Asbetos Lead Survey_Bldg-622_20160303.pdf

March 3, 2016

Mr. Aaron Williams USACE, Tulsa District 1645 South 101st East Avenue Tulsa, OK 74128 Phone: (918) 669-4915

RE: Submittal of Hazardous Building Material Surveys Contract No. W912BV-10-D-2011, Task Order 0002 Ft. Bliss Bldg. # 622

Dear Mr. Williams, This document summarizes the Asbestos Survey and/or Lead Paint Survey Reports for the subject building.

The below listed information was utilized to complete the Scope of Work Tasks:

Bldg. No. 622 POC: Jesse Moncada Phone No: 915-568-1838 Building Square Footage (SF) Reported: 14,634 Technical Summary:

1. LEAD PAINT. ENCON performed a total of two-hundred and forty (240) XRF analyses, which included two-hundred and eleven (211) building component measurements and twenty-nine (29) calibration checks.

Ninety-nine (99) of the building readings tested positive for lead paint. Refer to the attachments for more details.

2. ASBESTOS. A total of one-hundred and five (105) bulk samples were effectively collected for lab analysis of this subject building. The attached analytical results indicated that asbestos containing materials were present in the subject building. Contact Ft. Bliss, DPW regarding the latest overall status of any asbestos or lead paint materials.

SUMMARY TABLE (with Action Level) Previously Surveyed by others

Were Found

Were Not Found

Actions Required Yes / No

1. Lead Containing Paint Materials (≥0.3 mg/cm2) X Yes

2. Asbestos Containing Materials (>1 %) X Yes

Please contact me with any technical questions, or follow-up needs that you may have.

Sincerely, David Epperly, Ph.D., P.E.

Project Manager – ALL Consulting

CC: Jesse Moncada (Ft Bliss DPW) Barry Vercoe (CESFW-PEC-TM)

ATTACHMENTS

1. Lead Paint Survey Report

2. Asbestos Survey Report

ATTACHMENT 1

Lead Paint Survey Report

COMPREHENSIVE LEAD PAINT SURVEY

BUILDING 622

FORT BLISS, TEXAS 79916

Prepared for:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Tulsa District

Prepared by:

ALL CONSULTING TEAM

ENCON International, Inc.

7307 Remcon Circle, #103

El Paso, TX 79912 and

ALL Consulting, LLC 1718 S. Cheyenne Ave.

Tulsa, OK 74119

Inspection Start Date:

February 03, 2016

LEAD PAINT SURVEY REPORT

Ft. Bliss, Texas ─ Building 622

PURPOSE

The ALL Consulting Team was contracted by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Tulsa

District, to perform comprehensive Hazardous Building Materials Surveys to identify the presence of any asbestos or lead paint at a number of buildings at Ft. Bliss, Texas. This project also included the development and population of a database to store the survey reports for access by the Ft. Bliss

Directorate of Public Works (DPW), and others. The buildings that are included within this contract scope of work includes buildings at McGregor Base Camp and Doña Ana Base Camp within the New Mexico portion of Ft. Bliss, in addition to the Ft. Bliss buildings within Texas.

BACKGROUND

Ft. Bliss has a large number of buildings constructed before 1990 when the use of asbestos and lead paint was prevalent in the construction of buildings. Because the presence of these materials still exists in these buildings, Ft. Bliss is required to identify the extent of the lead paint remaining at these buildings, as well as their condition. Lead in paint is a hazard that is regulated by the

Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) under 29 CFR 1926.62 for worker exposure. In addition to the dangers of occupational exposure to construction and maintenance workers, as well as building occupants, lead particles and lead dust may be inadvertently carried home on clothes and shoes to expose their families. Identifying components containing lead paint will not only protect the workers and their families, but will help to indemnify Ft. Bliss by preemptively identifying the location of these potential hazardous materials.

INTRODUCTION

In accordance with OSHA Lead Regulation 29 CFR 1926.62, and the OSHA Hazard

Communication standard (29 CFR 1910.1200), where lead exists workers must be notified and steps must be taken to protect them from the inherent hazards. By identifying the lead containing components in these buildings, and, when appropriate, removing the hazards or potential hazards, Ft. Bliss avoids the liability of workers becoming exposed. Lead paint was banned for use in residential dwellings starting in January of 1978, but lead paint is still available for non-residential applications.

FACILITY DESCRIPTION

Building 622 was constructed in 1939, and was in use at the time of inspection. Its previous use was listed as an “administrative building.” A description of this building is presented in Table 1 below.

TABLE 1 – BUILDING DESCRIPTION

Building Items Description Area of building 14,634 square feet Date of Construction 1939 Number of floors Two (2) floors Exterior wall materials Brick, CMU Roof type Pitched Roof material Shingles Interior walls Drywall, brick, CMU, fire brick, ceramic tiles Interior floors Concrete Interior floor coverings Carpet, 12x12 vinyl floor tiles Ceilings Drywall, wood Notes:

UNIQUE PAINTING HISTORY

Lead can be found in paint, varnish, shellac, and stain, so any coated surface other than a factory coating is suspect for lead paint. A Lead Paint Survey is based upon coated components which are grouped into similar components with a similar (unique) painting history. This would include components with the same substrate, built or installed at the same time, with a common painting history. Items such as window components (sash and mullions), window frame (trim, header, sill, and apron), doors, and door frame materials, should be considered to have a possible separate painting history, and could have had different coatings applied throughout the years.

REGULATORY STANDARDS

Lead-based paint in residential structures, or Child Occupied Facilities (day care facilities, etc.), is regulated by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) under 24 CFR 35, and also by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) under 40 CFR 745. Only a few of these types of facilities have been identified in the buildings included in this contract. For all buildings included in this category, both HUD and EPA regulations will apply. All other buildings identified in this project would be regulated under the OSHA standards pertaining to worker protection from hazards (29 CFR 1926.62).

Sampling protocols have already been thoroughly established by the HUD and the EPA for residential housing units. For non-residential structures, there is no specified lead paint sampling protocol, but HUD / EPA protocols were generally followed. These comprehensive lead paint surveys include thorough inspections to identify all lead painted components.

SAMPLING METHODOLOGY

The building materials survey tasks were performed in accordance with the Final Hazardous

Building Materials Surveys, Sampling Plan, Fort Bliss, Texas, December 2014, prepared by ALL

Consulting and ENCON International, Inc. A visual inspection of the building was conducted to develop a sampling strategy. This included identifying component groups with similar painting histories. Each component group was sampled throughout the building to establish whether or not the building contained lead at the prescribed action level for this project, at the time of the survey.

This Lead Paint Inspection was performed on February 03 & 04, 2016 using an x-ray fluorescence

(XRF) analyzer, to identify if any lead amounts in the paint were at or above 0.3 mg/cm2. A total of two-hundred and forty (240) XRF analyses were performed, which included two-hundred and eleven (211) building component measurements and twenty-nine (29) calibration checks.

Drawings that illustrate the locations of all building measurements that tested positive for lead have been provided in Appendix A of this Report.

XRF RESULTS

The XRF analyzer indicated that lead-containing paint was identified in the building component types listed in the following Table 2. The table also provides additional details regarding building component types, and if the tested components were located at the exterior or interior of the subject building.

TABLE 2: LEAD CONTAINING COMPONENT TYPES

Component Substrate Condition Color

Exterior Building: S Wing, Second Floor

DOOR WOOD POOR GREY

THRESHOLD METAL POOR GREY

Exterior Building: S Wing, First Floor

LADDER METAL POOR GREY

LADDER BASE CONCRETE POOR YELLOW

Component Substrate Condition Color

WINDOW LINTEL METAL FAIR GREY

DOOR LINTEL METAL FAIR GREY

SCREEN DOOR CASING METAL FAIR GREY

BOLLARD CONCRETE POOR YELLOW

WINDOW METAL FAIR GREY

METAL SIDING METAL FAIR GREY

WALL CMU FAIR YELLOW

WINDOW METAL POOR GREY

OLD DOOR LINTEL METAL POOR YELLOW

PARTIAL DOOR CASING METAL POOR YELLOW

SCREEN DOOR CASING WOOD POOR GREY

Exterior Building: N Wing, First Floor

OLD DOORWAY

CASING METAL POOR GREY

WINDOW SILL PLASTER POOR YELLOW

WALL CMU POOR YELLOW

COLUMN METAL POOR GREY

DOOR CASING METAL POOR GREY

WINDOW LINTEL METAL POOR GREY

METAL SIDING METAL POOR GREY

WINDOW METAL POOR GREY

THRESHOLD CONCRETE POOR YELLOW

STAIR STRINGER METAL FAIR GREY

STAIR SUPPORT METAL POOR GREY

STAIR RISER CONCRETE POOR YELLOW

RAFTER TAIL METAL POOR GREY

RAFTER TAIL WOOD POOR GREY

LADDER METAL POOR GREY

HOSE CONNECTION METAL POOR RED

Exterior Building: N Wing, Second Floor

THRESHOLD METAL POOR GREY

Interior Building: N Wing, Second Floor

WINDOW SILL PLASTER FAIR WHITE

Interior Building: S Wing, First Floor

WINDOW METAL POOR BROWN

WINDOW METAL FAIR WHITE

DOOR WOOD FAIR BLUE

CEILING WOOD FAIR WHITE

Interior Building: N Wing, First Floor

WALL BRICK FAIR WHITE

COLUMN METAL FAIR WHITE

WALL BRICK FAIR GREEN

BASE TRIM BRICK POOR GREEN

COLUMN METAL FAIR GREEN

COLUMN METAL FAIR TAN

COLUMN METAL POOR TAN

DOOR TRIM METAL FAIR BROWN

WINDOW SILL PLASTER FAIR WHITE

DOOR CASING WOOD POOR WHITE

DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR WHITE

DOOR LINTEL METAL FAIR WHITE

CEILING DRYWALL FAIR WHITE

BEAM DRYWALL FAIR WHITE

Component Substrate Condition Color

WINDOW METAL FAIR WHITE

COLUMN CONCRETE FAIR WHITE

BEAM PLASTER POOR WHITE

WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE

DOOR CASING METAL FAIR TAN

The following Table 3 indicates that a total of ninety-nine (99) of the building measurements tested positive, which confirmed the presence of lead at or above 0.3 mg/cm2. The complete XRF lead paint data, including negative measurements and calibration readings, have been provided in

Appendix B of this Report. Note that the XRF analyzer makes a final determination regarding if a building component is positive or negative for lead in paint. This analytical determination is

0.3 mg/cm2), the measurement obtained, and the analytical range of the margin of error for the XRF analyzer. On occasion, a measurement obtained using this test method

(EPA method # 6200) that is slightly above or below the standard may effectively result in a positive or negative determination, due to the analyzer’s margin of error. Any measurements that are determined to be positive or negative for lead paint by the XRF analyzer, will be accepted as such, during this Survey. Any results to which this would apply would have been noted with an asterisk (*) in the “Results” column of Appendix B of this Report.

TABLE 3: POSITIVE XRF LEAD PAINT MEASUREMENTS

No. Component Substrate Condition Color Measurement Location Action Level

(mg/cm2)

Results PbC

(mg/cm2) Exterior Building: S Wing, Second Floor

5 DOOR WOOD POOR GREY S WALL; ENTRANCE 0.3 8.4

6 THRESHOLD METAL POOR GREY S ENTRANCE; FLOOR 0.3 1.7

Exterior Building: S Wing, First Floor

7 LADDER METAL POOR GREY S WALL 0.3 0.4

8 LADDER BASE CONCRETE POOR YELLOW S WALL 0.3 4.1

12 WINDOW LINTEL METAL FAIR GREY S WALL 0.3 12.8

13 DOOR LINTEL METAL FAIR GREY S WALL; E ENTRANCE 0.3 10.5

14 SCREEN DOOR CASING METAL FAIR GREY S WALL; E ENTRANCE 0.3 1.7

17 BOLLARD CONCRETE POOR YELLOW SE CORNER OF BUILDING 0.3 0.6

18 WINDOW METAL FAIR GREY E WALL 0.3 0.5

19 WINDOW METAL FAIR GREY E WALL 0.3 0.4

20 WINDOW LINTEL METAL FAIR GREY E WALL 0.3 12

23 WINDOW METAL FAIR GREY E WALL 0.3 2.5

24 WINDOW METAL FAIR GREY E WALL 0.3 2.4

25 WINDOW METAL FAIR GREY E WALL 0.3 2

26 WINDOW METAL FAIR GREY E WALL 0.3 2.1

27 WINDOW LINTEL METAL FAIR GREY E WALL 0.3 2.4

28 DOOR LINTEL METAL FAIR GREY E WALL; CENTER ENTRANCE 0.3 4.8

30 WINDOW METAL FAIR GREY E WALL 0.3 2.5

33 DOOR LINTEL METAL FAIR GREY E WALL; N ENTRANCE 0.3 4.8

No. Component Substrate Condition Color Measurement Location Action Level

(mg/cm2)

Results PbC

(mg/cm2)

36 METAL SIDING METAL FAIR GREY E WALL 0.3 1.3

39 WALL CMU FAIR YELLOW E WALL 0.3 0.6

41 WINDOW LINTEL METAL FAIR GREY E WALL 0.3 15.7

103 WINDOW METAL POOR GREY W WALL 0.3 2.6

104 OLD DOOR LINTEL METAL POOR YELLOW W WALL 0.3 4.8

105 PARTIAL DOOR CASING METAL POOR YELLOW W WALL 0.3 6.5

106 WINDOW METAL POOR GREY W WALL 0.3 2.1

107 WINDOW METAL POOR GREY W WALL 0.3 2.7

108 WINDOW METAL POOR GREY W WALL 0.3 0.7

109 SCREEN DOOR CASING WOOD POOR GREY S WALL; W ENTRANCE 0.3 5

Exterior Building: N Wing, First Floor

43 OLD DOORWAY CASING METAL POOR GREY E WALL 0.3 14.6

45 WINDOW SILL PLASTER POOR YELLOW E WALL 0.3 0.7

46 WALL CMU POOR YELLOW E WALL 0.3 0.6

47 COLUMN METAL POOR GREY E WALL 0.3 12.9

48 DOOR CASING METAL POOR GREY E WALL; S ENTRANCE 0.3 1.1

50 DOOR CASING METAL POOR GREY E WALL; S ENTRANCE 0.3 7.7

51 WINDOW LINTEL METAL POOR GREY E WALL 0.3 3.7

54 DOOR CASING METAL POOR GREY E WALL; CENTER ENTRANCE 0.3 12.1

55 WINDOW SILL PLASTER POOR YELLOW E WALL 0.3 0.8

56 METAL SIDING METAL POOR GREY E WALL 0.3 3.2

57 DOOR CASING METAL POOR GREY E WALL; CENTER ENTRANCE 0.3 7.5

58 METAL SIDING METAL POOR GREY E WALL 0.3 3.2

59 DOOR CASING METAL POOR GREY E WALL; N ENTRANCE 0.3 0.8

60 COLUMN METAL POOR GREY E WALL 0.3 9.4

61 WINDOW METAL POOR GREY E WALL 0.3 1.5

62 DOOR CASING METAL POOR GREY E WALL; N ENTRANCE 0.3 4.8

63 WINDOW METAL POOR GREY E WALL 0.3 3.4

64 THRESHOLD CONCRETE POOR YELLOW N SIDE; E ENTRANCE; FLOOR 0.3 1

66 STAIR STRINGER METAL FAIR GREY N STAIRWELL; W SIDE 0.3 4.3

67 STAIR SUPPORT METAL POOR GREY N STAIRWELL; UNDERNEATH STAIRS 0.3 4.3

84 THRESHOLD CONCRETE POOR YELLOW N SIDE; W ENTRANCE; FLOOR 0.3 0.6

86 STAIR RISER CONCRETE POOR YELLOW N SIDE; W ENTRANCE; STAIRS 0.3 3.9

88 WINDOW METAL POOR GREY W WALL 0.3 0.5

89 RAFTER TAIL METAL POOR GREY W SIDE 0.3 10.8

90 RAFTER TAIL WOOD POOR GREY W SIDE 0.3 1.9

92 COLUMN METAL POOR GREY W WALL 0.3 3.5

93 LADDER METAL POOR GREY W SIDE 0.3 0.5

95 WALL CMU POOR YELLOW W WALL 0.3 0.5

96 DOOR CASING METAL POOR GREY W WALL; N ENTRANCE 0.3 12.2

97 WINDOW LINTEL METAL POOR GREY W WALL 0.3 3.2

98 METAL SIDING METAL POOR GREY W WALL 0.3 2.2

101 HOSE CONNECTION METAL POOR RED W WALL 0.3 0.5

Exterior Building: N Wing, Second Floor

70 THRESHOLD METAL POOR GREY N ENTRANCE; FLOOR 0.3 10.4

Interior Building: N Wing, Second Floor

83 WINDOW SILL PLASTER FAIR WHITE E WALL 0.3 0.6

Interior Building: S Wing, First Floor

134 WINDOW METAL POOR BROWN RM. G; E WALL 0.3 1.9

136 WINDOW METAL POOR BROWN RM I; E WALL 0.3 2.6

137 WINDOW METAL FAIR WHITE RM. S; E WALL 0.3 2.2

142 DOOR WOOD FAIR BLUE NE HALLWAY; N WALL; ENTRANCE TO RM. V 0.3 0.5

144 WINDOW METAL FAIR WHITE NE HALLWAY; E WALL 0.3 3.2

145 WINDOW METAL FAIR WHITE NW HALLWAY; W WALL 0.3 2.8

226 CEILING WOOD FAIR WHITE RM. V 0.3 4.6

No. Component Substrate Condition Color Measurement Location Action Level

(mg/cm2)

Results PbC

(mg/cm2) Interior Building: N Wing, First Floor

148 WALL BRICK FAIR WHITE RM. Y; S WALL 0.3 0.4

149 COLUMN METAL FAIR WHITE RM. Z; CENTER AREA 0.3 6.7

155 WALL BRICK FAIR GREEN RM. X; W WALL 0.3 2.2

156 BASE TRIM BRICK POOR GREEN RM. X; N WALL 0.3 0.6

158 COLUMN METAL FAIR WHITE RM. AA; E WALL 0.3 11.6

165 COLUMN METAL FAIR GREEN RM. AH; W WALL 0.3 5.2

185 COLUMN METAL FAIR TAN RM. AI; W WALL 0.3 7.5

186 COLUMN METAL FAIR TAN RM. AI; W WALL 0.3 9

188 COLUMN METAL POOR TAN RM. AI; N SIDE 0.3 16.2

193 DOOR TRIM METAL FAIR BROWN NE HALLWAY; E WALL; ENTRANCE 0.3 4.2

196 WINDOW SILL PLASTER FAIR WHITE RM. AM; E WALL 0.3 0.8

197 DOOR CASING WOOD POOR WHITE RM. AM; N WALL; ENTRANCE TO RM. AO 0.3 3.6

198 DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR WHITE RM. AM; N WALL; ENTRANCE TO RM. AP 0.3 0.6

199 DOOR LINTEL METAL FAIR WHITE RM. AM; N WALL; ENTRANCE TO RM. AP 0.3 2.9

200 DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR WHITE RM. AP; W WALL; ENTRANCE TO RM. AO 0.3 1.2

201 WALL BRICK FAIR WHITE RM. AP; W WALL 0.3 1.3

203 CEILING DRYWALL FAIR WHITE RM. AP 0.3 0.6

204 BEAM DRYWALL FAIR WHITE RM. AP; CEILING 0.3 0.9

205 WINDOW METAL FAIR WHITE RM. AP; E WALL 0.3 17.5

207 CEILING DRYWALL FAIR WHITE RM. AN 0.3 0.6

208 CEILING DRYWALL FAIR WHITE RM. AM; W HALLWAY 0.3 0.7

210 WINDOW METAL FAIR WHITE RM. AM; W HALLWAY; W WALL 0.3 0.6

211 WINDOW SILL PLASTER FAIR WHITE RM. AL; W WALL 0.3 0.9

212 COLUMN CONCRETE FAIR WHITE RM. AL; W WALL 0.3 7.3

213 BEAM PLASTER POOR WHITE RM. AL; W WALL 0.3 0.7

214 WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE RM. AM; S WALL 0.3 0.5

215 WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE RM AM; W HALLWAY; S WALL 0.3 0.5

216 WALL BRICK FAIR WHITE RM. AO; S WALL 0.3 0.9

217 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR TAN RM. AO; N WALL; ENTRANCE 0.3 4.5

QUALIFICATIONS

This Comprehensive Lead Paint Survey was performed by an Inspector that was qualified to perform work in Texas, per the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS), and in New

Mexico per USEPA certification credentials. This individual has received training under the HUD

/ EPA training criteria for the required Lead Paint Inspector and/or Risk Assessor courses and has received the refresher training within the prescribed period for each jurisdiction. Company and individual licenses and credentials have been provided and are available for review in the project sampling plan documents, which have been submitted to the USACE.

LIMITATIONS

The overall purpose of this Comprehensive Lead Paint Survey was to identify if lead-containing components were present, within the qualifications and limitations summarized below. Reliance on this Report is specifically limited to gathering initial information regarding the presence of lead in paint. Any time that lead-based paint may be identified during the performance of a lead inspection, the owner of the building is responsible to the occupants and to the public to properly manage these materials, per Local, State and Federal regulations. Prior to the abatement or removal of any lead containing materials, a Lead Project Design should be properly performed, by a qualified Lead Firm, to 1) ensure that materials will be properly managed, and 2) to prepare a more accurate estimate of actual materials to be addressed. This Survey Report was specifically prepared for ALL Consulting’s Client (USACE and Ft. Bliss), and the extent of liability incurred, is limited to the amount of the Report Fee paid by its Client. The USACE agrees that the ALL

Consulting Team cannot be held responsible for any liability based on reliance of this Report by any third party.

CONCLUSIONS

1. Specific Conclusions. Lead-containing paint was found on components either inside and / or outside of this building.

• Lead paint should not be disturbed without proper procedures in place. Should the lead paint need to be disturbed, personnel should be evacuated in advance, and only properly trained persons with adequate PPE should be allowed to disturb the lead paint material.

• Lead painted components in poor condition should be stabilized with interim controls or abatement procedures by properly trained personnel.

• Lead hazard air monitoring should be performed during abatement activities.

• Following abatement activities, clearance wipe samples should be collected and sent to an approved laboratory for lead paint analysis.

• The OSHA Hazard Communication Standard and the Lead Paint Standard both require anyone working in such areas to be informed of lead paint hazards and methods to avoid the hazards.

2. General Conclusions. Proper notification should be made to the appropriate authorities prior to disturbance of any lead-containing materials, including abatement activity, renovations, or operations and maintenance (O&M) activities, or demolition of any facilities or public buildings.

Other personnel working in the area must be alerted by signage and the appropriate regulated area designations. OSHA specifies worker protection and engineering controls, as well as work practices to ensure the safety of workers and anyone who will be in the area after the conclusion of the work.

Contact the personnel listed below with any clarifications that may be needed.

Inspected by: Reviewed by: Approved by:

Tim Jones, RPIH Alex Woelper, P.E., RPIH David Epperly, Ph.D., P.E.

Lead Inspector Environmental Consultant Project Manager ENCON International, Inc. ENCON International, Inc. ALL Consulting, LLC License # 2070306

APPENDICES:

A. Lead Paint Measurement Location Drawing(s) B. XRF Lead Paint Data

APPENDIX A

Lead Paint Measurement Location Drawing(s)

Draw by: JA

NOT TO SCALE

Project: # 139-14

ALL CONSULTING TEAM

Hazardous Materials Surveys

Sheet

ENV-1

Lead Paint Measurement Location - 1st Floor

7307 Remcon Cir, Ste 103 El Paso, Texas, 79912 915.833.3740

ENCON INTERNATIONAL, INC

## Positive Lead Paint Measurement Locations

Date:

02-11-2016

Location:

Building # 622 Fort Bliss, TX

W. RR

M. RR

Rm. A

Rm. B Rm. C Rm. D Rm. E Rm. F Rm. G Rm. H Rm. I Rm. S Rm. V Rm. W

Rm. J Rm. K Rm. L Rm. M Rm. N Rm. O Rm. P Rm. Q Rm. T Rm. u

Rm. R

Conference Room

Rm. Y

Rm. X

Rm. Z

Rm. AB Rm. AC Rm. AD Rm. AE Rm. AF Rm. AJ Rm. AK Rm. AL

Rm. AN

Rm. AO

Rm. APRm. AMRm. AIRm. AH

N

18 19, 20 23 24 25 27 28 30 33 3639 41

4345 46 47 48 50 51 54 55 56 57 58 59 6261 63

84 86

92 9395969798101

103104105106107108

134 136 137

149155

156 Rm. AA

165 185 186

200 201

212213

215 216

889089

Project: # 139-14

ALL CONSULTING TEAM

Hazardous Materials Surveys

Sheet

ENV-1

Lead Paint Measurement Locations - 2nd Floor

## Positive Lead Paint Measurement Locations

7307 Remcon Cir, Ste 103 El Paso, Texas, 79912 915.833.3740

ENCON INTERNATIONAL, INC

2nd Floor South Side

N

2nd Floor North Side

Attic

Date:

02-11-2016

Location:

Building # 622 Fort Bliss, TX

APPENDIX B

XRF Lead Paint Data

Note that the XRF analyzer makes a final determination regarding if a building component is positive or negative for lead in paint. This analytical determination is based upon the standard (≥0.3 mg/cm2), the measurement obtained, and the analytical range of the margin of error for the XRF analyzer. On occasion, a measurement obtained using this test method (EPA method # 6200) that is above or below the standard may effectively result in a negative or positive determination, due to the analyzer’s margin of error. Any measurements that are determined to be negative or positive for lead paint by the XRF analyzer, will be accepted as such, for this Survey. Any results that apply to this situation will be noted with an asterisk (*) in the table to follow.

Ft. Bliss, Texas XRF Lead Paint Data Bldg. 622

No. Component Substrate Condition Color Measurement Location Results Action Level

(mg/cm2)

Results PbC

(mg/cm2)

1 SHUTTER_CAL 3.64

2 CALIBRATION N/A 0.3 1.2

3 CALIBRATION N/A 0.3 1.2

4 CALIBRATION N/A 0.3 0.9

5 DOOR WOOD POOR GREY S WALL; ENTRANCE Positive 0.3 8.4 6 THRESHOLD METAL POOR GREY S ENTRANCE; FLOOR Positive 0.3 1.7

7 LADDER METAL POOR GREY S WALL Positive 0.3 0.4 8 LADDER BASE CONCRETE POOR YELLOW S WALL Positive 0.3 4.1 9 GAS PIPE METAL POOR GREY S SIDE Negative 0.3 0.01

10 WINDOW METAL POOR GREY S WALL Negative 0.3 0.15 11 SCREEN DOOR WOOD POOR GREY S WALL; E ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0 12 WINDOW LINTEL METAL FAIR GREY S WALL Positive 0.3 12.8 13 DOOR LINTEL METAL FAIR GREY S WALL; E ENTRANCE Positive 0.3 10.5 14 SCREEN DOOR CASING METAL FAIR GREY S WALL; E ENTRANCE Positive 0.3 1.7 15 BOLLARD CONCRETE POOR YELLOW SE CORNER OF BUILDING Null 0.3 0.01 16 BOLLARD CONCRETE POOR YELLOW SE CORNER OF BUILDING Null 0.3 0 17 BOLLARD CONCRETE POOR YELLOW SE CORNER OF BUILDING Positive 0.3 0.6 18 WINDOW METAL FAIR GREY E WALL Positive 0.3 0.5 19 WINDOW METAL FAIR GREY E WALL Positive 0.3 0.4 20 WINDOW LINTEL METAL FAIR GREY E WALL Positive 0.3 12 21 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR GREY E WALL; S ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0 22 DOOR METAL FAIR GREY E WALL; S ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0 23 WINDOW METAL FAIR GREY E WALL Positive 0.3 2.5 24 WINDOW METAL FAIR GREY E WALL Positive 0.3 2.4 25 WINDOW METAL FAIR GREY E WALL Positive 0.3 2 26 WINDOW METAL FAIR GREY E WALL Positive 0.3 2.1 27 WINDOW LINTEL METAL FAIR GREY E WALL Positive 0.3 2.4 28 DOOR LINTEL METAL FAIR GREY E WALL; CENTER ENTRANCE Positive 0.3 4.8 29 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR GREY E WALL; CENTER ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0

Exterior Building: S Wing, Second Floor

Exterior Building: S Wing, First Floor

02/03/16 ALL CONSULTING TEAM 1

Action Level

(mg/cm2)

Results PbC

(mg/cm2)

30 WINDOW METAL FAIR GREY E WALL Positive 0.3 2.5 31 HANDRAIL METAL FAIR GREY E SIDE; N ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0.01 32 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR GREY E WALL; N ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0 33 DOOR LINTEL METAL FAIR GREY E WALL; N ENTRANCE Positive 0.3 4.8 34 VENT CASING METAL FAIR GREY E WALL Negative 0.3 0.07 35 VENT METAL FAIR GREY E WALL Negative 0.3 0 36 METAL SIDING METAL FAIR GREY E WALL Positive 0.3 1.3 37 WALL CMU FAIR YELLOW E WALL Null 0.3 0 38 WALL CMU FAIR YELLOW E WALL Null 0.3 0 39 WALL CMU FAIR YELLOW E WALL Positive 0.3 0.6 40 WINDOW GUARD METAL POOR GREY E WALL Negative 0.3 0.15 41 WINDOW LINTEL METAL FAIR GREY E WALL Positive 0.3 15.7 42 HINGE METAL POOR GREY E WALL Negative 0.3 0.05

102 DOOR CASING METAL POOR GREY W WALL; N ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0 103 WINDOW METAL POOR GREY W WALL Positive 0.3 2.6 104 OLD DOOR LINTEL METAL POOR YELLOW W WALL Positive 0.3 4.8 105 PARTIAL DOOR CASING METAL POOR YELLOW W WALL Positive 0.3 6.5 106 WINDOW METAL POOR GREY W WALL Positive 0.3 2.1 107 WINDOW METAL POOR GREY W WALL Positive 0.3 2.7 108 WINDOW METAL POOR GREY W WALL Positive 0.3 0.7 109 SCREEN DOOR CASING WOOD POOR GREY S WALL; W ENTRANCE Positive 0.3 5 110 SCREEN DOOR WOOD POOR GREY S WALL; W ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0

111 CALIBRATION N/A 0.3 0.9

112 CALIBRATION N/A 0.3 0.9

113 CALIBRATION N/A 0.3 1

114 SHUTTER_CAL 3.83

115 CALIBRATION N/A 0.3 1

116 CALIBRATION N/A 0.3 1

117 CALIBRATION N/A 0.3 1

43 OLD DOORWAY CASING METAL POOR GREY E WALL Positive 0.3 14.6 Exterior Building: N Wing, First Floor

02/03/16 ALL CONSULTING TEAM 2

Action Level

(mg/cm2)

Results PbC

(mg/cm2)

44 WINDOW SILL PLASTER POOR YELLOW E WALL Null 0.3 0.04 45 WINDOW SILL PLASTER POOR YELLOW E WALL Positive 0.3 0.7 46 WALL CMU POOR YELLOW E WALL Positive 0.3 0.6 47 COLUMN METAL POOR GREY E WALL Positive 0.3 12.9 48 DOOR CASING METAL POOR GREY E WALL; S ENTRANCE Positive 0.3 1.1 49 DOOR METAL POOR GREY E WALL; S ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0 50 DOOR CASING METAL POOR GREY E WALL; S ENTRANCE Positive 0.3 7.7 51 WINDOW LINTEL METAL POOR GREY E WALL Positive 0.3 3.7 52 WINDOW CASING WOOD POOR GREY E WALL Negative 0.3 0.04 53 WINDOW CASING (QA) WOOD POOR GREY E WALL Negative 0.3 0.03 54 DOOR CASING METAL POOR GREY E WALL; CENTER ENTRANCE Positive 0.3 12.1 55 WINDOW SILL PLASTER POOR YELLOW E WALL Positive 0.3 0.8 56 METAL SIDING METAL POOR GREY E WALL Positive 0.3 3.2 57 DOOR CASING METAL POOR GREY E WALL; CENTER ENTRANCE Positive 0.3 7.5 58 METAL SIDING METAL POOR GREY E WALL Positive 0.3 3.2 59 DOOR CASING METAL POOR GREY E WALL; N ENTRANCE Positive 0.3 0.8 60 COLUMN METAL POOR GREY E WALL Positive 0.3 9.4 61 WINDOW METAL POOR GREY E WALL Positive 0.3 1.5 62 DOOR CASING METAL POOR GREY E WALL; N ENTRANCE Positive 0.3 4.8 63 WINDOW METAL POOR GREY E WALL Positive 0.3 3.4 64 THRESHOLD CONCRETE POOR YELLOW N SIDE; E ENTRANCE; FLOOR Positive 0.3 1 65 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR GREY N WALL; E ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0 66 STAIR STRINGER METAL FAIR GREY N STAIRWELL; W SIDE Positive 0.3 4.3 67 STAIR SUPPORT METAL POOR GREY N STAIRWELL; UNDERNEATH STAIRS Positive 0.3 4.3 84 THRESHOLD CONCRETE POOR YELLOW N SIDE; W ENTRANCE; FLOOR Positive 0.3 0.6 85 HANDRAIL METAL POOR GREY N SIDE; W ENTRANCE; STAIRS Negative 0.3 0.02 86 STAIR RISER CONCRETE POOR YELLOW N SIDE; W ENTRANCE; STAIRS Positive 0.3 3.9 87 WINDOW METAL POOR GREY W WALL Null 0.3 0.3 88 WINDOW METAL POOR GREY W WALL Positive 0.3 0.5 89 RAFTER TAIL METAL POOR GREY W SIDE Positive 0.3 10.8 90 RAFTER TAIL WOOD POOR GREY W SIDE Positive 0.3 1.9

02/03/16 ALL CONSULTING TEAM 3

Action Level

(mg/cm2)

Results PbC

(mg/cm2)

91 FASCIA BOARD WOOD POOR GREY W SIDE Negative 0.3 0 92 COLUMN METAL POOR GREY W WALL Positive 0.3 3.5 93 LADDER METAL POOR GREY W SIDE Positive 0.3 0.5 94 WALL CMU POOR YELLOW W WALL Null 0.3 0.04 95 WALL CMU POOR YELLOW W WALL Positive 0.3 0.5 96 DOOR CASING METAL POOR GREY W WALL; N ENTRANCE Positive 0.3 12.2 97 WINDOW LINTEL METAL POOR GREY W WALL Positive 0.3 3.2 98 METAL SIDING METAL POOR GREY W WALL Positive 0.3 2.2 99 DOOR CASING METAL POOR GREY W WALL; S ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0

100 WINDOW GUARD METAL POOR GREY W WALL Negative 0.3 0 101 HOSE CONNECTION METAL POOR RED W WALL Positive 0.3 0.5

68 DOOR CASING WOOD POOR GREY N WALL; ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0 69 EXTERIOR SILL WOOD POOR GREY N WALL Negative 0.3 0.02 70 THRESHOLD METAL POOR GREY N ENTRANCE; FLOOR Positive 0.3 10.4 71 DOOR METAL POOR GREY N WALL; ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0

72 WINDOW SILL WOOD FAIR WHITE N WALL Negative 0.3 0.07 73 DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR GREY N WALL; ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0.12 74 WALL BRICK FAIR WHITE N WALL Null 0.3 0 75 WALL BRICK FAIR WHITE N WALL Negative 0.3 0 76 CEILING DRYWALL FAIR WHITE N SIDE Negative 0.3 0.07 77 BOOK CASE WOOD FAIR TAN S WALL Negative 0.3 0 78 BEAM DRYWALL FAIR WHITE CEILING Null 0.3 0.02 79 BEAM DRYWALL FAIR WHITE CEILING Null 0.3 0.04 80 BEAM DRYWALL FAIR WHITE CEILING Negative 0.3 0.02 81 DUCT METAL FAIR WHITE S SIDE Negative 0.3 0 82 WINDOW METAL FAIR WHITE E WALL Negative 0.3 *0.3 83 WINDOW SILL PLASTER FAIR WHITE E WALL Positive 0.3 0.6

118 WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE MEN'S RESTROOM; S WALL Negative 0.3 0

Exterior Building: N Wing, Second Floor

Interior Building: N Wing, Second Floor

Interior Building: S Wing, First Floor

02/03/16 ALL CONSULTING TEAM 4

Action Level

(mg/cm2)

Results PbC

(mg/cm2)

119 HEATER METAL FAIR BROWN MEN'S RESTROOM; N WALL Negative 0.3 0 120 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR BROWN RM. A; S WALL; ENTRANCE TO MEN'S RESTROOM Negative 0.3 0 121 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR BROWN RM. A; E WALL; ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0

122 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR BROWN

WOMEN'S RESTROOM ENTRYWAY; E WALL; ENTRANCE

TO WOMEN'S RESTROOM

Negative 0.3 0

123 CEILING DRYWALL FAIR WHITE WOMEN'S RESTROOM Null 0.3 0 124 CEILING DRYWALL FAIR WHITE WOMEN'S RESTROOM Negative 0.3 0 125 COLUMN DRYWALL FAIR WHITE HALLWAY; S SIDE Negative 0.3 0 126 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR BLUE HALLWAY; E WALL; ENTRANCE TO RM. B Negative 0.3 0 127 CEILING DRYWALL FAIR WHITE HALLWAY; S SIDE Negative 0.3 0

128 SHUTTER_CAL 3.86

129 WINDOW SILL PLASTER FAIR WHITE RM. D; E WALL Negative 0.3 0 130 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR BLUE HALLWAY; W WALL; ENTRANCE TO RM. L Negative 0.3 0 131 WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE RM. E; S WALL Null 0.3 0.01 132 WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE RM. E; S WALL Negative 0.3 0 133 WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE HALLWAY; E WALL Negative 0.3 0 134 WINDOW METAL POOR BROWN RM. G; E WALL Positive 0.3 1.9 135 WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE RM. P; N WALL Negative 0.3 0 136 WINDOW METAL POOR BROWN RM I; E WALL Positive 0.3 2.6 137 WINDOW METAL FAIR WHITE RM. S; E WALL Positive 0.3 2.2 138 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR BLUE RM. S; E WALL; ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0 139 WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE CONFERENCE RM.; W WALL Negative 0.3 0 140 WALL WOOD FAIR WHITE CONFERENCE RM.; CLOSET; N WALL Negative 0.3 0 141 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR BLUE CONFERENCE RM.; S WALL; ENTRANCE TO RM. S Negative 0.3 0 142 DOOR WOOD FAIR BLUE NE HALLWAY; N WALL; ENTRANCE TO RM. V Positive 0.3 0.5 143 DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR BLUE NE HALLWAY; N WALL; ENTRANCE TO RM. V Negative 0.3 0.01 144 WINDOW METAL FAIR WHITE NE HALLWAY; E WALL Positive 0.3 3.2 145 WINDOW METAL FAIR WHITE NW HALLWAY; W WALL Positive 0.3 2.8 146 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR BLUE NW HALLWAY; N WALL; ENTRANCE TO RM. T Negative 0.3 0.02 226 CEILING WOOD FAIR WHITE RM. V Positive 0.3 4.6 227 WALL BRICK FAIR WHITE RM. V; W WALL Null 0.3 0.17

02/03/16 ALL CONSULTING TEAM 5

Action Level

(mg/cm2)

Results PbC

(mg/cm2)

228 WALL BRICK FAIR WHITE RM. V; W WALL Null 0.3 0.28 229 WALL BRICK FAIR WHITE RM. V; W WALL Negative 0.3 0.23 230 DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR YELLOW RM. V; S WALL; ENTRANCE TO NE HALLWAY Negative 0.3 0 231 DOORWAY CASING DRYWALL FAIR WHITE RM. U; S WALL; ENTRANCE TO RM. T Negative 0.3 0 232 BASEBOARD WOOD POOR WHITE FIRE ALARM RM.; E WALL Negative 0.3 0.01

147 DOOR CASING WOOD POOR GREEN SE HALLWAY; S WALL; ENTRANCE TO RM. AA Negative 0.3 0.01 148 WALL BRICK FAIR WHITE RM. Y; S WALL Positive 0.3 0.4 149 COLUMN METAL FAIR WHITE RM. Z; CENTER AREA Positive 0.3 6.7 150 CEILING DRYWALL FAIR WHITE RM. Z Negative 0.3 0.03 151 WINDOW SILL PLASTER FAIR WHITE RM. Z; W WALL Negative 0.3 0.03 152 WINDOW METAL FAIR GREEN RM. Z; W WALL Negative 0.3 0.12 153 WALL CMU FAIR WHITE RM. Z; W WALL Negative 0.3 0.01 154 CROWN MOLDING WOOD FAIR WHITE RM. Z; S WALL Negative 0.3 0 155 WALL BRICK FAIR GREEN RM. X; W WALL Positive 0.3 2.2 156 BASE TRIM BRICK POOR GREEN RM. X; N WALL Positive 0.3 0.6 157 DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR GREEN RM. AA; S WALL; ENTRANCE TO RM. Z Negative 0.3 0 158 COLUMN METAL FAIR WHITE RM. AA; E WALL Positive 0.3 11.6 159 BASEBOARD WOOD FAIR GREEN RM. AA; W WALL Negative 0.3 0 160 BASEBOARD WOOD POOR GREEN SE HALLWAY; S WALL Negative 0.3 0.1 161 BASEBOARD WOOD POOR GREEN SE HALLWAY; N WALL Negative 0.3 0.01 162 WINDOW METAL FAIR GREEN RM. AB; W WALL Negative 0.3 0.11 163 DOOR CASING WOOD POOR GREEN S HALLWAY; E WALL; ENTRANCE TO RM. AH Negative 0.3 0.02 164 WINDOW METAL FAIR GREEN RM. AH; E WALL Negative 0.3 0.19 165 COLUMN METAL FAIR GREEN RM. AH; W WALL Positive 0.3 5.2 166 WALL CMU FAIR GREEN RM. AH; E WALL Negative 0.3 *0.3 167 WINDOW SILL PLASTER FAIR GREEN RM. AH; E WALL Negative 0.3 0.04 168 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR GREEN S HALLWAY; W WALL; ENTRANCE TO RM. AC Negative 0.3 0 169 WALL DRYWALL FAIR GREEN RM. AD; S WALL Negative 0.3 0 170 WINDOW WOOD POOR GREEN RM. AD; W WALL Negative 0.3 0.13 171 WINDOW SILL WOOD POOR GREEN RM. AD; W WALL Negative 0.3 0

Interior Building: N Wing, First Floor

02/03/16 ALL CONSULTING TEAM 6

Action Level

(mg/cm2)

Results PbC

(mg/cm2)

172 CALIBRATION N/A 0.3 0.9

173 CALIBRATION N/A 0.3 1.1

174 CALIBRATION N/A 0.3 1.2

175 SHUTTER_CAL 3.7

176 CALIBRATION N/A 0.3 1.2

177 CALIBRATION N/A 0.3 1.1

178 CALIBRATION N/A 0.3 1

179 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR BROWN S HALLWAY; N WALL; ENTRANCE TO N HALLWAY Negative 0.3 0 180 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR BROWN N HALLWAY; W WALL; ENTRANCE TO RM. AF Negative 0.3 0 181 CEILING DRYWALL FAIR WHITE N HALLWAY Negative 0.3 0 182 WALL PANEL METAL FAIR WHITE RM. AI; S WALL Negative 0.3 0 183 WINDOW METAL FAIR BROWN RM. AI; E WALL Negative 0.3 0.09 184 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR BROWN RM. AI; E WALL; ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0.19 185 COLUMN METAL FAIR TAN RM. AI; W WALL Positive 0.3 7.5 186 COLUMN METAL FAIR TAN RM. AI; W WALL Positive 0.3 9 187 WINDOW METAL FAIR BROWN RM. AI; E WALL Negative 0.3 0.09 188 COLUMN METAL POOR TAN RM. AI; N SIDE Positive 0.3 16.2 189 WALL DRYWALL FAIR TAN RM. AK; W WALL Negative 0.3 0 190 WINDOW WOOD FAIR BROWN RM. AK; W WALL Negative 0.3 0.16 191 WINDOW METAL FAIR BROWN NE HALLWAY; E WALL; ABOVE DOOR Null 0.3 0.25 192 WINDOW METAL FAIR BROWN NE HALLWAY; E WALL; ABOVE DOOR Negative 0.3 0.26 193 DOOR TRIM METAL FAIR BROWN NE HALLWAY; E WALL; ENTRANCE Positive 0.3 4.2 194 DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR BROWN NE HALLWAY; N WALL; ENTRANCE TO RM. AM Negative 0.3 0 195 WINDOW CASING METAL POOR WHITE RM. AM; E WALL Negative 0.3 0.23 196 WINDOW SILL PLASTER FAIR WHITE RM. AM; E WALL Positive 0.3 0.8 197 DOOR CASING WOOD POOR WHITE RM. AM; W HALLWAY; N WALL; ENTRANCE TO RM. AO Positive 0.3 3.6 198 DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR WHITE RM. AM; N WALL; ENTRANCE TO RM. AP Positive 0.3 0.6 199 DOOR LINTEL METAL FAIR WHITE RM. AM; N WALL; ENTRANCE TO RM. AP Positive 0.3 2.9 200 DOOR CASING WOOD FAIR WHITE RM. AP; W WALL; ENTRANCE TO RM. AO Positive 0.3 1.2 201 WALL BRICK FAIR WHITE RM. AP; W WALL Positive 0.3 1.3 202 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR WHITE RM. AP; N WALL; ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0

02/03/16 ALL CONSULTING TEAM 7

Action Level

(mg/cm2)

Results PbC

(mg/cm2)

203 CEILING DRYWALL FAIR WHITE RM. AP Positive 0.3 0.6 204 BEAM DRYWALL FAIR WHITE RM. AP; CEILING Positive 0.3 0.9 205 WINDOW METAL FAIR WHITE RM. AP; E WALL Positive 0.3 17.5 206 CEILING DRYWALL FAIR WHITE RM. AN Null 0.3 0.05 207 CEILING DRYWALL FAIR WHITE RM. AN Positive 0.3 0.6 208 CEILING DRYWALL FAIR WHITE RM. AM; W HALLWAY Positive 0.3 0.7 209 WINDOW METAL FAIR WHITE RM. AM; W HALLWAY; W WALL Null 0.3 0.2 210 WINDOW METAL FAIR WHITE RM. AM; W HALLWAY; W WALL Positive 0.3 0.6 211 WINDOW SILL PLASTER FAIR WHITE RM. AL; W WALL Positive 0.3 0.9 212 COLUMN CONCRETE FAIR WHITE RM. AL; W WALL Positive 0.3 7.3 213 BEAM PLASTER POOR WHITE RM. AL; W WALL Positive 0.3 0.7 214 WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE RM. AM; S WALL Positive 0.3 0.5 215 WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE RM AM; W HALLWAY; S WALL Positive 0.3 0.5 216 WALL BRICK FAIR WHITE RM. AO; S WALL Positive 0.3 0.9 217 DOOR CASING METAL FAIR TAN RM. AO; N WALL; ENTRANCE Positive 0.3 4.5 218 DOOR METAL FAIR TAN RM. AO; N WALL; ENTRANCE Negative 0.3 0

219 CALIBRATION N/A 0.3 1.3

220 CALIBRATION N/A 0.3 1.2

221 CALIBRATION N/A 0.3 1.1

222 SHUTTER_CAL 3.85

223 CALIBRATION N/A 0.3 1

224 CALIBRATION N/A 0.3 1.1

225 CALIBRATION N/A 0.3 1

233 CEILING DRYWALL FAIR WHITE RM. AM; W HALLWAY Negative 0.3 0 234 CEILING DRYWALL FAIR WHITE RM. AM Null 0.3 0.06 235 CEILING DRYWALL FAIR WHITE RM. AM Negative 0.3 0.02 236 CEILING DRYWALL FAIR WHITE RM. AO Negative 0.3 0.02 237 CEILING DRYWALL FAIR WHITE RM. AO Negative 0.3 0.01

238 CALIBRATION N/A 0.3 1

239 CALIBRATION N/A 0.3 1.1

240 CALIBRATION N/A 0.3 1.1

02/03/16 ALL CONSULTING TEAM 8

Action Level

(mg/cm2)

Results PbC

(mg/cm2)

Null - Any result of "null" in the table above indicates that an inconclusive measurement was obtained with the XRF analyzer, and was therefore repeated in the same location until a measurement was obtained.

02/03/16 ALL CONSULTING TEAM 9

ATTACHMENT 2

Asbestos Survey Report

COMPREHENSIVE ASBESTOS SURVEY

BUILDING 622

FORT BLISS, TEXAS 79916

Prepared for:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Tulsa District

Prepared by:

ALL CONSULTING TEAM

ALL Consulting, LLC 1718 S. Cheyenne Ave.

Tulsa, OK 74119

Inspection Start Date:

February 04, 2016

ENCON International, Inc.

7307 Remcon Circle, #103

El Paso, TX 79912

COMPREHENSIVE ASBESTOS SURVEY

Ft. Bliss, Bldg. 622

PURPOSE

The ALL Consulting Team was contracted by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Tulsa

District, to perform comprehensive Hazardous Building Materials Surveys to identify the presence of any asbestos or lead paint at a number of buildings at Ft. Bliss, Texas. This project also included the development and population of a database to store the survey reports for access by the Ft. Bliss

Directorate of Public Works (DPW), and others. The buildings that are included within this contract scope of work include buildings at McGregor Base Camp and Doña Ana Base Camp within the New Mexico portion of Ft. Bliss, in addition to the Ft. Bliss buildings within Texas.

BACKGROUND

Ft. Bliss has a large number of buildings constructed before 1990 when the use of asbestos and lead paint was prevalent in construction of buildings. Because these materials may still exist within these buildings, Ft. Bliss is required to identify (asbestos or lead containing materials), assess the condition (stable or deteriorating), determine the nature of building materials (i.e., drywall or floor tile), and the extent of these hazardous substances. In accordance with the Clean Air Act (40 CFR

61 Subpart M, Asbestos), any renovation, remodeling or demolition of any structure, (i.e., buildings, facilities, etc.), shall be surveyed for asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) and properly abated prior to any disturbance of the material.

INTRODUCTION

The buildings selected for this project were provided to the ALL Consulting Team by USACE, Tulsa District. The selected buildings were located in four (4) geographic areas: Ft. Bliss main post, Biggs Field (now known as East Bliss), McGregor Base Camp, NM, and Doña Ana Base

Camp, NM. Records were available for some of these buildings where previous partial or complete inspections had been performed. When available, prior asbestos reports were referenced to enhance the thoroughness of the asbestos inspection performed for this building. The goal of this project was to provide a comprehensive inspection of the designated facilities, but destructive sampling was not authorized. Therefore, on rare occasion some ACMs may be hidden behind walls, under subfloors, or located in other areas that were inaccessible to the inspector. If or when any building is to undergo future demolition, an additional investigation may be undertaken in which destructive sampling is authorized.

REGULATORY STANDARDS

Asbestos in building materials is regulated on the federal level by the Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA), and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). On the state level, Texas also has regulations pertaining to sampling and abatement of asbestos in buildings.

The inspection was conducted to ensure compliance with National Emission Standards for

Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) – 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M, which states that “prior to the commencement of the demolition or renovation, thoroughly inspect the affected facility or part of the facility where the demolition or renovation operation(s) will occur for the presence of asbestos, including Category I and Category II non-friable ACM.” Regulated asbestos containing materials have been designated as RACM. Asbestos Inspectors for both Texas and New Mexico facilities were trained under the EPA AHERA (40 CFR 763) standards. For buildings in the State of Texas, the Texas Asbestos Health Protection Rules (TAHPR) were complied with, which specify inspector licensure and a minimum of three (3) samples for each homogeneous area. In New

Mexico, facilities were sampled under the applicable regulations from the EPA, 40 CFR 61.

FACILITY DESCRIPTION

Building 622 was constructed in 1939, and was in use at the time of inspection. Its previous use was listed as an “administrative building.” A description of this building is presented in Table 1 below.

TABLE 1 – BUILDING DESCRIPTION

Building Items Description Area of building 14,634 square feet Date of Construction 1939 Number of floors Two (2) floors Exterior wall materials Brick, CMU Roof type Pitched Roof material Shingles Interior walls Drywall, brick, CMU, fire brick, ceramic tiles Interior floors Concrete Interior floor coverings Carpet, 12x12 vinyl floor tiles Ceilings Drywall, Wood Notes:

FUNCTIONAL AREAS

Functional areas were areas (or groups of areas), within a structure or building that were constructed to have the same use or purpose, constructed of the same materials, and were relatively the same age. A general administrative area, or several identical buildings within a facility, could typically be considered a single functional area.

The functional area(s), or purpose, of this facility was identified as follows:

“Administration offices”

HOMOGENEOUS AREAS

Within functional areas, homogeneous areas were determined. Homogeneous Areas are areas of surfacing material, thermal system insulation (TSI), or miscellaneous materials that were uniform in color, texture, substrate, and were relatively of the same age. Table 2 below lists the homogeneous areas and the general locations where they were identified.

TABLE 2 - Homogeneous Areas and Locations Identified

# Homogeneous Areas (Suspect Materials) Location

1 Textured drywall joint compound – ceilings/walls S wing: Throughout 2 12x12 vinyl floor tile & mastic S wing: Restrooms, Room A, Conference room (closet)

3 Vinyl cove base & mastic - purple S wing: Throughout (except hallways, Room S, Conference room

4 Carpet mastic S wing: Throughout (except restrooms, Room A, Conference room (closet)

5 Interior door caulking S wing: Throughout 6 Interior door caulking N wing: Throughout 7 Vinyl cove base & mastic – brown N wing: Throughout 8 Exterior door caulking Throughout building 9 Interior window glazing S wing: Throughout

10 Exterior window caulking Throughout building 11 Interior window caulking S wing: Throughout 12 Interior window caulking N wing: Throughout 13 Carpet mastic N wing 14 Textured drywall joint compound – ceilings/walls N wing 15 Plaster over beam N wing 16 Caulking at counter tops Throughout counter tops 17 Caulking at fixtures S wing: Restrooms 18 Interior window glazing N wing 19 Plaster along window sills S wing: Throughout 20 Vinyl cove base & mastic – Tan S wing: Hallways, Room S, Conference room 21 Interior caulking at masonry walls N wing 22 Roof shingles Throughout roof 23 Roof penetration sealant At roof penetrations 24 Interior penetration sealant N wing 25 Interior duct sealant N wing (2nd floor)

# Homogeneous Areas (Suspect Materials) Location

26 Vinyl floor tile & mastic under carpet N wing (2nd floor) 27 Textured drywall joint compound – ceiling/walls N wing (2nd floor) 28 Vinyl cove base & mastic – grey N wing (2nd floor) 29 Door caulking N wing (2nd floor) 30 Window glazing N wing (2nd floor) 31 Window caulking N wing (2nd floor) 32 Exterior CMU wall texture N wing: Throughout 33 Textured drywall joint compound – ceilings Room W 34 Drywall joint compound – ceilings/walls Fire alarm room 35 Drywall joint compound – ceilings Room AP

SAMPLING METHODOLOGY

The building materials survey tasks were performed in accordance with the Final Hazardous

Building Materials Surveys, Sampling Plan, Fort Bliss, Texas, December 2014, prepared by ALL

Consulting and ENCON International, Inc. A visual inspection of the building was conducted to develop a sampling strategy. This task included determining both functional areas and homogeneous areas / materials, as well as sample collection locations. Friability was assessed by manually manipulating the suspect asbestos materials utilizing hand pressure to determine if the materials, when dry, could be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder. Thirty-five (35) homogeneous areas were established and at least three (3) samples were collected from each area to adequately identify accessible asbestos in the building. Portions of the subject building that had suspect asbestos-containing surfacing, thermal system insulation, or miscellaneous materials were divided into homogeneous areas for sampling. These samples were each uniquely and individually identified and logged into a chain of custody document and prepared for shipment to a third-party, independent laboratory for analysis. Building materials that were not considered suspect ACM included the following; concrete, metal, glass, asphalt, plastic, and wood. Destructive sampling was not authorized or performed to locate hidden or inaccessible materials.

One-hundred and five (105) samples were collected and submitted for laboratory analysis. Bulk sample analyses were conducted utilizing polarized light microscopy (PLM), as per EPA Test

Method 600/R-93/116. This method separates the sample material into various layers based on their morphology, and then identifies the presence of the different asbestos fibers in each of these layers when detected. The analysis was performed by Apex Precision Analytical Services, Inc., located in Friendswood, TX. ACM is defined as a material that contains greater than 1% of any asbestos type including Chrysotile, Amosite, Crocidolite, Tremolite, Anthophyllite, and

Actinolite, or combinations of these materials. Asbestos materials were determined as recommended in the July 1993 EPA/600/R-93/116 document titled, "Method for the

Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials." Copies of the asbestos laboratory test results and related laboratory documentation have been provided in Appendix B of this Report.

LABORATORY ANALYSIS

The sample collection and subsequent laboratory analysis indicated that asbestos was identified in the building material listed below. The NESHAPS definitions were used to define the condition of ACMs, per 40 CFR 61, Subpart M.

The quantities provided above are rough estimates only and must be field verified by any future abatement contractors.

QUALIFICATIONS

This Comprehensive Asbestos Survey was performed by Inspector Tim Jones on February 04, 2016, and was conducted in accordance with the EPA National Emission Standards for Hazardous

Air Pollutants (NESHAP): 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M. Sampling protocols were performed in accordance with the TAHPR. The Inspector has received training under the AHERA required

Inspector Course and has received annual refresher training within the past year.

LIMITATIONS

The overall purpose of this Comprehensive Asbestos Survey was to identify if ACM was present, within the qualifications and limitations summarized below. Reliance on this report is specifically limited to gathering initial information regarding the presence of asbestos in building materials.

Any time that ACMs may be identified during the performance of an asbestos survey, the owner of the building is responsible to the occupants and to the public to manage these materials properly, per Local, State and Federal regulations. Prior to the abatement or removal of any ACMs, an asbestos project design should be properly created, by a qualified asbestos consulting firm, 1) to

TABLE 3 – Identified Asbestos Containing Materials (> 1%) Sample

No. Asbestos Containing Materials Approx.

Qty. Location Condition

(friable, cat, damaged) 28-30 Exterior window caulking 1,240 LF Throughout building CAT. I, Non-friable

79-81 Textured drywall joint compound – ceiling/walls 720 SF N wing (2nd floor) CAT. I, Non-friable

100-102 Drywall joint compound – ceilings/walls 270 SF Fire alarm room CAT. I, Non-friable 103-105 Drywall joint compound – ceilings 450 SF Room AP CAT. I, Non-friable ensure that materials will be properly managed, and 2) to prepare a more accurate estimate of materials to be abated. This Survey Report was specifically prepared for ALL Consulting’s Client

(USACE and Ft. Bliss), and the extent of liability incurred, is limited to the amount of the report fee paid by its Client. The USACE agrees that the ALL Consulting Team cannot be held responsible for any liability based on reliance of this report by any third party for any business reasons.

CONCLUSIONS

1. The ALL Consulting Team was retained by the USACE to perform a Comprehensive

Asbestos Survey at the subject building located within Ft. Bliss.

2. The survey for the…