Addendum - 52.212-2, Evaluation (1).docx
DOCX document 33 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Dispatcher Workstation & parts Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA446025Q0316
About this file
This document is an Addendum to the Evaluation Criteria for a Commercial Products and Commercial Services solicitation for Little Rock Air Force Base. The Air Force is seeking dispatch console furniture for six workstations, specifically four dispatcher workstations, two supervisor workstations, a map table, and necessary computer cabinets that can accommodate various computer, communication, display, environmental controls, and operator interface devices.
The evaluation process will be conducted using a Lowest Priced, Technically Acceptable (LPTA) methodology. Offerors will be first ranked by price, then evaluated technically to determine if they meet the specifications outlined in the Performance Work Statement. The government will continue technical evaluations until at least three offerors are deemed "Acceptable" technically. The government reserves the right to not select a contractor based on offer quality and fund availability. The solicitation (FA446025Q0316) is issued by the Department of the Air Force Air Mobility Command, with the final award to be made to the offeror presenting the best value to the government.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 7 B481 Questions and Answers.pdf | ||
| COMBO_Dispatcher_Workstation.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 - PWS - ECC Console Furniture.pdf | ||
| Addendum - 52.212-1, Instructions to Offeror.docx | DOCX document | |
| Wage Determination.docx | DOCX document | |
| Clauses B481 Dispatcher Workstation.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5.1 - PWS Diagram Attachment.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ADDENDUM
52.212-2, Evaluation—Commercial Products and Commercial Services. (Nov 2021)
1. The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:
1.1. Price.
1.2. Technical Capability / Acceptance.
2. By submission of its offer, the offeror agrees to abide by all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation. Offers/Offerors that fail to furnish required representations or information, or reject the terms and conditions of the solicitation may be considered non-responsive and/or excluded from consideration. (IAW 52.212-1)
3. Technical and past performance, when combined, are considered equal in importance.
4. Evaluation Factors and Process Defined:
4.1. First, the Government shall rank all responsive offers by price.
4.1.1. An offeror’s total evaluated price will include the total of all Contract Line Items as outlined in this solicitation or any associated attachments.
4.1.2. The Government reserves the right to deem an offeror's overall quotation to be unresponsive in the event that incomplete, unreasonable, or unbalanced pricing is submitted.
4.2. Second, the Government will conduct a Technical Evaluation, starting with the lowest priced evaluated responsive offer, to determine if they are “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable,” based on the offer/offeror meeting requirements as outlined in the solicitation or any associated attachments.
4.2.1. “Acceptable” means: the description DOES meet the specifications of the items described in the Salient Characteristics, Performance Work Statement (PWS), or associated attachments.
4.2.2. “Unacceptable” means: the description DOES NOT meet the specifications described in the Salient Characteristics, Performance Work Statement (PWS), or associated attachments. An unacceptable technical description will result in offer/offeror being removed from further consideration.
4.2.3. The Technical Evaluation processing of offers will continue (in order by price) until the Government determines that at least three (3) offerors are determined to have an “Acceptable” technical rating.
4.2.3.1. If there are less than 3 offers/offerors, the Government will perform a Technical Evaluation on ALL offers/offerors.
4.2.3.2. If no offer/offeror is determined to be “Acceptable,” then no award will be made, and the Contracting Officer will re-evaluate the requirement.
4.3. Third, once the requisite number of offers/offerors have been evaluated for both Price and Technical Capability/Acceptance, the Government will make an award to the “Lowest Priced, Technically Acceptable (LPTA)” offer/offeror. This offer/offeror represents the best value to the Government.
5. The Government reserves the right to communicate with all, some, or none of the offerors to address any issues, if necessary. The Government also reserves the right not to select a contractor, depending on the quality of the offers/offerors submitted and the availability of funds.
6. A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer’s specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .