Attach 3_Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)_22-R-0018.docx
DOCX document 20 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Patient Transport Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W81K00-23-R-0018
- Issued by
- Department of the Army Medical Command
About this file
This document is a past performance questionnaire template for a competitive acquisition by the Medical Readiness Contracting Office - West for patient transport services at Brooke Army Medical Center at Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston, Texas. The acquisition number is W81K00-23-R-0018. The questionnaire asks references to provide ratings and narratives on quality of service, business relations, and any unsatisfactory performance for the prime contractor and subcontractor being evaluated. References are asked to return the completed questionnaire by a specified date in 2023 to evaluate the offeror's past performance. The related federal contract opportunity is for patient transport services through the Department of the Army Medical Command.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| W81K00-23-R-0018 - Q and A_Patient Transport_15 September 2023.pdf | ||
| Attach 1_revised_Instructions to Offerors_Evaluation Criteria_23-R-0018__15 Sept 2023.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amendment 01_W81K00-23-R-0018_Patient Transport_15 Sept 2023.pdf | ||
| Attach 4_Price Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attach 5_PWS Patient Transport Services 22 Aug 2023.docx | DOCX document | |
| SCA WD_2015-5253_Revision_21.pdf | ||
| W81K00-23-R-0018.pdf | ||
| Attach 2_Past Performance Information (PPI) Sheet_23-R-0018.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attach 1_Instructions to Offerors_Evaluation Criteria_23-R-0018.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 3 W81K00-23-R-0018
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
The Medical Readiness Contracting Office - West is conducting a competitive acquisition for Patient Transport Services at Brooke Army Medical Center (BAMC), JBSA, Fort Sam Houston, Texas. The offeror has identified you as a reference to validate past performance.
Please complete the following questionnaire to assist our evaluation of the contractor’s past performance, and return to salameya.paulouskaya2.civ@health.mil and patrick.a.thielemann.civ@health.mil by xx xxxx 2023, 2:00 PM CT (San Antonio, Texas). Note: Clearly identify and provide the name of the Prime Contractor and Subcontractor. Specify Prime Contractor/Subcontractor.
Name of Contractor being evaluated:
Contract/Order Number: __________________________________________________________________
1. Type of service being provided?
2. Where is the location of this service?
3. What is the contract amount?
4. Have there been any unsatisfactory performance resulting in additional contractual or administrative costs?
Yes |_| No |_| If “Yes,” explain:
The last two questions will discuss quality of service & customer relations. Please refer to the following:
Rating System:
1. Excellent – Overall performance exceeds contractual requirements and gives extra benefits to the customer. Problems, if any, were promptly corrected without negative impact to the customer.
1. Satisfactory – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory
1. Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractor’s proposed actions to correct any problems appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
1. Unsatisfactory – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
IMPORTANT NOTE: NARRATIVES MUST BE PROVIDED FOR ANY RATING OTHER THAN SATISFACTORY AND MUST SUPPORT THE RATING GIVEN.
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE, Continued
5. Quality of Service – Please rate overall compliance with the contract Performance Work Statement.
(1) Excellent |_| (2) Satisfactory |_| (3) Marginal |_| (4) Unsatisfactory |_|
If other than “Satisfactory,” a narrative must be provided to explain how the overall performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
6. Business/Customer Relations – Please rate overall effective management; successfully managed services; reasonable/cooperative behavior; flexibility; business-like concern for customer’s interest.
(1) Excellent |_| (2) Satisfactory |_| (3) Marginal |_| (4) Unsatisfactory |_|
If other than “Satisfactory,” a narrative must be provided to explain how the overall performance exceeds or does not meet contractual requirements:
Signature: Date:
Print Name: Company:
Title: Telephone:
Thank you for your participation in providing a detailed and accurate history of past performance for this offeror.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .