Atch 3 PPQ.docx

DOCX document 45 KB Posted

Attached to
FY21 Kaiserslautern Military Community Grounds Maintenance Services
Solicitation number
FA561320R0001
Issued by

View the file

Other files

Show all 18

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING PPQ

1. This This Acquisition is for Grounds Maintenance Services throughout the Kaiserslautern Military Community (KMC), including Ramstein Air Base (RAB), Vogelweh Admin & Housing Area, Rod & Gun Club, Kapaun Annex, Einsiedlerhof Annex, Landstuhl Annex, Kaiserslautern Cold Storage including T-37 & T-41 Storage Facilities, Bann Communications Site, Pirmasens-Husterhöhe Communications Site, and Breitenbach, in a manner that will promote the growth of healthy grass, trees, shrubs, and plants, and present a clean, neat, and professional appearance.

2. As part of the source selection process, this questionnaire is provided to assist the 700th Contracting Squadron in the past performance evaluation of offerors pertaining to the competitive acquisition for Grounds Maintenance Services throughout the KMC that will result in the award of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and as complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up queries by the evaluators. In an effort to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Officer respectfully requests that you DO NOT MAIL hard copies. Instead, please e-mail the completed questionnaire(s) to Ms. Caterina Rothhaar, email: caterina.rothhaar.de@us.af.mil, SSgt Jessica Young, email: jessica.young.7@us.af.mil, and Ms. Beatrice Meier, e-mail: beatrice.meier.1.de@us.af.mil, no later than 21 August 2020. Please complete the attached questionnaire using the following guidance.

3. Indicate, based on the adjectives below, the contractor’s performance on the identified program. Assessments should reflect only contractor liable performance.

E
VG
S
M
U
N
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral
Performance meets
Performance meets
Performance
Performance does not
Performance
Performance
contractual
contractual
meets
meet some
does not meet
was not
requirements with
requirements with
contractual
contractual
most contractual
observed or
many exceeded to
some exceeded to
requirements.
requirements. The
requirements and
not applicable
your organization’s
your organization’s
The contractual
contractual
recovery is not
to the current
benefit. The
benefit. The
performance of
performance of the
likely in a timely
effort being
contractual
contractual
the element or
element or sub-
manner. The
reported
performance of the
performance of the
sub-element
element being
contractual
against.
element or sub-
element or sub-
contains some
assessed reflects a
performance of
element being
element being
minor problems
serious problem for
the element or
assessed was
assessed was
for which
which the contractor
sub-element
accomplished with
accomplished with
corrective
has not yet identified
contains a
no more than a few
no more than some
actions taken by
corrective actions or
serious
minor problems for
minor problems for
the contractor
the contractor’s
problem(s) for
which corrective
which corrective
were
proposed actions
which the
actions taken by the
actions taken by
satisfactory.
appear only
contractor’s
contractor were
the contractor was
marginally effective
corrective
highly effective.
effective.
or were not fully
actions appear or
implemented.
were ineffective.

PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF E, VG, M or U.

Source Selection Information -- See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

FA5613-20-R-0001

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

For Official Use Only Source Selection Information -- See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

4. Include the contractor’s name and the contract number for which the past performance information applies on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix-up in information among contracts surveyed for respective prime/sub-contractors, etc.

I. BUSINESS AND PROGRAM IDENTIFICATION

A. GENERAL INFORMATION:

Contractor’s Name: Address:

Telephone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact:

Project Title or Brief Description of Work*

Contract Number*: Contract Amount:

Contract Period or Dates of Performance*:

Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel

To be completed by the rater and returned directly to the contracting office.

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 5 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. RATER INFORMATION:

Primary Alternate

Name of Rater: Name of Rater:

Title: Title:

Address: Address:

Telephone Number: Telephone Number:

Email Address: Email Address:

Note: Once the PPQ is complete, it is considered to be Source Selection Information.

II. PROGRAM RELEVANCY

To determine program relevancy, please indicate below the services the contractor has or is performing under this contract by marking the applicable box with X or √ or N/A.

Overall Square Meters serviced: (please specify)

III. PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Please mark the appropriate column with “X” or “√” using the definitions matrix set forth in the instructions, and provide a narrative explanation for ratings of E, VG, M or U.

The contractor:
E
VG
S
M
U
N
N/A
1.
Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2.
Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
3.
Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
4.
Did contractor assign personnel with required skills to accomplish the work?
5.
Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
6.
Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
7.
Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
8.
Identified problems as they occurred.
9.
Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
10.
Displayed initiative to solve problems.
11.
Provided timely resolution of defects.
12.
Was responsive to contract changes.
13.
Provided adequate project supervision.
14.
Complied with environmental requirements.
15.
Did contractor consistently respond within the required time frames?
16.
Followed Government accepted Quality Control Plan.
17.
Submitted accurate and complete reports and schedules in a timely manner.
18.
How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance?
19.
For US Government contracts only: Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?

If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

YES
NO
20.
For US Government contracts only: Is the contractor rated in CPARS?
YES
NO
21.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If no, explain in “remarks.”
YES
NO

Remarks:

RETURN COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE CONTRACTING OFFICER (see POCs at paragraph 2)

RETURN COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE CONTRACTING OFFICER (see POCs at paragraph 2)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .