Addendum for FAR 52 212-2 evaluation of Commercial Items.pdf

PDF 84 KB Posted

Attached to
Recycling Services at Fort Buchanan, PR
Solicitation number
W912C325RA005
Issued by

About this file

This document is an Addendum for FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation-Commercial Items that outlines a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) solicitation for Recycling Services at Fort Buchanan, Puerto Rico. The solicitation is a 100% small business set-aside for a firm fixed-price contract with a base year and four option years, targeting recycling and waste management services using 49 dumpsters and mobile toter pickups. Key technical requirements include providing dumpsters within 10 calendar days of award, weekly service frequency, obtaining valid non-hazardous solid waste and recycling facility permits from the Puerto Rico Environmental Quality Board, and demonstrating at least one year of related recycling contract experience with a contract value of $250,000 or more. Offerors will be evaluated on technical acceptability and price, with technical acceptability being the most critical factor, and the government intends to select a single contractor for the award.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Addendum for FAR 52.212-2

Evaluation-Commercial Items

LOWEST PRICE TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE (LPTA) EVALUATION

FACTORS FOR AWARD

A. BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD: This acquisition shall utilize Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) in accordance with FAR 15.101-2, as supplemented.

This is a competitive LPTA best value source selection in which technical acceptability is considered the most important factor.

By submission of its offer, the offeror accepts all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements.

All technically acceptable offerors shall be treated equally except for their prices.

Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being determined technically unacceptable.

The government intends to select ONE contractor for award of this effort.

For the purpose of award, the government shall evaluate offers based on the evaluation factors described below:

FACTOR 1 Technical Acceptability (Acceptable/Unacceptable)

Adjectival Rating Description

Acceptable: Quote meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable: Quote does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

Sub-Factor 1 – Technical Approach

The offeror shall provide its Technical Approach to meeting the requirements outlined in the Performance Work Statement (PWS). Measures of merit for this factor are met when the offeror's technical approach demonstrates the following:

a. Demonstrate the ability to fulfill and comply with the following specific requirements* of the Performance Work Statement.

1. Able to provide 49 Dumpsters (6 Cubic Yards each) within 10 Calendar days of award

2. Weekly frequency of Service

4. Able to perform weekly Mobile Toter Pickup of 49 Dumpsters (50gal each) immediately after award.

5. Offerors must provide and have a valid and approved non-hazardous solid waste transportation permit/license from the Puerto Rico Environmental Quality Board (EQB).

6. Offerors must provide and have a valid and approved state or local recycling Material Recovery Facility permit/license from the Puerto Rico Environmental Quality Board

(EQB).

Sub-Factor 2 – Technical Capability (Past Experience)

a. The Offeror shall submit a narrative including Description of work, Contract amount, Person of contact, and telephone number that demonstrates at least one (1) year of related experience as the prime contractor or service provider in Recycle contract value at $250,000 or more.

* Note: Contractor shall comply with all requirements in the Performance Work Statement. However, for demonstrating knowledge and ability to meet specific requirements, the above are required.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .