Atch 05- Past Performance Questionnaire VTE FY24.docx
DOCX document 43 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Vertical Transportation Equipment Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA302023Q0025
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a vertical transportation equipment maintenance and repair services contract opportunity. The questionnaire requests information about a contractor's past performance on elevators and service calls at various locations on Sheppard Air Force Base in Texas from October 2023 through September 2028. Respondents are asked to provide ratings on the contractor's ability to hire qualified personnel, quality control procedures, report submission timeliness, issue resolution timeliness, and cooperation with customer personnel. The respondent is also asked if they would award another contract to the contractor and provide any explanation if needed. The completed questionnaire must be returned by email no later than July 17, 2023.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Solicitation Amendment FA302023Q00250001 SF 30_signed.pdf | ||
| 2. ELEVATOR SERVICE CALLS JULY 2022- JUNE 2023.pdf | ||
| VTE Answers Coverletter.pdf | ||
| 1 Amendment 1-Acknowledgement of Receipt.pdf | ||
| Solicitation - FA302023Q0025.pdf | ||
| Atch 04-SAFB Form 151 Base Pass Application.pdf | ||
| Atch 01-PWS VTE FINAL 16 May 2023.pdf | ||
| Atch 02-Price Exhibit FY24ver2.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Atch 03-Wage Determination 1987-0155 rev12Jan23.pdf | ||
| Atch 07-QASP VTE FINAL 12 May 2023.pdf | ||
| Atch 05a-PPQ Cover Letter-VTE FY24-CO signed.pdf | ||
| Atch 06-Davis-Bacon WD- TX20230274rev3Feb23.pdf |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
For Official Use Only When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.
Past Performance Questionnaire – FA302023Q0025 Vertical Transportation Equipment (VTE) Maintenance and Repair Services PPQ: Due 17 July 2023 NLT 2:00 pm CST Section 1: Contract Identification
A. Contractor (Company/Division):
B. Period of Performance
1. Beginning Date: through
C. Contract Scope
1. Quantity of how many total elevators were maintained under contract:
2. Quantity how many service calls (work orders) for repair and/or nonoperational equipment were issued under this contract to the contractor annually:
3. If management was not local what was the method provided to ensure quality control?
D. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No
E. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel
Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last three (3) years, please complete separate Past Performance Questionnaire forms for those contracts as well.
Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification
A. Customer or agency name:
B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):
C. Description of work performed under this contract:
Section 3: Respondent Identification
A. Respondent’s name:
B. Respondent’s title:
C. Respondent’s phone/e-mail address:
D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:
E. Other suggested points of contact:
Section 4: Performance Information
In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:
Code Performance Rating
E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.
| The Contractor: |
| E |
| V |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
1. Demonstrated the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
2. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
3. Submitted reports on time and followed established performance schedules.
4. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
5. Cooperated with customer personnel after award.
6. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?
7. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain.
EXPLANATION:
☐ Yes ☐ No
IF THIS WAS A GOVERNMENT CONTRACT:
Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience, or are there any pending terminations?
☐ Yes ☐ Default ☐ Convenience ☐ Pending Terminations ☐ No
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).
SECTION 5: GENERAL COMMENT
Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what was promised in the proposal, I [ click and select an item ] award to the contractor today given that I had a choice.
Additional remarks:
[click and pick the date]
Respondent’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
E-Mail to: tonishia.bedford-smith@us.af.mil Attachment 05 For Official Use Only Page 4 of 4
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .