Atch J.6 - Past Performance Survey - 11-17-22.docx

Attachment __J.6__ - Past Performance Survey Email Survey to CPOFTW@hud.gov____ Solicitation No:__86614623Q00001_ Email Subject Line - Name of Offeror Company – (CPO insert Project Name and Solicitation #)

PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY

Relevant Past Performance for this solicitation is as follows: Relevant efforts are those that involve one or more of the following: 1) conducting econometric analysis of consumer credit delinquency and default (including mortgages), 2) strong understanding of econometric and economic theory and research literature related to mortgage loan performance, 3) evaluating automated consumer credit approval algorithms for their accuracy and compliance with fair lending and fair credit objectives, including possible disparate impacts to protected classes, 4) strong understanding of credit score and credit attribute data, 5) understanding and use of machine learning and artificial intelligence to formulate algorithms for consumer credit approval, 6) ability to efficiently and accurately work with large data sets, 7) ability to produce statistical code that conforms to best practices including documentation, quality control and replicability standards.

PAST PERFORMANCE PROJECT IDENTIFICATION (To be filled out by the Offeror):

This past performance survey is to be completed on the designated contractor as designated below:

OFFEROR PRIME CONTRACTOR NAME:_________________________________________________________ OFFEROR PRIME CONTRACTOR DUNS / EIN NO:_________________________________________________

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES PERFORMED BY OFFEROR: (To be filled out by the Offeror):

Offeror summarizes services performed by the Offeror:

PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION (To be filled out by the Reference):

CONCURRENCE WITH DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES ABOVE:

[ ] Concur [ ] Do Not Concur Additional Comments (if any):

For each of the Five (5) criteria listed below, the rater must choose One (1) Adjectival Rating by checking the box, as applicable. For any rating that is checked Exceptional, Very Good, Marginal or Unsatisfactory, please submit additional comments to substantiate the rating. If Cost Control is N/A, please explain why. Exceptional or Good ratings without a narrative will be considered “satisfactory” and marginal or unsatisfactory ratings without a narrative will be considered “marginal.” Comment by Haselden, Justin D: How do we what to handle surveys that do not have narratives? GAO is finicky about this so we should address it.

I recommend we either (1) do not require narratives (the simplest method), (2) make narrative optional and state that HUD will give greater weight to surveys with clear narratives and give greater weight to the narrative if it is inconsistent with the rating, (3) or state that Exceptional or Good ratings without a narrative will be considered “satisfactory” and marginal or unsatisfactory ratings without a narrative will be considered “marginal.”

I recommend we go with the first option to simplify and speed the evaluation. We are asking a third party to do us a favor so we should make it easy on them and ourselves.

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: (Provide comments below if rating is Exceptional, Very Good, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory)

2. SCHEDULE

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: : (Provide comments below if rating is Exceptional, Very Good, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory)

3. COST CONTROL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Not Applicable

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: (Provide comments below if rating is Exceptional, Very Good, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory)

4. BUSINESS RELATIONS

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: (Provide comments below if rating is Exceptional, Very Good, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory)

5. MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: : (Provide comments below if rating is Exceptional, Very Good, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory)