ADDENDUM.pdf
PDF 130 KB Posted
- Attached to
- On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services
- Solicitation number
- Not on record
- Issued by
- Sacramento County, San Francisco City, California
About this file
This is an addendum to a Request for Proposals issued by the Sacramento County Department of Airports for On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services. The addendum, dated July 17, 2026, addresses 117 questions submitted by prospective proposers and clarifies key requirements of the RFP. The Department seeks qualified consultants to provide services on an as-needed basis in the following discipline areas: Architectural, Civil, Structural, Mechanical/Plumbing, Electrical, and Cost-Estimating. Services may support feasibility studies, facility assessments, programming, tenant improvements, paving, renovations, new construction, and deferred maintenance projects at facilities operating in occupied, secure, or continuously operating environments. Consultants may submit proposals for one or multiple discipline areas, with separate responses required for each discipline. Proposals must not exceed forty pages per discipline area and must be formatted according to specified sections addressing company qualifications, relevant experience, knowledge of applicable codes and regulations, project experience from the past five years, capacity and responsiveness, and specific completed projects demonstrating past performance. The contract term is three years with two optional one-year extension periods.
Proposers must submit hourly rate structures for each discipline area, including any overhead multipliers or additional fees, subject to negotiation. Financial documentation requirements include balance sheets and income statements for the last two fiscal years prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, interim financial statements reflecting significant events, and ownership information. Evaluation will be conducted by a panel using a 100-point scoring system across categories including consultant experience and qualifications (30 points), project team and key personnel (25 points), relevant project experience (20 points), capacity and responsiveness (15 points), and past performance (10 points), with completeness of response, minimum qualifications, and references evaluated on a pass/fail basis. The highest-ranked proposers may be required to participate in virtual interviews prior to final recommendation to the County's Board of Supervisors for contract award.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Bid Notice-On-Call Architectural and Engineering Services.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Department of Airports
Cindy Nichol
Director
County of Sacramento
Divisions
Operations & Maintenance
Finance & Administrative Services
Commercial Development
Planning & Development
6900 Airport Boulevard, Sacramento, CA 95837
Office (916) 929-5411 | air-market@saccounty.gov
July 17, 2026
To: Prospective Proposers
From: William Wallace
Administrative Services Officer II Sacramento County Department of Airports
Subject: Addendum #2 – RFP for On-Call Architectural and
Engineering Services at Sacramento County Department of Airports
This addendum provides updates to the Request for Proposals (RFP) referenced in the subject line and responses to questions received by the Department of Airports (Department) from potential proposers prior to the deadline designated in the RFP as well as updates to certain sections of the RFP document.
The Department received one hundred and eighteen (118) questions regarding the RFP. One (1) question was received after the Question deadline which is not included in these responses. Listed in Attachment 1 are the one hundred and seventeen (117) questions received prior to the deadline and the
Department’s responses. The questions listed are in the exact format received by the Department, with no corrections made for spelling or grammar.
RFP Update
All references to “Request for Qualifications” in the Request for Proposals shall be replaced with “Request for Proposals.”
All references to “SOQ” or “Statement of Qualifications” in the Request for Proposals shall be replaced by “Proposal.”
Section VIII Subsection D “Page Limits” is replaced in its entirety as follows:
Proposals must be typed or printed in a font no smaller than eleven (11) point, on 8.5” by 11” sized pages. The proposal should be concise and must not exceed forty (40) pages per discipline area for which the proposer intends to compete, including any marketing materials.
The following items are not included in the page limit count:
1. Cover page;
2. Table of contents, section dividers, and intentionally blank pages;
3. Cover letter;
4. Staff resumes;
5. Consultant’s team organization chart;
6. County of Sacramento Contractor Certification of Compliance Form;
7. Contractor Identification Form; and
8. Financial Statements
Section X. “Proposal Contents” is replaced in its entirety as follows:
The selected Consultant must demonstrate the capability to provide the services described in this RFP for airports or other large public-use facilities operating in occupied, secure, or continuously operating environments.
Proposals shall address the following components in a clear, well-organized narrative. The Department reserves the right to request additional information as necessary to evaluate the Consultant's qualifications and ability to perform the requested services.
1. Clearly identify the discipline area(s) for which the Consultant is submitting a proposal:
• Architectural
• Civil
• Structural
• Mechanical/Plumbing
• Electrical
• Cost-Estimating
Consultants seeking consideration for more than one discipline area shall provide separate responses to Items 2 through 7 for each discipline and clearly identify the applicable discipline area(s).
2. Describe the company and demonstrate how it meets the minimum qualifications for the proposed discipline area(s).
3. Describe the company's experience and qualifications in the proposed discipline area(s) by demonstrating experience with clients or projects of similar size, scope, and complexity, or experience with public-sector projects.
4. Demonstrate knowledge of applicable codes, regulations, permitting processes, and experience working in occupied, secure, or 24/7 operating facilities.
5. Demonstrate relevant project experience for the proposed discipline area(s), including successful completion of comparable projects within the last five (5) years, the ability to manage schedules and budgets, and experience coordinating with multidisciplinary teams and public stakeholders.
6. Demonstrate the company's capacity and responsiveness, including its current workload, ability to meet project timelines, ability to respond to urgent or time-sensitive assignments, and availability of staff to support multiple concurrent task orders, if required.
7. Identify specific projects completed within the past five (5) years that highlight the company's relevant experience and qualifications for the proposed discipline area(s) and demonstrate its past performance regarding schedule, budget, project team capabilities, responsiveness, collaboration, and communication.
Section XI. “Fee Structure, Proposal Cost, and Scope” is replaced in its entirety as follows:
Please include the hourly rates proposed for the services associated with each proposed discipline area. Clearly identify any overhead multipliers or other fees not covered by the stated hourly rates, if applicable. The terms of the resulting agreement will be subject to negotiations between the Department and the successful Contractor. The structure and general terms of the final agreement shall align with the sample agreement provided as Attachment 1 to the RFP.
Include the following additional information:
A. FINANCIAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Include the following historical financial information for the
Contractor and any joint venture or affiliate entities:
i. Balance sheet and income statements for the last two fiscal years prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, reflecting the current financial condition of the Consultant. Also, include an interim balance sheet and income statement of any significant financial events occurring after the closing date of the most recent financial statements.
ii. Describe ownership of the proposing entity.
B. FEE SCHEDULE
If submitting proposals for more than one discipline area, the Consultant shall provide a separate Fee Schedule for each discipline area proposed and clearly identify the applicable discipline area on each Fee Schedule submitted.
i. Consultant shall include a proposed Fee Schedule in the form of a fee matrix identifying the staff (or positions) that will perform services under the on-call agreement and showing the corresponding hourly rates and typical availability of those staff (or positions).
ii. Consultant shall include a discussion of anticipated cost-increases, if any, including any proposed escalation, across the full term of the agreement including the initial term of three (3) years and both of the two (2) one-year (1-year) extension terms.
Section XIV. “Evaluation of Proposals” is replaced in its entirety as follows:
The RFP evaluation process will include a specific focused review of each proposal by a panel of evaluators. Each proposal will be evaluated against other proposals received. Proposals must be formatted and headlined in the order of Sections IX-XII, indicated above, and must clearly answer / describe and or demonstrate all the required information requested herein.
Proposals will be evaluated for each discipline area which it is seeking consideration based on the following criteria in the table on the following page:
Category Points Towards Overall Score
Completeness of Response Pass/Fail
Minimum Qualifications Pass/Fail
References Pass/Fail
Consultant Experience & Qualifications 30
Project Team & Key Personnel 25
Relevant Project Experience 20
Capacity & Responsiveness 15
Past Performance 10
Total 100
Proposals will receive a final score for each discipline area which the
Consultant sought consideration for based on the average of scores from the evaluation panel. The highest-ranked proposers may be required to attend a virtual interview, which will serve as the basis for the panel’s final decision for a recommendation to the County’s Board of Supervisors for contract award.
Kind Regards, William Wallace
Administrative Services Officer II
Attachments:
1 – Questions and Responses
2 – Pre-Proposal Conference Attendee List
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .