Eielson RFLP Q and A GCN 1.pdf
PDF 151 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- AFCEC26R0009
About this file
This is a Questions and Answers document from a presolicitation meeting for Eielson Air Force Base RFLP No. AFCEC-26-R-0009, conducted by the Woodbury-Hunt-Ashlock Team on 7/24/26, addressing military family housing development requirements.
The document captures responses to 18 inquiries regarding base personnel, housing needs, site conditions, and leasing parameters. Key findings include: approximately 7,000 military personnel assigned to Eielson with a surrounding community population of 64,000; announced F-35 and KC-135 beddown missions expected to increase personnel; a current housing shortage of approximately 300 homes to accommodate projected influx; preference for accompanied (family) housing development over single-member housing; dormitory facilities currently operating near maximum capacity; and developer flexibility to design alternative housing styles, though a 3-bedroom/2-bathroom configuration is recommended. The site requires accompanied housing development with leasing rates based on 2026 Enlisted BAH rates plus COLA for Alaska OCONUS status. Environmental considerations include a potential wetland parcel east of French Creek Drive adjacent to Glacier Street on Site #3, with specific contamination boundaries redacted for OPSEC reasons. Utility routes and utilidor maps for Site #3 are pending availability. Single airmen may live off-base once approved by the Military Housing Office. Multiple responses regarding exact personnel demographics, rank breakdowns, and specific capacity metrics were redacted due to OPSEC limitations.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Eielson RFLP No. AFCEC-26-R-0009
POI Woodbury-Hunt-Ashlock Team
2. 7/24/26 | Woodbury/Hunt/Ashlock | Sec 4.6
What is the current base population including dependents?
Roughly 7K personnel are assigned here. Population of the surrounding community is 64K.
3. 7/24/26 | Woodbury/Hunt/Ashlock | Sec 4.6
What are the currently announced new missions that are expected to increase personnel at Eielson?
F-35 and KC-135 Beddown. – No issues with the provided response.
4. 7/24/26 | Woodbury/Hunt/Ashlock | Sec 4.6
What is the breakdown of personnel by rank and marital status at Eielson?
[CUI REDACTED: Exact rank-by-rank breakdowns and demographic metrics withheld due to OPSEC limitations.]
5. 7/24/26 | Woodbury/Hunt/Ashlock | Sec 4.6
Is there a greater need for single member housing or military family housing currently?
Both, however, Eielson would prefer Accompanied Housing to be developed. -–
No issues with the provided response.
6. 7/24/26 | Woodbury/Hunt/Ashlock | Sec 4.6
Does proposed housing style need to be consistent with existing military family housing units or may the developer choose alternative designs?
The developer can develop their own layouts with the idea Eielson recommends and accounts for 3 bed 2 bath style home when providing information to renters and single families. – No issues with the provided response.
7. 7/24/26 | Woodbury/Hunt/Ashlock | Sec 4.6
Are any of the existing military housing units condemned or unusable? If so, how many?
1 unit is currently offline due to structural damage. [CUI REDACTED: Internal incident investigation details withheld].
8. 7/24/26 | Woodbury/Hunt/Ashlock | Sec 4.6
What are the existing utility routes on Site #3?
Will follow up on this once available. – Yes, we will follow up on this once available.
9. 7/24/26 | Woodbury/Hunt | Sec 4.6
What is the excavated area with the burms on Site #3? Contamination of any kind?
[CUI REDACTED: Specific contamination boundaries and referenced attachment withheld]. General environmental and site condition notifications apply.
10. 7/24/26 | Woodbury/Hunt/Ashlock | Sec 4.6
What is the current dorms occupancy rate?
Dorms are currently operating near maximum capacity. [CUI REDACTED: Exact readiness/capacity metrics withheld].
11. 7/24/26 | Woodbury/Hunt | Sec 4.6
What is the biggest housing need for military personnel currently?
Roughly 300 homes in the local area to account for projected influx. – No issues with the provided response.
12. 7/24/26 | Woodbury/Hunt/Ashlock | Sec 4.6
Are single Airman allowed to live in off-base quarters and receive BAH? Is that policy negotiable?
Single airmen are allowed to live off base once approved by Military Housing
Office. – No issues with the provided response.
13. 7/24/26 | Woodbury/Hunt/Ashlock | Sec 4.6
How many dual military families are there currently?
[CUI REDACTED: Specific personnel composition statistics withheld].
14. 7/24/26 | Woodbury/Hunt/Ashlock | Sec 4.6
What is the current leasing rate of existing military housing?
Goes off the 2026 Enlisted BAH Rates. – No issues but removed the “of, “with the provided response.
15. 7/24/26 | Woodbury/Hunt/Ashlock | Sec 4.6
What is a current breakdown of military personnel on Eielson by rank/grade?
Information not available to provide.
16. 7/24/26 | Woodbury/Hunt/Ashlock | Sec 4.6
Are there any supplements contemplated for BAH/OHA for Eielson? If so, what is the current status?
No supplements outside of COLA to live in Alaska due to OCONUS structure. –
No issues with the provided response.
17. 7/24/26 | Woodbury/Hunt/Ashlock | Sec 4.6
May we get a map showing existing utilidors on Site #3?
Will follow up on this once available. – No issues with the provided response.
18. 7/24/26 | Woodbury/Hunt/Ashlock | Sec 4.6
May we get any existing environmental reports for Site #3?
The parcel East of French Creek Drive adjacent to Glacier Street is a potential wetland. [CUI REDACTED: Specific contamination boundaries and referenced attachment withheld].
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .