, even if they may be cleaned more than once on a weekly basis. For example, if building 595 is cleaned 3 times a week, it would still only be counted as 1 building.

II. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

To Be Completed/Accomplished By the Respondent

Name of Respondent: Title: Address: Telephone Number: Fax Number: Email Address:

Is the information provided by the Contractor in Section I, General Information accurate? Yes No If not explain which information is not accurate:

C. SEND COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO ALL THE EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW:

Juliet DiggsRoberto Escobedo
Contract SpecialistContracting Officer
Juliet.diggs.1@us.af.milroberto.escobedo.1@us.af.mil

Enclosure 1

III. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION:

To Be Completed/Accomplished By the Respondent

Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation or N/A if performance in this area is not applicable to the effort addressed.

PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

E
G
S
M
U
N
Exceptional
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeded many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeded some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: CONTRACT #:

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

Contractor Performance or Situation
E
G
S
M
U
N
N/A
1.
How well did the contractor implement an orderly transition from the incumbent contractor?
2.
How well did the contractor comply with the International Fabricare Institute, American Institute of Laundering, and Standard Commercial Practices?

3.

How well did the contractor attract and retain qualified and fully trained personnel within their organization to ensure contract compliance?

4.
How well did the contractor manage personnel clearances in order to regularly service secured locations?
5.
How well does the contractor’s stain removal treatment

process meet contractual requirements?

6.
How well does the contractor’s complies with vehicle interior requirements?
7.
Rate contractor’s ability to deliver the correct quantities.
8.
How willing was the contractor to improve and correct noncompliance issues or concerns?
9.
How well did the contractor handle and remove contaminated laundry from the pickup location?
10.
How well did the contractor comply with pickup and delivery schedules.
11.
How well did the contractor meet the sanitation and packaging requirements. If the Contractor did not perform sanitation and packaging requirements (or equivalent), rate as N/A.
12.
How well did the contractor comply with washroom testing? If the Contractor did not perform washroom testing, rate as N/A.
Contractor Performance or Situation
E
G
S
M
U
N
N/A
13.
How would you rate the overall performance of the contractor under this contract?
14.
Was the contractor ever issued a default, cure or show cause notice, Notice of Violation under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

YES/NO

15.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
YES/NO
16.
If a Government Contract, is the contractor rated in CPARS?
YES/NO

Remarks (provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings, especially those concerning performance at child development centers and youth centers and fitness centers):

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .