Att12_L-5 Relevancy Information of the Past Performance Contract 30AUG24.docx

DOCX document 21 KB Posted

Attached to
Aviation Electrician (AE) Training Systems
Solicitation number
N6134025R0001
Issued by

About this file

This document is Attachment 12, titled "L-5 Relevancy Information of the Past Performance Contract," which provides instructions for contractors to compare their past performance contracts to the requirements of the current solicitation. The key details include:

The solicitation is for "Aviation Electrician (AE) Training Systems" and is being issued by the Department of the Navy Naval Air Systems Command. Contractors are required to provide a comparison of their past performance contracts to the current solicitation in areas such as contract type, total dollar amount, dollar amount performed, location and division, period of performance, scope, magnitude, and complexity. This information is to be provided in an MS Word table format for up to 5 past performance contracts. The goal is to demonstrate the relevancy of the contractor's past experience to the requirements of the current solicitation.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 12, L-5 Relevancy Information of the Past Performance Contract Provide the information identified below in an MS Word Table for each past performance contract identified.

Prime or Joint Venture Company, JV Team Member, or Subcontractor (Follow same reference notations as referenced in L-3 Instructions, Contract Reference above)
P1
P2
P3
S1
S2
1
Contract Types: Compare the contract type of the past performance contract to the contract type of this solicitation’s effort.
2
Total Dollar Amounts: Compare the total dollar amount of the past performance contract to the total proposed dollar amount of this solicitation’s effort.
3
Dollar Amounts Actually Performed: Compare the dollar amount of the effort actually performed by the company under the past performance contract to the dollar amount of the effort proposed to be performed by the company under this solicitation’s effort.
4
Locations and Divisions: Compare the location and division of the company that performed the past performance contract effort to the location and division of the company that is proposed to perform this solicitation’s effort.
5
Period of Performances: Compare the period of performance of the past performance contract to the period of performance actually performed under that past performance contract to that of the company proposed to perform.
6
Compare similarities: Compare the similarity of the product or service actually performed by the company under the past performance contract to the product or service proposed to be performed by the company proposed to perform under this solicitation’s effort for scope.
7
Compare similarities: Compare the similarity of the product or service actually performed by the company under the past performance contract to the product or service proposed to be performed by the company proposed to perform under this solicitation’s effort for Magnitude.
8
Compare similarities: Compare the similarity of the product or service actually performed by the company under the past performance contract to the product or service proposed to be performed by the company proposed to perform under this solicitation’s effort for Complexity.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .