ATTACHMENT #6 - Past Performance Survey - 10-03-2019.docx

DOCX document 26 KB Posted

Attached to
HUD OIG Audit Assistance for Ginnie Mae
Solicitation number
86612720R00001
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance survey template for evaluating offerors on a solicitation from the Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Inspector General. The solicitation seeks an independent public accounting firm to complete annual financial statement audits of the Government National Mortgage Association for fiscal years 2020 through 2024 in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards and other requirements. The survey evaluates offerors on five criteria: quality of service, schedule, cost control, business relations, and management of key personnel. References are asked to provide adjectival ratings and comments for each criterion on work performed for the offeror.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Sol_86612720R00001_Amd_0002.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers 2 FINAL 12102019.docx DOCX document
ATTACHMENT #4 - DEGM - Final.docx DOCX document
Sol_86612720R00001_Amd_001.pdf PDF
QA 1.docx DOCX document
P14 - Instructions to Offerors and Evaluation Criteria FINAL FINAL.docx DOCX document
ATTACHMENT A - NFR FORM - 10-2-2019.docx DOCX document
ATTACHMENT #7 - Progress Payment Schedule - 10-3-2019.docx DOCX document
ATTACHMENT 1 FINAL FINAL.docx DOCX document
P02 - PWS - 11-15-19 FINAL FINAL.docx DOCX document
ATTACHMENT D - NDA - 10-10-2019 POST OLC POST CAPD.docx DOCX document
ATTACHMENT 2 FINAL FINAL.docx DOCX document
ATTACHMENT B - NFR GUIDANCE - 10-2-2019.docx DOCX document
ATTACHMENT 3 FINAL FINAL.docx DOCX document
ATTACHMENT C NFR LOGISTICS - 10-2-2019.docx DOCX document
ATTACHMENT #5 - Past Performance Chart - 10-03-2019.docx DOCX document
ATTACHMENT E - LEVEL PROJECTIONS.docx DOCX document
Show all 17

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment #6 – Past Performance Survey

PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY

This past performance survey is to be completed on the designated contractor or key personnel as designated below:

PAST PERFORMANCE PROJECT IDENTIFICATON (To be filled out by the Offeror):

CONTRACTOR OR KEY PERSONNEL NAME:
Click here to enter text.
CONTRACT or ORDER NUMBER:
Click here to enter text.
PROJECT TITLE:
Click here to enter text.
TOTAL PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE, INCLUDING OPTIONS
Click here to enter text.

PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION (To be filled out by the Reference):

NAME:
Click here to enter text.
TITLE:
Click here to enter text.
AGENCY or CUSTOMER:
Click here to enter text.
PHONE:
Click here to enter text.
E-MAIL
Click here to enter text.

The Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Inspector General (HUD OIG) is procuring the services described in the box below. You have been selected by the contractor or key personnel identified above to provide past performance information to HUD OIG to be used in evaluating the offeror’s proposal for this acquisition. Thank you for your input.

The objective of this contract is to obtain the services of an independent public accounting firm (IPA) to complete an Audit of the Government National Mortgage Association’s (Ginnie Mae) financial statements for the fiscal year 2020(including the fiscal year 2019 comparatives) and upon exercise of four subsequent option periods beginning with fiscal year 2021, in accordance with the Chief Financial Officers Act (CFO) of 1990, as amended.

The CFO Act requires that the Inspector General, or independent external auditor as determined by the Inspector General, to conduct an annual audit of Department of Housing and Urban Development (DHUD) financial statements. Ginnie Mae's financial statements are a major component of Department of HUD’s consolidated financial statements. This audit must be conducted in accordance with the most recent version of the following standards:

· Generally accepted government auditing standards (GAGAS) or yellow book; issued by the Comptroller General of the United States;

· Generally accepted auditing standards (GAAS) as established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and promulgated in its Statements on Auditing Standards (SAS);

· Financial Audit Manual (FAM) issue by Government Accountability Office (GAO);

· GAO’s Federal Information System Controls Audit Manual (FISCAM);

· National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standards and guidelines;

· OMB Bulletin 07-04, as amended, Audit Requirements for Federal Financial Statements, and other related amendments and memorandum issued by OMB;

· OMB Circular A-136, Financial Reporting Requirements.

Click here to enter text.

For each of the Five (5) criteria listed below, the rater must choose One (1) Adjectival Rating by checking the box, as applicable. At a minimum, for any rating that is checked Exceptional, Very Good, Marginal or Unsatisfactory, please submit additional comments to substantiate the rating. If Cost Control is N/A, please explain why.

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were highly effective

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were effective

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel appear or were satisfactory

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor/Key Personnel has not yet identified corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s/Key Personnel’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

Click here to enter text.

2. SCHEDULE

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor/Key Personnel has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s/Key Personnel’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Click here to enter text.

3. COST CONTROL

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor/Key Personnel has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s/Key Personnel’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Not Applicable

Click here to enter text.

4. BUSINESS RELATIONS

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor/Key Personnel has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s/Key Personnel’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Click here to enter text.

5. MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor/Key Personnel appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor/Key Personnel has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s/Key Personnel’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Click here to enter text.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .