Attach 18 - Past Perf Questionaire - Cyber TRIDENT.docx
DOCX document 35 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Cyber TRIDENT Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W900KK-20-R-0001
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire template for the Cyber Training, Readiness, Integration, Delivery and Enterprise Technology (Cyber TRIDENT) contract. The questionnaire collects feedback on a contractor's past performance on relevant contracts and includes sections to evaluate technical and quality performance, schedule performance, cost control performance, management performance, and suitability for future efforts. Respondents are asked to provide ratings and narrative responses on the contractor's performance in these areas. The questionnaire instructs contractors to send it to references for completed past performance evaluations to be considered for the Cyber TRIDENT contract.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 34
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 18 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THE CYBER TRAINING, READINESS, INTEGRATION, DELIVERY AND ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOGY (Cyber TRIDENT)
Questionnaire Instructions: The form is designed to be e-mailed to the Customer for input and feedback.
PART A - The offeror shall complete PART A only. After completing Part A the offeror shall forward one copy to each PCO, Program Manager and Technical Lead/Contracting Officer Representative (COR) for each relevant project, FOR CPARS REPORTS THAT ARE MORE THAN SIX MONTHS OLD, E.G., THE COMPLETION DATE IS MORE THAN SIX MONTHS BEFORE THE DUE DATE FOR THE PAST PERFORMANCE VOLUME, OR WHICH DOES NOT HAVE A CPARS SUBMISSION, to be considered for the Cyber TRIDENT Past Performance.
PART B - The respondent(s) (Contracting Officer, Program Manager and Technical Lead/COR (Prime’s PM if applicable)) will each complete PART B of the form received. After completing PART B the respondent shall deliver the form to the below POC.
Form Delivery Method - The respondent(s) will return the completed Past Performance Questionnaire directly to Ms. Rebeca Gonzalez at rebeca.a.gonzalez.civ@mail.mil. Ms. Gonzalez can be reached by phone at 407-384-3968.
PART A RELEVANT CONTRACT INFORMATION
CONTRACTOR IDENTIFICATION
a. Contractor Name: ________________________________ Contractor Cage Code/DUNS#: _________________
b. Program Title: _____________________________
c. Contract Number: ___________________________
d. Type of Contract (FFP, CPFF, T&M) _____________________________ Percent Complete %: ________________________
e. Contract Award Date: ________________________
f. Contract Award Value: _______________________
e. Supply or Service Contract: ___________________
Please provide a short description of the subject contract:
Was execution of this contract in a support service nature with guidance provided by the Government/Prime?
|_| Yes |_| No
Was execution of this contract in developmental nature with contractor responsible of implementation and delivery?
|_| Yes |_| No
PART B: PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS
RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION
a. Name: _______________________________________________________________
b. Agency: _____________________________________________________________
c. Position: _____________________________________________________________
d. Relation to Program (PM, PCO, COR) ______________________________________
e. Phone//Email Address: __________________________________________________
f. Date Questionnaire Completed: ___________________________________________
PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS
Please check those activities, which are applicable to your program:
Activities
Activities
Agile Development/Operations (DevOps)
Logistics, Maintenance and Training
Third Party Orchestration and Integration
License and Property Management
Hardware/ Software Infrastructure
Technical Operations Management
Platform Architecture Framework and Platform Development Kit (PDK)
Development and Operations Servers
Continuous Integration, Test and Deployment Pipeline
Cybersecurity and Risk Management Framework (RMF) (Unclassified, Classified, TS/SCI/JWICS)
· Sustainment and Help Desk
Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
Release Testing
Software Factory
Operational Assessment
Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V)
Cyber Innovation Challenges (CIC)
PERFORMANCE LEVELS (Use these grades to provide the overall rating where requested below).
· Exceptional - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit.
· Very Good - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.
· Satisfactory - Performance meets contractual requirements.
· Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.
· Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.
INSTRUCTIONS: Please check the appropriate response for each of the items to be rated.
TECHNICAL AND QUALITY PERFORMANCE
| Items to be rated |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Personnel Qualifications and Performance
Data Collection
Data Synthesis and Requirements Analysis
Design and Design Reviews/Agile Ceremonies
Technical/Progress Reviews/Agile Ceremonies
Quality and Accuracy of Product Design
Quality and Accuracy of Product
Quality and Accuracy of Technical Documents
Quality and Accuracy of Product Testing
Product Usability
Production Problems or Issues
Configuration Management of Products and Product Components
Provide Narrative Description to substantiate your ratings of this contractor in the TECHNICAL AND QUALITY PERFORMANCE area.
SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE
| Items to be rated |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Accurate, Complete, and Timely Deliverables
Design Reviews/Agile Ceremonies
Progress Reviews /Agile Ceremonies
Product Testing
Production Scheduling
Deficiency/Discrepancy Correction
Provide Narrative Description to substantiate your ratings of this contractor in the SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE area.
COST CONTROL PERFORMANCE
| Items to be rated |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Accurate Costs Proposed
Effective Expenditure Tracking and Reporting
Product Rework Experience
Ability to manage overruns
Provide Narrative Description to substantiate your ratings of this contractor in the COST PERFORMANCE area.
MANAGEMENT
| Items to be rated |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Timeliness and Completeness of Management Responsiveness
Completeness and quality of problem identification
Effective corrective action plans
Reasonable and cooperative behavior
Customer satisfaction
Timely award and management of subcontracts
Ability to identify and apply resources to contract activities
Communicate appropriate information to affected program elements in a timely manner
Ability to manage and mitigate risk
Provide Narrative Description to substantiate your ratings of this contractor in the MANAGEMENT area.
FUTURE EFFORTS: If you had the option, knowing what you know today, would you award another effort to this contractor
_____Definitely would Not
_____Might
_____Probably would
_____Definitely would
Provide Narrative Description to substantiate your ratings of this contractor in the FUTURE EFFORTS area.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .