Addendum 1 21357.pdf

DTMB-0414 (Rev 6/16)

DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGY, MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET

State Facilities Administration Design and Construction Division

CONSTRUCTION BID ADDENDUM NO. 1

This form identifies an Addendum to Bidding Documents, and incorporates interpretations or clarifications, modifications, acceptance of proposed “or equal” materials, and other information into the Bidding Documents.

Addenda will be numbered by the Professional and distributed through www.michigan.gov/SIGMAVSS as an attachment.

TO:

ALL BIDDERS

DATE ISSUED

March 30, 2023

PROJECT NAME

Michigan Reformatory – Barn Demolition

FILE NUMBER

472/21357.SMD

PROFESSIONAL

Straub Pettitt Yaste Architects Richard Mann

PROJECT DIRECTOR

Scott DeKorte

BID OPENING DATE:

April 5, 2023

ADDENDUM ITEMS:

Item 1 – Replace the Asbestos Inspection Report attached as Appendix II to Section 020800 – Asbestos Abatement with the attached Asbestos and Other Waste Assessment Report, dated 3/27/2023.

Item 2 - Attached is a copy of the attendance sheet from the mandatory Pre-Bid Conference held on 3/24/2023.

Item 3 - Question: Will a water source be available?

Answer: Yes, the Facility has a water source available to use. The tap that is available is in the Grounds Building

(storage building to the north or the barn).

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: This Addendum must be acknowledged by the Bidder in the space provided in the Bid Summary and Bid Form. Failing to acknowledge Addenda may be cause for the Bid to be rejected. Addenda will become part of the Contract Documents.

PROFESSIONAL: Richard Mann DATE 3/30/2023 Straub Pettitt Yaste Architects

APPROVED BY:

PROJECT DIRECTOR Scott DeKorte DATE 3/30/2023

PROJECT NO.: 221644

REPORT DATE: 3/27/2023

SHEET: 1 of 11

PROJECT Dairy Barn at Michigan Reformatory Correctional Facility CLIENT Straub Pettitt Yaste Architects

ASBESTOS & OTHER WASTE ASSESSMENT REPORT

REPORT BY: Matthew Plummer A51770

Sampling was performed by a trained and qualified technician in accordance with generally accepted industry practice, Materials Testing Consultants procedures and the above referenced standards. Review of report by the Project Manager is standard practice. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the client and any partial or whole reproduction without the consent of the client is prohibited. This report is applicable only to the items and location(s) listed herein.

Asbestos & Other Waste Assessment Sections

1.0 Asbestos Assessment – page 1

2.0 Lead Paint Assessment – page 6

3.0 Other Waste Assessment – page 11

1.1 Summary: Asbestos tested materials, sample numbers and sample locations are provided in the Lab Test Report. ND=None Detected. Sample locations do not represent all locations materials may be present, but represent the material based on visual characteristics (like materials). Quantities are estimated for management of materials in place and for bidding purposes should be field verified. The following summarizes asbestos materials, assumed asbestos materials and potentially hidden asbestos materials:

• Transite Shingle (201-202) Chrysotile 15%-20% - 6,500 sf

• No material was considered potentially hidden.

• Electrical Switches assumed to contain asbestos – 5 Each

• Pipe Gaskets assumed to contain asbestos – 5 Each

• Roof Vents (Silver Paint Coating) assumed to contain asbestos – 4 Each (200 sf)

1.2 Recommendations: Materials containing asbestos are regulated by MIOSHA and DEGLE. For air quality, DEGLE regulates asbestos materials with content greater than 1%. For worker protection, MIOSHA regulates asbestos materials at detectable levels, with minimum work practice requirements for materials with detectable amounts below 1% and as Asbestos Containing Materials for materials with greater than 1% asbestos content.

Building Owners have obligations under MIOSHA Part 602, including but not limited to communicating this report to employees and employers working in the building; treating unidentified materials as assumed or presumed asbestos containing materials (PACM) and handling assumed and PACM as asbestos containing materials until tested for asbestos content; and communicating to employees and employers working in the building the hazards associated with the potential existence of hidden asbestos materials in cavities, vaults, pits, spaces below floor slabs and below other materials with instructions to stop work when suspect asbestos materials are encountered. Consult with Materials Testing Consultants for additional assessments and testing.

1.0 Asbestos Assessment

LOCATION(S): Dairy Barn at Michigan Reformatory Correctional Facility, 1342 W Main St, Ionia, MI 48846.

NO. OF MATERIALS TESTED: 12

CODE OR STANDARD: EPA AHERA 40CFR, Subpart E, 763.86; EPA NESHAP 40 CFR 61; OSHA 29 CFR 1926.1101 (K)(S)

MTC PROCEDURE: ASB-0004.0 Asbestos Survey and Bulk Sampling – Ltd-Destructive ANALYSIS BY: EMSL Analytical, Inc. METHOD: EPA 600/R-93/116 PLM LAB TEST REPORT: Enclosed following Summary and Recommendations

SHEET: 2 of 11

Sampling was performed by a trained and qualified technician in accordance with generally accepted industry practice, Materials Testing Consultants procedures and the above referenced standards. Review of report by the Project Manager is standard practice. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the client and any partial or whole reproduction without the consent of the client is prohibited. This report is applicable only to the items and location(s)

1.3 Asbestos Testing Laboratory Analysis

SHEET: 3 of 11

Sampling was performed by a trained and qualified technician in accordance with generally accepted industry practice, Materials Testing Consultants procedures and the above referenced standards. Review of report by the Project Manager is standard practice. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the client and any partial or whole reproduction without the consent of the client is prohibited. This report is applicable only to the items and location(s)

SHEET: 4 of 11

Sampling was performed by a trained and qualified technician in accordance with generally accepted industry practice, Materials Testing Consultants procedures and the above referenced standards. Review of report by the Project Manager is standard practice. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the client and any partial or whole reproduction without the consent of the client is prohibited. This report is applicable only to the items and location(s)

SHEET: 5 of 11

Sampling was performed by a trained and qualified technician in accordance with generally accepted industry practice, Materials Testing Consultants procedures and the above referenced standards. Review of report by the Project Manager is standard practice. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the client and any partial or whole reproduction without the consent of the client is prohibited. This report is applicable only to the items and location(s)

SHEET: 6 of 11

Sampling was performed by a trained and qualified technician in accordance with generally accepted industry practice, Materials Testing Consultants procedures and the above referenced standards. Review of report by the Project Manager is standard practice. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the client and any partial or whole reproduction without the consent of the client is prohibited. This report is applicable only to the items and location(s)

2.0 Lead Paint Assessment

SAMPLING DATE(S): 3/16/2023

CODE OR STANDARD: MIOSHA Part 309-Cadmium, Part 603-Lead, Part 604-Chromium Exposure in Construction MTC PROCEDURE: Following ASTM E1729-05 EQUIPMENT: Metal Scraper, Tape, Paper, Collection Bag

2.1 Summary: The enclosed lab report for the (3) three paint sample(s) collected from the project site shows concentrations of lead, cadmium and chromium. Concentrations below the laboratory detection limit is indicated by the “<” symbol preceding the concentration on the attached lab reports. Due to limitations of the analytical method, the laboratory could not determine the concentration below the laboratory detection value. Detection limits are part of analytical procedures for any method. Concentrations above the detection limit are reported as determined. Sample locations are provided on the lab report.

Remediation or abatement of painted surfaces is not a requirement under the Construction Standard, nor under any standard. The concentration of lead, cadmium or chromium does not trigger a requirement to remove painted surfaces prior to construction. According to OSHA, regarding the Lead in Construction, 29 CFR 1926.62 standard and in interpretation letters dated March 1, 1999 and September 10, 2008, employers must comply with assessment measures and any applicable protections of that standard for all tasks governed by the standard involving paints having any level of lead. OSHA further indicates that exposures above the PEL can occur when disturbing paint at “extremely low concentrations”. It is expected that this level of interpretation applies to cadmium and chromium levels for their respective standards.

2.2 Recommendations: To comply with the OSHA and MIOSHA Construction Safety and Health standards governing worker exposure to lead, MTC recommends that each employer impacting painted surfaces review the regulatory standards to determine if work tasks are likely to cause worker exposure above the PEL either by using objective data or prior exposure assessments. Where no objective data or assessment data is available, conduct an exposure assessment in accordance with the standards. MTC is available to assist in meeting these requirements.

SHEET: 7 of 11

Sampling was performed by a trained and qualified technician in accordance with generally accepted industry practice, Materials Testing Consultants procedures and the above referenced standards. Review of report by the Project Manager is standard practice. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the client and any partial or whole reproduction without the consent of the client is prohibited. This report is applicable only to the items and location(s)

2.3 Paint Laboratory Analysis:

SHEET: 8 of 11

Sampling was performed by a trained and qualified technician in accordance with generally accepted industry practice, Materials Testing Consultants procedures and the above referenced standards. Review of report by the Project Manager is standard practice. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the client and any partial or whole reproduction without the consent of the client is prohibited. This report is applicable only to the items and location(s)

SHEET: 9 of 11

Sampling was performed by a trained and qualified technician in accordance with generally accepted industry practice, Materials Testing Consultants procedures and the above referenced standards. Review of report by the Project Manager is standard practice. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the client and any partial or whole reproduction without the consent of the client is prohibited. This report is applicable only to the items and location(s)

SHEET: 10 of 11

Sampling was performed by a trained and qualified technician in accordance with generally accepted industry practice, Materials Testing Consultants procedures and the above referenced standards. Review of report by the Project Manager is standard practice. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the client and any partial or whole reproduction without the consent of the client is prohibited. This report is applicable only to the items and location(s)

SHEET: 11 of 11

Sampling was performed by a trained and qualified technician in accordance with generally accepted industry practice, Materials Testing Consultants procedures and the above referenced standards. Review of report by the Project Manager is standard practice. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the client and any partial or whole reproduction without the consent of the client is prohibited. This report is applicable only to the items and location(s)

3.0 Other Waste Assessment

3.1 Summary: Potential regulated or universal waste characterized and quantified by visual observation.

Other Waste Item (location) Characterization Estimated Quantity Firing Range Backstop Sand (upper floor) Lead/Heavy Metals 9 Cubic Yards Refrigerator (lower floor) Ozone Depleting Substance 1 Each Light Bulbs (lower floor) Mercury 50 Each Light Ballasts (lower floor) PCB 4 Each Thermostat (lower floor) Mercury 1 Each Compressor Oils (lower floor) PCB 1 Each Animal Waste / Bird Droppings (upper floor) Biohazard

(Histoplasmosis/Psittacosis) 20 Cubic Yards