Atch 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 32 KB Posted
- Attached to
- ATLANTIC UNDERSEA TEST AND EVALUATION CENTER (AUTEC) PALM BEACH FL (KPBI)—ANDROS TOWN BAHAMAS (MYAF)
- Solicitation number
- HTC71125RC004
About this file
The document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a federal contract opportunity related to fixed wing transportation services. The solicitation (HTC71125RC004) is issued by the Department of Defense United States Transportation Command for the Atlantic Undersea Test and Evaluation Center (AUTEC), requiring transportation services between Palm Beach, Florida (KPBI) and Andros Town, Bahamas (MYAF). The questionnaire is designed to assess a contractor's historical performance, with sections covering contract identification, respondent information, performance ratings across multiple service dimensions, and narrative questions about past contract execution.
The questionnaire requires detailed evaluation of the contractor's performance in areas such as passenger and cargo transportation, aircraft availability, maintenance, personnel qualifications, responsiveness, and overall contract management. Respondents are asked to provide ratings from Unsatisfactory to Exceptional across 13 specific performance criteria. The document mandates that completed questionnaires must be submitted by 17 April 2025 to specified USTRANSCOM Acquisition Office email addresses, with the understanding that the information will be used to determine the contractor's potential for successfully performing the fixed wing transportation service contract.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2025.04.22 HTC71125RC004 QA.pdf | ||
| 2025.04.22 AMD 0003 HTC71125RC004.pdf | ||
| 2025.04.16 HTC71125RC004 QA.pdf | ||
| Atch 1 - AUTEC PWS 2025.04.16.pdf | ||
| 2025.04.17 AMD 0002 HTC71125RC004.pdf | ||
| 20250320 - HTC71125RC004 Solicitation.pdf | ||
| Atch 1 - AUTEC PWS 2025.03.18.pdf | ||
| HTC71125RC004 Solicitation 2025.03.17.pdf | ||
| Atch 7 - Wage Determination 2015-4573 30 DEC 2024.pdf | ||
| HTC71125RC004 Solicitation 2025.03.18 .docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch 6 - Basic Eligibility.docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch 5 - RFP Offeror Information Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch 1 - AUTEC PWS 2025.03.18.docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch 4 - Aircraft Information Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch 2 - AUTEC Pricing Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CUI
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 Source Selection Information When Filled In
HTC71125RC004
Attachment 3 – Past Performance Questionnare
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
INSTRUCTIONS: The Offeror submitting a proposal to USTRANSCOM in response to solicitation number HTC71125RC004 completes this section prior to sending to the Respondent.
A. Contractor Name on Awarded Contract: __________________________________________________________
B. Contractor (e.g., Prime, Affiliate, Subsidiary, or Subcontractor) Performing Services: ____________________
C. Contract Title/Number: ______________________________________________________________________
D. Brief Description of Work Performed (include workload estimates):
E. Location(s) where service was performed under this contract:________________________________________
F. Contractor being evaluated performed as the: ______ Prime or ______ Subcontractor (Mark one)
G. Contract Type: ___ Fixed Price ___ Cost ___ IDIQ ___ Single Award ___ Multiple Award
Other: ______________________________________________________________________________
H. Total Period of Performance (month/year – month/year): __________________________________________
I. Annual Contract Value (amount awarded): _____________________________________________________
J. Total Contract Value (including unexercised options): _____________________________________________
SECTION 2: RESPONDENT INFORMATION
INSTRUCTIONS: The remaining sections are to be completed by Respondent.
The results of this survey will aid the Government in determining whether there is a reasonable expectation that the contractor will successfully perform the Atlantic Undersea Test and Evaluation Center fixed wing transportation service contract. Therefore, it is important the responses be candid, factual, and as complete as possible. The contractor will not be provided with this form, once completed, or the name of the respondent.
If you do not have knowledge of, or experience with, the contract referenced above, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who can provide the information. Also, if offeror holds or has held other relevant contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
Questionnaires must be returned no later than 17 April 2025 to USTRANSCOM Acquisition Office via E-mail: barbara.l.wolf11.civ@mail.mil; nicole.i.blanson.civ@mail.mil. Please indicate “Performance Survey” in the subject. Note, this information is to be received directly from the respondent and will not be considered if received from the Offeror.
A. Respondent's name: __________________________________________________________________________
B. Respondent's title: ___________________________________________________________________________
C. Customer or agency name: ____________________________________________________________________
D. Respondent's phone number: ___________________________________________________________________
E. Respondent’s Email: _________________________________________________________________________
F. Description of Work Performed. Please mark the appropriate boxes to indicate the services provided under this reference. In the space below, provide workload estimates (such as pounds of cargo, number of passengers or missions flown, etc.) and any other services not listed. Note: If any of the information in Section 1 is incorrect, please provide the correct information here.
| Cargo |
| Passengers |
| Passengers and Cargo |
Fixed Wing
G. Was contract performance assessed in Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS)?
________ Yes ________ No
NOTE: The CPARS may be reviewed for the referenced contract as well as responses to this questionnaire. Although you may have filed a CPARS for the contract listed, we appreciate your response to this questionnaire because some of the questions relate to areas not covered by CPARS.
SECTION 3: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
INSTRUCTIONS: Place a mark in the block that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation.
In responding to the survey, please justify and explain Marginal or Unsatisfactory ratings. As the Respondent, you may be contacted to clarify comments or ratings. In order for the government to review and assess the contractor’s past performance rating, please use the following ratings to describe the offeror’s performance on your contract or project:
Exceptional (E) - Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to your company’s (or agency’s) benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner.
Very Good (VG) - Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to your company’s (agency’s) benefit. There were a few minor problems that the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.
Satisfactory (S) - Performance met contract requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Marginal (M) - Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective or was not fully implemented.
Unsatisfactory (US) - Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
Unknown (U) - No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.
Not Applicable (NA) – The requested information was not related to the referenced contract effort.
| 1. QUALITY OF SERVICE |
| US |
| M |
| S |
| VG |
| E |
| U |
| NA |
| A |
| Contractor’s performance in providing fixed wing passenger transportation services, including effective flight planning and execution. |
| B |
| Contractor’s performance in providing fixed wing cargo transportation services, including effective flight planning and execution. |
| C |
| Contractor’s performance in providing fixed wing combi (passenger and cargo) transportation services, including effective flight planning and execution. |
| D |
| Fixed Wing aircraft availability (i.e., were aircraft available to fly missions as required). |
| E |
| Contractor’s performance in providing airlift services, including effective flight planning and execution |
| F |
| Contractor’s performance air planning coordination/services |
| G |
| Contractor’s performance in providing airlift transportation services without damage or loss of cargo. |
| H |
| Contractor’s performance in providing airlift transportation services without loss or injury of passengers. |
| I |
| Contractor’s performance of scheduled maintenance on aircraft to ensure limited interruption of service. |
| J |
| Contractor’s performance of providing personnel, including aircrew, which demonstrated the appropriate education, experience, skill level, expertise and security clearance for the tasks required. |
| K |
| Contractor’s responsiveness |
| L |
| Contractor’s flexibility to meet the customer’s mission needs |
| M |
| Contractor’s performance in providing documents, and related deliverables to the required specification. |
| 2. OVERALL PERFORMANCE |
| US |
| M |
| S |
| VG |
| E |
| U |
| NA |
| A |
| Contractor’s overall performance providing air transportation services |
| B |
| Contractor’s overall program/contract management. |
| C |
| Contractor’s overall performance in forecasting and controlling costs |
| D |
| Overall performance of the contractor. |
Rating Comments. Please discuss each response for which you indicated Marginal or Unsatisfactory performance in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
SECTION 4: NARRATIVE QUESTIONS
INSTRUCTIONS: Respond to the questions and provide explanations as necessary.
1. Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience, or are there any pending terminations? ________ Yes ________ No
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc.)
2. Would you have any reservations with awarding to this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your most critical and demanding programs? If so, please explain why.
3. Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .