ATT 19_DRAFT ROM Cost Template.xls
XLS spreadsheet 55 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Andromeda Draft RFP
- Solicitation number
- FA881926RB001
About this file
The file is a Request for Information (RFI) ROM (Rough Order of Magnitude) Cost Template for a Space Domain Awareness (SDA) system called SPECTRE. The comprehensive spreadsheet provides a detailed cost breakdown across multiple fiscal years (FY26-FY29) for a space-based system, covering elements such as space vehicles, ground segments, operations, and sustainment. The template requires contractors to provide programmatic and technical details including system quantities, non-recurring and recurring costs, mission type, orbit characteristics, technology readiness levels, and heritage percentages.
The cost template includes granular Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) categories ranging from systems engineering and program management to launch operations, mission support, and disposal. Key parameters contractors must document include the number of gateway sites, antenna configurations, factory and operations center locations, and specific cost allocations for bus, payload, and ground segment components. The template emphasizes detailed cost reporting in constant year 2024 dollars, with guidance on differentiating between non-recurring (NRE) and recurring (REC) costs, and instructions for allocating costs based on program milestones and design maturity.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| ATT 02_DRAFT_HTRO_Self-Score Matrix_22 Oct 2025.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| ATT 06_DRAFT Andromeda SF 328.pdf | ||
| ATT 24_DoDD 520502E.pdf | ||
| ATT 25_NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3.pdf | ||
| DRAFT Solicitation - FA881926RB001.pdf | ||
| Comment Resolution Matrix.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| ATT 02_DRAFT HTRO Self-Score Matrix.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ROM GR&As
| ROM Ground Rules & Assumptions | |
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| … | |
| n |
ROM
| Quantity | FY26 | FY27 | FY28 | FY29 | FY..N | Total | Provide Assumptions / Notes | ||||||||
| NRE | REC | NRE | REC | NRE | REC | NRE | REC | NRE | REC | NRE | REC | ||||
| 1.0 | SPECTRE Space Based SDA System | ||||||||||||||
| 1.1 | SEIT/PM and Support Equipment | ||||||||||||||
| 1.2 | Space Vehicle | ||||||||||||||
| 1.2.1 | SEIT/PM and Support Equipment | ||||||||||||||
| 1.2.1.1 | Systems Engineering | ||||||||||||||
| 1.2.1.2 | Assembly, Integration and Test | ||||||||||||||
| 1.2.1.3 | Program Management | ||||||||||||||
| 1.2.1.4 | Support Equipment (Includes Space Vehicle and Bus Simulators, Emulators, STE, etc.) | ||||||||||||||
| 1.2.2 | Bus | ||||||||||||||
| 1.2.4 | Payload | ||||||||||||||
| 1.2.5 | Booster Adapter | ||||||||||||||
| 1.2.6 | Space Vehicle Storage | ||||||||||||||
| 1.2.7 | Launch Systems Integration (LSI) | ||||||||||||||
| 1.2.8 | Launch Operations | ||||||||||||||
| 1.2.9 | Mission Operations Support | ||||||||||||||
| 1.2.10 | Space Vehicle Other | ||||||||||||||
| 1.3 | Ground Segment | ||||||||||||||
| 1.3.1 | SEIT/PM and Support Equipment | ||||||||||||||
| 1.3.2 | Ground Function | ||||||||||||||
| 1.3.2.1 | SEIT/PM and Support Equipment | ||||||||||||||
| 1.3.2.2 | COTS Hardware | ||||||||||||||
| 1.3.2.4 | Ground Function Software (includes all Ground SW Development) | ||||||||||||||
| 1.3.3 | Ground Terminal/Gateway (GT) | ||||||||||||||
| 1.3.4 | External Network (T-COMM) | ||||||||||||||
| 1.8 | Pre-Operations Support & Interim Contractor Support (ICS) (assumed through IOC) | ||||||||||||||
| 1.9 | Operations and Sustainment (Contractor Logistics Support, CLS) | ||||||||||||||
| 1.9.1 | Operations | ||||||||||||||
| 1.9.2 | Sustainment | ||||||||||||||
| 1.9.3 | Disposal | ||||||||||||||
| 1.10 | Contract Fee |
# of Gateway Sites. State in notes # of Antennas and Antenna Diameter per Anchor Station Site.
# of Factory and Ops Center Locations. State in notes number for each.
ALL Costs shall exclude assumed fee (fee reported in WBS 1.10) Factory and Ops Center Locations; excludes Anchor Station Site HW Includes Gateway Sites HW, civil works, site installation and checkout Include Bus SE Include Bus AI&T Include Bus PM Bus HW and SW Includes Payload SE, PM, AI&T, Support Equipment, HW, SW.
Past-Current Perf Program Data
| DESCRIPTIONS | ITEM TYPE | PARAMETER | |||
| PARAMETER NAME | VALUE | UNIT OF MEASURE | REMARKS | ||
| 1 | Programmatic | Program Name | Name | ||
| 2 | Programmatic | Contract Type | Type | ||
| 3 | Programmatic | If Fixed Price, INITIAL Total Fixed Price Value | Dollars | ||
| 4 | Programmatic | If Fixed Price, FINAL Total Fixed Price Value | Dollars | ||
| 5 | Programmatic | Initial (Baseline) ATP to AFL Duration | Months | ||
| 6 | Programmatic | Final (Actual) ATP to AFL Duration | Months | ||
| 7 | Programmatic | Acquisition Agency / Customer | Type | ||
| 8 | System Quantities | No. of Units (indicate how many buses and PLs per bus, per system) | Quantity | ||
| 9 | Space System | Non-recurring Costs (Total Program) | Dollars | ||
| 10 | Space System | Recurring Costs (Total Program) | Dollars | ||
| 11 | Space System | Mission Type | Type | ||
| 12 | Space System | Orbit(s) | Type | ||
| 13 | Space System | Mission Assurance | Name | ||
| 14 | Space System | Test Plan | Name | ||
| 15 | Spacecraft Bus | Non-recurring Costs (Total Bus) | Dollars | ||
| 16 | Spacecraft Bus | Recurring Costs (Total Bus) | Dollars | ||
| 17 | Spacecraft Bus | Final Mass | Pounds | ||
| 18 | Spacecraft Bus | TRL | Number | ||
| 19 | Spacecraft Bus | Heritage | Percent (%) at ATP | ||
| 20 | Payload | Non-recurring Costs (Total Payload) | Dollars | ||
| 21 | Payload | Recurring Costs (Total Payload) | Dollars | ||
| 22 | Payload | Final Mass | Pounds | ||
| 23 | Payload | TRL | Number | ||
| 24 | Payload | Heritage | Percent (%) at ATP | ||
| 25 | Ground | Non-recurring Costs (Total Ground, includes HW and SW) | Dollars | ||
| 26 | Ground | Recurring Costs (Total for all Sites) | Dollars | ||
| 27 | Ground | No. of Ground Control Station Sites | Number | ||
| 28 | Ground | No. of Ground Gateway Station Sites | Number | ||
| Notes | |||||
| Include all analogous programs. | |||||
| 1. Program Name | |||||
| 2. Contract Type (Cost Plus or Fixed Price) with Fixed Price Values in CP24$M [deescalate to base year via NRO indices] | |||||
| 3. Non-recurring and Recurring cost (excluding fee) to include total program cost in CP24$M [deescalate to base year via NRO indices]. If NRE and REC not natively captured by accounting system, contractor shall use best judgement to allocate between NRE and REC (E.g., costs prior to CDR are all NRE, known cost of production satellites is REC and thus back into NRE, etc) | |||||
| 4. Contract Authority to Proceed (ATP) to Available for Launch (AFL) duration excludes storage | |||||
| 5. Identify which organization/customer acquired the system or owns the program. | |||||
| 6. Specify total number of Space Vehicle quantities in each contract | |||||
| 7. Mission Type (E.g., OPIR, SATCOM, Navigation, Space Domaing Awareness, etc) | |||||
| 8. Identify the Orbit(s) of the Space Vehicle(s) [e.g LEO, MEO, GEO, HEO, etc.] | |||||
| 9. Mission Assurance class (A-D) | |||||
| 10. Test Plan (Traditional Qual, Proto Qual, Qual by Similarity, ENGR model, ATP) | |||||
| 11. Bus and payload mass are to include final mass. | |||||
| 12. Current Technology Readiness Level (TRL) | |||||
| 13. Heritage definition: The extent of the item's design (at contract ATP) that is new using a 0-100% scale with the following guidelines: |
- 0%-10% Existing design. Build-to-print or previously qualified design solution, TRL is expected to be high (e.g. TRL 9).
- 10%-40% Minor design change. No change to form, fit, function of the solution. May result from parts obsolescence and/or producibility enhancements. Considers updates to configuration drawings and test procedures as necessary. Includes any design reviews and changes to engineering/prototype/qualification models as needed. Anticipate the design will be qualified by similarity or analysis. TRL is expected to be high (e.g. TRL 8-9.)
- 40%-70% Moderate design changes. Solution derived from previously qualified design. Includes updates to configuration drawings and test procedures. Includes design reviews, modified tooling & test equipment, and engineering/prototype/qualification models needed to qualify the modified design. TRL is expected to be moderately high (e.g. TRL 7-8).
- 70%-100% Major redesign or new design to meet derived requirements. New form, fit, and function solution. Includes design reviews, tooling & test equipment, and engineering/prototype/qualification models needed to qualify the design. This range suggests a significant design effort - TRL may be in the 5-7 range.
Note for all designs lower than TRL-6, significant technology maturation may be required over and above the effort outlined above.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .