Att 7 W912DY22Q0Army War College Executive Conference Table.docx

DOCX document 42 KB Posted May 23, 2022

Attached to: Carlisle Barracks, PA – Army War College-Executive Conference Table
Solicitation number: W912DY22Q0101
Issued by: Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Engineering Support Center Huntsville

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
RFQ-Amend 1W912DY22Q0101Army War College Executive Table.pdf	PDF	Jun 21, 2022
Att 1 - Carlisle_Barracks-Army_War_College-Executive_Conference_Table.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	May 23, 2022
W912DY-22-Q-0101 Army War College Conference Room Table.pdf	PDF	May 23, 2022
Army War College_GIB_Conference Table _Att 3 SOW.pdf	PDF	May 23, 2022
AWC-IF110A-TERRACE LEVEL FURN PLAN-AREA A-ROOM 103.pdf	PDF	May 23, 2022

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

ADMIN Technical Documents Compliance/Technical Review Army War College GIB Executive Conference Table

Vendor Directions:

The Technical Documents Checklist section (below) must be completed and returned in Word format by the contractor performing as the lead quoter. A quote that is submitted without the necessary document’s compliance may not be considered for award.

Technical Documents Checklist

Vendor (Lead Quoter) Company _______________________________________ Point-of-Contact for this RFQ ____________________________ Email _______________________________________________ Telephone ___________________________________________

1. Are technical documents organized sequentially according to Attachment 2, Furniture Item Descriptions (FID), Section 1.1?

Yes ____ No ____ If No, please do not continue; to be considered for award, technical documents shall be organized sequentially according to the FID.

2. Are technical documents annotated to draw the reader’s attention to the product descriptions and quality requirements required in FID, Section 2.0?

Yes ____ If Yes, please continue to question 3.

No ____ If No, please do not continue; to be considered for award, technical documents shall be complete and formatted as stated above.

3. Are technical documents annotated to draw the reader’s attention to the item descriptions required in FID, Section 3.0?

Yes ____ If Yes, please continue to question 4.

No ____ If No, please do not continue; to be considered for award, technical documents shall be complete and formatted as stated above.

4. Do all quoted items meet all current GSA test requirements (excluding open market items)?

Yes ____ If Yes, please submit Attachment 8 in Word format along with your company’s quote by the required due date.

No ____ If No, please do not continue; to be considered for award, all testing shall be approved by GSA and current.

Vendors: Do not go beyond this point, unless requested by the Government during clarifications or communications.

Technical Documents Compliant: Yes/No

Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Signed: ___ Title: Interior Designer Date:

Technical Review of Quoted Items

[Vendor]

3.1 Item No.

Product Provided:

Warranty:

Environmental:

1st Review:

3.2 Item No.

1st Review:

3.3 Item No.

1st Review:

3.4 Item No.

1st Review:

3.5 Item No.

1st Review:

3.6 Item No.

1st Review:

3.7 Item No.

1st Review:

3.8 Item No.

1st Review:

3.9 Item No.

1st Review:

3.10 Item No.

1st Review:

3.11 Item No.

1st Review:

3.12 Item No.

1st Review:

3.13 Item No.

1st Review:

3.14 Item No.

1st Review:

3.15 Item No.

1st Review:

3.16 Item No.

1st Review:

3.17 Item No.

1st Review:

3.18 Item No.

1st Review:

3.19 Item No.

1st Review:

3.20 Item No.

1st Review:

3.21 Item No.

1st Review:

3.22 Item No.

1st Review:

3.23 Item No.

1st Review:

3.24 Item No.

1st Review:

3.25 Item No.

1st Review:

3.26 Item No.

1st Review:

3.27 Item No.

1st Review:

3.28 Item No.

1st Review:

3.29 Item No.

1st Review:

3.30 Item No.

1st Review:

3.31 Item No.

1st Review:

3.32 Item No.

1st Review:

3.33 Item No.

1st Review:

3.34 Item No.

1st Review:

3.35 Item No.

1st Review:

3.36 Item No.

1st Review:

3.37 Item No.

1st Review:

3.38 Item No.

1st Review:

3.39 Item No.

1st Review:

3.40 Item No.

1st Review:

3.41 Item No.

1st Review:

3.42 Item No.

1st Review:

3.43 Item No.

1st Review:

3.44 Item No.

1st Review:

3.45 Item No.

1st Review:

3.46 Item No.

1st Review:

3.47 Item No.

1st Review:

3.48 Item No.

1st Review:

3.49 Item No.

1st Review:

3.50 Item No.

1st Review:

3.51 Item No.

1st Review:

3.52 Item No.

1st Review:

3.53 Item No.

1st Review:

3.54 Item No.

1st Review:

3.55 Item No.

1st Review:

3.56 Item No.

1st Review:

3.57 Item No.

1st Review:

3.58 Item No.

1st Review:

3.59 Item No.

1st Review:

3.60 Item No.

1st Review:

3.61 Item No.

1st Review:

3.62 Item No.

1st Review:

3.63 Item No.

1st Review:

3.64 Item No.

1st Review:

3.65 Item No.

1st Review:

3.66 Item No.

1st Review:

3.67 Item No.

1st Review:

3.68 Item No.

1st Review:

3.69 Item No.

1st Review:

3.70 Item No.

1st Review:

3.71 Item No.

1st Review:

3.72 Item No.

1st Review:

3.73 Item No.

1st Review:

3.74 Item No.

1st Review:

3.75 Item No.

1st Review:

3.76 Item No.

1st Review:

3.77 Item No.

1st Review:

3.78 Item No.

1st Review:

3.79 Item No.

1st Review:

3.80 Item No.

1st Review:

Tech. Review Summary:

Technically Acceptable: YES/ NO

Signed: Title: Interior Designer Date:

Attachment 7

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated May 23, 2022.