Addenda 1 - Bidder Q&A M-57 Mill_Fill.pdf
PDF 62 KB Posted
- Attached to
- PMC M-57, Gratiot County, Washington Twp, HMA State and local contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- RFP 591 250000001767 2
- Issued by
- Gogebic County, Michigan
About this file
This is a Bidder Questions & Answers addendum for Request for Proposal (RFP) 250000001767 issued by the State of Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) for the M-57 (Cleveland Road) HMA Cold Mill and Overlay project located in Washington Township, Gratiot County. The project involves hot mix asphalt (HMA) work with specific performance requirements. The addendum addresses clarifications on technical specifications and contract structure that were submitted by bidders during the solicitation process.
The addendum clarifies two critical bidding parameters: the performance grade of asphalt to be used is PG 70-28P for the HMA 5EML High Stress application, and the project is structured as a lump sum contract rather than a unit price contract. These clarifications were provided by the State in response to bidder inquiries regarding the MDOT Standard Specifications for Construction Division 5 and the pricing schedule outlined in the RFP documents.
View the file
Other files for this state and local contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 2 - WHD-9917 FEB 9 2024.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - M-57 Proposal.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 - WHD-9918 FEB 9 2024.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 - ORS-002120_MDOT_M57_Issued.03.11.25.pdf | ||
| RFP 25-1767 PMC M-57 Cleveland Road.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Michigan.gov/MiProcurement
Version 2021-1
BIDDER QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
RFP 250000001767
M-57 (CLEVELAND ROAD) HMA COLD MILL AND OVERLAY
WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP, GRATIOT COUNTY
Bidders who have questions for the above Solicitation must fill the sections below and attach the document in an email to the Solicitation Manager, as described in the Instruction to Bidders.
Q # Document and Section
Page
Bidder Question Answer (to be completed by the State)
MDOT Standard Specifications for Construction, Division 5
Is the performance grade 70-28 shown in the HMA application table accurate, or is PG 70-28P desired for the HMA, 5EML, High Stress?
PG 70-28P is the desired mix for the HMA, 5EML, High Stress
RFP Document;
Schedule B - Pricing
22 &
Is this a lump sum or a unit price contract?
This project is a lump sum contract
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .