Appendix B - SOW 2-3-22.pdf
PDF 200 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 2-B148-P-00143-00
- Issued by
-
Department of Energy Office of Science
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Addendum 1.docx | DOCX document | |
| Appendix B-1 - SOW 3-4-22.docx | DOCX document | |
| Reps and Certs ANL-70B (Long).doc | DOC document | |
| Draft FP Contract (For Reference Only).doc | DOC document | |
| Appendix D8-29-JUN-2020.PDF | ||
| Appendix A-Fixed Price-10-DEC-2021.PDF | ||
| Request for Proposal.docx | DOCX document | |
| Enclosure 4- Evaluation Criteria - Cost of Cathode Matls Mfg.docx | DOCX document | |
| PD-9 Contract Pricing RandD.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
2/3/2022
Appendix B - Argonne National Laboratory Statement of Work
Estimate the Cost of a Manufacturing Plant for NMCA Cathode Materials
Argonne National Laboratory has been working on the development of lithium-ion batteries (LIB) for several decades with noteworthy contributions in the advancement of the technology. Technoeconomic analysis is an integral part of the technology development to evaluate new technologies and potential for technology commercialization.
The objective of this study is to estimate the cost of setting up a large scale, material for up to 250 MT of Lithium nickel manganese aluminum oxide (NMCA) materials per day, plant in the United States and to estimate the cost of the NMCA materials in this plant. The plant should be capable of producing powder that incorporate the state-of-the-art materials in anticipation of demand in 5–10-year period, such as high nickel content materials, core-shell structure, single crystal, etc.
The design should be for a plant of very high efficiency to be built 5 years in the future. Therefore, the plant will be highly automated with high-speed production per units of plant area, capital equipment cost, and labor cost. It should be assumed that the appropriate R & D to establish the feasibility of the plant design have been successfully completed. Forward looking what-if scenarios, for material recycle and lower cost heat treatments should be considered.
The study will include the capital investment needed and the cost of operating the plant. Some of the salient features of the study are as follows.
- The hypothetical plant would produce NMCA materials with the ability to change the
Ni:Mn:Co:Al ratios in different lines.
- The design and cost of the plant should be presented for 3 alternate production volumes of 100, 175, and 250 MT/yr.
- The estimate shall include:
o Composition of the NMCA material and its morphology (e.g., single crystal, core/shell, coating layers, etc.)
o Quantity and price of purchased materials (raw materials, supplies) o Flow diagram showing material, energy flows for each type of equipment.
o Operating conditions (temperature, pressure, pH, residence time, environment1) of each type of equipment. The operating condition profile / history for units with long residence time (>1 hour) or changing conditions should be included o Plant layout chart o Capital equipment for the plant with breakdown of equipment and installation (USA)
Rated capacity of each type of equipment and the number of units in the plant Processing rates for batch and continuous reactors, furnaces, etc.
Rated energy use of each type of equipment o Building construction cost for production area and infrastructure (maintenance, warehouse, shipping, utility, recycle facility, water processing) o Building operation cost for production area and infrastructure (maintenance, warehouse, shipping, utility, recycle facility, water processing) o Footprint area of the production floor and infrastructure (maintenance, warehouse, shipping, utility, recycle facility, water processing)
1 Furnaces may use oxygen-rich or inert-rich gas.
o Labor required per year o Quantity breakdown of annual electric, natural gas, cooling water, and process water demands of the plant
- The total anticipated investment cost
- The estimated per-unit cost of the products produced and the methodology used to develop this estimate
The final report will be due 4 months after contract signing.
This statement of work does not include any work beyond the final report and cost estimate.
The final report shall include:
SEE PAGE 3 FOR Table 1 - Components for Estimation of Total Capital Investment and Product Cost
Table 1. Components for Estimation of Total Capital Investment and Product Cost
I. Direct Costs = I-A + I-B + I-C + I-D I-A. Equipment + installation + instrumentation + piping + electrical + insulation + painting
Purchased Equipment Installation, including insulation and painting Instrumentation and controls, installed Piping, installed Electrical, installed
I-B. Buildings, process and auxiliary I-C. Service facilities and yard improvements I-D. Land
II. Indirect Costs = II-A + II-B + II-C II-A. Engineering and supervision II-B. Construction expense and contractor's fee II-C. Contingency
III. Fixed Capital Investment = I + II IV. Working Capital V. Total Capital Investment = III + IV
VI. Manufacturing Cost, $/year = VI-A + VI-B + VI-C VI-A. Direct Product Costs
Raw Materials Operating labor Direct supervisory and clerical labor Utilities Maintenance and Repairs Operating supplies Laboratory charges Patents and royalties
VI-B. Fixed Charges Depreciation Local taxes Insurance Rent Financing (interest)
VI-C. Plant Overhead Costs VII. General Expenses, $/year = VII-A + VII-B + VII-C
VII-A. Administrative costs VII-B. Distribution and selling costs VII-C. R&D costs
VIII. Total Product Cost, $/year = Manufacturing Cost (VI) + General Expenses (VII) ah038076 Cross-Out
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .