Asbestos Demolition - Addendum 1.pdf
PDF 65 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 2023-08-22
- Issued by
- Rusk County, Wisconsin
About this file
This is an Addendum #1 to an Advertisement for Bids issued by Rusk County, Wisconsin for asbestos abatement and building demolition services at a former nursing home/hospital located at 900 College Ave. in Ladysmith, Wisconsin. The addendum provides clarifications and additional information regarding project scope and options for contractors to consider in their bids.
The addendum addresses four key items: estimated monthly utility expenses (electric costs averaging $2,000-$2,500 and water/sewer costs averaging $1,900), clarification that contractors should assume all foundations are positive for asbestos and require proper disposal procedures, and two optional approaches for site remediation that contractors may propose in their bids. These options include using crushed concrete and masonry as backfill material instead of imported sand if materials are confirmed clean, and potentially using crushed concrete or masonry as erosion barriers instead of seed and topsoil for future site redevelopment. The County recommends that contractors include these alternatives as bid options to provide flexibility and potentially reduce project costs through material reuse and waste diversion strategies.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Advertisement for Bids - Asbestos Abatement and Building Demolition.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Advertisement for Bids – Asbestos Abatement and Building Demolition Addendum #1
1. Estimated expense of utility – power/water dollars spent on a monthly average.
Average electric runs from $2,000 - $2,500/mo and average water/sewer is $1,900/mo
2. Estimated location where exterior waterproofing was tested or assumed to be positive and or is the County assuming all foundations are positive for proper disposal of abatement?
The report says to assume all.
3. If all masonry & concrete proven to be clean can it be crushed and used as backfill vs sand import?
The County would suggest contractors put it as an option in bids.
4. Can crushed concrete/masonry be used as erosion barrier vs seed and topsoil for future redevelopment?
The County would suggest contractors put it as an option in bids.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .