Sol_89303320REM000066_Amd_0001.pdf

(x)

89303320REM000066

x x

1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted ; or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR

OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted , such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

x

Cincinnati OH 45202

03001

250 E. 5th Street, Suite 500 EM Consolidated Business Center U.S. Department of Energy

EMCBC

Cincinnati OH 45202 550 Main Street, Room 7-010

893033

EM Consolidated Business Center U.S. Department of Energy

EMCBC

EM -Environmental Mgmt Con Bus Ctr

03/15/20210001

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) is not extended.is extended, Items 8 and 15, and returning

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended , by one of the following methods: (a) By completing

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

FACILITY CODE CODE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)CODE 6. ISSUED BY

PAGE OF PAGES

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.3. EFFECTIVE DATE2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

02/11/2021

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return __________________ copies to the issuing office.

ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

See continuation pages providing a summary table of changes.

Submit offers online at fedconnect.net. Reference Number 89303320REM000066

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

Michael J. Forsgren

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Previous edition unusable

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9 A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect .

03/15/2021 Signature on File

Moab Remedial Action Contract – Final Request for Proposal, Amendment 0001

Solicitation Number 89303320REM000066

The purpose of this Standard Form 30 is to amend Solicitation No. 89303320REM000066 as shown in red or strikethrough text below, and to incorporate the changes into the solicitation. All other sections of the Final RFP remain unchanged. Versions of all changed Sections are provided on FedConnect, beta.sam.gov, and the Moab RAC procurement website.

RFP

Section/

Paragraph

RFP Amended

FROM: TO:

B.9 (c)

As discussed in Q&A #3

(c) Third Degree: Performance failures that reflect a lack of focus on ESH&Q… (c) Third Degree: Performance failures that reflect a lack of focus on improving ESH&Q…

C.4.2 in Q&A #5

The reporting shall also include the number of rail shipments, the tons per rail shipment, and the number or containers and railcars per shipment.

The reporting shall also include the number of rail shipments, the tons per rail shipment, and the number of containers and railcars per shipment.

C.07 in Q&A #8

To ensure continuity of operations, the Contractor shall adopt, as applicable, the incumbent contractors’ plans and implementing procedures, manuals and associated training/qualification curriculum at the effective date of the transition task order, provided the Contractor has formally reviewed the documents to ensure compliance with contract requirements, current regulatory requirements, DOE Orders and directives, and the Contractors’ organizational roles and responsibilities…

To ensure continuity of operations, the Contractor shall adopt, as applicable, the incumbent contractors’ plans and implementing procedures, manuals and associated training/qualification curriculum at the effective date of the transition task order, provided the Contractor has formally reviewed the documents to ensure compliance with contract requirements, current regulatory requirements, DOE Orders and directives, and the

Contractors’ organizational roles and responsibilities…

Section/

Paragraph

RFP Amended

FROM: TO:

Attachment J-2 at Q&A

#110, 113

(Previous Attachment J-2 is hereby superseded in its entirety) (See new Attachment J-2 accompanying this Amendment 0001)

Section K

Implication of Q&A

#28, 35, 38

Multiple changes adding modifier “digitally” before

“signed” throughout

(Previous Section K is hereby superseded in its entirety) (See new Section K accompanying this Amendment

0001)

L.11 (c)(3)

#28, 35, 38

(3) Electronic submission of a proposal via FedConnect shall be required; however, the original, signed, hard copy submission of the proposal shall be considered the Offeror's official offer and will be considered binding.

(3) Electronic submission of a proposal via

FedConnect shall be required. The proposal shall contain visibly identifiable and time-stamped digital signatures on all documents requiring digital signatures by the Offeror. The digitally signed, electronic submission of the proposal in

FedConnect shall be considered the Offeror’s official offer and will be considered binding. The electronic version of the Offeror’s ‘Estimating Flat

File’ submitted through FedConnect will constitute part of the binding offer.

Section/

Paragraph

RFP Amended

L.11 (c)(4) in Q&A #28, 35, 38

(4) In addition to the electronic submission of the Offeror’s proposal via FedConnect, the Offeror shall submit the required number of paper and USB flash drive copies of each proposal volume as indicated below. The content in the paper and electronic copies shall be identical. The only exceptions are:

(i) Financial statements and annual reports, which shall be included in the electronic submission, USB flash drive copies, and the signed original only, but are not required to be included in the additional paper copies.

(ii) The Offeror’s ‘Estimating Flat File’ shall only be included in the electronic submission and USB flash drive copies. No paper (original or copy) submittal is required. The electronic version of the ‘Estimating Flat File’ submitted through FedConnect will constitute part of the binding offer.

The paper copies shall be delivered and received no later than the proposal due date, as follows:

MAIL TO (see table below for number of hard and electronic copies):

U S. Department of Energy

Attention: Michael Forsgren, Contracting Officer

550 Main Street, Room 7-010, Cincinnati, OH, 45202

Shipping materials shall be marked as follows: TO BE OPENED BY ADDRESSEE ONLY. RFP No.

89303320REM000066

E-mail: michael.forsgren@emcbc.doe.gov

Phone: 513-430-8536

Note: Delivery of proposals to the above address should take place between the hours of 1000-1530 (10AM to

3:30PM) Eastern Standard Time. Offerors should contact the Contracting Officer in advance to advise of the anticipated delivery date and time.

In addition, Offerors shall provide USB flash drives that are clearly labeled with the Offeror’s name, Request for

Proposal (RFP) number, volume number, and copy number. The proposals provided via USB flash drive copies are provided for Source Evaluation Board evaluation convenience only. In the event of a conflict, the hard copy material takes precedence over the electronic submission.

The original proposal shall contain signed originals of all documents requiring signatures by the Offeror. Use of reproductions of signed originals is authorized in all other copies of the proposal. The original, signed, hard copy submission of the proposal shall be considered the Offeror’s official offer and will be considered binding.

Proposal Volume – Title

Number of Hard Copy

Proposals Required

Number of USB Flash

Drives Required

Volume I – Offer and Other Documents 1 signed original + 1 copy 2

Volume II – Management Proposal 1 signed original + 5 copies 2

Volume III – Cost and Fee/Profit Proposal 1 signed original + 2 copies 2

(4) RESERVED

Section/

Paragraph

RFP Amended

L.11 (f)(2)

#28, 35, 38

(2) Page size. Page size shall be 8½ × 11 inches for text pages, excluding foldouts. When 8½ × 11 inch pages contain text on both front and back, this is considered two pages. Page size for foldouts shall not exceed 11 × 17 inches;

foldouts may be used for large tables, charts, graphs, diagrams, design drawings, or other schematics. Foldout pages shall fold entirely within the volume in which it appears. Each page of a foldout shall count as two (2) pages. Where both sides of a foldout contain printed material, the foldout shall count as four (4) pages. Tables of contents, lists of figures, dividers, tabs, or similar inserts that do not provide any substantive information are not counted as a page. Use of 11 × 17 binders for the Volume III, Cost and Fee/Profit Proposal, is permitted.

(2) Page size. Page size shall be 8½ × 11 inches for text pages, excluding foldouts. When 8½ × 11 inch pages contain text on both front and back, this is considered two pages. Page size for foldouts shall not exceed 11 × 17 inches; foldouts may be used for large tables, charts, graphs, diagrams, design drawings, or other schematics. Foldout pages shall fold entirely within the volume in which it appears.

Each page of a foldout shall count as two (2) pages.

Where both sides of a foldout contain printed material, the foldout shall count as four (4) pages.

Tables of contents, lists of figures, dividers, tabs, or similar inserts that do not provide any substantive information are not counted as a page. Use of 11 ×

17 binders for the Volume III, Cost and Fee/Profit

Proposal, is permitted.

L.11 (f)(7) and (f)(8) in Q&A

#28, 35, 38

(7) Binding and labeling of hard copies. Each volume shall be separately bound in three-ringed loose-leaf binders.

Cost proposals may be submitted in three-ringed binders of any size up to 11 × 17. Staples shall not be used. The outside front cover of each binder shall indicate the Offeror’s name, the RFP number, the title of the RFP, and the copy number (i.e., sequentially number the required copies with the original being copy no. 1). The same identifying data shall be placed on the spine of each binder to facilitate identification and accountability when placed in a vertical position.

(8) Excel printed paper formatting. As part of the Offeror’s proposal submission, the Offeror shall provide Section L

Excel® Attachments in accordance with the solicitation requirements (paper copies and electronic versions), including the font size requirements. To address the potential width and height of the documents in the printed paper copies, Offerors are allowed to logically break these Excel worksheets into multiple pages in order to meet the solicitation requirements. Also, it is acceptable for Offerors to scale the printed paper copies of the Excel® worksheets to a smaller print size, so long as the documents are legible. Additionally, if the Excel® worksheets span multiple pages, then each page of the worksheets shall include the applicable column and row headers.

(7) RESERVED

(8) RESERVED

Section/

Paragraph

RFP Amended

L.12 (b)

#28, 35, 38

(b) General. Volume I – Offer and Other Documents, contains the offer to enter into a contract and other documents.

The signed original(s) of all documents requiring signature by Offerors shall be contained in the original Volume

I. Offerors shall include the information listed in the following paragraphs in Volume I, assembled in the order listed. In cases where the Offeror is required to fill in information in a contract clause, the Offeror shall submit only those pages that require input of information or a signature. Those specific areas are:…

(b) General. Volume I – Offer and Other Documents, contains the offer to enter into a contract and other documents. Visibly identifiable and time-stamped digital signatures on The signed original(s) of all documents requiring digital signature by Offerors shall be contained in the original Volume I.

Offerors shall include the information listed in the following paragraphs in Volume I, assembled in the order listed. In cases where the Offeror is required to fill in information in a contract clause, the

Offeror shall submit only those pages that require input of information or a signature. Those specific areas are:…

L.12 (c)

#28, 35, 38

See also –

Section K changes adding modifier

“digitally” before “signed” throughout

(c) Standard Form 33, Solicitation, Offer and Award – one signed original of the Standard Form (SF) 33 must be provided in addition to a copy for each set of the Volume I.

(1) The person signing the SF 33 must have the authority to commit the Offeror to the terms and conditions of the resulting contract, Sections A - J. By signing and submitting the SF 33, the Offeror commits to accept the resulting Contract as contained in the solicitation, unless an exception or deviation to the terms and conditions as stated in the solicitation is explicitly stated by the Offeror in accordance with the below subsection (g), Exceptions and Deviations.

(c) Standard Form 33, Solicitation, Offer and Award – one visibly identifiable and time-stamped digital signature on the signed original of the Standard

Form (SF) 33 must be provided in addition to a copy for each set of the Volume I.

(1) The person digitally signing the SF 33 must have the authority to commit the Offeror to the terms and conditions of the resulting contract, Sections A - J.

By digitally signing and submitting the SF 33, the

Offeror commits to accept the resulting Contract as contained in the solicitation, unless an exception or deviation to the terms and conditions as stated in the solicitation is explicitly stated by the Offeror in accordance with the below subsection (g), Exceptions and Deviations.

Section/

Paragraph

RFP Amended

L.15 (b) at Q&A #1

(b) Offeror past performance. The Offeror, to include all members of a teaming arrangement, as defined by FAR

9.601(1), shall provide information on contracts that are most similar in terms of scope, size, and complexity to the portion of the Master IDIQ PWS that each entity is proposed to perform. Similar scope, size, and complexity are defined as follows based on the portion of work that each entity is proposed to perform: scope – type of work

(e.g., work as identified in the Master IDIQ PWS, including similar work of a non-nuclear nature and/or similar non-DOE work); size – dollar value (approximate average annual value in relation to proposed work; annual contract value of approximately $40M for evaluation purposes); and complexity – performance challenges (e.g., overcoming barriers for completion/closure-type projects to safely accelerate work scope, prior innovations, work performance improvements, subcontractor management, management of large complex contracts in highly regulated industries, cost efficiencies, and successful partnerships with the Government, Client, and Regulators).

(b) Offeror past performance. The Offeror, to include all members of a teaming arrangement, as defined by FAR 9.601(1), shall provide information on contracts that are most similar in terms of scope, size, and complexity to the portion of the Master

IDIQ PWS that each entity is proposed to perform.

Similar scope, size, and complexity are defined as follows based on the portion of work that each entity is proposed to perform: scope – type of work

(e.g., work as identified in the Master IDIQ PWS, including similar work of a non-nuclear nature and/or similar non-DOE work); size – dollar value

(approximate average annual value in relation to proposed work; annual contract value of approximately $40M$20M for evaluation purposes); and complexity – performance challenges (e.g., overcoming barriers for completion/closure-type projects to safely accelerate work scope, prior innovations, work performance improvements, subcontractor management, management of large complex contracts in highly regulated industries, cost efficiencies, and successful partnerships with the

Government, Client, and Regulators).

L.15 (h) at Q&A

#51

(h) Past Performance Questionnaire. The Offeror shall provide the Past Performance Questionnaire contained in

Attachment L-4, “Past Performance Cover Letter and Questionnaire”, to the appropriate contract client reference within the Program Office/Project Office and/or the Contracting Office for completion for those contracts described in paragraph (a) for which no contractor performance data is available in the Contractor Performance

Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). The Offeror shall request that clients return the Past Performance

Questionnaire directly to DOE by electronic means to the address identified below no later than two (2) weeks prior to the date for receipt of proposals.

(h) Past Performance Questionnaire. The Offeror shall provide the Past Performance Questionnaire contained in Attachment L-4, “Past Performance

Cover Letter and Questionnaire”, to the appropriate contract client reference within the Program

Office/Project Office and/or the Contracting Office for completion for those contracts described in paragraph (a) for which no contractor performance data is available in the Contractor Performance

Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). The

Offeror shall request that clients return the Past

Performance Questionnaire directly to DOE by electronic means to the address identified below no later than two (2) weeks prior to the date for receipt of proposals.

Section/

Paragraph

RFP Amended

L.16 (a)

(DOE

direction)

(a) The Offeror shall provide a Closure Strategy that describes how it will effectively and efficiently manage Sections

C.04 and C.05 of the Master IDIQ PWS and achieve Project completion. The Closure Strategy shall describe how the Offeror will coordinate and sequence the Residual Radioactive Material (RRM – including debris), off-pile, and sub-pile excavation and placement while implementing all of PWS Sections C.01 through C.05 to minimize costs and schedule and meet all Project completion requirements. The Closure Strategy shall describe the details of the planned excavation methods, the excavation sequence based on optimizing placement of RRM/debris in the cell at Crescent Junction, mixing of slimes and sands, preparation and management of drying beds, size reduction or preparation of oversize debris, transportation and placement of RRM, and cell cover construction. The Offeror shall describe any proposed operational, technical, or administrative process improvements, including any graded approach to the PWS requirements, necessary to achieve the contract’s scope or its purposes at PWS Section

C.1.2. To support its Closure Strategy, the Offeror’s management approach shall include, but not be limited to: an organizational structure chart including the number of staff occupying each position; a description of, and basis for, the number of daily and weekly work shifts; and a description of, and basis for, any seasonal changes in site operations.

(a) The Offeror shall provide a Closure Strategy that describes how it will effectively and efficiently manage Sections C.04 and C.05 of the Master IDIQ

PWS and achieve Project completion. The Closure

Strategy shall describe how the Offeror will coordinate and sequence the Residual Radioactive

Material (RRM – including debris), off-pile, and sub-pile excavation and placement while implementing all of PWS Sections C.01 through

C.05 to minimize costs and schedule and meet all

Project completion requirements. The Closure

Strategy shall describe the details of the planned excavation methods, the excavation sequence based on optimizing placement of RRM/debris in the cell at Crescent Junction, mixing of slimes and sands, preparation and management of drying beds, size reduction or preparation of oversize debris, transportation and placement of RRM, and cell cover construction. The Offeror shall describe any proposed operational, technical, or administrative process improvements and systems, including any graded approach to the PWS requirements, necessary to achieve the contract’s scope or its purposes at PWS Section C.1.2. To support its

Closure Strategy, the Offeror’s management approach shall include, but not be limited to: an organizational structure chart including the number of staff occupying each position; a description of, and basis for, the number of daily and weekly work shifts; and a description of, and basis for, any seasonal changes in site operations.

Section/

Paragraph

RFP Amended

FROM: TO:

Attachment L-3

Box #14 at Q&A

#123

14. Approximate Average Annual

Percentage Value the Company

(identified in #2) is planned to perform on Moab Remedial Action

Contract (Note: to avoid the need for clarifications, ensure all submitted

Past Performance Reference

Information Forms’ #14s, when combined, do not exceed 100%):

14. Approximate Average

Annual Value (in $) the

Company (identified in

#2) is planned to perform on Moab

Remedial Action

Contract:

L-6 at Q&A

#31, 58, 66, 69, 74-78, 82-84, 102

(Previous Attachment L-6 is hereby superseded in its entirety) (See new Attachment L-6 accompanying this

L-8 at Q&A

#98, 99

(Previous Attachment L-8 is hereby superseded in its entirety) (See new Attachment L-8 accompanying this

Section/

Paragraph

RFP Amended

M.3 (a) at Q&A #1

(a) Offeror. The Offeror, to include all members of a teaming arrangement, as defined in FAR 9.601(1), will be evaluated on the Government’s assessment of relevant and recent past performance information obtained for the

Offeror performing work similar in scope, size, and complexity to the portion of the Master IDIQ PWS that each entity is proposed to perform. The information will be evaluated in order to assess the Offeror’s potential success in performing the work required by the contract. Similar scope, size, and complexity are defined as follows based on the portion of work that each entity is proposed to perform: scope – type of work (e.g., work as identified in the Master IDIQ PWS, including similar work of a non-nuclear nature and/or similar non-DOE work); size – dollar value (approximate average annual value in relation to the proposed work; annual contract value of approximately $40M for evaluation purposes); and complexity – performance challenges (e.g., overcoming barriers for completion/closure-type projects to safely accelerate work scope, prior innovations, work performance improvements, subcontractor management, management of large complex contracts in highly regulated industries, cost efficiencies, and successful partnerships with the Government, Client, and Regulators).

The higher the degree of relevance of the work, the greater the consideration that may be given.

(a) Offeror. The Offeror, to include all members of a teaming arrangement, as defined in FAR 9.601(1), will be evaluated on the Government’s assessment of relevant and recent past performance information obtained for the Offeror performing work similar in scope, size, and complexity to the portion of the

Master IDIQ PWS that each entity is proposed to perform. The information will be evaluated in order to assess the Offeror’s potential success in performing the work required by the contract.

Similar scope, size, and complexity are defined as follows based on the portion of work that each entity is proposed to perform: scope – type of work

(e.g., work as identified in the Master IDIQ PWS, including similar work of a non-nuclear nature and/or similar non-DOE work); size – dollar value

(approximate average annual value in relation to the proposed work; annual contract value of approximately $40M$20M for evaluation purposes); and complexity – performance challenges (e.g., overcoming barriers for completion/closure-type projects to safely accelerate work scope, prior innovations, work performance improvements, subcontractor management, management of large complex contracts in highly regulated industries, cost efficiencies, and successful partnerships with the

Government, Client, and Regulators). The higher the degree of relevance of the work, the greater the consideration that may be given.

Section/

Paragraph

RFP Amended

M.4 (a)

(DOE

direction)

(a) DOE will evaluate the Offeror’s Closure Strategy that describes how it will effectively and efficiently manage

Sections C.04 and C.05 of the Master IDIQ PWS and achieve Project completion. DOE will evaluate the

Offeror’s Closure Strategy to coordinate and sequence the RRM (including debris), off-pile, and sub-pile excavation and placement while implementing all of PWS Sections C.01 through C.05 to minimize costs and schedule and meet all Project completion requirements. DOE will evaluate how the Closure Strategy describes the details of the planned excavation methods, the excavation sequence based on optimizing placement of

RRM/debris in the cell at Crescent Junction, mixing of slimes and sands, preparation and management of drying beds, size reduction or preparation of oversize debris, transportation and placement of RRM, and cell cover construction. DOE will evaluate any proposed operational, technical, or administrative process improvements, including any graded approach to the PWS requirements, necessary to achieve the contract’s scope or its purposes described at PWS Section C.1.2. DOE will evaluate how the Offeror’s proposed Closure Strategy is supported by its management approach, including, but not limited to, an organizational structure chart including the number of staff occupying each position, the basis for the number of daily and weekly work shifts, and the basis for any seasonal changes in site operations.

(a) DOE will evaluate the Offeror’s Closure Strategy that describes how it will effectively and efficiently manage Sections C.04 and C.05 of the Master IDIQ

PWS and achieve Project completion. DOE will evaluate the Offeror’s Closure Strategy to coordinate and sequence the RRM (including debris), off-pile, and sub-pile excavation and placement while implementing all of PWS Sections

C.01 through C.05 to minimize costs and schedule and meet all Project completion requirements.

DOE will evaluate how the Closure Strategy describes the details of the planned excavation methods, the excavation sequence based on optimizing placement of RRM/debris in the cell at

Crescent Junction, mixing of slimes and sands, preparation and management of drying beds, size reduction or preparation of oversize debris, transportation and placement of RRM, and cell cover construction. DOE will evaluate any proposed operational, technical, or administrative process improvements and systems, including any graded approach to the PWS requirements, necessary to achieve the contract’s scope or its purposes described at PWS Section C.1.2. DOE will evaluate how the Offeror’s proposed Closure

Strategy is supported by its management approach, including, but not limited to, an organizational structure chart including the number of staff occupying each position, the basis for the number of daily and weekly work shifts, and the basis for any seasonal changes in site operations.