APPENDIX E - Salt Load Reduction Table.pdf
PDF 132 KB Posted
- Attached to
- BASINWIDE & BASIN STATES SALINITY CONTROL PROGRAMS Federal grant opportunity
- Opportunity number
- R23AS00353
About this file
APPENDIX E - Salt Load Reduction Table.pdf
View the file
Other files for this federal grant opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| NOFO R23AS00353 BASINWIDE & BASIN STATES SALINITY CONTROL PROGRAMS. Revised.pdf | ||
| APPLICATION 2023 SALINITY NOFO.docx | DOCX document | |
| APPLICATION 2023 SALINITY NOFO.docx | DOCX document | |
| Appendix A Cost Est. Sheet NOFO 2023.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| APPENDIX F - Significance rev 4_6_2023.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| APPENDIX E - Salt Load Reduction Worksheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| APPENDIX B - On-Farm Enable rev 04-12-2023.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| NOFO R23AS00353 BASINWIDE & BASIN STATES SALINITY CONTROL PROGRAMS.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Item Units Identify individual canal, lateral, or ditch (Insert name here)
Length of existing canal/lateral/ditch feet
Irrigated acreage served acres
Irrigation season
Average diversion flow cfs
Average seasonal diversion ac-ft
Average no. of days water carried days
Non-irrigation season (stockwater)
Average diversion flow cfs
Average seasonal diversion ac-ft
Average no. of days water carried days
Length of ditch carrying winter water feet
Describe EXISTING lined or piped sections
Lined length (see Note 3) feet
Liner type (concrete, earth, etc)
See
Note 1
Year installed year
Liner condition See
Note 2
Piped length (see Note 3) feet
Remaining unlined/unpiped length feet
Unlined Length to be replaced/improved feet
Existing piped/lined Length to be replaced/improved feet
Proposed replacement material pressurized pipe, non-pressurized pipe, or liner
Notes:
1. Type of liner may be concrete, earth (clay), membrane or other (please specify).
2. Condition of liner should be rated as poor, satisfactory, good.
3. Disregard dispersed piped or concrete lined segments with individual lengths of less than 100 feet
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .