Attach 18 - Past Perf Questionaire - Cyber TRIDENT.docx

DOCX document 35 KB Posted

Attached to
Cyber TRIDENT Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W900KK-20-R-0001
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Contracting Command Orlando Contracting Center

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire template for the Cyber Training, Readiness, Integration, Delivery and Enterprise Technology (Cyber TRIDENT) contract. The questionnaire collects feedback on a contractor's past performance on relevant contracts and includes sections to evaluate technical and quality performance, schedule performance, cost control performance, management performance, and suitability for future efforts. Respondents are asked to provide ratings and narrative responses on the contractor's performance in these areas. The questionnaire instructs contractors to send it to references for completed past performance evaluations to be considered for the Cyber TRIDENT contract.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Cyber TRIDENT, newest first.
File Type Posted
DO 0003-Order-SOW-CDRLs.pdf PDF
TO 0001-Order-SOW-CDRLs.pdf PDF
TO 0002-Order-SOW-CDRLs.pdf PDF
Slides - Industry Day - Pre-Solicitation Briefing Slides Contracts - 4-30-20.pptx PPTX presentation
Attach 18 - Past Perf Questionnaire - Cyber TRIDENT - 4-15-20 Updated.docx DOCX document
Attach 1 - SOW - Base CYBER TRIDENT Base SOW - 29 Apr 2020 Updated.pdf PDF
Attach 4 - RCS Price List - 4-24-20 Updated.docx DOCX document
CDRL_Base_SOW.pdf PDF
RFP - W900KK-20-R-0001 DRAFT 30 Apr 2020 Updated.pdf PDF
SOW - DO 3 CYBER TRIDENT DO 3 SOW - 29 Apr 2020 Updated.pdf PDF
SOW - TO 1 CYBER TRIDENT TO 1 SOW - 29 Apr 2020 Updated.pdf PDF
Attach 17 - Proposal Cost Price Workbook 4-30-20 Updated.xls XLS spreadsheet
SOW - TO 2 CYBER TRIDENT TO 2 SOW - 29 Apr 2020 Updated.pdf PDF
Consolidated Industry Questions 1-200 4-30-2020 Posted (2).pdf PDF
Consolidated Industry Questions 1-200 4-30-2020 Posted.pdf PDF
Consolidated Industry Questions-Answer 1-74.pdf PDF
Q_A from Draft RFP.pdf PDF
Q-As -Cyber TRIDENT W900KK-20-R-0001 27 Mar 2020.pdf PDF
Distribution Agreement - Cyber TRIDENT Solicitation -Final 13 Mar 2020.pdf PDF
List of Attachments - 13 Mar 2020.pdf PDF
Attach 19 - Q-A Spreadsheet-12 Mar 2020.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Instructions for Obtaining Distribution D Document - 13 Mar 2020.pdf PDF
Attach 2 -Contract Labor Rates.docx DOCX document
Attach 15 - Pre-Award Survey of Prospective Contractor Acctg System Checklist.pdf PDF
RFP - W900KK-20-R-0001 DRAFT 10 Mar 2020.pdf PDF
Statement of Work - DO 2 - Integraton Factory.pdf PDF
Statement of Work -DO 3 - Platform Capability Production.pdf PDF
Attach 5 Small Business Participation Proposal Form.DOCX DOCX document
Attach 1 - Statement of Work - Basic Contract - Cyber TRIDENT.pdf PDF
Statement of Work - DO 1 - Infrastructure and Maintenance.pdf PDF
Attach 14 - PCTE DD254.pdf PDF
Instructions to Obtain Distribution D Documents.docx DOCX document
Attach 16 - SF1408 - Pre-Award Suvey of Prospective Contractor Acctg System.pdf PDF
00 Solicitation Attachment List.pdf PDF
Show all 34

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 18 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THE CYBER TRAINING, READINESS, INTEGRATION, DELIVERY AND ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOGY (Cyber TRIDENT)

Questionnaire Instructions: The form is designed to be e-mailed to the Customer for input and feedback.

PART A - The offeror shall complete PART A only. After completing Part A the offeror shall forward one copy to each PCO, Program Manager and Technical Lead/Contracting Officer Representative (COR) for each relevant project, FOR CPARS REPORTS THAT ARE MORE THAN SIX MONTHS OLD, E.G., THE COMPLETION DATE IS MORE THAN SIX MONTHS BEFORE THE DUE DATE FOR THE PAST PERFORMANCE VOLUME, OR WHICH DOES NOT HAVE A CPARS SUBMISSION, to be considered for the Cyber TRIDENT Past Performance.

PART B - The respondent(s) (Contracting Officer, Program Manager and Technical Lead/COR (Prime’s PM if applicable)) will each complete PART B of the form received. After completing PART B the respondent shall deliver the form to the below POC.

Form Delivery Method - The respondent(s) will return the completed Past Performance Questionnaire directly to Ms. Rebeca Gonzalez at rebeca.a.gonzalez.civ@mail.mil. Ms. Gonzalez can be reached by phone at 407-384-3968.

PART A RELEVANT CONTRACT INFORMATION

CONTRACTOR IDENTIFICATION

a. Contractor Name: ________________________________ Contractor Cage Code/DUNS#: _________________

b. Program Title: _____________________________

c. Contract Number: ___________________________

d. Type of Contract (FFP, CPFF, T&M) _____________________________ Percent Complete %: ________________________

e. Contract Award Date: ________________________

f. Contract Award Value: _______________________

e. Supply or Service Contract: ___________________

Please provide a short description of the subject contract:

Was execution of this contract in a support service nature with guidance provided by the Government/Prime?

|_| Yes |_| No

Was execution of this contract in developmental nature with contractor responsible of implementation and delivery?

|_| Yes |_| No

PART B: PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS

RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION

a. Name: _______________________________________________________________

b. Agency: _____________________________________________________________

c. Position: _____________________________________________________________

d. Relation to Program (PM, PCO, COR) ______________________________________

e. Phone//Email Address: __________________________________________________

f. Date Questionnaire Completed: ___________________________________________

PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS

Please check those activities, which are applicable to your program:

Activities

Activities

Agile Development/Operations (DevOps)

Logistics, Maintenance and Training

Third Party Orchestration and Integration

License and Property Management

Hardware/ Software Infrastructure

Technical Operations Management

Platform Architecture Framework and Platform Development Kit (PDK)

Development and Operations Servers

Continuous Integration, Test and Deployment Pipeline

Cybersecurity and Risk Management Framework (RMF) (Unclassified, Classified, TS/SCI/JWICS)

· Sustainment and Help Desk

Integrated Development Environment (IDE)

Release Testing

Software Factory

Operational Assessment

Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V)

Cyber Innovation Challenges (CIC)

PERFORMANCE LEVELS (Use these grades to provide the overall rating where requested below).

· Exceptional - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit.

· Very Good - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.

· Satisfactory - Performance meets contractual requirements.

· Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

· Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.

INSTRUCTIONS: Please check the appropriate response for each of the items to be rated.

TECHNICAL AND QUALITY PERFORMANCE

Items to be rated
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Personnel Qualifications and Performance

Data Collection

Data Synthesis and Requirements Analysis

Design and Design Reviews/Agile Ceremonies

Technical/Progress Reviews/Agile Ceremonies

Quality and Accuracy of Product Design

Quality and Accuracy of Product

Quality and Accuracy of Technical Documents

Quality and Accuracy of Product Testing

Product Usability

Production Problems or Issues

Configuration Management of Products and Product Components

Provide Narrative Description to substantiate your ratings of this contractor in the TECHNICAL AND QUALITY PERFORMANCE area.

SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE

Items to be rated
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Accurate, Complete, and Timely Deliverables

Design Reviews/Agile Ceremonies

Progress Reviews /Agile Ceremonies

Product Testing

Production Scheduling

Deficiency/Discrepancy Correction

Provide Narrative Description to substantiate your ratings of this contractor in the SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE area.

COST CONTROL PERFORMANCE

Items to be rated
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Accurate Costs Proposed

Effective Expenditure Tracking and Reporting

Product Rework Experience

Ability to manage overruns

Provide Narrative Description to substantiate your ratings of this contractor in the COST PERFORMANCE area.

MANAGEMENT

Items to be rated
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Timeliness and Completeness of Management Responsiveness

Completeness and quality of problem identification

Effective corrective action plans

Reasonable and cooperative behavior

Customer satisfaction

Timely award and management of subcontracts

Ability to identify and apply resources to contract activities

Communicate appropriate information to affected program elements in a timely manner

Ability to manage and mitigate risk

Provide Narrative Description to substantiate your ratings of this contractor in the MANAGEMENT area.

FUTURE EFFORTS: If you had the option, knowing what you know today, would you award another effort to this contractor

_____Definitely would Not

_____Might

_____Probably would

_____Definitely would

Provide Narrative Description to substantiate your ratings of this contractor in the FUTURE EFFORTS area.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .