Att D_Reference Check Form~1.doc
DOC document 54 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- S-DASOBO-00000520
- Issued by
- Marion County, Oregon
About this file
This document is an Attachment D - Reference Check Form related to an RFP issued by the Oregon Department of Agriculture for Mass Comparators. The form requests information on the overall quality and satisfaction with the goods and services provided by the proposer, the delivery of service, and the responsiveness to customer service issues. Respondents are asked to rate these areas on a scale of 0-10. The RFP number is [###-####-##] and the solicitation title is [RFP title].
The contract opportunity is for Mass Comparators for the Oregon Department of Agriculture. No other details about the project scope, quantities, timeline, or award process are provided in this attachment.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Att F_Cobid.doc | DOC document | |
| Att C_Information and Certification~1.doc | DOC document | |
| Att G_Responsibility Inquiry~1.doc | DOC document | |
| Att B_Affidavit~1.doc | DOC document | |
| S-10700-00000521_NOITA.pdf | ||
| Att H_Specifications~2.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFP_ODA.pdf | ||
| Att A_Sample Price Agreement.docx | DOCX document | |
| Att E_Cost Proposal.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Addendum_1_S-DASOBO-00000520.pdf | ||
| Addendum_2_S-DASOBO-00000520.pdf |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP [###-####-##] – [RFP title]
ATTACHMENT F - REFERENCE CHECK FORM
RF# S-DASOBO-00000520– Oregon Department of Agriculture Mass Comparators Att D
ATTACHMENT D - REFERENCE CHECK FORM
Proposer Name:
Reference Entity:
Reference Contact Name:
Contact Telephone Number:
Contact Email Address:
Please rate the following questions on a scale of 0-10:
0 = Not satisfied 5 = Moderately satisfied 10 = Extremely satisfied
1. How would you rate the Proposer’s overall quality of goods provided and your overall satisfaction with Proposer’s goods?
Score:
Description of specific goods purchased:
Comments:
2. How would you rate the Proposer’s overall quality of services provided and your overall relationship with the Proposer?
Score:
Comments:
3. How would you rate the Proposer’s delivery of service?
Score:
Comments:
4. How would you rate the Proposer’s responsiveness to customer service issues and special requests (e.g., reported problems, changes billing, etc.)?
Score:
Comments:
COMMENTS \* FirstCap \* MERGEFORMAT DAS Procurement Services, Version 2.0 – December 9, 2016
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .