Appendix A_QG2.pdf
PDF 995 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 70T04026SN7573N001
About this file
This is a white paper template and submission form for vendors seeking to qualify Explosive Trace Detection (ETD) devices under the Air Cargo Screening Qualification Test (ACSQT) Qualification Group Two program (Special Notice 70T04026SN7573N001).
The template requires vendors to provide comprehensive information across ten sections: vendor business details including SAM.gov registration and CAGE code; technical specifications and overview of the ETD device including dimensions, weight, and electrical requirements; commercial availability confirmation with production lead times and current pricing; safety compliance including standards certifications (UL 61010-1, IEEE C95.1) and, if applicable, radioactive source licensing per NRC Title 10 CFR 34 and 10 CFR 20; electromagnetic compatibility documentation demonstrating compliance with IEC 61326-1 and FCC Title 47 CFR Part 15; quality management certifications including ISO 9001 and TSA access agreements for technical records and facilities; configuration management practices per ISO 10007 with unique serial number identification; supporting documentation such as completed user manuals and training packages; pre-qualification readiness testing facility selections (minimum three IAC or CCSF locations for approximately 4,000 cargo parcel testing); and attachments including device specification sheets and component block diagrams. The TRP (Technical Review Panel) will evaluate responses to determine vendor capability to meet Security Sensitive Information vetting requirements, device commercial availability, safety and regulatory compliance, and test readiness for potential qualification into the ACSQT program.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Appendix A_QG1.pdf | ||
| Appendix A_QG3.pdf | ||
| Appendix A_QG4.pdf | ||
| Special Notice ACSQT Process Guide v.Final.pdf | ||
| Appendix B_Terms.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Special Notice
70T04026SN7573N001
Air Cargo Screening Qualification Test
Qualification Group Two Explosive Trace Detection Devices
Appendix A: ACSQT White Paper Requirements & Template
Manufacturer: _______________________________ Date: ______________________________
Model: _____________________________________
I. VENDOR INFORMATION
What is the vendor’s legal business name?
What is the type of business entity? U.S. Business Foreign Business Foreign Government
Does the vendor have a (SAM.gov) Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) number?
Yes No
If yes, what is the vendor’s UEI number?
What is the physical address the SAM.gov has on file for the vendor?
Is the vendor currently registered with the System for Award Management (SAM)?
Yes No
If yes, what is the vendor’s Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code?
What is the vendor’s web address?
What is the vendor’s Point of Contact (POC) name for this submission?
What is the POC’s phone number?
What is the POC’s email address?
Provide city & state location(s) of the candidate device final point of production.
Evaluation considerations: The TRP will evaluate the vendor’s responses to determine the vendor’s ability to meet Security Sensitive Information (SSI) vetting requirements and that the vendor is an established business.
II. DEVICE OVERVIEW AND TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION
Describe the candidate device to include a technical summary of the screening/detection technology.
What are the dimensions of the candidate device?
What is the weight of the candidate device?
What are the following electrical requirements for the candidate device?
Voltage Alternating Current?
Hertz
Amperage
Evaluation considerations: The TRP will evaluate the vendor’s responses to determine if the device meets the qualification group criteria and assess the candidate device general screening capabilities.
III. COMMERCIAL AVAILABILITY
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Is the candidate device currently available for purchase?
If available for purchase, what is the production lead time for the candidate device?
What is the current production rate of the candidate device?
What is the current commercial pricing of the candidate device?
Is the candidate device rebranded?
If rebranded, who is the original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM)?
Is the candidate device product information available online?
If yes, what is the web address?
Evaluation considerations: The TRP will evaluate the vendor’s responses to determine if the candidate device is commercially available and a representative unit can be made available for further evaluation upon acceptance into the ACSQT program.
IV. SAFETY
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
General Safety
Does the candidate device comply with any recognized industrial or commercial standards which ensure the device does not pose any safety hazards to an operator or to transient personnel?
If yes, can the vendor provide evidence from an independent testing organization that the candidate device is compliant with UL 61010-1?
If yes, can the vendor provide evidence from an independent testing organization that the candidate device is compliant with IEEE C95.1?
Safety (Radioactive Source)
Does the device contain an active radioactive source?
If yes, does the device require a license issued by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission?
If a license is required, has the vendor been granted a license in accordance with NRC Title 10 CFR 34?
If a license is required, does the vendor have an established program to control the receipt, possession, use, transfer, and disposal of licensed material in accordance with NRC Title 10 CFR 20?
Yes No
Evaluation considerations: The TRP will evaluate the vendor’s responses to determine if the candidate device is safe and an appropriate sealed radiation source license has been obtained, if applicable. Note – compliance with the listed standards is required and evidence will be requested during later stages of the qualification process.
Yes No
Yes No
V. ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY (EMC)
EM Immunity
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Does the candidate device comply with any recognized industrial or commercial standards which ensure the normal operation of the device is not susceptible to electromagnetic disturbances typical of an air cargo screening environment?
If yes, can the vendor provide evidence from an independent testing organization that the candidate device is compliant with IEC 61326-1?
EM Emissions
Does the candidate device comply with any recognized government, industrial, or commercial standards which ensure the device does not emit conduc ted or radiated electromagnetic fields at a level which may disrupt the operation of electronic equipment in the vicinity of the devi ce?
If yes, can the vendor provide evidence from an independent testing organization that the candidate device is compliant with IEC 61326-1?
Radio Frequency Interference
Does the candidate device comply with any recognized industrial or commercial standards which ensure the device does not emit radiated RF electromagnetic fields at a level which may disrupt the operations of electronic equipment in the vicinity of the device?
If yes, can the vendor provide evidence from an independent testing organization that the candidate device is compliant with FCC Title 47, CFR Part 15?
Yes No
Evaluation considerations: The TRP will evaluate the vendor’s responses to determine if the candidate device is immune to EM disturbances and does not emit EM fields that may affect the operation of equipment in the vicinity of the device. Note – compliance with the listed standards is required and evidence will be requested during later stages of the qualification process.
VI. QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Does the vendor comply with any recognized industrial or commercial quality management standards?
Yes No
If yes, can the vendor provide third-party certification evidence of compliance with the most current version of ISO 9001.
Yes No
Does the vendor agree to provide the TSA access to technical records, personnel, and facilities pertaining to manufacturing, processing, inspection, and testing to assure continued compliance with all performance specification requirements?
Yes No
Evaluation considerations: The TRP will evaluate the vendor responses to ensure the manufacturer’s product and services are consistent and continually improved upon.
VII. CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Does the vendor identify, control, maintain status records, and conduct periodic audits of your product configuration baselines in accordance with ISO 10007 or an equivalent?
Does the vendor identify and cont rol each delivered system configuration using a unique vendor-assigned serial number?
Will the vendor be willing to provide a document package that fully defines the design baseline of your product upon request for TSA review as part of the qualification process?
Evaluation consideration: The TRP will evaluate the vendor’s responses to ensure the vendor utilizes a standardized configuration management process to identify and control the functional and physical characteristics of the device.
VIII. SUPPORTING INFORMATION
qualifications, either foreign or domestic, sponsored by a government Yes No
Does the candidate device have any current certifications or qualifications, either foreign or domestic, sponsored by a government agency?
List current certifications or qualifications for the candidate device and the sponsoring agency.
Does the device have a completed User Manual?
Yes
No
No Does the device have a completed user training package?
Evaluation consideration: The TRP will evaluate the vendor’s responses to assess the candidate device’s level of test readiness.
Yes
IX. PRE-QUALIFICATION IAC OR CCSF REQUEST
X. ATTACHMENTS
Yes No
Yes No
Include candidate device specification sheet.
Include block diagram of candidate device major components.
List three potential IAC and/or CCSF facilities and their locations to be utilized for pre-qualification readiness testing.
Evaluation consideration: Explosive Trace Detection devices submitted for qualification will undergo pre-qualification readiness testing, which includes operational data collection of approximately 4,000 cargo parcels at an IAC or CCSF. The TRP will choose one of the three IAC or CCSF facilities at which pre-qualification activities will occur.
| Text1: |
| Text1Paragraph: |
| Check Box15: Off |
| Check Box16: Off |
| Check Box17: Off |
| Check Box18: Off |
| Check Box19: Off |
| Check Box20: Off |
| Check Box21: Off |
| Check Box22: Off |
| Check Box23: Off |
| Check Box24: Off |
| Check Box27: Off |
| Check Box28: Off |
| Check Box31: Off |
| Check Box32: Off |
| Manufacturer: |
| Model: |
| Date1_af_date: 4/8/26 |
| Group41: Choice1 |
| Text2: |
| Text3: |
| Text4: |
| Text5: |
| Text6: |
| Text7: |
| Text8: |
| Text9: |
| Text10: |
| Text11: |
| Text12: |
| Text13: |
| Text14: |
| Text17: |
| Text18: |
| Text19: |
| Text20: |
| Text21: |
| Check Box70: Off |
| Check Box73: |
| 0: Off |
| 1: Off |
| Check Box75: |
| 0: Off |
| 1: Off |
| Check Box76: |
| 0: Off |
| 1: Off |
| Check Box78: |
| 0: Off |
| 1: Off |
| Check Box79: |
| 0: Off |
| 1: Off |
| Check Box80: |
| 0: Off |
| 1: Off |
| Check Box71: |
| 0: Off |
| 1: Off |
| Check Box72: |
| 0: Off |
| 1: Off |
| Check Box74: |
| 0: Off |
| 1: Off |
| Check Box49: Off |
| Check Box50: Off |
| Check Box51: Off |
| Check Box52: Off |
| Check Box53: Off |
| Check Box54: Off |
| Check Box55: Off |
| Check Box56: Off |
| Check Box57: Off |
| Check Box58: Off |
| Check Box59: Off |
| Check Box60: Off |
| Check Box61: Off |
| Check Box62: Off |
| Check Box63: Off |
| Check Box64: Off |
| Check Box65: Off |
| Check Box66: Off |
| Check Box67: Off |
| Check Box68: Off |
| Check Box69: Off |
| Check Box92: Off |
| Check Box93: Off |
| Check Box1: Off |
| Check Box2: Off |
| Text27: |
| TextParagraph2: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .