A08 - Technical Evaluation Factors - DRAFT.pdf

Factor 1: Technical Capabilities

Sub-Factor 1.1: Performance Requirements

• The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s Performance Work Statement. Specifically, the government will evaluate the Offeror’s defined solutions that encompass the work to be completed for the acquisition and installation of the Airborne Imaging Systems and Special

Mission Equipment on government-owned aircraft in support of DEA law enforcement missions.

• The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s understanding of every section of the requirement and the Offeror’s ability to satisfy the unique requirements for all types of aircraft listed as specified in the Statement of Work (SOW), as follows:

A. Bell 407 Helicopter

B. Bell 412 Helicopter

C. Cessna 208 Aircraft

D. Cessna 206 Aircraft

Sub-Factor 1.2: Delivery Schedule

• The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s expected completion time for the Airborne

Imaging System and Special Mission Equipment. Specifically, the Government will evaluate the

Offeror’s break down by each aircraft type and the defined steps related to the acquisition and installation/modification of equipment as specified in the SOW.

• The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s specificity, completeness and demonstrated ability to perform the work in the most time-efficient manner. (Note: Upon acceptance by the government, the successful offeror’s expected completion time for the Airborne Imaging System and Special Mission Equipment will be incorporated into the contract pursuant to SOW.)

Factor 2: Past Performance

• The Government will evaluate each Offeror’s experience installing and integrating Airborne

Imaging Systems and Special Mission Equipment of a similar nature to the requirement described in this solicitation. Specifically, past performance of scope, complexity and aircraft type in relation to the requirements of this solicitation, is of particular interest to the

Government.

• The Government will evaluate past performance under existing and prior contracts for similar services within the last three years based on information obtained from references provided by the Offeror and any information the Government obtains through reference checks, its own knowledge/experience and/or from other sources (i.e. Contracting Offices, Past Performance

Information Retrieval Systems (PPIRS) and Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting

Systems (CPARS)).

• The Government will evaluate the Offeror's resilience in the face of trouble, resourcefulness and management determination to see that the organization lived up to commitments or standards in the performance of the work.

• The Government will evaluate the degree to which the Offeror supplies examples of accomplishments to indicate an ability to implement the proposed methods and techniques for solving problems.

(Note: Offeror with no relevant past performance history shall receive the rating of “neutral,” meaning the rating is treated neither favorably nor unfavorably.)

Factor 3: Corporate Capabilities

Sub-Factor 3.1: Quality Control Plan

• The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s description of its overall corporate strategy and solutions for contract management.

• The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s demonstrated corporate quality control and inspection procedures, including management of resources, quality assurance, risk mitigation and problem resolution.

• The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s methodology to identify issues and to correct any deficiencies in services that may occur.

Sub-Factor 3.2: Requirements and Deliverables

• The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s demonstrated ability to provide the deliverable products and data specified in the Statement of Work.