A2_13__QASP_SS_1.pdf
PDF 137 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CGB-400 IMT GIS Technical Service Support Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140R2026Q0014
About this file
This is a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) for Solicitation #140R2026Q0014, a Geospatial Information Systems (GIS) Technical Support contract. The QASP establishes the government's methodology for monitoring contractor performance against standards defined in the Performance Work Statement (PWS).
The QASP outlines five key procedural elements: (1) the Contracting Officer Representative (COR) tracks contractor performance throughout the evaluation period with interim assessments identifying strengths and weaknesses; (2) the contractor may submit a written self-assessment within five working days after each evaluation period, not to exceed one page per Performance Requirements Summary (PRS) element, addressing both performance strengths and corrective actions for deficiencies; (3) the COR prepares a findings and recommendations report to the Contracting Officer (CO), providing the contractor a draft copy to identify factual errors before the final report is submitted; (4) the CO makes a final written determination on the percentage of work successfully completed and resulting payment within 45 calendar days after the evaluation period ends; and (5) any disincentive deductions are made within the later of 60 days after the evaluation period or 30 days after receipt of an approved invoice. Performance requirements are measured across two categories—Project Management and Technical Support. Project Management performance includes timeliness (biweekly progress reports and monthly management reports/invoices submitted on time 98% of the time), quality (reports are thorough), and accuracy (100% of invoices include all required supporting documentation). Technical Support performance is evaluated on timeliness (service and technical questions answered within required timeframes 98% of the time) and quality (staff competent and versed in GIS to answer 95% of all relevant questions). Measurement means include confirmed reports, periodic COR surveillance, and input from Reclamation staff.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| A2_23__PWS_SS_1.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOLICITATION #140R2026Q0014
GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS (GIS) TECHNICAL SUPPORT
QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP)
The Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) is one evaluation method the government uses to perform surveillance to determine whether the Contractor meets the standards of performance as defined in the PWS. The absence of a QASP for any contract requirement, however, shall not detract from its enforceability or limit the rights or remedies of the government under any other provision of the contract in determining the quality of the Contractor performance during the evaluation period.
1. Monitoring Performance: During the course of the evaluation period, the Contracting Officer Representative (COR) will track Contractor performance. Interim (mid-term) evaluations may be provided to identify strengths and weaknesses in the Contractor's performance during the period being evaluated. At the end of the period, the COR will assess the Contractor's performance in accordance with the Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) and report to the Contracting Officer (CO).
2. Contractor Self-Assessment: Following each evaluation period, the Contractor may provide a written self- assessment of its performance to the COR to be considered in its report to the CO. The self-assessment shall be submitted no later than 5 working days after the end of each evaluation period. The self-evaluation shall not exceed 1 page per PRS element. The self-assessment shall address both the strengths and weaknesses of the Contractor's performance during the evaluation period. Where deficiencies in performance are noted, the Contractor shall describe the actions planned or taken to correct such deficiencies and avoid their recurrence. The self-assessment itself will NOT be the basis for the Disincentives determination.
3. COR Recommendation: The COR will consider all evaluations and any other pertinent information, including Contractor self-assessment, and will prepare a report to the CO with findings and recommendations. The Contractor will be provided a copy of the draft findings and recommendations of the COR and will be afforded the opportunity to identify factual errors. The COR's draft recommendation is not subject to negotiation and the COR will not engage in discussions with the Contractor. Any errors identified by the Contractor will be addressed by the COR in its final report. The Contractor will be provided a copy of the final COR report at the same time the report is submitted to the
CO.
4. Payment Determination: The CO may meet with the COR to discuss the COR's report.
The CO will make a final determination in writing as to the percentage of work successfully completed, and the resulting payment to be made. A copy of the determination will be provided to the Contractor no later than 45 calendar days after the end of the period being evaluated. All CO decisions regarding Disincentives are unilateral decisions made solely at the discretion of the Government.
5. Deduction: Notwithstanding any other clause of this contract, deduction of the
Disincentive will be made within the later of 60 days after the end of the evaluation period or 30 days after receipt of an approved invoice.
SOLICITATION #140R2026Q0014
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY and QUALITY ASSURANCE
SURVEILLANCE PLAN
PERFORMANCE
REQUIREMENT
ACCEPTABLE QUALITY
LEVEL
MEANS OF
MEASUREMENT
Project Management 1. TIMELINESS Biweekly Progress/Status and monthly Management Report/Invoice are on time 98% of the time.
Confirmed Reports.
Periodic COR Surveillance.
2. QUALITY:
Biweekly Progress/Status and monthly Management Report/Invoice are thorough.
Confirmed Reports.
Periodic COR Surveillance.
3. ACCURACY:
100% of invoices include all required supporting documentation.
Review of invoices submitted.
Technical Support
1. TIMELINESS:
Service, Technical Support, and questions are answered within the required timeframe 98% of the time.
Input from Reclamation staff Periodic COR Surveillance
2. QUALITY:
Staff providing Service and Technical Support are competent and versed in GIS sufficient to perform duties and answer 95% of all relevant questions asked of them.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .