SSP_41165-RevN.docx

DOCX document 3 MB Posted

Attached to
Human Space Flight Technical Integration Contract (HSFTIC) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
80JSC019R0023
Issued by
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Johnson Space Center

About this file

This notice announces a forthcoming solicitation for the Human Space Flight Technical Integration Contract (HSFTIC). The solicitation will be issued as a total small business set-aside, with a North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code of 541715 and size standard of 1,250 employees. The anticipated release date for the request for proposal (RFP) is November 1, 2019, with an offer due date of December 11, 2019. The RFP and any associated documents will be available on the NASA Johnson Space Center procurement website and Federal Business Opportunities (FBO) portal. Offerors must notify the agency of their intent to submit a proposal. The contract will support technical integration for human space flight programs at Johnson Space Center.

SSP 41165-RevN

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Human Space Flight Technical Integration Contract (HSFTIC), newest first.
File Type Posted
HSFTIC_J-4_Applicable_and_Reference_Document_List.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SSP_50035_Revision_C_Retired.docx DOCX document
SSP_50314-Rev_C.docx DOCX document
SSP41142P2_RD_CD_012045_2.pdf PDF
SSP-50803.doc DOC document
PPD_524_RB_FINAL_MRICB_Charter.docx DOCX document
GPO_Website_Ref.pptx PPTX presentation
SSP_50481-RevC.docx DOCX document
42124_P2_RC_.pdf PDF
SSP_50094-RevB.pdf PDF
SSP_50659_Rev_E.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
IMPR_Package_Mar_Apr_18.pptx PPTX presentation
SSP_41167-RevJ.docx DOCX document
SSP_50835_Rev_E.doc DOC document
42097P1_RD.pdf PDF
SSP42003_P2_RevC.pdf PDF
Applicable_3.zip ZIP file
MD_101_RA_FINAL.docx DOCX document
SSP_50477-RevC.pdf PDF
SSP_50670-Rev_A-DCN001-Collated_Master.doc DOC document
SSP_50781-RevA-DCN_003.docx DOCX document
PPD_517.pdf PDF
SSP_41002-RevR.docx DOCX document
SSP_50901.docx DOCX document
SSP_54059_54060-Baseline.docx DOCX document
SSP5003.PDF PDF
SSP30559RD-Errata.pdf PDF
SSP_41000-RevCJ.pdf PDF
42137P1_RC_CD_012230.pdf PDF
SSP_41163-Rev_L.docx DOCX document
9.0.zip ZIP file
SSP_42001-RevW.docx DOCX document
SSP_50875.docx DOCX document
SSP41017p2rJ.pdf PDF
41143Pt2RD.pdf PDF
SSP_50489-Rev_G.docx DOCX document
41015P2RH.pdf PDF
SSP_42121_Part_2.pdf PDF
SSP_50309_Part_1.pdf PDF
SSP_50477-RevC_Joint_Crew_Provisioning_Catalog.pdf PDF
JSC_Form_1240.pdf PDF
SSP_41160-RevH.docx DOCX document
Increment_Utilization_Accomplishment_Report_Blank_Book_RevB(March_2019).docx DOCX document
SSP_50102.pdf PDF
SSP_50146-RevB-SSCD_15566.pdf PDF
SSP_50034_Revision_D.DOC DOC document
SSP_50227-RevC.docx DOCX document
SSP_50621-RevF-DCN001-Collated_Master.pdf PDF
SSP41004_P2_RJ.pdf PDF
DRAFT_HSFTIC_Work_Load_Indicators.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 50

Human Space Flight Technical Integration Contract (HSFTIC) has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Segment Specification for the Japanese Experiment Module

International Space Station Program

Revision N

July 2018

EAR 99. This document contains data within the purview of the U.S. Export Administration Regulations (EAR), 15 CFR 730-774, and is export controlled. The document may be used only in the International Space Station (ISS) program to fulfill responsibilities of the Parties or of a Cooperating Agency of an ISS Partner in furtherance of the ISS Intergovernmental Agreement. Re-transfer or disclosure to, or use by, any persons other than citizens of ISS Program International Partner countries, or use for any other purpose, requires prior U.S. Government authorization.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration International Space Station Program Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas Contract No.: NNJ12GA46C

SSP 41165

Revision N

REVISION AND HISTORY

REVISION AND HISTORY

REVISION AND HISTORY

REVISION AND HISTORY

REVISION AND HISTORY

REVISION AND HISTORY

REVISION AND HISTORY

REVISION AND HISTORY

REV.
DESCRIPTION
PUB. DATE

The following SCN numbers have been cancelled. The SCNs were never created and will never be released. The reason for these cancellations is that the content of the SSCNs has been incorporated into Revision M.

SCN 209 (SSCN 011525)

SCN 210 (SSCN 008942)

SCN 211 (SSCN 012037)

SCN 212 (SSCN 011028)

SCN 213 (SSCN 011768)

M
Revision M, Type 1, Final Document

Incorporates SSCNs 008942, 011028, 011525, 011768, 012037, and 012743.

08-26-11

The following SCN numbers have been cancelled. The SCNs were never created and will never be released. The reason for these cancellations is that the content of the SSCNs has been incorporated into Revision N.

SCN 214 (SSCN 012713)

SCN 215 (SSCN 012524)

SCN 216 (SSCN 012906)

SCN 217 (SSCN 012597)

N
Revision N (Reference per SSCD 015933, EFF. 09-14-18)

Program Release Incorporates SSCNs 012447, 012524, 012597, 012662, 012713, 012906, 012929, 013515, 013573, 013845, 015485, 015491,and 015608.

01-18-19

SSP 41165

Revision N

PREFACE

segment specification for the japanese experiment module This SSP 41165, Segment Specification establishes the performance and design requirements for the Japanese Experiment Module (JEM). Any changes to this document will be approved bilaterally by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) Program Managers. This document is under the control of the Space Station Control Board.

SEE DIRECTIVE APPROVAL

Kirk A. Shireman ISS Program Manager National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Date

Fumiya Tsutsui ISS Program Manager Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency

Date i

INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION PROGRAM

segment specification for the Japanese Experiment Module

CONCURRENCE

july 2018

Prepared by:
Gregg Singer

MAPI OP

book coordinator/dqa representative org

/s/ Gregg D. Singer

6/27/18 signature

DATE

Concurred by:
Walter J. Lueke

NASA OM

nasa icwg chair

ORG

/s/ Walter J. Lueke

6/27/18

SIGNATURE

DATE

ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PARAGRAPHPAGE
1.0SCOPE1
1.1Identification.1
1.2System overview.1
2.0applicable DOCUMENTS2
2.1Government documents.2
2.1.1Specifications, standards, and handbooks.2
2.1.2Other government documents, drawings, and publications.3
2.2Nongovernment publications.9
2.3Order of precedence.10
2.4Meet or exceed.10
3.0SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS11
3.1System definition.11
3.1.1System description.11
3.1.1.1JEM flight system.11
3.1.1.2Deleted.12
3.1.2Missions.12
3.1.3Threat.12
3.1.4System diagrams.12
3.1.5Interface requirements.12
3.1.5.1External interfaces.12
3.1.5.1.1United States On-orbit Segment external interface descriptions.13
3.1.5.1.2Deleted.13
3.1.5.1.3Canadian Mobile Servicing System external interface descriptions.13
3.1.5.1.4Orbiter external interface descriptions.14
3.1.5.1.5User payload external interface descriptions.14
3.1.5.1.5.1Internal user payload external interface descriptions.14
3.1.5.1.5.2External user payload external interface descriptions.14
3.1.5.1.6Crew external interface descriptions.14
3.1.5.1.7Interfaces with MPEV External Sampling Adapter.14
3.1.5.1.8Interfaces with MPEV Internal Sampling Adapter.14
3.1.5.2Deleted.15
3.1.6United States furnished material.15
3.2Characteristics.15
3.2.1Performance characteristics.15
3.2.1.1State: Perform mission-on-orbit.15
3.2.1.1.1Mode: Standard.15
3.2.1.1.1.1Capability: Relieve overpressure.15
3.2.1.1.1.2Capability: Equalize pressure.15
3.2.1.1.1.3Capability: Control atmosphere temperature.15
3.2.1.1.1.4Capability: Control atmosphere moisture.16
3.2.1.1.1.5Capability: Circulate atmosphere.16
3.2.1.1.1.6Capability: Control internal lighting.16
3.2.1.1.1.7Capability: Illuminate internal area.16
3.2.1.1.1.8Capability: Illuminate video area - external.16
3.2.1.1.1.9Capability: Isolate to recovery level.17
3.2.1.1.1.10Capability: Recover lost function.18
3.2.1.1.1.11Capability: Isolate for safing.18
3.2.1.1.1.12Capability: Safe.18
3.2.1.1.1.13Capability: Maintain station mode.18
3.2.1.1.1.14Capability: Transition station mode.19
3.2.1.1.1.15Capability: Provide data to crew.21
3.2.1.1.1.16Capability: Accept crew inputs and commands.22
3.2.1.1.1.17Capability: Generate functional data.22
3.2.1.1.1.18Capability: Assess functional data.22
3.2.1.1.1.19Deleted.22
3.2.1.1.1.20Deleted.22
3.2.1.1.1.21Capability: Respond to fire.22
3.2.1.1.1.22Capability: Respond to hazardous atmosphere.27
3.2.1.1.1.23Capability: Distribute user payload power.27
3.2.1.1.1.24Capability: Perform user payload thermal conditioning.28
3.2.1.1.1.25Capability: Supply vacuum services to user payloads.29
3.2.1.1.1.26Capability: Distribute gases to user payloads.29
3.2.1.1.1.27Capability: Transfer user payload command and control data.29
3.2.1.1.1.28Capability: Support user payload telemetry services.29
3.2.1.1.1.29Capability: Support user payload video services.29
3.2.1.1.1.30Deleted.29
3.2.1.1.1.31Deleted.29
3.2.1.1.1.32Capability: Distribute power.29
3.2.1.1.1.33Capability: Collect thermal energy.30
3.2.1.1.1.34Capability: Distribute thermal energy.30
3.2.1.1.1.35Capability: Provide time interface.30
3.2.1.1.1.36Capability: Support internal crew restraint and mobility.30
3.2.1.1.1.37Capability: Control airborne particulate contaminants.30
3.2.1.1.1.38Capability: Control airborne microbial growth.30
3.2.1.1.1.39Capability: Provide direct visual access.31
3.2.1.1.1.40Capability: Provide remote visual access.31
3.2.1.1.1.41Capability: Set up voice communication.31
3.2.1.1.1.42Capability: Transmit voice communication.31
3.2.1.1.1.43Capability: Receive voice communication.31
3.2.1.1.1.44Capability: Support uplinked data.31
3.2.1.1.1.45Capability: Provide data for downlink.31
3.2.1.1.1.46Deleted.32
3.2.1.1.1.47Deleted.32
3.2.1.1.1.48Capability: Support internal equipment removal and replacement.32
3.2.1.1.1.49Capability: Support internal equipment restraint.32
3.2.1.1.1.50Capability: Manage random cyclic loads.32
3.2.1.1.1.51Capability: Distribute waste water.32
3.2.1.1.1.52Capability: Execute planning products.32
3.2.1.1.1.53Capability: Respond to rapid decompression.32
3.2.1.1.2Mode: Reboost.32
3.2.1.1.3Deleted.32
3.2.1.1.4Mode: Microgravity - habitable.32
3.2.1.1.4.1Capability: Limit accelerations.33
3.2.1.1.4.2Capability: Limit angular momentum disturbance.33
3.2.1.1.4.2.1Limit disturbance induced ISS attitude rate.33
3.2.1.1.4.2.2Limit disturbance induced CMG momentum usage.34
3.2.1.1.5Mode: Survival.35
3.2.1.1.6Mode: Proximity operations.35
3.2.1.1.7Mode: Assured safe crew return.35
3.2.1.1.8Mode: External operations.35
3.2.1.1.8.1Capability: Generate pointing and support data.35
3.2.1.1.8.2Capability: Perform external robotic operations.35
3.2.1.2Deleted.36
3.2.1.2.1Deleted.36
3.2.1.2.2Deleted.36
3.2.1.2.3Deleted.36
3.2.1.2.4Deleted.36
3.2.1.2.5Deleted.36
3.2.1.2.6Deleted.36
3.2.1.2.7Deleted.36
3.2.1.3Deleted.36
3.2.2Physical characteristics.36
3.2.2.1Deleted.36
3.2.2.2On-orbit dynamic envelope.36
3.2.2.3Shuttle payload bay envelope.37
3.2.2.4Storage volume.38
3.2.2.5Interior size.38
3.2.2.6Establish external translation paths.38
3.2.2.7Establish worksites.39
3.2.2.8Coordinate system.40
3.2.2.9Distribute commands and data.40
3.2.2.10Provide medium rate data links.41
3.2.2.10.1Simplex link segment insertion loss.42
3.2.2.11Establish robotics translation corridor.42
3.2.2.12Interfaces with MPEV.44
3.2.2.12.1Interfaces with MPEV External Sampling Adapter.44
3.2.2.12.2Interfaces with MPEV ISA.44
3.2.2.13Distribute signal and data.44
3.2.2.13.1Distribute data for external vehicles.44
3.2.2.13.2Distribute RF signal for intravehicular communications.44
3.2.2.14Active Rack Isolation System interfaces.44
3.2.2.15Manually operated rack power switch.44
3.2.2.16Switch output signal from C&W panel.44
3.2.3Reliability.44
3.2.3.1Failure tolerance.44
3.2.3.2Deleted.46
3.2.3.3Failure propagation.46
3.2.3.4Separation of redundant paths.46
3.2.3.5Redundancy status.46
3.2.4Maintainability.46
3.2.4.1Maintenance.46
3.2.4.2Nonpressurized area equipment maintenance time.47
3.2.4.3Access item retainment.47
3.2.4.4Equipment item interconnecting devices.47
3.2.4.5Incorrect equipment installation.47
3.2.4.6Lockwiring and staking.47
3.2.4.7Restraining and handling devices for temporary storage.47
3.2.4.8Failure Detection, Isolation, and Recovery.48
3.2.4.8.1Manual FDIR.48
3.2.4.8.2Manual control of FDIR.48
3.2.4.8.3Testing at operating locations.48
3.2.4.8.4Ambiguity resolution.48
3.2.4.8.5Data availability.48
3.2.4.8.6False Alarm mitigation.48
3.2.4.9Fluid capture and containment.48
3.2.5Availability.49
3.2.6Environmental conditions.49
3.2.6.1Thermal environment.49
3.2.6.2Neutral atmosphere.50
3.2.6.3External contamination.50
3.2.6.4Electromagnetic and geomagnetic fields.50
3.2.6.5Plasma.51
3.2.6.6Ionizing radiation.51
3.2.6.7Solar ultraviolet radiation.52
3.2.6.8Meteoroids and orbital debris.52
3.2.6.9Gravitational field.52
3.2.6.10Plume impingement pressures.52
3.2.7Transportability.52
3.2.8Flight attitude.52
3.3Design and construction.56
3.3.1Materials, processes, and parts.56
3.3.1.1Toxic products and formulations.56
3.3.1.2Protective coatings.56
3.3.1.3Materials and processes.56
3.3.1.3.1Control of water soluble volatile organic compounds.56
3.3.1.4Electrical, Electronic, and Electromechanical parts selection.56
3.3.1.5Seal life.56
3.3.2Electromagnetic radiation.56
3.3.3Nameplates and product marking.56
3.3.3.1Inventory labels.57
3.3.3.2General labels and decals.57
3.3.3.3Portable equipment.57
3.3.3.4Covers.58
3.3.3.5Label criteria.58
3.3.3.6Label attachment.58
3.3.3.7Wire bundles.58
3.3.3.8Label markings.58
3.3.4Workmanship.58
3.3.5Interchangeability.58
3.3.6Safety.58
3.3.6.1General.58
3.3.6.1.1Catastrophic hazards.58
3.3.6.1.2Critical hazards.58
3.3.6.1.3Design for minimum risk.59
3.3.6.1.4Control of functions resulting in critical hazards.59
3.3.6.1.4.1Inadvertent operation resulting in critical hazards.59
3.3.6.1.4.2Loss of function resulting in critical hazards.59
3.3.6.1.5Control of functions resulting in catastrophic hazards.59
3.3.6.1.5.1Inadvertent operation resulting in catastrophic hazards.59
3.3.6.1.5.2Loss of function resulting in catastrophic hazards.59
3.3.6.1.6Subsequent induced loads.60
3.3.6.1.7Safety interlocks.60
3.3.6.1.8Environmental compatibility.60
3.3.6.2Hazard detection and safing.60
3.3.6.2.1Monitors.60
3.3.6.2.1.1Status information.60
3.3.6.2.1.2Hazardous function operation prevention.60
3.3.6.2.1.3Loss of input or failure.60
3.3.6.2.1.4Launch site availability.60
3.3.6.2.1.5Flight crew availability.60
3.3.6.2.2Near-real-time monitoring.60
3.3.6.2.3Real-time monitoring.61
3.3.6.2.3.1Maintain status of hazard controls.61
3.3.6.2.3.2Crew response time and safing procedures.61
3.3.6.2.3.3Ground monitoring.61
3.3.6.3Command and computer control of hazardous functions.61
3.3.6.3.1Computer based control of hazardous functions.61
3.3.6.3.1.1General.61
3.3.6.3.1.2Must work function.62
3.3.6.3.1.3Must-not work function.62
3.3.6.3.1.3.1Fault Containment Approach.63
3.3.6.3.1.3.2The Control Path Separation approach.63
3.3.6.4Hazardous materials.64
3.3.6.4.1Hazardous fluid containment.64
3.3.6.4.2Storage of hazardous chemicals.64
3.3.6.5Pyrotechnics.64
3.3.6.6Radiation.64
3.3.6.6.1Nonionizing radiation.64
3.3.6.6.2JEM transmitters.64
3.3.6.7Optics and lasers.64
3.3.6.7.1Optical requirements.64
3.3.6.7.1.1Optical instruments.64
3.3.6.7.1.2Personnel protection.65
3.3.6.7.1.3Direct viewing optical systems.65
3.3.6.8Electrical safety.65
3.3.6.8.1Electrical power circuit overloads.65
3.3.6.8.1.1Circuit overload protection.65
3.3.6.8.1.2Protective device sizing.65
3.3.6.8.1.3Bent pin or conductive contamination.65
3.3.6.8.2Crew protection for electrical shock.65
3.3.6.8.3Reapplication of power.65
3.3.6.9Liquid propellant propulsion systems.65
3.3.6.10Fire protection.65
3.3.6.10.1Manual activation.65
3.3.6.10.2Isolation.66
3.3.6.10.3Fire suppressant.66
3.3.6.10.4Fire suppressant application.66
3.3.6.10.5PBA and PFE locations.66
3.3.6.10.6Fixed suppression.66
3.3.6.10.7Restorable suppression.66
3.3.6.10.8Power removal.66
3.3.6.10.9Confirmation.66
3.3.6.10.10Verification of a suppressant.66
3.3.6.11Constraints.66
3.3.6.11.1Pressurized volume depressurization and repressurization tolerance.66
3.3.6.11.1.1Pressure differential tolerance.66
3.3.6.11.1.2Operation during pressure changes.67
3.3.6.11.2Emergency egress.67
3.3.6.11.2.1No drag-throughs.67
3.3.6.11.3Component hazardous energy provision.67
3.3.6.11.4Hatch opening.67
3.3.6.11.5Hazardous gas accumulation.68
3.3.6.11.6Equipment clearance for entrapment hazard.68
3.3.6.11.7Light fixture.68
3.3.6.12Human engineering safety.69
3.3.6.12.1Internal volume touch temperature.69
3.3.6.12.2External touch temperature.69
3.3.6.12.2.1Incidental contact.69
3.3.6.12.2.2Unlimited contact.69
3.3.6.12.3External corner and edge protection.70
3.3.6.12.3.1Sharp edges.70
3.3.6.12.3.2Thin materials.70
3.3.6.12.3.3Planned maintenance or storage.70
3.3.6.12.4Internal corner and edge protection.70
3.3.6.12.4.1Equipment exposed to crew activity.70
3.3.6.12.4.2Equipment exposed only during planned maintenance activities.70
3.3.6.12.5Latches.70
3.3.6.12.6Screws and bolts.71
3.3.6.12.7Safety critical fasteners.71
3.3.6.12.8Levers, cranks, hooks, and controls.71
3.3.6.12.9Burrs.71
3.3.6.12.10Holes.71
3.3.6.12.10.1Equipment located inside habitable volumes.71
3.3.6.12.10.2Equipment located outside habitable volumes.71
3.3.6.12.11Protrusions.71
3.3.6.12.12Pinch points.71
3.3.6.12.13Emergency ingress.71
3.3.6.12.14Flexhoses.72
3.3.6.12.15Translation routes and established worksites.72
3.3.6.12.15.1Primary translation routes and established worksites.72
3.3.6.12.15.2Secondary translation routes and established worksites.72
3.3.6.12.15.3EVA crewmember contact isolation.73
3.3.6.12.16Moving or rotating equipment.73
3.3.6.13Launch vehicle interfaces and services.73
3.3.6.13.1Safe without Space Shuttle Program services.73
3.3.6.13.1.1Fault tolerance/safety margins.73
3.3.6.13.1.2Termination of services due to Orbiter emergency conditions.73
3.3.6.13.2Critical Orbiter services.73
3.3.6.13.3Inadvertent deployment, separation, and jettison functions.73
3.3.6.13.4Contingency return and rapid safing.73
3.3.6.13.4.1Deleted.74
3.3.6.13.4.2Deleted.74
3.3.6.13.5Flammable atmosphere.74
3.3.6.13.5.1Normal functions.74
3.3.6.13.5.2Electrical ignition sources.74
3.3.6.13.5.3Surface temperatures.74
3.3.6.13.5.4Conductive surfaces.74
3.3.6.13.6Lightning protection.74
3.3.6.13.7Orbiter vent/dump provisions.74
3.3.6.13.7.1Release or ejection of hazardous material.74
3.3.6.13.7.2Fluid system containment.74
3.3.6.13.8Sealed compartments.74
3.3.6.14Ground safety requirements for Space Shuttle launch of JEM hardware.74
3.3.7Human engineering.75
3.3.7.1Anthropometric requirements.75
3.3.7.2Strength requirements.75
3.3.7.2.1Normal operations.75
3.3.7.2.2Maintenance.75
3.3.7.2.3Emergency controls.76
3.3.7.3Location coding.76
3.3.7.4Internal equipment translation.76
3.3.7.5Support housekeeping.76
3.3.7.6Operational uniformity.76
3.3.7.7Annunciator commonality.77
3.3.7.8Pressure-suited operations.77
3.3.8Nuclear control.77
3.3.9System security.77
3.3.10Structures and mechanisms.77
3.3.10.1Structural design.77
3.3.10.2Structure penetrations.77
3.3.10.3EVA induced loads.77
3.3.10.4Window, glass and ceramic structural design.79
3.3.10.5Orbiter liftoff and landing loads.80
3.3.11Design for remote controlled external operations.80
3.3.11.1Equipment requiring Shuttle robotic support.80
3.3.11.2External equipment requiring robotic hand-off.81
3.3.11.3External equipment requiring SSRMS support.81
3.3.11.3.1Equipment requiring SSRMS support using an NSTS GF.83
3.3.11.3.2Equipment requiring SSRMS support using a Power Data Grapple Fixture.83
3.3.11.4External equipment requiring dexterous robotic support.84
3.3.11.5Equipment requiring robotic translation.84
3.3.11.6JEM Centerline Berthing Camera System accommodations.84
3.3.12Fluid standards.85
3.3.13Atmosphere leakage.85
3.3.14Robotic hand controllers.85
3.3.15Environmental constraints.85
3.3.15.1Acoustic emission limits.85
3.3.15.2External contamination releases.85
3.3.15.3Ionizing radiation emission limits.85
3.3.16Communication links.85
3.3.17Deleted.85
3.3.18Preclude condensation.85
3.3.19MIL-STD-1553 data bus addresses.85
3.3.20MIL-STD-1553 data bus constraints.86
3.3.20.1Space Station Quality components.86
3.3.20.1.1Bus coupler type.86
3.3.20.2Bus stub length.86
3.3.20.3Bus coupling.87
3.3.20.4End item multiple bus isolation.87
3.3.21Terminal interface units.87
3.3.21.1Input impedance.88
3.3.21.2TIU multiple bus isolation.88
3.3.22JEM not-to-exceed bus length.88
3.3.23Medium rate data link constraints.88
3.3.23.1SSQ components.89
3.3.23.2Maximum link segment length.89
3.3.24User payload interfaces.89
3.3.25Manage Resources.89
3.3.25.1Housekeeping power allocation.89
3.3.25.1.1Reference Orbit Conditions.89
3.3.25.1.2Housekeeping power conditions.89
3.3.26Operational lifetime.90
3.4Computer resource requirements.90
3.4.1Computer hardware design considerations.90
3.4.2Flexibility and expansion.90
3.4.3Software portability.91
3.5Logistics.91
3.5.1Maintenance.91
3.5.1.1Standard tools.91
3.5.1.2Physical accessibility.92
3.5.1.3Visual accessibility.92
3.5.1.4Nonpressurized area access for inspection.93
3.5.1.5Pressurized volume rack rotation.93
3.5.2Supply.93
3.6Personnel and training.93
3.6.1Personnel.93
3.6.2Training.93
3.7Characteristics of major functional elements.93
3.7.1JEM flight system.93
3.7.1.1Purpose.93
3.7.1.2Description.93
3.7.1.3Capabilities.93
3.7.2Deleted.93
3.8Precedence.93
4.0QUALITY ASSURANCE PROVISIONS95
4.1General.95
4.1.1Responsibility for verifications.96
4.1.2Special tests and examinations.96
4.2Segment quality conformance inspections.96
4.2.1Requirement/verification cross reference matrix.96
5.0PREPARATION FOR DELIVERY97
6.0NOTES98
6.1Definitions.98
6.2Abbreviations and acronyms.109

APPENDIX

aRESERVED114
bREQUIREMENT EXCEPTIONS115

TABLE

I.On-orbit JEM functions requiring automatic FDIR capability (2 pages)17
II.Mode/capability applicability matrix (2 pages)20
III.JEM internal payload accommodations28
IV.JEM external payload accommodations28
V.JEM segment power capacity30
VI.Maximum angular momentum impulse34
VII.CMG momentum usage calculation34
VIII.JEM MIL-STD-1553 data bus distribution41
IX.HRDL interfaces41
X.Medium Rate Data Link Distribution41
XI.Failure tolerance allocation (2 pages)45
XII.JEM crew time for maintenance allocation47
XIII.Hot and cold natural thermal environments(1)49
XIV.Extreme hot and cold natural thermal environments(1)50
XV.Parameters for M/OD environments definition52
XVI.Flight attitudes for vehicle design (3 Pages)53
XVII.Spacecraft maximum allowable concentrations68
XVIII.Heat transfer rates69
XIX.Designated EVA interfaces69
XX.Control for exposed risks to EVA crew72
XXI.Miscellaneous crew actuation load limits76
XXII.EVA induced loads (2 pages)78
XXIII.Mobile Servicing Centre robotic payload properties81
XXIV.Berthing contact conditions82
XXV.Force/moment accommodation82
XXVI.JEM PM/EF berthing mechanism capture envelope83
XXVII.JEM EF/ELM-ES berthing mechanism (EFU/PIU) capture envelope83
XXVIII.Payload translation and transport84
XXIX.Standard IVA tool list (2 pages)91
XXX.Deleted92
XXXI.EPCE equipment with applicable power quality specification115

FIGURE

1.JEM functional flow and layout11
2.JEM external interfaces13
3.Deleted15
4.Fire protection selection criteria24
5.Deleted27
6.Deleted27
7.JEM microgravity vibro-acoustic acceleration limits33
8.JEM dynamic envelope37
9.Measurement of EVA translation path gap39
10.Robotics translation corridor43
11.On-orbit electric field environment51
12.Typical bus87
13.TIU minimum input impedance88
14.SRMS envelope around PS FRGF #2117
15.SRMS envelope around ES FRGF #2118
16.SSRMS envelope around PS FRGF #2120
17.SSRMS envelope around EF FRGF #1121
18.SSRMS envelope around EF FRGF #2 (EVA envelope)122
19.SSRMS envelope around ES FRGF #1123

xiii

SCOPE

This specification establishes the performance and design requirements for the JEM. This specification has been developed using SSP 41171, Preparation of Program-Unique Specifications (a tailored version of MIL-STD-490, Specification Practices), as a guide for a type A System Segment Specification. Sections 1 and 3.1 are for informational purposes only and are not binding between NASA and JAXA. Documents listed in section 2 are applicable to JAXA only to the extent that they are referenced in section 3.

The paragraph headers in 3.2.1 are based on the functional decomposition allocations to the JEM in the International Space Station (ISS) System Specification. The requirements in section 3.2.1 define the performance of the JEM. Requirements in sections 3.2.2 through 3.6 are constraints with which the JEM must comply. The performance requirements herein are applicable during nominal operations only and do not account for maintenance or contingency events unless otherwise addressed.

Identification.

Not applicable.

System overview.

The JEM is a facility developed by JAXA for the purpose of supporting research and development experiments in a microgravity environment in earth orbit as a segment of the Space Station. The JEM supports internally and externally mounted user payloads, provides pressurized and unpressurized logistics support, and remote manipulation of external items.

applicable DOCUMENTS Paragraphs which reference documents identified with asterisks below are not applicable until JAXA review and concurrence.

Government documents.

Specifications, standards, and handbooks.

The following specifications, standards, and handbooks of the exact issue shown form a part of this specification to the extent specified herein. In the event of a conflict between the documents referenced herein and the contents of this specification, the contents of this specification shall be considered a superseding requirement.

SPECIFICATIONS

FEDERAL

None

MILITARY

None

STANDARDS

FEDERAL

None

MILITARY

MIL-STD-1553B

Rev. B Notice 2 September 8, 1986 Digital Time Division Command/Response Multiplex Data Bus (Reference paragraphs 3.2.2.9, 3.3.19, 3.3.21)

MIL-STD-490

Rev. A June 4, 1985 Specification Practices (Reference paragraph 1.0)

HANDBOOKS

FEDERAL

None

MILITARY

None

(Unless otherwise indicated, copies of United States (U.S.) federal and military specifications, standards, and handbooks are available from the Standardization Documents Order Desk, Building 4D, 700 Robbins Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111-5094.)

Other government documents, drawings, and publications.

The following other government documents, drawings, and publications form a part of this document to the extent specified herein. Unless otherwise specified, the exact issue shown applies to this segment specification.

OTHER GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS

NASA

CR-99050

Revision C November 27, 1995 Electrical, Electronic and Electromechanical Parts Management and Implementation Plan for Japanese Experiment Module (JEM) (Reference paragraph 2.4)

CR-99117

Revision B August 1995 Japanese Experiment Module (JEM) Requirements for Materials and Processes (Reference paragraph 2.4)

ICD-A-21370-PM

Revision Basic + Change Packages 1 - 5 October 31, 2007 Shuttle Orbiter/JEM PM/RMS Cargo Element Interface (Reference paragraphs 3.1.5.1.4, 3.2.2.3, 3.3.11.1, 3.3.11.3, 3.3.11.3.1, 3.3.11.3.2, B3.3.11.1, B3.3.11.3)

ICD-A-21433-PS

Revision Basic + Change Packages 1-12 September 19, 2007 Shuttle Orbiter/Japanese Experiment Module (JEM-PS) Cargo Element Interfaces (Reference paragraphs 3.1.5.1.4, 3.2.2.3, 3.3.11.1, 3.3.11.3, 3.3.11.3.1, 3.3.11.3.2, B3.3.11.1, B3.3.11.3)

ICD-A-21434-EF

Revision Basic February 1, 2008 Shuttle Orbiter/JEM-EF Cargo Element Interface (Reference paragraphs 3.1.5.1.4, 3.2.2.3, 3.3.11.1, 3.3.11.3, 3.3.11.3.1, 3.3.11.3.2, B3.3.11.1, B3.3.11.3)

ICD-A-21434-ES

Revision Basic February 1, 2008 Shuttle Orbiter/Japanese Experiment Module (JEM-ES) Cargo Element Interface (Reference paragraphs 3.1.5.1.4, 3.2.2.3, 3.3.11.1, 3.3.11.3, 3.3.11.3.1, 3.3.11.3.2, B3.3.11.1, B3.3.11.3)

ICD-2-19001

(NSTS 07700 Volume XIV, Attachment 1) Rev. L January 15, 1998 Shuttle Orbiter/Cargo Standard Interfaces (Reference paragraph 3.3.6.6.2, 3.3.6.13.5.4, 3.3.6.13.6)

ICD-3-60060

Rev. Basic June 24, 1995 Manual Pressure Equalization Valve Sampling Adapter (External) ICD (Reference paragraphs 3.1.5.1.7, 3.2.2.12.1)

ICD-3-60067

Rev. Basic March 12, 1996 Manual Pressure Equalization Valve Sampling Adapter (Internal) ICD (Reference paragraphs 3.1.5.1.8, 3.2.2.12.2)

JSC 26895

Revision Baseline 28 October 1997 Guidelines for Assessing the Toxic Hazard of Spacecraft Chemicals and Test Materials (Reference paragraph 3.3.3)

JSC 63828

Revision C October 2010 Bio-Safety Review Board Operations and Requirements Document (Reference paragraph 3.3.3)

JSC 64825

Revision Baseline 9 July 2009 Guidelines for Assessing the Flammability Hazard of Spacecraft Chemicals and Test Materials (Reference paragraph 3.3.3)

KHB 1700.7

Revision B September 30, 1992 Space Shuttle Payload Ground Safety Handbook (Reference paragraph 3.3.6.14)

NASDA-ESPC-2900

Rev. B March 28, 2016 JEM Payload Accommodation Handbook - Volume 3 Exposed Facility/Payload Standard Interface Control Document (Reference paragraph 3.1.5.1.5.2)

NASDA-ESPC-840

Rev. H Nov. 25, 1999 Japanese Experiment Module (JEM) System Specification (Reference paragraph 3.7.1.3)

NHB 8060.1

Rev. C April 2, 1991 Flammability, Odor, Offgassing, and Compatibility Requirements and Test Procedures for Materials in Environments that Support Combustion (Reference Figure 4)

NSTS 07700, Volume XIV, Appendix 7 Rev. J, CN 1, CN 2 April 19, 2000 System Description and Design Data - Extravehicular Activities (Reference paragraphs 3.3.6.12.3.1, 3.3.10.4)

NSTS 14046

Rev. D July 1997 Payload Verification Requirements (Reference paragraph 3.2.7)

NSTS 37329

Rev. B, Change 3 October 18, 2004 Structural Integration Analyses Responsibility Definition for Space Shuttle Vehicle and Cargo Element Developers (Reference paragraph 3.3.10.5)

SSP 30219

Rev. J 1 May 2008 Space Station Reference Coordinate Systems (Reference paragraphs 3.2.1.1.8.1, 3.2.2.8, 3.2.2.11, Table VI, VII, XXIII)

SSP 30233

Rev. F, DCN (SSCN 7292, SSCN 9111) March 6, 1998 Space Station Requirements for Materials and Processes (Reference paragraph 3.3.1.3, 3.3.1.3.1)

SSP 30243

Rev. E, DCN 003, 005, 007, 014, (SSCN 10915) June 9, 1998 Space Station Requirements for Electromagnetic Compatibility (Reference paragraph 3.3.2)

SSP 30245

Rev. E, DCN 019, (SSCN 6154), (SSCN 7474), 030, (SSCN 10866), (SSCN 10915) October 15, 1999 Space Station Electrical Bonding Requirements (Reference paragraph 3.3.11.1)

SSP 30256:001

Rev. J October 17, 2012 Extravehicular Activity (EVA) Standard Interface Control Document (Reference paragraphs 3.2.2.6, 3.5.1.1)

SSP 30312

Rev. H, DCN 002 November 22, 1999 Electrical, Electronic, and Electromechanical (EEE) and Mechanical Parts Management and Implementation Plan for Space Station Program (Reference paragraphs 3.3.1.4, 3.3.6.8.1.2)

SSP 30420

Rev. B June, 1993 Space Station Electromagnetic, Ionizing Radiation, and Plasma Environment Definition and Design Requirements (Reference paragraph 3.2.6.5)

SSP 30423

Rev. H January 15, 2000 Space Station Approved Electrical, Electronic and Electromechanical Parts List (Reference paragraph 3.3.20.1)

SSP 30425

Rev. B February 8, 1994 Space Station Program Natural Environment Definition for Design (Reference paragraphs 3.2.6.2, 3.2.6.4, 3.2.6.5, 3.2.6.7, 3.2.6.8, 3.2.6.9)

SSP 30426

Rev. D, DCN 001 January 21, 1994 Space Station External Contamination Control Requirements (Reference paragraphs 3.2.6.3, 3.3.15.2)

SSP 30482 Volume 1 Rev. C July 7, 1997 Electric Power Specifications and Standards Volume 1: EPS Electrical Performance Specifications (Reference paragraph 3.2.1.1.1.32, B.3.2.1.1.1.32)

SSP 30482 Volume 2 Rev. A, DCN 001, 002, 003, 004 January, 1994 Electric Power Specifications and Standards Volume 2: Consumer Constraints (Reference paragraphs 3.2.1.1.1.32, B.3.2.1.1.1.32)

SSP 30512

Rev. C June 3, 1994 Space Station Ionizing Radiation Design Environment (Reference paragraph 3.2.6.6)

SSP 30558

Rev. C August 24, 2001 Fracture Control Requirements for Space Station (Reference paragraphs 3.3.6.4.1, 3.3.10.1)

SSP 30559

Rev. C, DCN (SSCN 9111) September 29, 2000 Structural Design and Verification Requirements (Reference paragraph 3.3.10.1)

SSP 30560

Rev. Basic June, 1991 Glass, Window, and Ceramic Structural Design and Verification Requirements (Reference paragraph 3.3.10.1)

SSP 30573

Rev. E December 2, 2009 Space Station Program Fluid Procurement and Use Control Specification (Reference paragraph 3.3.12)

SSP 30575

Rev. E April 2007 Space Station Interior and Exterior Operational Location Coding System (Reference paragraph 3.3.7.3)

SSP 41002

Current Issue International Standard Payload Rack to NASA/ESA/JAXA Modules Interface Control Document (Reference Table X)

SSP 41015, Part 1 Revision G

IRN 41015-0004, 0014

September 23, 2005 Common Hatch And Mechanisms To Pressurized Elements Interface Control Document Part 1 (Reference paragraph 3.3.11.6)

SSP 41151

Current Issue Interface Requirements Document United States On-orbit Segment to Japanese Experiment Module (Reference paragraphs 3.1.5.1.1, 3.1.5.1.3, 3.2.1.1.1.5, 3.2.1.1.1.15, 3.2.1.1.1.16, 3.2.1.1.1.32, 3.2.1.1.1.34, 3.2.1.1.1.35, 3.2.1.1.1.42, 3.2.1.1.1.43, 3.2.1.1.1.44, 3.2.1.1.1.45, 3.2.1.1.1.51, 3.2.1.1.1.52, 3.2.2.9, 3.2.2.13.1, 3.2.2.13.2, 3.2.2.15, 3.2.2.16, 3.2.4.8.5, Tables VIII, IX, X)

SSP 41151

Appendix D Current Issue United States On-orbit Segment to Japanese Experiment Module Interface Requirements Document Appendix D Software Interfaces (Reference paragraphs 3.2.1.1.1.13, 3.2.1.1.1.14, 3.2.1.1.1.16, 3.2.1.1.1.17, 3.2.1.1.1.21, 3.2.1.1.1.22, 3.2.1.1.1.52, 3.2.1.1.1.53, 3.2.1.1.8.1, 3.3.19, 3.3.21)

SSP 41152

Current Issue Interface Requirements Document International Standard Payload Rack (ISPR) (Reference paragraphs 3.1.5.1.5.1, 3.2.1.1.1.23, 3.2.1.1.1.24, 3.2.1.1.1.25, 3.2.1.1.1.26, 3.2.1.1.1.27, 3.2.1.1.1.28, 3.2.1.1.1.29, 3.2.2.4, 3.2.2.9, 3.3.24, Tables III, IX)

SSP 41171

Rev. B September 7, 1998 Preparation of Program-Unique Specifications (Reference paragraph 1.0)

SSP 42000

Current Issue United States On-orbit Segment to Japanese Experiment Module Interface Control Document (Reference Table X)

SSP 42004, Part I Current Issue Mobile Servicing System (MSS) to User (Generic) Interface Control Document Part I (Reference paragraphs 3.1.5.1.3, 3.3.11.3.1, 3.3.11.3.2)

SSP 50005

Rev. E, DCN (SSCN 012447), DCN (SSCN 012662), DCN (SSCN 012929) June 30, 2006 International Space Station Flight Crew Integration Standard (NASA-STD-3000/T) (Reference paragraphs 3.2.1.1.1.7, 3.2.1.1.1.15, 3.2.1.1.1.16, 3.2.1.1.1.18, 3.2.2.7, 3.3.3, 3.3.3.2, 3.3.3.5, 3.3.6.6.1, 3.3.6.8.2, 3.3.6.12.1, 3.3.6.12.4.1, 3.3.7.1, 3.3.7.2.1, 3.3.7.2.2, 3.3.7.2.3, 3.3.7.4, 3.3.7.5, 3.3.7.6, 3.3.7.7, 3.5.1.2, B.3.3.6.12.1, Table XX)

SSP 50007

Rev. D February 2006 Space Station Inventory Management System Bar Code Label Requirements and Specification (Reference paragraphs 3.3.3, 3.3.3.1)

SSP 50014

Rev. B September 3, 1997 International Space Station Utility Coding Specification (Reference paragraph 3.3.3)

SSP 50036

Rev. C April 15, 2003 Microgravity Control Plan (Reference paragraph 3.2.1.1.4.1)

SSP 50184

Rev. B May 25, 2001 Physical Media, Physical Signaling & Link-Level Protocol Specifications for Ensuring Interoperability of High Rate Data Link Stations on the International Space Station (Reference paragraph 3.2.2.9)

SSP 50251, Part 1 Rev. B, IRN 0003 May 30, 2003 ARIS to Pressurized Element Interface Control Document Part 1 (Reference paragraph 3.2.2.14)

SSP 50342

Rev. C August 18, 2010 MIL-STD-1553 Remote Terminal Test Exceptions Report (Reference paragraph 3.3.21)

SSQ 21635

Rev. K October 29, 2002 Connectors and Accessories, Electrical, Circular, Miniature, IVA/EVA Compatible, Space Quality, General Specification for (Reference paragraph 3.3.23.1)

SSQ 21636

Rev. F January 15, 2000 Connectors and Accessories, Electrical, Rectangular, Rack and Panel, Space Quality, General Specification for (Reference paragraph 3.3.23.1)

SSQ 21655

Rev. F January 15, 2000 Cable, Electrical, MIL-STD-1553 Databus, Space Quality, General Specification for (Reference paragraph 3.3.23.1)

SSQ 26000

Rev. Basic October 16, 1996 Space Station Program Office Standard Repair for Sharp Edges on SSQ 21635 NZGL Type Connector Assemblies and Components (Reference paragraph 3.3.6.12.3.1)

Nongovernment publications.

The following documents of the exact issue shown form a part of this specification to the extent specified herein. In the event of a conflict between the documents referenced herein and the contents of this specification, the contents of this specification shall be considered a superseding requirement.

SPECIFICATIONS

INDUSTRY

ISO/IEC 8802-3

4th Edition July 8, 1993 (withdrawn) Information Technology - Local and Metropolitan Area Networks - Part 3: Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection (CSMA/CD) Access Method and Physical Layer Specifications (Reference paragraph 3.2.2.10)

SPACE STATION PROGRAM

NONE

Order of precedence.

In the event of a conflict between the text of this specification and references cited herein, the text of this specification takes precedence. Nothing in this specification, however, supersedes applicable laws and regulations unless a specific exemption has been obtained.

Meet or exceed.

The following documents have been identified as meeting or exceeding the applicable Space Station Program (SSP) documents referenced herein:

JAXA Document Meets or Exceeds ISS Document

CR-99117 SSP 30233

CR-99050 SSP 30312

SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS

System definition.

System description.

The JEM is a facility consisting of a laboratory, logistics modules and robotic manipulator for the purpose of supporting research and development experiments in a microgravity environment in an earth orbit. The JEM supports permanent human habitation as a segment of the Space Station. The JEM can support both internal and external user payloads and can transfer equipment and user payloads from the laboratory to the vacuum of space without the need of a pressure suited crewmember. The JEM system diagram is shown in Figure 1, JEM functional flow and layout.

FIGURE 1. JEM functional flow and layout JEM flight system.

The JEM flight system is comprised of five major sections which are launched and assembled on orbit.

The Pressurized Module (PM) is a laboratory which provides crewmembers a shirt-sleeve environment for experimental research in areas such as space medicine, life sciences, materials processing, and biotechnologies. The PM can also transfer equipment to and from the vacuum of space without having to depressurize the entire laboratory.

The Exposed Facility (EF) is an unpressurized pallet structure exposed to the environments of space to support user payloads for the purpose of experimental research in areas such as communications, science, engineering, materials processing, and earth observation. The EF supplies user payloads with structural support, thermal conditioning, power, video, and data services.

The Experiment Logistics Module-Pressurized Section (ELM-PS) is a pressurized passive storage and carrier module for consumables, Orbital Replaceable Unit (ORU), and internal user payloads.

The Experiment Logistics Module-Exposed Section (ELM-ES) is an unpressurized storage and carrier module for external ORU and EF user payloads.

The JEM Remote Manipulator System (RMS) is a robotic system used for the transport and positioning of external user payloads. The JEM RMS is comprised of both an internal and external section. The external section consists of a main arm and a fine arm for robotics manipulation. The internal section allows an Intravehicular Activity (IVA) crew to operate the external robotics.

Deleted.

Missions.

The primary mission of the JEM is to provide supporting functions and operations to multiple users. These functions and operations provide a capability for:

A.Materials processing research.
B.Life sciences research including permanently manned presence.
C.A permanent observatory.

Threat.

Not applicable.

System diagrams.

The JEM system level functional schematic, functional flow, and system level layout is shown in Figure 1.

Interface requirements.

External interfaces.

The JEM functional external interfaces are as shown in Figure 2.

FIGURE 2. JEM external interfaces United States On-orbit Segment external interface descriptions.

The JEM interface with the United States On-orbit Segment (USOS) consists of structural, mechanical, and utility connections. At the JEM to USOS pressurized interface the JEM receives electrical power, and gaseous nitrogen from the USOS, shares data, thermal energy, video, audio, atmosphere, structural, mechanical, loads and vibrations with the USOS and returns water to the USOS. This interface also allows for crew, payload and equipment translation between the USOS and JEM. The USOS to JEM physical and functional interface requirements are as defined in SSP 41151, Interface Requirements Document United States On-orbit Segment to Japanese Experiment Module.

Deleted.

Canadian Mobile Servicing System external interface descriptions.

The JEM interface with the Mobile Servicing System (MSS) consists of mechanical and utility connections. These interfaces permit the MSS to translate and position the JEM and to provide necessary “keep alive” utilities. At this interface the JEM can receive power and shares a mechanical interface, loads, and vibrations. The MSS to JEM physical and functional interface requirements are as defined in SSP 41151, sections 3.3 and 3.4 and SSP 42004, Mobile Servicing System (MSS) to User (Generic) Interface Control Document Part I, section A3.

Orbiter external interface descriptions.

The JEM interface with the Orbiter consists of mechanical and utility connections during JEM transport in the Orbiter cargo bay and handling by the Orbiter RMS. The JEM to Orbiter physical and functional interface requirements are as defined in ICD-A-21370-PM, Shuttle Orbiter/JEM PM/RMS Cargo Element Interface, ICD-A-21433-PS, Shuttle Orbiter/Japanese Experiment Module (JEM-PS) Cargo Element Interfaces, ICD-A-21434-EF, Shuttle Orbiter/JEM-EF Cargo Element Interface, and ICD-A-21434-ES, Shuttle Orbiter/Japanese Experiment Module (JEM-ES) Cargo Element Interface.

User payload external interface descriptions.

Internal user payload external interface descriptions.

The JEM interface with internal user payloads consists of mechanical and utility connections. At this interface the JEM provides power, thermal conditioning, gases, and vacuum resources to, and shares data and video with user payloads. The user payload to JEM interface requirements are as defined in SSP 41152, Interface Requirements Document International Standard Payload Rack (ISPR).

External user payload external interface descriptions.

The JEM interface with external user payloads consists of mechanical and utility connections. At this interface the JEM provides power and thermal conditioning resources to, and shares data and video with user payloads. The requirements to be met by external user payloads are defined in JAXA document NASDA-ESPC-2900, JEM Payload Accommodation Handbook - Volume 3 Exposed Facility/Payload Standard Interface Control Document.

Crew external interface descriptions.

The JEM interfaces with the crew to allow monitor and control of user payloads, conduct of scientific experiments, and to perform maintenance tasks.

Interfaces with MPEV External Sampling Adapter.

The JEM provides mechanical and fluid interfaces with the Manual Pressure Equalization Valve (MPEV) External Sampling Adapter. The detailed requirements for these physical and functional interfaces are as specified in ICD-3-60060, Manual Pressure Equalization Valve Sampling Adapter (External) ICD.

Interfaces with MPEV Internal Sampling Adapter.

The JEM provides mechanical and fluid interfaces with the MPEV Internal Sampling Adapter (ISA). The detailed requirements for these physical and functional interfaces are as specified in ICD-3-60067, Manual Pressure Equalization Valve Sampling Adapter (Internal) ICD.

Deleted.

FIGURE 3. Deleted United States furnished material.

Characteristics.

Performance characteristics.

State: Perform mission-on-orbit.

A stable condition of the Space Station defined by the provision of human habitable environment to support the accomplishment of mission objectives.

Mode: Standard.

This mode represents the core operations of the Space Station when it is tended or preparing to support a human presence. The vehicle actively determines and controls its attitude nonpropulsively. This mode provides a “shirt sleeve” environment for the crew. Both internal and external user payload operations are being supported, monitored, and controlled. The crew can perform IVA maintenance actions. The functional capabilities for this mode are in the following paragraphs.

Capability: Relieve overpressure.

Deleted.

Capability: Equalize pressure.

The JEM shall equalize the pressure differential between the JEM at 14.9 psia and an adjacent vestibule at vacuum to less than 0.01 psid within three minutes.

Capability: Control atmosphere temperature.

A.The JEM shall control the atmosphere temperature in the JEM cabin aisleway within the range of 65 to 85 degrees F and 65 to 80 degrees F in the laboratory aisleway.
B.The JEM shall operate its temperature control equipment in response to commands from the USOS.
C.The JEM shall provide temperature control equipment health, status, and performance data to the USOS.
D.The JEM laboratory cabin atmosphere temperature shall be selectively controlled within plus or minus 2 degrees F during normal operation at 65 to 80 degrees F for nominal heat loads or 70 to 80 degrees F for high heat loads.
E.Temperature selectability during peak heat load conditions shall not be required.

Capability: Control atmosphere moisture.

A.The JEM shall maintain the atmosphere relative humidity in the JEM cabin aisleway within the range of 25 to 70 percent.
B.The JEM shall maintain the atmosphere dew point in the JEM cabin aisleway within the range of 40 to 60 degrees F.
C.The JEM shall operate its moisture removal equipment in response to commands from the USOS.
D.The JEM shall provide moisture removal equipment health, status, and performance data to the USOS.

Capability: Circulate atmosphere.

A.The JEM shall maintain an effective atmosphere velocity in the JEM cabin aisleway within the range of 15 to 40 fpm.
B.The JEM shall operate its cabin ventilation equipment in response to commands from the USOS.
C.The JEM shall provide cabin ventilation equipment health, status, and performance data to the USOS.
D.The JEM shall exchange atmosphere with the USOS as specified in SSP 41151, section 3.2.4.1 (Intermodule Ventilation).
E.The JEM shall operate its intermodule ventilation (IMV) equipment in response to commands from the USOS.
F.The JEM shall provide IMV equipment health, status, and performance data to the USOS.

Capability: Control internal lighting.

A.The JEM shall control internal lighting levels.
B.The JEM shall centrally control general lighting.

Capability: Illuminate internal area.

The JEM shall illuminate the interior of the JEM to the levels as specified in accordance with SSP 50005, International Space Station Flight Crew Integration Standard (NASA-STD-3000/T), Figure 8.13.3.1.2-1.

Capability: Illuminate video area - external.

The JEM shall illuminate the external video camera areas.

Capability: Isolate to recovery level.

The JEM shall automatically isolate detected failures to the functional recovery level for those functions requiring automatic recovery, identified in Table I, On-orbit JEM functions requiring automatic FDIR capability, Automatic Isolation/Recovery column.

TABLE I. On-orbit JEM functions requiring automatic FDIR capability (2 pages)

JEM functions (1)
Automatic

Assessment (2) Automatic Isolation/Recovery (3)

Equalize pressure

Control atmosphere temperature
X
Control atmosphere moisture
X
Circulate atmosphere
X

Control internal lighting

Illuminate internal area

Illuminate video area - external

Isolate to recovery level
X
X
Recover lost function
X
X
Isolate for safing
X
X
Safe
X
X
Maintain station mode
X
X
Transition station modes
X
X
Provide data to crew
X
Accept crew inputs/commands
X
Generate functional data
X
X
Assess functional data
X
X
Respond to fire
X
X
Respond to hazardous atmosphere
X
Respond to rapid decompression
X (5)
X
Distribute user payload power
X
Perform user payload thermal conditioning
X
Supply vacuum services to user payloads
X
Distribute gases to user payloads
X
Transfer user payload command and control data
X
Support user payload telemetry services
X
Support user payload video services
X
Distribute power
X
Collect thermal energy
X
Distribute thermal energy
X
Provide time interface
X

Control airborne particulate contaminants

Control airborne microbial growth

Provide remote visual access

Set up voice communication

Transmit voice communication

Receive voice communication

Generate pointing and support data

Support uplinked data
X
Provide data for downlink
X

Limit acceleration

Perform external robotic operations

Notes:
(1)This column lists on-orbit functions.
(2)An ”X” in this column indicates the function requires, at a minimum, automatic detection.
(3)An ”X” in this column indicates the function requires automatic failure isolation and recovery (i.e., supports 24 hour autonomy).
(4)An ”X” does not imply that all ”shalls” are required. Tables detailing further decomposition may be implemented to specifically define automatic function allocations.
(5)The USOS normally detects the rapid decompression at the JEM Segment.

Capability: Recover lost function.

The JEM shall automatically implement pre-defined recovery procedures for failures of those functions requiring automatic recovery, identified in Table I, Automatic Isolation/Recovery column.

Capability: Isolate for safing.

The JEM shall automatically isolate to the safing level detected hazards that may, within 24 hours, manifest a catastrophic or critical hazard.

Capability: Safe.

The JEM shall automatically safe, in less time than time to catastrophic or critical effect, any hazard that may, within 24 hours, manifest a catastrophic or critical hazard.

Capability: Maintain station mode.

A.The JEM shall reject operator requests to activate functions not allowed and to deactivate functions required to be continuous in the present mode constrained software controlled functions in accordance with Table II, Mode/capability applicability matrix.
B.The JEM shall notify the command source upon rejecting a command due to mode inhibits.
C.The JEM shall provide an operator the ability to force execution of a mode constrained software controlled function.
D.The JEM shall notify the requesting command source when a mode inhibited automated function is being forced to execute. (The JEM will notify the command source in response to the command, and will operate the function).
E.The JEM shall provide the capability to reduce its power and thermal loads upon command such that 24-hour on-orbit vehicle autonomy is supported.
F.The JEM shall accept and confirm mode commands from the USOS in accordance with SSP 41151, Appendix D, United States On-orbit Segment to Japanese Experiment Module Interface Requirements Document Appendix D Software Interfaces, paragraphs D.3.3.2.2.2, D.3.3.2.2.3, D.3.4.2.1.1.2, and D.3.4.2.2.2.2.
G.When commanded by the USOS to shed electrical power loads in accordance with SSP 41151, Appendix D, paragraph D.3.4.2.1.1.16, the JEM shall reduce electrical power consumption by the amount and on the power channel specified by the command within ten seconds after receipt of the command. Each USOS load shedding command to JEM is limited to commanding a maximum of 500 watt reduction in JEM power consumption.
H.The JEM command response to USOS shed electrical powers load commands shall be in accordance with SSP 41151, Appendix D, paragraph D.3.3.2.2.3.

Capability: Transition station mode.

A.The JEM shall receive and execute commands from the USOS in accordance with SSP 41151, Appendix D, paragraph D.3.4.2.1.1.2 to establish a new functional configuration based on mode applicability of functions in Table II such that:
1.Software controlled JEM functions which are not allowed in the new mode are inhibited.
2.Software controlled JEM functions which are allowed in the new mode are enabled.
3.Software controlled JEM functions which are active but not allowed in the new mode are deactivated and.
4.Software controlled JEM functions which are not active but are required in the new mode are activated.
5.Software controlled functions which are both active and allowed in both modes are continued.

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .