Atch 3_PP Reference List.pdf

PDF 183 KB Posted

Attached to
INTEGRATED SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT CONTRACT AT YOKOTA AIR BASE AND GEOGRAPHICALLY SEPARATED UNITS
Solicitation number
FA520925R0001
Issued by

About this file

This document is an Attachment 3 - Past Performance Reference List for Solicitation No. FA520925R0001 related to an Integrated Solid Waste Management Contract at Yokota Air Base and Geographically Separated Units in Japan.

The solicitation requires the contractor to provide all personnel, equipment, tools, materials, vehicles, supervision, and other items and services necessary to perform integrated solid waste management services including waste collection, transportation, segregation, disposal, recycling and non-recurring off-base incineration services. The successful offeror must be a qualified local vendor licensed and registered to perform the required services in Japan. The contract will be performed entirely in Japan. A site visit for offerors is scheduled for November 18, 2024. Funds are not yet available for this effort, and the government reserves the right to cancel the solicitation. The attachment provides a template for offerors to list three relevant and recent past performance contracts, including details on the products/services, contracting agency, contract value, period of performance, and POC information.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Pre-Con Attendance Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch 1_PWS Waste Management 6 Nov.pdf PDF
Atch 4-1_PPQ Cover Letter 6 Nov.pdf PDF
2. Solicitation - FA520925R0001.pdf PDF
Atch 4-2_PPQ 6 Nov.docx DOCX document
Atch 2_Pricing Exhibits A-F Waste Mgmt.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
1. Business w U.S. Government.pdf PDF
Atch 5_ Sol Prov Not Typically Included in SAM.pdf PDF
0. Notice to Offeror.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 3 Solicitation No. FA520925R0001

CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION

PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE LIST

Name of Offeror:

The following Three (3) contracts are the most relevant (similar in scope, size and complexity) and recent

(performed with the last 3 years of the solicitation issue date) contracts performed for US Government agencies, Government of Japan, or Commercial customers.

Contract No. 1

(1) Company/Division name

(2) Description of Product/Service

(3) Contracting Agency/Customer

(4) Contract Number

(5) Contract Dollar Value

(6) Period of Performance

(7) Verified, up-to-date name, mailing and e-mail addresses, and telephone number of the contracting officer (Point-of-Contact)

(8) Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions

(9) Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.

(10) Include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance and identify aspects (scope, magnitude of effort, and complexity) of the contracts deemed relevant and how they relate to the proposed effort.

Contract No. 2

(1) Company/Division name

(2) Description of Product/Service

(3) Contracting Agency/Customer

(4) Contract Number

(5) Contract Dollar Value

(6) Period of Performance

(7) Verified, up-to-date name, mailing and e-mail addresses, and telephone number of the contracting officer (Point-of-Contact)

(8) Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions

(9) Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.

(10) Include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance and identify aspects (scope, magnitude of effort, and complexity) of the contracts deemed relevant and how they relate to the proposed effort.

Contract No. 3

(1) Company/Division name

(2) Description of Product/Service

(3) Contracting Agency/Customer

(4) Contract Number

(5) Contract Dollar Value

(6) Period of Performance

(7) Verified, up-to-date name, mailing and e-mail addresses, and telephone number of the contracting officer (Point-of-Contact)

(8) Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions

(9) Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.

(10) Include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance and identify aspects (scope, magnitude of effort, and complexity) of the contracts deemed relevant and how they relate to the proposed effort.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .