ADVANCED_WATER_PURIFICATION_PILOT_DEMONSTRATION_FACILITY_2-STEP_CONSTRUCTION_MANAGER_AT_RISK_SERVICES.pdf
PDF 225 KB Posted
- Attached to
- ADVANCED WATER PURIFICATION PILOT DEMONSTRATION FACILITY 2-STEP CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT RISK SERVICES
- Solicitation number
- WS85710005
- Issued by
- Maricopa County, Phoenix City, Arizona
About this file
Advanced Water Purification Pilot Demonstration Facility – Construction Manager at Risk Services
This Request for Qualifications (RFQ) is issued by the City of Phoenix, Arizona Office of the City Engineer for Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) preconstruction and construction services. The City seeks a qualified CMAR to deliver the Advanced Water Purification Pilot Demonstration Facility, located north of the existing 91st Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plant at 5615 S. 91st Avenue, Tolleson, Arizona 85353. The facility will treat Class B+ non-potable reclaimed water using advanced purification processes to produce potable water with a treatment capacity of approximately 200 gallons per minute (0.29 MGD). The proposed processes include flocculation and sedimentation, ozone treatment, dissolved air floatation, biofiltration, granular activated carbon, membranes, reverse osmosis, ultraviolet advanced oxidation, and calcite stabilization, along with supporting infrastructure including mechanical, electrical, instrumentation, fire/life safety systems, laboratory space, and office areas. A mandatory pre-submittal meeting is scheduled for 1:00 p.m. Phoenix time on Thursday, October 8, 2026, at City Hall, 9th Floor, Training Room, with virtual attendance available via Microsoft Teams. Statements of Qualifications are due by 12:00 p.m. Phoenix time on Friday, October 23, 2026, submitted electronically through the City's Procurement Portal. The selection process is two-step, with up to three finalists selected from SOQ submissions to proceed to the Request for Proposal phase. Final selection notification is anticipated in January 2027, with scope meetings in February 2027. The project design and construction will occur over multiple fiscal years with multiple design packages, and the CMAR will assume risk through a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) contract.
The estimated construction cost is $20 million, with partial federal funding from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. The CMAR must comply with all applicable federal regulations, including Davis-Bacon Act prevailing wage requirements, Build America Buy America Act (BABA), American Iron and Steel (AIS) requirements, and buy American preferences under 49 U.S.C. Section 50101. All steel and manufactured products installed must be produced in the United States unless formally approved otherwise. The CMAR is responsible for developing cost models at design milestones (60%, 90%, and final design phases) and for all construction means, methods, and subcontractor management through the City's subcontractor selection process. Preconstruction services include design coordination, cost estimating, scheduling, constructability studies, long-lead procurement, and permitting assistance. Construction phase services encompass subcontractor selection and management, procurement, quality control, bonding and insurance, safety management, commissioning, and training. The selected CMAR will be required to use UNIFIER, the City's web-based project management database, and maintain all project records in electronic format. The GMP submission must follow MAG or CSI format. Respondents must hold appropriate Arizona contractor licenses and provide a bonding statement from a surety company rated A- or better. No incumbent information is specified in this solicitation.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA
OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PROCUREMENT
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS
ADVANCED WATER PURIFICATION PILOT DEMONSTRATION FACILITY
2-STEP CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT RISK SERVICES
OPENGOV ID NO. WS85710005
RFQ Rev. 1/25 Page | 2
The City of Phoenix is seeking a qualified Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) to provide preconstruction services and complete construction services for the ADVANCED WATER
PURIFICATION PILOT DEMONSTRATION FACILITY 2-STEP CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT
RISK SERVICES project. The selected CMAR will work as a team with the designer of record engineering consultants, and City staff to ensure an efficient design approach for the project. The project site is located north of the existing 91st Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) at
5615 S. 91st Ave, Tolleson, AZ 85353. The estimated construction cost is $20 million. The work to be performed under the contract resulting from this RFQ may be supported by federal funding and, will be subject to all applicable federal regulations, policies, and procedures, including but not limited to Davis Bacon Act prevailing wage requirements, Build America, Buy America Act
(BABA), and American Iron and Steel (AIS) requirements.
This project will be funded in part by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. Respondents are advised to review the requirements outlined in Attachment AA, which includes the Department of the
Interior’s Office of Grants Management guidance. Compliance with all applicable federal regulations is mandatory.
Project Description
The Advanced Water Purification Pilot Facility, located north of the existing 91st Avenue WWTP, will focus on pursuing a long-term, reliable, and sustainable drinking water resource through the development of advanced water purification facilities and represents a critical step in evaluating future full-scale implementation. The AWP Pilot Facility will treat and convey Class B+ non-potable reclaimed water from the 91st Avenue WWTP and treat the reclaimed water with
Advanced Purification Processes to produce potable water. The facility will be designed and constructed to provide a treatment capacity of up to approximately 200 gallons per minute (0.29
MGD).
The proposed key processes and skids may include, but are not limited to the following:
• Flocculation & Sedimentation Basin
• Ozone
• Dissolved Air Floatation (DAF)
• Biofiltration
• Granular Activated Carbon (GAC)
• Membranes and/or Filtration
• Reverse Osmosis
• Ultraviolet Advanced Oxidation Process o Ultraviolet-Mercury o Ultraviolet-LED
• Calcite stabilization
Page | 3
• Influent Pumping
• Effluent Pumping
• Chemical Storage & Feed Storage
• Potential Brine Management Holding / Pumping
• Other facilities and processes as needed for the project
The proposed facility components may include but are not limited to:
• Architectural
• Building Mechanical
• Electrical
• Instrumentation
• Fire/Life Safety and potential security systems
• Laboratory / Research area
• Office area
• Site Civil
• Structural
• Other facilities and infrastructure as needed for the project
It is anticipated that the design and construction necessary to complete the project scope will occur over multiple fiscal years with multiple design packages. Contractor is required to develop multiple cost models at various milestones, including Final Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) packages or long lead equipment and instruments.
Scope of Work
The Construction Manager at Risk will begin with the firm in an agency support role for preconstruction services. The CMAR will assume the risk of delivering the project through a
Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) contract. The CMAR will be responsible for construction means and methods, and will be required to solicit bids from prequalified subcontractors to perform the work using the City’s subcontractor selection process. The GMP must be submitted in MAG or CSI format or it will not be accepted.
A. Preconstruction phase services by the CMAR may include the following:
• Attend and participate in design progress meetings with the engineering consultant(s) and City staff
• Provide accurate detailed cost model estimates at key milestones, including 60%, 90%, and final design phases and based on the knowledge of current marketplace conditions
Page | 4
• Provide project planning and scheduling
• Construction phasing and scheduling to minimize interruption of City operations
• Provide alternate systems evaluation and constructability studies
• Advise City on ways to gain efficiencies in project delivery
• Provide long-lead procurement studies and initiate procurement of long-lead items
• Assist in the permitting processes
• Protect the owner’s sensitivity to quality, safety, and environmental factors
• Advise the City on choosing green building materials
• Provide page by page drawing and specification review to determine effectiveness to eliminate vagueness for constructability
• Conduct clarification and assumptions review with design firm.
B. Construction phase services by the CMAR may include:
• Select subcontractors/suppliers for this project
• Prepare a subsequent Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) proposal for City’s approval
• Coordinate with City of Phoenix departments, other agencies, utility companies, etc.
• Conduct construction progress meetings with the project team
• Arrange for procurement of materials and equipment
• Schedule and manage construction site operations
• Bid, award, and manage all construction related contracts while meeting City bid requirements including the local and SBE participation goal
• Provide quality controls
• Bond and insure the construction
• Address all federal, state and local permitting requirements
• Maintain a safe work site for all project participants
• The CMAR will be required to maintain all project records in electronic format.
• Provide operations and maintenance manuals for new equipment and ensure their completeness and adherence to City standards and requirements
• Provide start-up assistance
• Provide training services as required
Page | 5
• Provide commissioning services
• Prepare and review project documents (e.g. correspondence, schedules, submittals, shop drawings, test data, project data, progress payments, change orders, as-built drawings, etc.)
Use of UNIFIER, an Application Service Provider (ASP) web-based project management database, may be required. The following information provides a guideline for utilization. Any questions related to the requirements of UNIFIER should be directed to the Project Manager.
• The CMAR will be required to maintain all project records in electronic format.
• The City provides an ASP web-based project management database which the CMAR will be required to utilize in the fulfillment of the contract requirements.
• The CMAR shall provide a computerized networked office platform with broadband internet connectivity.
• UNIFIER training will be provided through the City of Phoenix to firms under contract.
Pre-Submittal Meeting
A pre-submittal meeting will be held at 1:00 pm, Phoenix time on Thursday, October 8, 2026, at
200 W. Washington St., City Hall, 9th Floor, Training Room AND via Teams. At this meeting, City staff will discuss the scope of work, general project requirements, and respond to questions from the attendees. It is strongly recommended that interested firms attend the pre-submittal meeting.
Inquiries regarding the project scope outside of this pre-submittal meeting must be directed to the
Contracts Specialist.
Pre-Submittal Meeting Teams Information:
Microsoft Teams meeting
Join: https://teams.microsoft.com/meet/277717481968258?p=30q0VIHgbU6DZKMKBS
Meeting ID: 277 717 481 968 258
Passcode: Lm7XQ7v7
Statement of Qualifications Evaluation Criteria
A firm will be selected through a qualifications-based selection process based on the criteria below. Subcriteria are listed in order of importance in relation to project services. City of Phoenix project experience is not required.
No. Evaluation Criteria Scoring Method Weight (Points) https://teams.microsoft.com/meet/277717481968258?p=30q0VIHgbU6DZKMKBS
Page | 6
1. General Information
A. Provide a general description of the firm that is proposing to provide construction management services and general construction services. Explain the legal organization of the proposed firm or team. Provide an organization chart showing key personnel.
B. Please describe in detail how your team selection, organization chart and succession planning strategies are intended to maintain team continuity from Pre-
Construction to Construction to
Startup & Commissioning phases and intentionally minimizing transition-related issues throughout the overall project.
C. Provide the following information:
1. List the Arizona contractor licenses held by the firm and the key personnel who will be assigned to this project.
Provide the contractor license number. Reference the appropriate licenses held, if needed. In order to be considered for this project, the contractor must hold the correct license as deemed appropriate by the Arizona
Registrar of Contractors prior to submitting a Statement of
Qualifications (SOQ) for this project in accordance with
Arizona Revised Statute §32-
1151.
2. Identify the location of the firm’s principal office and the home office location of key staff on this project.
3. Identify any contract or subcontract held by the firm or officers of the firm, which has been terminated within the last five years. Identify
Points Based 150 (14.7% of Total)
Page | 7 any claims arising from a contract which resulted in litigation or arbitration within the last three years. Briefly describe the circumstances and the outcomes.
2. Experience and Qualifications of the
Firm
A. Identify at least three comparable projects in which the firm served as either CMAR, agency
Construction Manager during design and construction phases
(without providing construction services), or General Contractor.
Special consideration will be given to firms that have provided
Construction Manager at Risk services on similar successful projects. For each project identified, provide the following:
1. Description of the project
2. Role of the firm (specify whether Construction
Manager at Risk, Construction Manager or
General Contractor. If CMAR or General Contractor, identify the percent of work self-performed. Also specify services provided during design phase, i.e. cost estimating, scheduling, value engineering, etc.)
3. Project’s original contracted construction cost and final construction cost
4. Construction dates
5. Project owner
Points Based 250 (24.5% of Total)
Page | 8
3. Experience of Key Personnel to be
Assigned to This Project
A. For each key person identified, list their length of time with the firm and at least two comparable projects in which they have played a primary role. If a project selected for a key person is the same as one selected for the firm, provide just the project name and the role of the key person. For other projects provide the following:
1. Description of project including the scope of employer’s self performance
2. Role of the person during pre-construction
3. Role of the person during construction
4. Project’s original construction cost and final construction cost
5. Original and Final
Construction dates
6. Project owner
B. List any proposed subconsultants/subcontractors, including key staff names and the experience and qualifications of these individuals.
C. Provide Resumes: In addition to the SOQ page limit, each firm may provide up to 7 resumes for key roles as shown in org chart up to
7 pages max and no more than 1 page per resume (in addition to the SOQ page limit). Resumes may only be submitted for the following roles and 1 additional role: Project Manager, Lead
Superintendent, Other On-Site
Superintendent, Lead
Estimator, Procurement
Points Based 400 (39.2% of Total)
Page | 9
Manager, Start Up and
Commissioning Manager.
4. Project Management Approach
A. Describe your firm’s project management approach and team organization during design and construction phase services.
Describe software systems and processes used for planning, scheduling, estimating, and managing construction. Briefly describe the firm’s experience on quality control, dispute resolution, and safety management.
B. Attached to this Request for
Qualifications is the City of
Phoenix general subcontractor selection plan (see Exhibit A).
Describe how you intend to implement a subcontractor selection plan including your recommendations for subcontractor trades to be selected by qualifications only vs.
qualifications and bids; and discuss the benefit that your subcontractor selection plan provides to the project.
C. Describe the firm’s safety management approach, including but not limited to: OSHA compliance, hazard identification and risk mitigation, workforce training/education, emergency response and incident management, monitoring and continuous improvement.
Points Based 200 (19.6% of Total)
Page | 10
5. Reference Checks
Use the form provided in the Attachments section to obtain at least three references.
It is preferred no more than one be a City of Phoenix project. If your firm has not completed prior projects with other agencies, you will not be penalized. It is recommended there be references outside the City of Phoenix.
*These points are in addition to the 1,000 points for the SOQ.
Points Based 21 (2.1% of Total)
Submittal Requirements
Electronic Submittal Process: Firms interested in this project must submit a Statement of
Qualifications (SOQ) electronically through the City's Procurement Portal at https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/phoenix.
Submittal requirements are as follows:
Vendor Information: All firms must be registered in the City’s Vendor Management System prior to submitting a proposal. The vendor number should be included on the cover of the
SOQ. Information on how to register with the City is available at:
https://www.phoenix.gov/financesite/Pages/EProc-help.aspx
If your firm is already registered with the City of Phoenix’s Procurement system, visit https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/phoenix to login and access the electronic solicitation.
Submittals:
• Experience Modification Rate (EMR) – provide current rating; the awarded company will be asked to provide verification upon contract execution.
• Submit only one SOQ electronically, in .PDF format only, addressing all evaluation criteria. No hard copies will be accepted.
• Clearly display the firm legal name, vendor number, project title, and project number on the cover of the SOQ.
• A maximum of 10 pages is permitted to address all content in the SOQ submittal plus up to 7 pages of resumes. (Maximum page limit includes evaluation criteria and all additional content. It does not include information sheet.)
• In addition to the SOQ page limits, each firm may provide up to seven resumes for key roles as shown in the org chart.
• Provide Resumes: In addition to the SOQ page limit, each firm may provide up to 7 resumes for key roles as shown in org chart up to 7 pages maximum and no more than 1 page per resume. Resumes may only be submitted for the following roles and 1 https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/phoenix https://www.phoenix.gov/financesite/Pages/EProc-help.aspx https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/phoenix
Page | 11 additional role: Project Manager, Lead Superintendent, Other On-Site Superintendent, Lead Estimator, Procurement Manager, Start Up and Commissioning Manager.
• Submit electronically the Statement of Qualifications by 12:00 pm, Phoenix time, on
Friday, October 23, 2026.
• Page size must meet requirements of 8½” x 11”.
• Font size must not be less than 10 point.
• Content count:
o Each side of a page containing evaluation criteria and additional content will be counted toward the maximum page limit noted above.
o Pages that have project photos, charts and/or graphs will be counted towards the maximum page limit noted above.
o Front and back covers, information sheet, Table of Contents pages, and divider (tab) pages will NOT be counted toward the maximum page limit noted above, unless they include evaluation criteria and additional content that could be considered by the selection panel.
Information Sheet: Provide an information sheet that includes project title, OpenGov ID number, legal firm name (not a trade name), address, phone number, vendor number, and the name, title, email address and signature of your contact person for the project. Do not include any additional information.
Evaluation Criteria: Address the SOQ evaluation criteria.
Bonding Statement: As a separate PDF attachment, include a statement of the firm’s bonding capacity from a Surety Company (A- or better for the prior four quarters). This bond statement will not be counted towards the maximum number of pages.
Additional Content: Resumes and other information may be included (content shall be included within the permitted maximum page limit).
Note: All pages exceeding the specified maximum page limit will be removed from the submittal and not considered in evaluating a submitted SOQ.
Grounds for Disqualification
Please be advised that the following will be grounds for disqualification, and will be strictly enforced:
• Submitting a Statement of Qualifications for a different project.
• Violating the “Contact with City Employees” policy contained in this RFQ.
• Failure to provide bonding statement.
Selection Process and Schedule
Page | 12
The successful Contractor will be selected through a two-step process which is a qualifications-based selection that includes a cost value element.
During the first step, interested firms will submit their SOQ. The selection panel will evaluate the
SOQs according to the criteria in Statement of Qualifications Evaluation Criteria above and may select up to three firms as finalists to proceed to the second step of the procurement, which is the Request for Proposal (RFP) process.
During the second step, the RFP will be issued to the three finalists. The three finalists will submit technical and price proposals in response to the RFP. The finalists’ proposals will be evaluated and scored in accordance with the RFP scoring methodology. The firm with the highest composite scores for the technical and price proposals will be selected for the procurement. The final step is the recommendation for award of the JOC.
The City expects to create a final list of at least one, but not more than three firms for this project.
The City will enter into negotiations with the selected firm and execute a contract upon completion of negotiation of contract terms for City Council approval.
The following tentative schedule has been prepared for this project. The Pre-submittal meeting is not mandatory.
Pre-submittal Meeting 1:00 pm on Thursday, October
8, 2026
SOQs Due 12:00 pm on Friday, October
23, 2026
Firms Notified for Request for Proposal End of November
Selection Notification January 2027
Scope Meeting February 2027
If the City is unsuccessful in negotiating a contract with the best-qualified firm, the City may then negotiate with the next most qualified firm until a contract is executed, or the City may decide to terminate the selection process. Once a contract is executed with the successful firm, the procurement is complete.
Firms on the short list for interviews for this project will be notified directly by the City. Notification to all other firms on the status of a short list for this project will be posted on the City of Phoenix’s
Procurement Portal:
https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/phoenix
The firm selected for this project will be notified directly by the City. Notification to all other firms on the status of a short list for this project will be posted on the City of Phoenix’s Procurement
Portal:
https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/phoenix
Page | 13
Construction Phase Davis Bacon Compliance
The CMAR shall comply with “Federal Davis Bacon and Related Acts” in accordance with 29 CFR
Part 3 and 29 CFR Part 5 as applicable for the construction phase contract. Prior to bidding to subcontractors, the CMAR shall obtain the effective federal wage determination to be included in all subcontracts.
Federal Requirements
Lobbying and Influencing Federal Employees. No Federal appropriated funds shall be paid, by or on behalf of the CMAR, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the making of any Federal grant and the amendment or modification of any Federal grant. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with any Federal grant, the CMAR shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, “Disclosure of Lobby activities,” in accordance with its instructions.
Trade Restriction. The CMAR and subcontractors, by submission of the Statement of
Qualifications, certifies that it is not owned or controlled by one or more citizens of a foreign country included in the list of countries that discriminate against U.S. firms published by the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR); has not knowingly entered into any contract or subcontract for this JOC with a person that is a citizen or national of a foreign country on said list, or is owned or controlled directly or indirectly by one or more citizens or nationals of a foreign country on said list; and has not procured any product nor subcontracted for the supply of any product for use on the contract that is produced in a foreign country on said list.
Unless the restrictions of this clause are waived by the Secretary of Transportation in accordance with 49 CFR 30.17, no contract shall be awarded to a CMAR or subcontractor who is unable to certify to the above. If the CMAR knowingly procures or subcontracts for the supply of any product or service of a foreign country on said list for use on the project, the Federal Aviation
Administration may direct through the Sponsor cancellation of the contract at no cost to the
Government.
Further, the CMAR agrees that, if awarded a contract resulting from this solicitation it will incorporate this provision for certification without modification in each contract and in all lower tier subcontracts. The CMAR may rely on the certification of a prospective subcontractor unless it has knowledge that the certification is erroneous.
The CMAR shall provide immediate written notice to the Sponsor if the CMAR learns that its certification or that of a subcontractor was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. The subcontractor agrees to provide written notice to the
CMAR if at any time it learns that its certification was erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.
Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render, in good faith, the certification required by this provision. The knowledge
Page | 14 and information of a CMAR is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.
Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion. The CMAR and its subcontractors, by submission of its Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) certifies that neither it nor its principals is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any Federal department or agency. It further agrees by submitting its SOQ that it will include this clause without modification in all lower tier transactions, solicitations, proposals, contracts, and subcontracts. Where the CMAR or any lower tier participant is unable to certify this statement, it shall attach an explanation to its SOQ.
Buy American Preference. The CMAR certifies by submission of its Statement of Qualifications, that it will comply with Buy American preferences established under Title 49 U.S.C. Section
50101. Unless formally approved by the Federal Aviation Administration, all acquired steel and manufactured products installed must be produced in the United States. Be advised that the North
American Free Trade Agreement does not apply to Aviation Improvement projects.
Equal Employment Opportunity. The CMAR agrees that it will undertake affirmative action in conformance with 14 CFR Part 152, Subpart E, to insure that no person shall on the grounds of race, creed, color, national origin or sex be excluded from participating in any employment, contracting or leasing activities covered in 14 CFR Part 152, Subpart E. The CMAR assures that no person will be excluded on such grounds from participating in or receiving the services or benefits of any program or activity covered by Subpart E. The CMAR further agrees that it will require its covered suborganizations to provide assurances to the CMAR that they similarly will undertake affirmative action and that they will require like assurances from their suborganizations, as required by 14 CFR Part 152, Subpart E.
If the CMAR is a construction contractor on the Airport, the CMAR shall submit to the City of
Phoenix the reports required by paragraph (e) of 14 C.F.R. § 152.415, on the same basis as stated in paragraph (e) of 14 C.F.R. § 152.415, and the CMAR shall require each subcontractor to submit the reports required by paragraph (f) of 14 C.F.R. § 152.415 through the CMAR to the
City of Phoenix, for transmittal by the City of Phoenix to the FAA.
Non-Segregated Facilities. The CMAR and its subcontractors, by submission of the Statement of Qualifications certifies that it does not maintain or provide for its employees any segregated facilities at any its establishments, and that it does not permit its employees to perform their services at any location, under its control where segregated facilities are maintained. The CMAR certifies further that it will not maintain or provide for its employees segregated facilities at any of its establishments, and that it will not permit its employees to perform their services at any location, under its control, where segregated facilities are maintained.
Federal Affirmative Action Requirements. The CMAR will comply with the federal Affirmative
Action requirements as provided by 14 C.F.R. Part 152, subpart E during the term of the contract and the CMAR will require its subcontractors to also comply with the federal Affirmative Action requirements as set out above, and as may be amended. Failure of the CMAR and its subcontractors to maintain compliance during the term of the contract, including renewal options, is a material breach and may result in termination of the contract.
The selected Contractor should expect to comply with the Arizona State Statutes Title 34 and City of Phoenix Design and Construction Procurement’s contract provisions.
Page | 15
General Information
Citywide Capital Improvement Projects. Consulting and contractor services supporting the
City’s Capital Improvement Projects are procured under the authority of the City Engineer, currently located within the Street Transportation Department. Design and Construction
Procurement coordinates the citywide consulting and construction contracting procurement processes.
Changes to Request for Qualifications. Any changes to this Request for Qualifications
(RFQ) will be in the form of a Notification. The City of Phoenix shall not be held responsible for any oral instructions. Notifications are available on both the Current Opportunities and City's eProcurement Portal at https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/phoenix.
It shall be the responsibility of the registered RFQ holder to determine, prior to the submittal of the Statement of Qualifications, if a Notification has been issued. Registered
RFQ holders may refer to the web page or call the Contracts Specialist (listed below) to ascertain if a Notification has been issued for this project.
Alternate Format. For more information or a copy of this publication in an alternate format, contact the Contracts Specialist (listed below) - Voice or TTY 711. Requests will only be honored if made within the first week of the advertising period.
Release of Project Information/Public Records Request. The City shall provide the release of all public information concerning the project, including selection announcements and contract awards. Those desiring to release information to the public must receive prior written approval from the City. To submit a Public Records Request, visit phoenix.gov/prr.
City Rights. The City of Phoenix reserves the right to reject any or all Statements of
Qualifications, to waive any informality or irregularity in any Statement of Qualifications received, and to be the sole judge of the merits of the respective Statements of Qualifications received.
Contact with City Employees. This policy is intended to create a level playing field for all
Proposers, assure that contracts are awarded in public, and protect the integrity of the selection process. OFFERORS THAT VIOLATE THIS POLICY WILL BE DISQUALIFIED.
Beginning on the date the RFQ is issued and until the date the contract is awarded or the RFQ withdrawn, all persons or entities that respond to the RFQ, including their authorized employees, agents, representatives, proposed partner(s), subcontractor(s), joint venture(s), member(s), or any of their lobbyists or attorneys (collectively the Proposer), will refrain from any direct or indirect contact with any person (other than the designated Contract Specialist) who may play a part in the selection process, including members of the evaluation panel, the City Manager, Assistant
City Manager, Deputy City Managers, Department heads, the Mayor and other members of the
Phoenix City Council. As long as the RFQ solicitation is not discussed, Proposers may continue to conduct business with the City and discuss business that is unrelated to this RFQ solicitation with City staff.
Commencing on the date and time a solicitation is published, potential or actual proposers
(including their representatives) will only discuss matters associated with the solicitation with the
Mayor, any members of City Council, the City Manager, any Deputy City Manager, or any department director directly associated with the solicitation (including in each case their assigned staff, except for the designated procurement officer) at a public meeting, posted under the Arizona https://phoenix.gov/prr
Page | 16
Revised Statutes, until the resulting contract(s) are awarded or all offers or responses are rejected and the solicitation is cancelled without any announcement by the procurement officer of the City’s intent to reissue the same or a similar solicitation.
Proposers may discuss their proposal or the RFQ solicitation with the Mayor or one or more members of the Phoenix City Council, provided such meetings are scheduled through the
Contract Specialist, Alissa Bahr (602) 256-4107, conducted in person at 200 W. Washington, Phoenix, Arizona 85003, and are posted as open meetings with the City Clerk at least twenty-four
(24) hours prior to the scheduled meetings. The City Clerk will be responsible for posting the meetings. The posted notice shall identify the participants and the subject matter, as well as invite the public to participate.
Conflict of Interest. The City reserves the right to disqualify any Proposer on the basis of any real or apparent conflict of interest that is disclosed by the proposal submitted or any other data available to the City. This disqualification is at the sole discretion of the City. Any Proposer submitting a proposal herein waves any right to object now or at any future time, before any body or agency, including but not limited to, the City Council of the City of Phoenix or any court.
Protest Procedures. Firms responding to disqualification or a procurement outcome are referred to the Code of the City of Phoenix Chapter 2, Article XII, Section 2-187 to 2-190.4, which governs protest procedures utilized throughout the selection process. The procedures may be reviewed through the City of Phoenix website at:
http://www.codepublishing.com/az/phoenix/
A copy of the Protest Policy is also available online at:
https://www.phoenix.gov/administration/departments/streets/careers/business-opportunities.html
Questions - Questions pertaining to this selection process or contract issues should be submitted via the Procurement Portal.
Vendor Questionnaire
*Response required
*Response required http://www.codepublishing.com/az/phoenix/ https://www.phoenix.gov/administration/departments/streets/careers/business-opportunities.html
| REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS |
| Project Description |
| Scope of Work |
| Pre-Submittal Meeting |
| Statement of Qualifications Evaluation Criteria |
| Submittal Requirements |
| Grounds for Disqualification |
| Selection Process and Schedule |
| Construction Phase Davis Bacon Compliance |
| Federal Requirements |
| General Information |
| Vendor Questionnaire |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .